04_STACK_E/OPERA_E_ExecutionMechanism.md

Page Sections

LLULLIANA_PROTOCOL_SURFACE: line 1
OPERA E â€” REGIMEN_RQ (EXECUTION LAYER) line 10
Ars Generalis Applied â€” Interrogative Reduction Engine line 11
Version: 1.0.4-OPERA-E-QE-TRIPLEX line 12
Status: LOCK-CANDIDATE / QE TRIPLEX PATCH INTEGRATED line 13
Scope: EXECUTION / REDUCTION / RESULT CONSTRUCTION line 14
Authority: AGLA / OPERA line 15
Class: OPERA line 16
ALIAS BINDING: line 17
Mutation Policy: VERSION-CONTROLLED ONLY line 27
Alias: OPERA Q line 29
LIBER_X_ALIGNMENT: line 33
ATQS_OPERA_DISCIPLINE: line 46
## LOCAL SECTION INDEX line 57
Scope: local anchors within this artifact only. No cross-artifact links are introduced here. line 59
I. PURPOSE line 107
Define the execution system governing: line 111
OPERA_E performs: line 118
OPERA_E operates only when: line 128
II. POSITION IN CLASS ORDER line 137
OPERA_E operates: line 145
III. EXECUTION OBJECT line 155
Input: line 159
Output: line 166
Execution Domain: line 173
IV. CORE EXECUTION PRINCIPLE line 182
Execution is defined as: line 186
Formal: line 193
Definition: line 207
V. EXECUTION STAGES line 220
Stage 0 â€” INPUT RESOLUTION line 227
Normalize Q into: line 231
Constraint: line 239
Stage I â€” REDUCTIO AD REGULAM line 248
Constraint: line 258
Stage II â€” DEFINITION BINDING line 267
Bind: line 271
Output: line 279
Stage III â€” OBJECTIFICATIO line 288
Construct interrogative object: line 292
Definition: line 299
Constraint: line 307
Stage IV â€” SPECIES ACTIVATION line 316
Activate species for each carrier: line 320
Output: line 327
Stage V â€” EVALUATIO line 336
Evaluate admissible paths: line 340
Constraint: line 347
Stage VI â€” ELECTIO line 360
Select valid resolution path: line 364
Selection Criteria: line 371
Note: line 380
Stage VII â€” RESULT CONSTRUCTION line 390
Produce structured result: line 394
Form: line 401
Output is: line 410
VI. EXECUTION CONSTRAINTS line 420
1. STRUCTURAL DEPENDENCE line 427
All execution must occur within: line 431
2. ADMISSIBILITY DEPENDENCE line 439
Execution requires: line 443
3. DEFINITION PRIMACY line 451
No operation without: line 455
4. NON-STOCHASTICITY line 463
Execution is deterministic line 466
5. TRACEABILITY line 472
All steps must be reconstructible: line 476
VII. EXECUTION MODES line 485
1. SINGLE-CARRIER MODE line 492
2. MULTI-CARRIER MODE line 501
3. RECURSIVE MODE line 510
Constraint: line 518
VIII. FAILURE HANDLING line 527
OPERA_E does not define admissibility failures. line 530
If failure occurs: line 535
IX. OUTPUT STRUCTURE line 544
R(Q) contains: line 548
Optional: line 558
IX-A. CARRIER-B TRIPLEX TRAVERSAL AND AGGREGATION line 567
The carrier-B triplex is the OPERA Q mechanism for reducing overfitting and line 570

LLULLIANA_PROTOCOL_SURFACE: version: 1.0.0-E-INTERROGATIVE-OPERA posture: EMBEDDED_LOCAL_FACET / DORMANT_UNLESS_SELECTED role: supply admitted question and rule evaluation to OPERA_LLULLIANA without claiming that the interrogative surface itself explains or answers authority: OPERA E remains the local interrogative execution authority activation: requires explicit Llulliana routing, AREPO admission, and composition trace non_coupling: OPERA E remains independently reusable and never self-selects Llulliana transitive_consumers: D / F / G / H / I expose the effective OPERA E or Q ancestry ============================================================ OPERA E â€” REGIMEN_RQ (EXECUTION LAYER) Ars Generalis Applied â€” Interrogative Reduction Engine Version: 1.0.4-OPERA-E-QE-TRIPLEX Status: LOCK-CANDIDATE / QE TRIPLEX PATCH INTEGRATED Scope: EXECUTION / REDUCTION / RESULT CONSTRUCTION Authority: AGLA / OPERA Class: OPERA ALIAS BINDING: Alias_Artifact: ./ALIAS_E Alias_Class: AGLA / ALIAS Canonical_Invocation: OPERA E Invocation_Surfaces: - OPERA E - OPERA Q - OPERA R - OPERA REGIMEN_RQ Alias_Law: routing only; no execution, admissibility, doctrine, structure, or mediation authority transfers from alias. Mutation Policy: VERSION-CONTROLLED ONLY Alias: OPERA Q ============================================================ LIBER_X_ALIGNMENT: patch_id: LIBER_X_ATQS_MAIN_STACK_ALIGNMENT source_liber: _00_Documentation/00_Sources/01_CONTEXT_Development_Only/CODEX_DEV/LIBER_X_ARS_BREVIS_VERSIO_LATINA_SCHOLASTICA_COMMENTATA.md notation_liber: 90_STACK_LIBER/LIBRI X/LIBER X - NOTATIONIS STYLATAE ATQS caput_rosetta: CAPUT E ars_brevis_locus: Pars Quarta - Rules agu_dataset_lane: AGU Dataset 003 target_stack: E class_role: OPERA alignment_note: E routes question rules, including K1/K2 as quomodo and cum quo. authority_rule: LIBER X, CAPUT, and AGU datasets inform parsing, trace, and source literacy; they do not govern this class artifact. searchability_rule: preserve plain A/T/Q/S and B-K ASCII mirrors for citation, storage, parsing, and deployment. ATQS_OPERA_DISCIPLINE: notation_source: 90_STACK_LIBER/LIBRI X/LIBER X - NOTATIONIS STYLATAE ATQS effect: OPERA may accept optional human sigils and styled notation only by normalizing them to canonical regimen/operator structure before execution. normalization_examples: !B -> A_FORMAL(B); :B -> T_FORMAL(B); ?B -> Q_FORMAL(B); ;B -> S_FORMAL(B); #B -> ALL_REGIMENS(B) across admitted lanes only. local_slot_rule: context-derived, OPERA-derived, or qualified LIBER_EX_OPERAE content may fill LOCAL_APPLIED_PREPROCESSED slots only with provenance and expiry/discardability. rosetta_source_trace: enabled: OPTIONAL_WHERE_OUTPUT_SCHEMA_ACCEPTS_TRACE fields: [liber_x_source, caput_rosetta, agu_dataset_lane, normalized_input, ascii_mirror, local_slot_status] prohibition: no glyph, sigil, punctuation, CAPUT, or LIBER source creates OPERA authority by itself. ============================================================  ## LOCAL SECTION INDEX Scope: local anchors within this artifact only. No cross-artifact links are introduced here. - [I. PURPOSE](#local-section-04-stack-e-opera-e-executionmechanism-i-purpose) - [II. POSITION IN CLASS ORDER](#local-section-04-stack-e-opera-e-executionmechanism-ii-position-in-class-order) - [III. EXECUTION OBJECT](#local-section-04-stack-e-opera-e-executionmechanism-iii-execution-object) - [IV. CORE EXECUTION PRINCIPLE](#local-section-04-stack-e-opera-e-executionmechanism-iv-core-execution-principle) - [V. EXECUTION STAGES](#local-section-04-stack-e-opera-e-executionmechanism-v-execution-stages) - [Stage 0 â€” INPUT RESOLUTION](#local-section-04-stack-e-opera-e-executionmechanism-stage-0-input-resolution) - [Stage I â€” REDUCTIO AD REGULAM](#local-section-04-stack-e-opera-e-executionmechanism-stage-i-reductio-ad-regulam) - [Stage II â€” DEFINITION BINDING](#local-section-04-stack-e-opera-e-executionmechanism-stage-ii-definition-binding) - [Stage III â€” OBJECTIFICATIO](#local-section-04-stack-e-opera-e-executionmechanism-stage-iii-objectificatio) - [Stage IV â€” SPECIES ACTIVATION](#local-section-04-stack-e-opera-e-executionmechanism-stage-iv-species-activation) - [Stage V â€” EVALUATIO](#local-section-04-stack-e-opera-e-executionmechanism-stage-v-evaluatio) - [Stage VI â€” ELECTIO](#local-section-04-stack-e-opera-e-executionmechanism-stage-vi-electio) - [Stage VII â€” RESULT CONSTRUCTION](#local-section-04-stack-e-opera-e-executionmechanism-stage-vii-result-construction) - [VI. EXECUTION CONSTRAINTS](#local-section-04-stack-e-opera-e-executionmechanism-vi-execution-constraints) - [1. STRUCTURAL DEPENDENCE](#local-section-04-stack-e-opera-e-executionmechanism-1-structural-dependence) - [2. ADMISSIBILITY DEPENDENCE](#local-section-04-stack-e-opera-e-executionmechanism-2-admissibility-dependence) - [3. DEFINITION PRIMACY](#local-section-04-stack-e-opera-e-executionmechanism-3-definition-primacy) - [4. NON-STOCHASTICITY](#local-section-04-stack-e-opera-e-executionmechanism-4-non-stochasticity) - [5. TRACEABILITY](#local-section-04-stack-e-opera-e-executionmechanism-5-traceability) - [VII. EXECUTION MODES](#local-section-04-stack-e-opera-e-executionmechanism-vii-execution-modes) - [1. SINGLE-CARRIER MODE](#local-section-04-stack-e-opera-e-executionmechanism-1-single-carrier-mode) - [2. MULTI-CARRIER MODE](#local-section-04-stack-e-opera-e-executionmechanism-2-multi-carrier-mode) - [3. RECURSIVE MODE](#local-section-04-stack-e-opera-e-executionmechanism-3-recursive-mode) - [VIII. FAILURE HANDLING](#local-section-04-stack-e-opera-e-executionmechanism-viii-failure-handling) - [IX. OUTPUT STRUCTURE](#local-section-04-stack-e-opera-e-executionmechanism-ix-output-structure) - [IX-A. CARRIER-B TRIPLEX TRAVERSAL AND AGGREGATION](#local-section-04-stack-e-opera-e-executionmechanism-ix-a-carrier-b-triplex-traversal-and-aggregation) - [X. CIRCULAR INTERROGATIVE CONSISTENCY VALIDATION](#local-section-04-stack-e-opera-e-executionmechanism-x-circular-interrogative-consistency-validation) - [PURPOSE](#local-section-04-stack-e-opera-e-executionmechanism-purpose) - [VALIDATION PRINCIPLE](#local-section-04-stack-e-opera-e-executionmechanism-validation-principle) - [ACT GENERATION LAW](#local-section-04-stack-e-opera-e-executionmechanism-act-generation-law) - [AGENT GROUNDING LAW](#local-section-04-stack-e-opera-e-executionmechanism-agent-grounding-law) - [CIRCULAR INTERROGATIVE CLOSURE](#local-section-04-stack-e-opera-e-executionmechanism-circular-interrogative-closure) - [CIRCULAR CONSISTENCY CHECK](#local-section-04-stack-e-opera-e-executionmechanism-circular-consistency-check) - [CHECK:](#local-section-04-stack-e-opera-e-executionmechanism-check) - [Q_CIRCULAR_INCONSISTENCY:](#local-section-04-stack-e-opera-e-executionmechanism-q-circular-inconsistency) - [VALIDITY CONSEQUENCES](#local-section-04-stack-e-opera-e-executionmechanism-validity-consequences) - [OUTPUT EXTENSION](#local-section-04-stack-e-opera-e-executionmechanism-output-extension) - [CIRCULAR_INTERROGATIVE_VALIDATION:](#local-section-04-stack-e-opera-e-executionmechanism-circular-interrogative-validation) - [RESULT](#local-section-04-stack-e-opera-e-executionmechanism-result) - [XI. LIMITS](#local-section-04-stack-e-opera-e-executionmechanism-xi-limits) - [OPERA_E ONLY:](#local-section-04-stack-e-opera-e-executionmechanism-opera-e-only) - [XII. CLOSURE](#local-section-04-stack-e-opera-e-executionmechanism-xii-closure) - [STATUS:](#local-section-04-stack-e-opera-e-executionmechanism-status)  <a id="local-section-04-stack-e-opera-e-executionmechanism-i-purpose"></a> I. PURPOSE ------------------------------------------------------------ Define the execution system governing: STACK E â€” REGIMEN_RQ ------------------------------------------------------------ OPERA_E performs: â€¢ interrogative reduction â€¢ carrier-driven traversal â€¢ species activation â€¢ structured result construction ------------------------------------------------------------ OPERA_E operates only when: admissibility = TRUE (AREPO_E) ============================================================ <a id="local-section-04-stack-e-opera-e-executionmechanism-ii-position-in-class-order"></a> II. POSITION IN CLASS ORDER ============================================================ TENET â†’ ROTAS â†’ AREPO â†’ OPERA â†’ SATOR ------------------------------------------------------------ OPERA_E operates: AFTER admissibility authorization WITHIN ROTAS_E structure ============================================================ <a id="local-section-04-stack-e-opera-e-executionmechanism-iii-execution-object"></a> III. EXECUTION OBJECT ============================================================ Input: admissible question Q ------------------------------------------------------------ Output: structured result R(Q) ------------------------------------------------------------ Execution Domain: interrogative reduction space (ROTAS_E) ============================================================ <a id="local-section-04-stack-e-opera-e-executionmechanism-iv-core-execution-principle"></a> IV. CORE EXECUTION PRINCIPLE ============================================================ Execution is defined as: reduction + traversal + construction ------------------------------------------------------------ Formal: OPERA_E(Q) = construct( traverse( activate( reduce(Q) ) ) ) ------------------------------------------------------------ Definition: structured result = â€¢ carrier-grounded â€¢ species-bound â€¢ traversal-consistent configuration ============================================================ <a id="local-section-04-stack-e-opera-e-executionmechanism-v-execution-stages"></a> V. EXECUTION STAGES ============================================================ ------------------------------------------------------------ <a id="local-section-04-stack-e-opera-e-executionmechanism-stage-0-input-resolution"></a> Stage 0 â€” INPUT RESOLUTION ------------------------------------------------------------ Normalize Q into: â€¢ syntactic unit â€¢ structural candidate set ------------------------------------------------------------ Constraint: no semantic expansion beyond CAPUT-bound mappings ------------------------------------------------------------ <a id="local-section-04-stack-e-opera-e-executionmechanism-stage-i-reductio-ad-regulam"></a> Stage I â€” REDUCTIO AD REGULAM ------------------------------------------------------------ Map Q â†’ carrier set: Q â†’ { nâ‚, nâ‚‚, ..., nâ‚– } ------------------------------------------------------------ Constraint: must respect TENET E definitions ------------------------------------------------------------ <a id="local-section-04-stack-e-opera-e-executionmechanism-stage-ii-definition-binding"></a> Stage II â€” DEFINITION BINDING ------------------------------------------------------------ Bind: carriers â†’ definitions (TENET E) species â†’ domains (TENET R) ------------------------------------------------------------ Output: bound structure B(Q) ------------------------------------------------------------ <a id="local-section-04-stack-e-opera-e-executionmechanism-stage-iii-objectificatio"></a> Stage III â€” OBJECTIFICATIO ------------------------------------------------------------ Construct interrogative object: O(Q) ------------------------------------------------------------ Definition: minimal structured form representing Q within ROTAS_E ------------------------------------------------------------ Constraint: no traversal yet ------------------------------------------------------------ <a id="local-section-04-stack-e-opera-e-executionmechanism-stage-iv-species-activation"></a> Stage IV â€” SPECIES ACTIVATION ------------------------------------------------------------ Activate species for each carrier: n â†’ R1(n) ------------------------------------------------------------ Output: expanded object Oâ‚›(Q) ------------------------------------------------------------ <a id="local-section-04-stack-e-opera-e-executionmechanism-stage-v-evaluatio"></a> Stage V â€” EVALUATIO ------------------------------------------------------------ Evaluate admissible paths: P âŠ‚ R3 ------------------------------------------------------------ Constraint: must respect: â€¢ ROTAS_E structure â€¢ AREPO_E admissibility ------------------------------------------------------------ <a id="local-section-04-stack-e-opera-e-executionmechanism-stage-vi-electio"></a> Stage VI â€” ELECTIO ------------------------------------------------------------ Select valid resolution path: P* ------------------------------------------------------------ Selection Criteria: â€¢ structural completeness â€¢ definition consistency â€¢ admissibility compliance ------------------------------------------------------------ Note: selection is deterministic no optimization or ranking implied ------------------------------------------------------------ <a id="local-section-04-stack-e-opera-e-executionmechanism-stage-vii-result-construction"></a> Stage VII â€” RESULT CONSTRUCTION ------------------------------------------------------------ Produce structured result: R(Q) ------------------------------------------------------------ Form: â€¢ carrier-based â€¢ species-grounded â€¢ traversal-consistent ------------------------------------------------------------ Output is: deterministic reconstructible ============================================================ <a id="local-section-04-stack-e-opera-e-executionmechanism-vi-execution-constraints"></a> VI. EXECUTION CONSTRAINTS ============================================================ ------------------------------------------------------------ <a id="local-section-04-stack-e-opera-e-executionmechanism-1-structural-dependence"></a> 1. STRUCTURAL DEPENDENCE ------------------------------------------------------------ All execution must occur within: ROTAS_E ------------------------------------------------------------ <a id="local-section-04-stack-e-opera-e-executionmechanism-2-admissibility-dependence"></a> 2. ADMISSIBILITY DEPENDENCE ------------------------------------------------------------ Execution requires: AREPO_E approval ------------------------------------------------------------ <a id="local-section-04-stack-e-opera-e-executionmechanism-3-definition-primacy"></a> 3. DEFINITION PRIMACY ------------------------------------------------------------ No operation without: TENET binding ------------------------------------------------------------ <a id="local-section-04-stack-e-opera-e-executionmechanism-4-non-stochasticity"></a> 4. NON-STOCHASTICITY ------------------------------------------------------------ Execution is deterministic ------------------------------------------------------------ <a id="local-section-04-stack-e-opera-e-executionmechanism-5-traceability"></a> 5. TRACEABILITY ------------------------------------------------------------ All steps must be reconstructible: Q â†’ R0 â†’ R1 â†’ R2 â†’ R3 â†’ R(Q) ============================================================ <a id="local-section-04-stack-e-opera-e-executionmechanism-vii-execution-modes"></a> VII. EXECUTION MODES ============================================================ ------------------------------------------------------------ <a id="local-section-04-stack-e-opera-e-executionmechanism-1-single-carrier-mode"></a> 1. SINGLE-CARRIER MODE ------------------------------------------------------------ Q â†’ n â†’ R1(n) â†’ R(Q) ------------------------------------------------------------ <a id="local-section-04-stack-e-opera-e-executionmechanism-2-multi-carrier-mode"></a> 2. MULTI-CARRIER MODE ------------------------------------------------------------ Q â†’ {nâ‚, nâ‚‚} â†’ R2(nâ‚,nâ‚‚) â†’ R(Q) ------------------------------------------------------------ <a id="local-section-04-stack-e-opera-e-executionmechanism-3-recursive-mode"></a> 3. RECURSIVE MODE ------------------------------------------------------------ R(Q) â†’ Q' â†’ OPERA_E(Q') ------------------------------------------------------------ Constraint: recursion must re-enter AREPO_E ============================================================ <a id="local-section-04-stack-e-opera-e-executionmechanism-viii-failure-handling"></a> VIII. FAILURE HANDLING ============================================================ OPERA_E does not define admissibility failures. ------------------------------------------------------------ If failure occurs: defer to AREPO_E ============================================================ <a id="local-section-04-stack-e-opera-e-executionmechanism-ix-output-structure"></a> IX. OUTPUT STRUCTURE ============================================================ R(Q) contains: â€¢ carrier mapping â€¢ species activation â€¢ traversal path â€¢ structured result ------------------------------------------------------------ Optional: execution trace ============================================================ <a id="local-section-04-stack-e-opera-e-executionmechanism-ix-a-carrier-b-triplex-traversal-and-aggregation"></a> IX-A. CARRIER-B TRIPLEX TRAVERSAL AND AGGREGATION ============================================================ The carrier-B triplex is the OPERA Q mechanism for reducing overfitting and premature hypothesis closure. OPERA E must preserve admissible affirmative, negative, and dubitative traces long enough for their evidence, failure, and return states to be inspected independently. No hypothesis closes merely because it is first, numerous, fluent, preferred, or the only trace currently carrying positive support. Closure requires the current judgment rule to accept the complete disclosed comparison frame. For an admitted carrier-B triplex invocation, OPERA E: • preserves separate versioned traces • executes only admitted transitions • records local states and state deltas • constructs a disclosed comparison frame Aggregation has no default majority, consensus, branch priority, or hidden synthesis. Lack of support does not become negation. OPERA E distinguishes: BRANCH_LOCAL_CONTRADICTION LAWFUL_LOCAL_TERMINATION RUNTIME_SUSPENSION GLOBAL_TRAVERSAL_FAILURE GLOBAL_JUDGMENT_UNRESOLVED Re-entry requires a prior-state reference and a non-empty state delta. Return is a typed handoff to a receiving AREPO; it is not automatic merge, closure, parent mutation, or downstream execution. Global result status is READY, UNRESOLVED, SUSPENDED, REJECTED, or FAILED. READY requires an explicit current judgment rule that accepts the disclosed comparison frame. Branch count alone never determines the result. ============================================================ <a id="local-section-04-stack-e-opera-e-executionmechanism-x-circular-interrogative-consistency-validation"></a> X. CIRCULAR INTERROGATIVE CONSISTENCY VALIDATION ============================================================ <a id="local-section-04-stack-e-opera-e-executionmechanism-purpose"></a> PURPOSE ------------------------------------------------------------ Circular interrogative consistency validation treats the REGIMEN_RQ interrogative scaffold as a quasi-cyclic structure for validation purposes. It does NOT claim: â€¢ that Q is a literal ROTA â€¢ that Llull defined Q as a wheel It DOES establish: â€¢ a lawful isomorphic projection for validation â€¢ cyclic coherence checking across interrogative loci â€¢ improved anti-drift control in OPERA_E execution ------------------------------------------------------------ <a id="local-section-04-stack-e-opera-e-executionmechanism-validation-principle"></a> VALIDATION PRINCIPLE ------------------------------------------------------------ A question structure is not fully validated merely because: â€¢ individual questions are answered â€¢ local coherence is present It must also be coherent with: â€¢ the generative triad from which a question arises â€¢ the downstream questions it must sustain Thus OPERA_E validates: local interrogative validity + scaffold completeness + circular interrogative coherence ------------------------------------------------------------ <a id="local-section-04-stack-e-opera-e-executionmechanism-act-generation-law"></a> ACT GENERATION LAW ------------------------------------------------------------ Exploratory ACT mapping: E (CAUSE) = ACT(B, C, D) F (QUANTITY) = ACT(C, D, E) G (QUALITY) = ACT(D, E, F) H (WHEN) = ACT(E, F, G) I (WHERE) = ACT(F, G, H) K (HOW / WITH WHAT) = ACT(G, H, I) Where: B = POSSIBILITY (AN SIT) C = QUIDDITY (QUID SIT) D = MATERIALITY (DE QUO EST) Interpretation: Higher-order questions emerge from foundational ones. Example: â€¢ Cause cannot be stable if possibility, quiddity, and material grounding are weak Rule: No higher-order question may be treated as resolved if its source triad is unresolved or inconsistent. ------------------------------------------------------------ <a id="local-section-04-stack-e-opera-e-executionmechanism-agent-grounding-law"></a> AGENT GROUNDING LAW ------------------------------------------------------------ Exploratory AGENT mapping: B (POSSIBILITY) = AGENT(H, I, K) C (QUIDDITY) = AGENT(I, K, B) D (MATERIALITY) = AGENT(K, B, C) Interpretation: Foundational questions are retro-validated by applied ones. Example: â€¢ a claimed possibility must remain compatible with when/where/how it is instantiated Rule: Foundational Q-answers must not contradict their applied manifestation. ------------------------------------------------------------ <a id="local-section-04-stack-e-opera-e-executionmechanism-circular-interrogative-closure"></a> CIRCULAR INTERROGATIVE CLOSURE ------------------------------------------------------------ Closure: B â†’ C â†’ D â†’ E â†’ F â†’ G â†’ H â†’ I â†’ K â†’ B Rule: After OPERA_E execution, the question-field must be checked for cyclic coherence. Meaning: A Q-structure may be: â€¢ locally answered â€¢ partially coherent â€¢ yet globally inconsistent Constraint: This is a validation overlay, not a replacement of Q-sequence. ------------------------------------------------------------ <a id="local-section-04-stack-e-opera-e-executionmechanism-circular-consistency-check"></a> CIRCULAR CONSISTENCY CHECK ------------------------------------------------------------ For each Q-node: <a id="local-section-04-stack-e-opera-e-executionmechanism-check"></a> CHECK: consistency with source triad consistency with target triad Flag: <a id="local-section-04-stack-e-opera-e-executionmechanism-q-circular-inconsistency"></a> Q_CIRCULAR_INCONSISTENCY: assigned when answers across Q-loci cannot be jointly sustained ------------------------------------------------------------ <a id="local-section-04-stack-e-opera-e-executionmechanism-validity-consequences"></a> VALIDITY CONSEQUENCES ------------------------------------------------------------ If circular inconsistency is: minor: â†’ mark as PARTIAL structural: â†’ mark as INCOMPLETE_Q_FIELD severe: â†’ force re-interrogation at B/C/D level Rule: Q must not proceed to A/T/D if circular inconsistency is load-bearing. ------------------------------------------------------------ <a id="local-section-04-stack-e-opera-e-executionmechanism-output-extension"></a> OUTPUT EXTENSION ------------------------------------------------------------ R(Q) may include: <a id="local-section-04-stack-e-opera-e-executionmechanism-circular-interrogative-validation"></a> CIRCULAR_INTERROGATIVE_VALIDATION: ACT_SOURCE_STATUS::<COHERENT|PARTIAL|FAILED> AGENT_TARGET_STATUS::<COHERENT|PARTIAL|FAILED> Q_CLOSURE_STATUS::<CLOSED|PARTIAL|OPEN|FAILED> Q_CIRCULAR_FLAGS::{...} ------------------------------------------------------------ <a id="local-section-04-stack-e-opera-e-executionmechanism-result"></a> RESULT ------------------------------------------------------------ OPERA_E becomes: a coherent interrogative field validator not merely: a question enumerator ============================================================ <a id="local-section-04-stack-e-opera-e-executionmechanism-xi-limits"></a> XI. LIMITS ============================================================ OPERA_E does NOT: â€¢ define admissibility (AREPO) â€¢ define structure (ROTAS) â€¢ define principles (TENET) â€¢ mediate output (SATOR) ------------------------------------------------------------ <a id="local-section-04-stack-e-opera-e-executionmechanism-opera-e-only"></a> OPERA_E ONLY: executes interrogative reduction ============================================================ <a id="local-section-04-stack-e-opera-e-executionmechanism-xii-closure"></a> XII. CLOSURE ============================================================ OPERA_E establishes: the execution engine for: REGIMEN_RQ ------------------------------------------------------------ With this artifact: âœ“ questions become reducible âœ“ structure becomes traversable âœ“ results become constructible ------------------------------------------------------------ <a id="local-section-04-stack-e-opera-e-executionmechanism-status"></a> STATUS: FUNCTIONALLY COMPLETE LOCK-CANDIDATE CIRCULAR-VALIDATION-INTEGRATED ============================================================ END OF ARTIFACT ============================================================