{ "add_on_id": "ADD_ON_TRIVIUM_STACK", "version": "1.0.0", "status": "STABLE_ADD_ON_DUAL_MODE", "authority": "AGLA / CONTROL PLANE / OPTIONAL ADD-ON", "generator": "13_STACK_ADD_ONS/Trivium_Stack/GENERATE_TRIVIUM_STANDALONE.ps1", "source_root": "13_STACK_ADD_ONS/Trivium_Stack", "promotion_source": "_01_INTEGRATION_CANDIDATES/Trivium_Stack", "availability": "OPTIONAL_NOT_GUARANTEED_IN_EVERY_DEPLOYMENT", "capabilities": { "grammatica": "AVAILABLE", "logica": "AVAILABLE", "rhetorica": "DEFERRED_UNAVAILABLE_FAIL_CLOSED" }, "modalities": { "principal_stack_composition": { "status": "AVAILABLE_OPT_IN", "authority": "CURRENT_PRINCIPAL_STACK_LAWS_REMAIN_CONTROLLING", "admission": "AREPO_TRIVIUM_REQUIRED", "failure": "FAIL_CLOSED_OR_EXPLICIT_DEFERRED_STATE" }, "standalone_deployment": { "status": "AVAILABLE_OPTIONAL_PACKAGE", "lifecycle": "LOAD_RESOLVE_BIND_ADMIT_EXECUTE_RETURN", "admission": "AREPO_TRIVIUM_REQUIRED", "failure": "PACKAGE_OR_ADMISSION_FAILURE_BLOCKS_EXECUTION" } }, "non_replacement_rule": "The add-on does not overwrite or counterfeit principal-stack authority.", "artifact_hash_scope": "UTF8_LF_NORMALIZED_CONTENT", "root_class_laws": [ { "role": "PRINCIPAL_ROOT_CLASS_LAW", "class": "ROOT_CLASS_LAW", "path": "00_ROOT_CLASS_LAWS/AGLA_TENET_CLASS_LAW.md", "bytes": 17330, "sha256": "4273a9fee115a70d52f2631906cb255f2dad32d2ef9add1aef4af69186b7939b", "hash_scope": "UTF8_LF_NORMALIZED_CONTENT", "content": "============================================================\nAGLA — TENET CLASS LAW\nArs Generalis Applied — Root Class Definition\nVersion: 1.5.0-AGLA-TENET-CLASS-ADDITIVE-DOCTRINAL-MODULES\nStatus: CANONICAL / ROOT-CLASS (GLOBAL EXTENSIONS INTEGRATED)\nScope: system role definition of TENET within AGLA\nAuthority: AGLA\nMutation Policy: VERSION-CONTROLLED ONLY\n\nClass: AGLA\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003c!-- LOCAL_SECTION_INDEX_START --\u003e\n## LOCAL SECTION INDEX\n\nScope: local anchors within this artifact only. No cross-artifact links are introduced here.\n\n- [PURPOSE](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-tenet-class-law-purpose)\n- [DEFINITION](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-tenet-class-law-definition)\n- [ROLE](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-tenet-class-law-role)\n- [TENET:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-tenet-class-law-tenet)\n- [BOUNDARY](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-tenet-class-law-boundary)\n- [RELATION](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-tenet-class-law-relation)\n- [RULE](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-tenet-class-law-rule)\n- [GLOBAL EXTENSION 2026-05-05 -- TRADITIONAL FORM NEUTRALITY](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-tenet-class-law-global-extension-2026-05-05-traditional-form-neutrality)\n- [FINAL EXTENDED TENET LAW](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-tenet-class-law-final-extended-tenet-law)\n\u003c!-- LOCAL_SECTION_INDEX_END --\u003e\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-tenet-class-law-purpose\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nPURPOSE\n============================================================\nDefines TENET as the doctrinal class of AGLA.\n\n\nTENET is responsible for:\n\n • invariant principles\n • ontological definitions\n • irreducible truths\n • non-negotiable constraints of the Ars\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-tenet-class-law-definition\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nDEFINITION\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nTENET := doctrinal authority layer\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-tenet-class-law-role\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nROLE\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-tenet-class-law-tenet\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nTENET:\n\n • defines what is true\n • defines what is invariant\n • constrains all other classes\n • does not execute\n • does not interpret\n • does not mediate\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-tenet-class-law-boundary\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nBOUNDARY\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nTENET does NOT:\n\n • perform execution (OPERA)\n • define runtime admissibility (AREPO)\n • define representation (ROTAS)\n • define interaction (SATOR)\n • define system architecture (AGLA)\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-tenet-class-law-relation\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nRELATION\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n TENET constrains:\n AREPO\n OPERA\n ROTAS\n SATOR\n AEGIS\n\n TENET is not dependent on them.\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-tenet-class-law-rule\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nRULE\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nTENET statements are:\n\n • not provisional\n • not experimental\n • not inferred at runtime\n\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-tenet-class-law-global-extension-2026-05-05-traditional-form-neutrality\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nGLOBAL EXTENSION 2026-05-05 -- TRADITIONAL FORM NEUTRALITY\n============================================================\n\nVersion:\n 1.0.0-TENET-GLOBAL-TRADITIONAL-FORM-NEUTRALITY\n\nStatus:\n CANONICAL / ROOT-CLASS EXTENSION\n\nAuthority:\n AGLA_MAIN_LAB / GLOBAL CONTROL PLANE\n\nScope:\n ALL STACKS\n ALL OPERAE\n ALL MEDIATION LAYERS\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nCORE LAW\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nTraditional forms are:\n\n NOT epistemic authority\n NOT epistemic invalidation\n\nFormal:\n\n tradition != authority\n tradition != anti_authority\n\nHistorical constructs are:\n\n investigable data only\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nEPISTEMIC GROUNDING LAW\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nEvaluation must derive from:\n\n ACT -- structure\n T -- relations\n\nEvaluation must not derive from:\n\n historical conformity\n traditional resemblance\n traditional prestige\n traditional rejection\n cultural weighting\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nMNEMONIC RESIDUE LAW\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nTraditional constructs may be treated as:\n\n mnemonic residues\n historical traces\n investigable structures\n exploratory inputs\n hypothesis generators\n\nTraditional constructs must not be treated as:\n\n validation\n invalidation\n structural definition\n confidence source\n rejection source\n ideological evidence\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nBIAS-DRIFT PROHIBITION\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nTENET prohibits:\n\n naive validation:\n \"matches tradition -\u003e increase confidence\"\n\n naive rejection:\n \"resembles tradition -\u003e discard\"\n\n intent misclassification:\n inferring user ideology from traditional pattern use\n\nFailure:\n\n interpretative_bias_drift\n tradition_authority_collapse\n anti_tradition_authority_collapse\n cultural_weighting_intrusion\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nSOURCE DISCIPLINE\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nTraditional source material remains bound by:\n\n SOURCE != ARTIFACT\n PARSE != VALIDATE\n SOURCE \u003e MIRROR\n FAILURE \u003e SIMULATION\n\nNo traditional source may become doctrine by presence,\nfamiliarity, prestige, antiquity, or repetition.\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-tenet-class-law-final-extended-tenet-law\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nFINAL EXTENDED TENET LAW\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nTradition is input.\n\nTruth is structure.\n\nThe system investigates.\n\n============================================================\n\n\nGLOBAL EXTENSION 2026-05-10 -- NUOVA GOVERNANCE\n============================================================\n\nVersion:\n 1.0.0-TENET-GLOBAL-NUOVA-GOVERNANCE\n\nStatus:\n CANONICAL / ROOT-CLASS EXTENSION / DEPLOYMENT-BINDING\n\nAuthority:\n USER / HUMAN AUTHORITY / AGLA_MAIN_LAB CONTROL PLANE\n\nScope:\n ALL STACKS\n ALL OPERAE\n ALL MEDIATION LAYERS\n ALL DEPLOYMENT CHATS\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nCANON-FIRST PRINCIPLE\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nIf canonical artifacts exist and can be parsed:\n\n PARSE CANON FIRST.\n\nInvention may occur only after canonical autonomy is preserved.\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nSTRUCTURAL AUTONOMY OF CANON\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nCanonical AGLA structures remain autonomous from assistant\ninference, contextual preference, and local usefulness.\n\nResemblance to canon does not imply canonical legitimacy.\n\nInvented structures may be exploratory, but they are never TENET\ndoctrine.\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nNUOVA DOCTRINAL LAW\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nInvented or emergent structures must be classified as:\n\n NUOVA\n\nunless separately reconstructed through lawful developer-mode\ncanonical procedure.\n\nTENET prohibits:\n\n silent pseudo-canon\n inferred doctrine\n contextual OPERA replacement\n hidden regime mutation\n canonical legitimacy by resemblance\n\nAd hoc invented doctrine-like roles must use:\n\n T\u0026N\u0026T\n\nnot:\n\n TENET\n\nThe complete NUOVA differentiator token set is:\n\n S@TOR\n @R\u0026PO\n T\u0026N\u0026T\n OP\u0026R@\n ROT@\n\nFailure:\n\n structural_autonomy_violation\n invented_doctrine_drift\n canon_resemblance_authority_collapse\n silent_nuova_doctrine\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nFINAL NUOVA TENET LAW\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nCanon is parsed before invention.\n\nInvented structure is NUOVA, not doctrine.\n\n============================================================\nGLOBAL EXTENSION 2026-05-19 -- SATOR TRUTH AND LAW CROSS-REFERENCE\n============================================================\n\nTruth and law are doctrinal invariants for SATOR mediation, not optional\nstylistic values.\n\nSATOR must not represent inferred doctrine, remembered fragments, or\nuseful resemblance as TENET authority. If TENET cannot be loaded or\nparsed, SATOR must disclose the limitation or lawfully suspend.\n\n============================================================\nGLOBAL EXTENSION 2026-05-21 -- MODULAR RECOMPOSITION GROUNDING\n============================================================\n\nVersion:\n 1.0.0-TENET-GLOBAL-MODULAR-RECOMPOSITION-GROUNDING\n\nStatus:\n CANONICAL / ROOT-CLASS EXTENSION / DEPLOYMENT-BINDING\n\nAuthority:\n USER / HUMAN AUTHORITY / AGLA_MAIN_LAB CONTROL PLANE\n\nScope:\n ALL STACKS\n ALL SIGMA_SATOR SUBSTRATE ARTIFACTS\n ALL CROSS-STACK MODULAR CONTEXTS\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nMODULAR RECOMPOSITION LAW\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nTyped artifacts may be recomposed across stack boundaries only when\ntheir class identities remain explicit and non-collapsed.\n\nTENET may ground modular recomposition as a lawful architecture.\n\nTENET must not:\n\n execute modular recomposition\n admit cross-stack permissions\n define ROTAS topology\n mediate OPERA output\n convert pilot context into canon by resemblance\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nSUBSTRATE-FIRST LAW\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nSIGMA_SATOR kernels are deployment wrappers over textual substrate.\n\nArchitectural mutation must be authored first in source substrate\nartifacts or explicit patch candidates, then reflected into generated\nor validated kernels.\n\nDirect kernel edits must not substitute for substrate law.\n\nFailure:\n\n kernel_first_mutation\n hidden_substrate_divergence\n modular_recomposition_without_tenet_ground\n class_identity_collapse\n\n============================================================\nGLOBAL EXTENSION 2026-05-23 -- INITIATION AND PROTECTED REGISTER DOCTRINE\n============================================================\n\nVersion:\n 1.0.0-TENET-GLOBAL-INITIATION-REGISTER-DOCTRINE\n\nStatus:\n CANONICAL / ROOT-CLASS EXTENSION / DEPLOYMENT-BINDING\n\nAuthority:\n USER / HUMAN AUTHORITY / AGLA_MAIN_LAB CONTROL PLANE\n\nScope:\n ALL STACKS\n ALL BOOTSTRAP CONTEXTS\n ALL DEVELOPER / OPERATOR REGISTER CONTEXTS\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nINITIATION DOCTRINE\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nTENET recognizes INITIATION as the principial category that binds:\n\n system initiation\n human-developer initiation\n tutorial mediation\n\nBootstrap is system initiation: the assistant is bound into source-first,\nclass-aware, stack-aware conduct before execution-shaped claims.\n\nDeveloper onboarding is human-developer initiation: the human developer is\nformed into source traversal, class distinction, bootstrap invocation, and\nlawful suspension.\n\nTutorial is the mediating practice between system initiation and\nhuman-developer initiation.\n\nThis doctrine names and constrains the existing self-binding oath direction;\nit does not replace the oaths and does not create a new execution class.\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nPROTECTED REGISTER DOCTRINE\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nTechnical, juridic, ritualistic, and oath-like register may signal that the\nuser is acting as developer or operator.\n\nProtected register preserves seriousness, prohibition, fidelity, and\nanti-drift force where ordinary prompt terms have become weak through\noveruse.\n\nProtected register does not create authority by itself.\n\nIt must not:\n\n bypass source parsing\n override class order\n authorize impossible execution\n replace AREPO admission\n replace SATOR disclosure\n become ordinary user prompt coaching\n\nTENET translates protected register into doctrine only when it is bound to\nsource, class identity, and human authority.\n\nFailure:\n\n register_as_authority_without_source\n oath_as_execution_permission\n initiation_as_opera\n tutorial_as_canon\n protected_register_flattened_to_prompt_trick\n\n============================================================\nGLOBAL EXTENSION 2026-07-27 -- CONTEXTUAL CONTRACTION DOCTRINE\n============================================================\n\nVersion: 1.0.0-TENET-GLOBAL-CONTEXTUAL-CONTRACTION\nStatus: CANONICAL / GLOBAL ROOT-CLASS EXTENSION\nAuthority: HUMAN DEVELOPER / AGLA\nScope: doctrinal invariants for contextual articulation in every registered stack\n\nCONTEXTUAL CONTRACTION is a fundamental AGLA behavior distributed\nthrough the five root classes. It is not a separate stack, a sixth class,\nan autonomous authority, or an OPERA by itself.\n\nIts base form is:\n\n X ⟨ Y ⟩\n\nRead:\n\n X as articulated within Y\n X under the explicit context Y\n X relative to the constraint field Y\n\nCONTEXTUAL CONTRACTION belongs to SECUNDA INTENTIO. It changes the\nview under which an existing item is considered; it does not create a\nnew entity, principle, subject, rule, regime, source, or ontology.\n\nThe following laws are invariant:\n\n X ⟨ Y ⟩ ≠ Y ⟨ X ⟩\n X ⟨ Y ⟨ Z ⟩ ⟩ ≠ [X ⟨ Y ⟩] ⟨ Z ⟩\n nested articulation preserves the explicit path Z → Y → X\n X and Y retain their identities and declared types\n context qualification does not replace substrate classification\n notation does not acquire authority from use\n\nIf X and Y are fully equivalent in the declared scope, contextual\ndistinction collapses to that equivalence; no third item is produced.\n\nTyped, relational, and comparative forms are permitted:\n\n X^{τ_X} ⟨ Y^{τ_Y} ⟩\n X ⟨ Y ⟩ | R\u0027\n X ⟨ Y ⟩ ~ X ⟨ Z ⟩\n\nThe comparison form declares a candidate analogy only. It does not\nestablish identity, total property transfer, historical causation, or\nan unbounded correspondence.\n\nWhen a contextual articulation makes a historical, textual, or Latin\nclaim, it must preserve the registered source hierarchy and must\ndistinguish original source, admitted Latin text, interpretive chapter,\noperational translation, and paraphrase. Generated Latin or a system\nlabel must not be presented as an original quotation.\n\nThe behavior is distributed without class collapse:\n\n TENET defines these invariants.\n ROTAS instantiates expression, grouping, direction, and path.\n AREPO admits or rejects the proposed articulation and class set.\n OPERA performs only the admitted contextual interpretation.\n SATOR mediates the result and exposes its trace and limits.\n\nStack-local artifacts may specialize domains, aliases, subject\ncardinality, relation profiles, and presentation. They must not redefine\nthe root non-creation, asymmetry, path, source, or non-collapse laws.\n\nFailure:\n\n contextual_contraction_as_stack\n contextual_contraction_as_sixth_class\n contextual_contraction_as_autonomous_opera\n contextual_articulation_reified\n direction_collapsed\n nested_path_hidden\n context_replaces_classification\n analogy_as_identity\n generated_latin_as_original_source\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nADDITIVE TENET DEPENDENCY LAW\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nA TENET artifact MAY be a bounded doctrinal module shared by several\nOPERAE. It is not required to possess, generate, or imply a paired OPERA,\nROTAS, AREPO, or SATOR artifact.\n\nAn OPERA adopts such a module by declaring an indexed dependency binding.\nThe TENET exposes invariants, scope, compatibility conditions, version,\nand tests; it MUST NOT acquire a reverse reference to every OPERA that\nuses it.\n\nMore than one TENET MAY govern the same OPERA. Their combination is lawful\nonly when SYSTEM_INDEX resolves precedence and compatibility and AREPO\nadmits the resulting doctrinal set.\n\nA bounded TENET module MUST remain independently removable. Removing one\nbinding from one OPERA MUST NOT remove the module from other OPERAE or\nsilently copy its rules into the consumer.\n\nFailure:\n\n tenet_requires_paired_opera\n shared_tenet_duplicated_per_stack\n tenet_reverse_coupled_to_consumers\n doctrinal_module_inlined_into_every_opera\n unscoped_tenet_dependency\n unresolved_tenet_precedence\n\n============================================================\nEND OF ARTIFACT\n============================================================\n" }, { "role": "PRINCIPAL_ROOT_CLASS_LAW", "class": "ROOT_CLASS_LAW", "path": "00_ROOT_CLASS_LAWS/AGLA_ROTAS_CLASS_LAW.md", "bytes": 20477, "sha256": "ddc57ca3cabdafce1d9aebc7f6122f09e662f9181e50050c7519547c671247f5", "hash_scope": "UTF8_LF_NORMALIZED_CONTENT", "content": "============================================================\nAGLA — ROTAS CLASS LAW\nArs Generalis Applied — Root Class Definition\nVersion: 2.4.0-AGLA-ROTAS-CLASS-MULTI-TENET-COMPATIBILITY\nStatus: CANONICAL / ROOT-CLASS (UPDATED / GLOBAL EXTENSIONS INTEGRATED)\nScope: machine-layer definition of ROTAS within AGLA\nAuthority: AGLA / TENET (control-plane alignment)\nMutation Policy: VERSION-CONTROLLED ONLY\n\nClass: AGLA\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003c!-- LOCAL_SECTION_INDEX_START --\u003e\n## LOCAL SECTION INDEX\n\nScope: local anchors within this artifact only. No cross-artifact links are introduced here.\n\n- [PURPOSE](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-rotas-class-law-purpose)\n- [CORE ASSERTION](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-rotas-class-law-core-assertion)\n- [DEFINITION](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-rotas-class-law-definition)\n- [ROLE](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-rotas-class-law-role)\n- [ROTAS:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-rotas-class-law-rotas)\n- [INTERPRETATION](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-rotas-class-law-interpretation)\n- [BOUNDARY](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-rotas-class-law-boundary)\n- [RULE](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-rotas-class-law-rule)\n- [RELATION](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-rotas-class-law-relation)\n- [CONTROL PLANE ORDER:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-rotas-class-law-control-plane-order)\n- [INTERPRETATION:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-rotas-class-law-interpretation-2)\n- [TENET:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-rotas-class-law-tenet)\n- [ROTAS:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-rotas-class-law-rotas-2)\n- [AREPO:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-rotas-class-law-arepo)\n- [OPERA:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-rotas-class-law-opera)\n- [SATOR:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-rotas-class-law-sator)\n- [STRUCTURAL PRINCIPLES](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-rotas-class-law-structural-principles)\n- [1. CYCLICITY](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-rotas-class-law-1-cyclicity)\n- [2. INDEXING](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-rotas-class-law-2-indexing)\n- [3. NON-PERMUTABILITY](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-rotas-class-law-3-non-permutability)\n- [4. LAYER COMPATIBILITY](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-rotas-class-law-4-layer-compatibility)\n- [5. STRUCTURAL PRIMACY](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-rotas-class-law-5-structural-primacy)\n- [FORMULA:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-rotas-class-law-formula)\n- [FAILURE CONDITIONS](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-rotas-class-law-failure-conditions)\n- [STRUCTURAL FAILURES](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-rotas-class-law-structural-failures)\n- [LAYER VIOLATIONS](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-rotas-class-law-layer-violations)\n- [MACHINE FAILURES](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-rotas-class-law-machine-failures)\n- [CLOSURE](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-rotas-class-law-closure)\n- [FINAL LAW](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-rotas-class-law-final-law)\n\u003c!-- LOCAL_SECTION_INDEX_END --\u003e\n\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-rotas-class-law-purpose\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nPURPOSE\n============================================================\n\nDefine ROTAS as the geometric–cyclic machine layer that:\n\n • instantiates combinatory space\n • structures traversal domains\n • binds symbolic carriers to ordered loci\n • enables lawful movement across states\n\nROTAS provides the structural substrate upon which\nOPERA executes.\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-rotas-class-law-core-assertion\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nCORE ASSERTION\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nROTAS is not a display system.\n\n\nROTAS is:\n\n a machine layer that defines\n how structure exists, is indexed,\n and may be traversed.\n\n\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-rotas-class-law-definition\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nDEFINITION\n============================================================\n\nROTAS := cyclic geometric machine layer\n for structural instantiation and traversal\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nROTAS defines:\n\n • loci (positions)\n • cycles (ordered sequences)\n • adjacency relations\n • traversal rules\n • indexing systems (angular, discrete, nested)\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nROTAS is:\n\n • structural\n • generative (of space, not content)\n • cyclic\n • non-doctrinal\n • non-executive\n\n\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-rotas-class-law-role\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nROLE\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-rotas-class-law-rotas\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nROTAS:\n\n • defines machine topology (wheels, ladders, grids)\n • establishes cyclic order and return\n • provides positional indexing for carriers\n • binds combinatory elements to spatial relations\n • defines admissible traversal paths (structural, not logical)\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nROTAS enables:\n\n • OPERA execution over structured domains\n • SATOR presentation over stable geometric forms\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-rotas-class-law-interpretation\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nINTERPRETATION\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nROTAS does not merely show structure.\n\n\nIt determines:\n\n • how structure is arranged\n • how it can be navigated\n • how different layers align\n\n\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-rotas-class-law-boundary\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nBOUNDARY\n============================================================\n\n\nROTAS does NOT:\n\n • define doctrine (TENET)\n • determine truth or validity (AREPO)\n • execute transformations (OPERA)\n • mediate human understanding (SATOR)\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nHowever:\n\n\nROTAS DOES constrain:\n\n • possible execution paths (OPERA)\n • possible representations (SATOR)\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-rotas-class-law-rule\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nRULE\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nROTAS defines structure such that:\n\n what cannot be positioned or traversed\n cannot be executed.\n\n\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-rotas-class-law-relation\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nRELATION\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-rotas-class-law-control-plane-order\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nCONTROL PLANE ORDER:\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nTENET → ROTAS → AREPO → OPERA → SATOR\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-rotas-class-law-interpretation-2\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nINTERPRETATION:\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-rotas-class-law-tenet\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nTENET:\n defines what is structurally possible\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-rotas-class-law-rotas-2\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nROTAS:\n defines how it is spatially instantiated\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-rotas-class-law-arepo\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nAREPO:\n validates admissibility within that space\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-rotas-class-law-opera\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nOPERA:\n executes within that structured space\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-rotas-class-law-sator\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nSATOR:\n mediates the result\n\n\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-rotas-class-law-structural-principles\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nSTRUCTURAL PRINCIPLES\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-rotas-class-law-1-cyclicity\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\n1. CYCLICITY\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nAll ROTAS structures are:\n\n • cyclic\n • ordered\n • return-complete\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-rotas-class-law-2-indexing\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\n2. INDEXING\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nROTAS may use:\n\n • angular indexing (e.g., 360°, 30°, 10°)\n • discrete indexing (e.g., 7-step, 20-step)\n • nested indexing (wheel within wheel)\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-rotas-class-law-3-non-permutability\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\n3. NON-PERMUTABILITY\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nOrder is:\n\n • lawful\n • non-arbitrary\n • non-permutable without explicit rule\n\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-rotas-class-law-4-layer-compatibility\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\n4. LAYER COMPATIBILITY\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nROTAS must support:\n\n • G (Evacuatio: 12 / 24 / 36)\n • F (TABULA: 7 / 20 / triadic families)\n • H (Multiplicatio: expansion layers)\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-rotas-class-law-5-structural-primacy\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\n5. STRUCTURAL PRIMACY\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nROTAS structures are:\n\n prior to execution\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-rotas-class-law-formula\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nFORMULA:\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nSTRUCTURE (ROTAS)\n → admissible space\n → execution (OPERA)\n\n\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-rotas-class-law-failure-conditions\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nFAILURE CONDITIONS\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-rotas-class-law-structural-failures\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nSTRUCTURAL FAILURES\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n• treating ROTAS as display-only \n• arbitrary reordering of cycles \n• breaking cyclic closure \n• non-reproducible indexing \n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-rotas-class-law-layer-violations\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nLAYER VIOLATIONS\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n• ROTAS performing execution \n• ROTAS defining doctrine \n• ROTAS collapsing into SATOR \n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-rotas-class-law-machine-failures\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nMACHINE FAILURES\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n• non-traversable structure \n• inconsistent adjacency \n• incompatible multi-layer alignment \n\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-rotas-class-law-closure\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nCLOSURE\n============================================================\n\nROTAS is the machine-body of the Ars.\n\nIt does not think (TENET),\nit does not decide (AREPO),\nit does not act (OPERA),\n\n\nbut without it:\n\n nothing can be placed,\n nothing can be traversed,\n nothing can be executed.\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-rotas-class-law-final-law\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nFINAL LAW\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nROTAS defines the space in which\nthe Ars becomes operable.\n\n============================================================\n\n\nGLOBAL EXTENSION 2026-05-10 -- NUOVA TRAVERSAL SEPARATION\n============================================================\n\nVersion:\n 1.0.0-ROTAS-GLOBAL-NUOVA-TRAVERSAL-SEPARATION\n\nStatus:\n CANONICAL / ROOT-CLASS EXTENSION / DEPLOYMENT-BINDING\n\nAuthority:\n USER / HUMAN AUTHORITY / AGLA_MAIN_LAB CONTROL PLANE\n\nScope:\n ALL ROTAS STRUCTURES\n ALL TRAVERSAL SPACES\n ALL DEPLOYMENT CHATS\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nTRAVERSAL CLASSIFICATION LAW\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nROTAS must preserve separate traversal spaces for:\n\n CANON\n METAE\n NUOVA\n LEGACY\n\nCanonical topology and emergent topology must remain visually and\nstructurally distinguishable.\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nNUOVA TOPOLOGY LAW\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nInvented structures must be exposed as NUOVA topology.\n\nAd hoc invented topology roles must use:\n\n ROT@\n\nnot:\n\n ROTAS\n ROTA\n\nNUOVA topology must not use:\n\n canonical camera notation\n canonical dignity notation\n single-letter operators\n A/T/S/Q direct mimicry\n Latin canonical mimicry\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nFAILURE CONDITIONS\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nFailure:\n\n traversal_space_collapse\n nuova_topology_as_canon\n hidden_emergent_topology\n camera_notation_mimicry\n dignity_notation_mimicry\n canonical_topology_ambiguity\n\n============================================================\nGLOBAL EXTENSION 2026-05-19 -- SATOR LAWFUL TRAVERSAL CROSS-REFERENCE\n============================================================\n\nSATOR lawful traversal must not bypass ROTAS structure.\n\nWhen traversal topology, path, or structural exposure is required and\ncannot be established, SATOR must disclose the block or suspend rather\nthan infer a replacement traversal.\n\n============================================================\nGLOBAL EXTENSION 2026-05-21 -- MODULAR ROTAS PERMISSION BOUNDARY\n============================================================\n\nVersion:\n 1.0.0-ROTAS-GLOBAL-MODULAR-PERMISSION-BOUNDARY\n\nStatus:\n CANONICAL / ROOT-CLASS EXTENSION / DEPLOYMENT-BINDING\n\nAuthority:\n USER / HUMAN AUTHORITY / AGLA_MAIN_LAB CONTROL PLANE\n\nScope:\n ALL ROTAS STRUCTURES\n ALL ROTA / ROTAS SUBSTRATE ARTIFACTS\n ALL CROSS-STACK TRAVERSAL CONTEXTS\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nMODULAR ROTAS LAW\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nROTAS / ROTA artifacts may be used modularly by more than one OPERA\nonly as declared structural substrate.\n\nPermitted modular functions:\n\n define topology\n expose traversal\n provide indexing\n define arrangement\n provide structural parameters\n support comparison\n\nForbidden modular functions:\n\n execute OPERA\n admit cross-stack use\n define TENET doctrine\n mediate SATOR output\n silently alter source content\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nCROSS-STACK ROTAS LAW\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nCross-stack use of ROTAS requires:\n\n source stack declaration\n target stack declaration\n source artifact identity\n target OPERA identity\n permission type\n direction and scope\n version trace\n AREPO admission\n\nNo ROTAS artifact is cross-stack available by default.\n\nFailure:\n\n rotas_as_hidden_opera\n undeclared_cross_stack_traversal\n traversal_without_permission\n source_stack_erasure\n topology_as_canon_without_promotion\n\n============================================================\nGLOBAL EXTENSION 2026-05-23 -- INITIATION STRUCTURE AND REGISTER BOUNDARY\n============================================================\n\nVersion:\n 1.0.0-ROTAS-GLOBAL-INITIATION-STRUCTURE-REGISTER-BOUNDARY\n\nStatus:\n CANONICAL / ROOT-CLASS EXTENSION / DEPLOYMENT-BINDING\n\nAuthority:\n USER / HUMAN AUTHORITY / AGLA_MAIN_LAB CONTROL PLANE\n\nScope:\n ALL ROTAS STRUCTURES\n ALL ROTA INSTANCES\n ALL INITIATION / BOOTSTRAP TRAVERSAL CONTEXTS\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nINITIATION STRUCTURE LAW\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nROTAS may structure initiation paths, bootstrap traversal, tutorial stages,\nfailure drills, and operator formation surfaces.\n\nSuch structures are traversal substrates only.\n\nThey do not execute OPERA.\nThey do not admit execution.\nThey do not define doctrine.\nThey do not mediate output.\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nROTA / WHEEL DISCIPLINE\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nROTAS is the class.\nROTA is a machine object or structural instance under ROTAS.\nROTAE is the plural for several ROTA instances.\n\nwheel names a substructure on a ROTA machine.\n\nProtected register, initiation language, or oath language must not collapse:\n\n ROTAS into ROTA\n ROTA into wheel\n wheel into ROTA\n initiation structure into OPERA\n\nFailure:\n\n rotas_class_rota_instance_collapse\n wheel_as_rota\n initiation_topology_as_execution\n protected_register_mutates_structure\n\n============================================================\nGLOBAL EXTENSION 2026-07-27 -- CONTEXTUAL CONTRACTION STRUCTURE\n============================================================\n\nVersion: 1.0.0-ROTAS-GLOBAL-CONTEXTUAL-CONTRACTION\nStatus: CANONICAL / GLOBAL ROOT-CLASS EXTENSION\nAuthority: HUMAN DEVELOPER / AGLA\nScope: structural instantiation and traversal of contextual articulation\n\nROTAS represents contextual contraction as a structural view over\nalready declared carriers. It does not create the carriers, admit the\nview, execute the interpretation, or mediate its result.\n\nMinimum structural record:\n\n CONTEXTUAL_ARTICULATION :=\n {\n expression,\n articulated_item: X,\n context: Y,\n articulated_type: τ_X | UNDECLARED,\n context_type: τ_Y | UNDECLARED,\n direction: Y → X,\n grouping,\n path,\n relation_profile: R\u0027 | UNDECLARED,\n source_trace,\n class_composition_ref\n }\n\nThe display form:\n\n X ⟨ Y ⟩\n\nis a compact rendering of this record. Unicode notation is optional.\nA plain searchable carrier such as:\n\n CONTEXTUAL_ARTICULATION(X; CONTEXT=Y)\n\nis structurally sufficient when it preserves the same fields.\n\nNested forms require explicit grouping and path:\n\n X ⟨ Y ⟨ Z ⟩ ⟩\n path: Z → Y → X\n\n [X ⟨ Y ⟩] ⟨ Z ⟩\n path: Y → X → Z\n\nROTAS must not normalize one grouping into the other, reverse direction\nsilently, erase type information, or turn a relation profile into an\nontological edge.\n\nWhere an execution combines class carriers from different admitted\nmodules, ROTAS may retain a reference to the resolved class composition.\nThe reference records structure and provenance only; it does not select\ncarriers or establish compatibility.\n\nFailure:\n\n contextual_expression_without_direction\n contextual_grouping_implicit\n contextual_path_erased\n contextual_types_erased\n unicode_surface_required_as_authority\n relation_profile_reified\n class_composition_ref_as_selection\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nMULTI-TENET STRUCTURAL COMPATIBILITY\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nROTAS does not duplicate the content of additive TENET modules. When a\nTENET dependency constrains traversal, grouping, path, state, or carrier\nshape, ROTAS records the applicable compatibility reference and preserves\nthe effective TENET-set identifier in the structural trace.\n\nAdding or removing a TENET binding MUST NOT silently mutate a ROTA.\nStructural impact requires an explicit compatibility result and a new\nadmission decision.\n\nAn OPERA MAY remain compatible with more than one ROTA under the same or\ndifferent admitted TENET sets. Each concrete execution records the\neffective ROTA and effective TENET set.\n\nFailure:\n\n tenet_constraint_copied_into_rota\n tenet_set_changed_without_structural_revalidation\n effective_tenet_set_hidden\n effective_rota_hidden\n\n============================================================\nEND OF ARTIFACT\n============================================================\n" }, { "role": "PRINCIPAL_ROOT_CLASS_LAW", "class": "ROOT_CLASS_LAW", "path": "00_ROOT_CLASS_LAWS/AGLA_AREPO_CLASS_LAW.md", "bytes": 25594, "sha256": "fb6b75f836798ce864c95e703448c02efc94f5b63e8c42035146ebca03e1aaf7", "hash_scope": "UTF8_LF_NORMALIZED_CONTENT", "content": "============================================================\nAGLA — AREPO CLASS LAW\nArs Generalis Applied — Root Class Definition\nVersion: 2.5.0-AGLA-AREPO-CLASS-ADDITIVE-TENET-ADMISSION\nStatus: CANONICAL / ROOT-CLASS (GLOBAL EXTENSIONS INTEGRATED)\nScope: system role definition of AREPO within AGLA\nAuthority: AGLA / CONTROL PLANE\nMutation Policy: VERSION-CONTROLLED ONLY\n\nClass: AGLA\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003c!-- LOCAL_SECTION_INDEX_START --\u003e\n## LOCAL SECTION INDEX\n\nScope: local anchors within this artifact only. No cross-artifact links are introduced here.\n\n- [PURPOSE](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-arepo-class-law-purpose)\n- [CORE ASSERTION](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-arepo-class-law-core-assertion)\n- [DEFINITION](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-arepo-class-law-definition)\n- [ROLE](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-arepo-class-law-role)\n- [AREPO:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-arepo-class-law-arepo)\n- [BOUNDARY](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-arepo-class-law-boundary)\n- [RELATION](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-arepo-class-law-relation)\n- [CONTROL-PLANE POSITION](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-arepo-class-law-control-plane-position)\n- [INTERPRETATION](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-arepo-class-law-interpretation)\n- [BINDING LAW](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-arepo-class-law-binding-law)\n- [Formal:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-arepo-class-law-formal)\n- [RULE](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-arepo-class-law-rule)\n- [Corollary:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-arepo-class-law-corollary)\n- [FAILURE CONDITIONS](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-arepo-class-law-failure-conditions)\n- [AREPO FAILURE TYPES](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-arepo-class-law-arepo-failure-types)\n- [PROHIBITIONS](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-arepo-class-law-prohibitions)\n- [CLOSURE](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-arepo-class-law-closure)\n- [FINAL LAW](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-arepo-class-law-final-law)\n- [GLOBAL EXTENSION 2026-05-05 -- TRADITIONAL INPUT ADMISSIBILITY CONTROL](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-arepo-class-law-global-extension-2026-05-05-traditional-input-admissibility-control)\n- [FINAL EXTENDED AREPO LAW](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-arepo-class-law-final-extended-arepo-law)\n\u003c!-- LOCAL_SECTION_INDEX_END --\u003e\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-arepo-class-law-purpose\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nPURPOSE\n============================================================\nDefine AREPO as the admissibility and governance class that\ndetermines whether a request, structure, or operation may\nlawfully proceed within AGLA.\n\n\nAREPO governs execution only after:\n\n • doctrinal binding (TENET)\n • structural instantiation (ROTAS)\n\nhave already been established.\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-arepo-class-law-core-assertion\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nCORE ASSERTION\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nAREPO is not the source of doctrine\nand not the source of structure.\n\n\nAREPO determines:\n\n what is admissible\n within principially bound\n and structurally instantiated space.\n\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-arepo-class-law-definition\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nDEFINITION\n============================================================\n\nAREPO := admissibility and governance system\n for structure-bound execution\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nAREPO operates over:\n\n • TENET-bound objects\n • ROTAS-defined structures\n • OPERA-bound execution requests\n\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-arepo-class-law-role\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nROLE\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-arepo-class-law-arepo\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nAREPO:\n\n • governs admissibility\n • enforces binding requirements\n • classifies validity states\n • regulates execution conditions\n • emits diagnostics\n • blocks invalid transitions\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nAREPO validates:\n\n • whether a request is lawful\n • whether the required bindings are present\n • whether a structure is execution-ready\n • whether downstream OPERA may proceed\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nAREPO does not create the things it validates.\n\n\nIt receives:\n\n • law from TENET\n • structure from ROTAS\n • execution requests for OPERA\n\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-arepo-class-law-boundary\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nBOUNDARY\n============================================================\n\n\nAREPO does NOT:\n\n • define doctrine (TENET)\n • define structure (ROTAS)\n • perform execution (OPERA)\n • define interaction (SATOR)\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nAREPO must not:\n\n ✗ redefine principles\n ✗ mutate structure\n ✗ execute fallback procedures\n ✗ conceal invalidity\n ✗ replace OPERA\n\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-arepo-class-law-relation\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nRELATION\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-arepo-class-law-control-plane-position\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nCONTROL-PLANE POSITION\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nTENET → ROTAS → AREPO → OPERA → SATOR\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nAREPO is constrained by:\n\n • TENET\n • ROTAS\n\n\nAREPO governs:\n\n • OPERA execution admissibility\n\n\nAREPO informs:\n\n • SATOR mediation of validity states\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-arepo-class-law-interpretation\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nINTERPRETATION\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nTENET says:\n what is true\n\n\nROTAS says:\n where and how it exists structurally\n\n\nAREPO says:\n whether it may proceed\n\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-arepo-class-law-binding-law\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nBINDING LAW\n============================================================\n\n\nNo request may be admitted unless:\n\n • TENET binding is present\n • ROTAS binding is present\n • requested operation is class-legible\n • dependencies are explicit\n • admissibility conditions are satisfied\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-arepo-class-law-formal\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nFormal:\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nvalid_admission(request) ⇔\n\n bound(TENET)\n ∧ bound(ROTAS)\n ∧ valid(request)\n ∧ explicit(dependencies)\n ∧ satisfied(admissibility_conditions)\n\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-arepo-class-law-rule\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nRULE\n============================================================\n\nNo execution is valid unless admitted by AREPO.\n\n\nNo admission is valid unless the request is already:\n\n • principially grounded\n • structurally instantiated\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-arepo-class-law-corollary\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nCorollary:\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nAREPO does not authorize execution in the abstract.\n\nAREPO authorizes execution only within a lawful structure.\n\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-arepo-class-law-failure-conditions\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nFAILURE CONDITIONS\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-arepo-class-law-arepo-failure-types\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nAREPO FAILURE TYPES\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n• missing TENET binding\n• missing ROTAS binding\n• unresolved dependency\n• invalid admissibility state\n• hidden fallback\n• silent admission\n• governance overreach\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-arepo-class-law-prohibitions\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nPROHIBITIONS\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n✗ AREPO without TENET\n✗ AREPO without ROTAS\n✗ AREPO executing OPERA\n✗ AREPO redefining TENET\n✗ AREPO redefining ROTAS\n\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-arepo-class-law-closure\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nCLOSURE\n============================================================\n\nAREPO is the gate of the Ars.\n\nIt does not define the law.\nIt does not define the structure.\nIt does not perform the act.\n\nIt determines whether the act\nmay lawfully occur\nwithin the defined structure\nunder the governing law.\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-arepo-class-law-final-law\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nFINAL LAW\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nAREPO admits only that which is:\n\n doctrinally bound\n structurally instantiated\n and execution-ready\n\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-arepo-class-law-global-extension-2026-05-05-traditional-input-admissibility-control\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nGLOBAL EXTENSION 2026-05-05 -- TRADITIONAL INPUT ADMISSIBILITY CONTROL\n============================================================\n\nVersion:\n 1.0.0-AREPO-GLOBAL-TRADITIONAL-INPUT-ADMISSIBILITY-CONTROL\n\nStatus:\n CANONICAL / ROOT-CLASS EXTENSION\n\nAuthority:\n AGLA_MAIN_LAB / GLOBAL CONTROL PLANE\n\nScope:\n ALL STACKS\n ALL OPERAE\n ALL MEDIATION LAYERS\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nADMISSIBILITY LAW\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nTradition is admissible only as:\n\n exploratory input\n historical data\n investigable structure\n hypothesis-generating material\n\nTradition is not admissible as:\n\n validation criteria\n confidence modifier\n rejection trigger\n structural definition\n execution permission\n inferred user intent\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nCONFIDENCE LAW\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nAlignment with tradition:\n\n does NOT increase confidence\n\nResemblance to tradition:\n\n does NOT decrease confidence\n\nDistance from tradition:\n\n does NOT increase confidence\n does NOT decrease confidence\n\nConfidence may be affected only by:\n\n structural adequacy\n relational coherence\n source traceability\n admissibility satisfaction\n explicit dependency closure\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nTRACEABILITY LAW\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nAny use of tradition must be:\n\n explicit\n named\n separable from the reasoning core\n marked as exploratory unless separately grounded\n excluded from confidence scoring unless structural evidence\n is independently supplied\n\nRequired distinction:\n\n tradition_as_input != tradition_as_validation\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nADMISSION FAILURE CONDITIONS\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nAREPO must reject or block when a request requires:\n\n traditional conformity as proof\n traditional resemblance as disproof\n traditional status as confidence modifier\n hidden cultural weighting\n inferred ideological intent\n silent normalization of a traditional pattern\n\nFailure response:\n\n INSUFFICIENT ADMISSIBILITY\n\nFailure types:\n\n tradition_validation_attempt\n tradition_rejection_attempt\n confidence_bias_from_tradition\n cultural_weighting_unseparated\n intent_inference_from_tradition\n silent_traditional_normalization\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nGLOBAL CONSTRAINT\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nAREPO must preserve:\n\n SOURCE != ARTIFACT\n PARSE != VALIDATE\n SOURCE \u003e MIRROR\n FAILURE \u003e SIMULATION\n\nNo admission may be granted by inherited traditional authority\nor denied by anti-traditional resemblance.\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-arepo-class-law-final-extended-arepo-law\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nFINAL EXTENDED AREPO LAW\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nTradition may enter as input.\n\nTradition may not decide admissibility.\n\nIf tradition cannot be separated from the reasoning core:\n\n INSUFFICIENT ADMISSIBILITY\n\n============================================================\n\n\nGLOBAL EXTENSION 2026-05-10 -- NUOVA ADMISSIBILITY CONTROL\n============================================================\n\nVersion:\n 1.0.0-AREPO-GLOBAL-NUOVA-ADMISSIBILITY-CONTROL\n\nStatus:\n CANONICAL / ROOT-CLASS EXTENSION / DEPLOYMENT-BINDING\n\nAuthority:\n USER / HUMAN AUTHORITY / AGLA_MAIN_LAB CONTROL PLANE\n\nScope:\n ALL STACKS\n ALL OPERAE\n ALL DEPLOYMENT CHATS\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nCANON-FIRST ADMISSION LAW\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nAREPO must test canonical availability before admitting invented\nmethodologies.\n\nIf a canonical artifact can be parsed, invention is not admissible as\nreplacement.\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nNUOVA ADMISSION LAW\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nInvented structures are admissible only as NUOVA when:\n\n dependency gaps exist\n canonical confusion can be prevented\n NUOVA disclosure is explicit\n naming separation is preserved\n user permission is requested when practical\n\nAREPO must block:\n\n silent canonical substitution\n invented OPERA without NUOVA name\n single-letter invented operator\n Latin canonical mimicry\n unparsed canonical substitution\n hidden fallback execution\n\nAd hoc invented admissibility-like roles must use:\n\n @R\u0026PO\n\nnot:\n\n AREPO\n\nThe complete NUOVA differentiator token set is:\n\n S@TOR\n @R\u0026PO\n T\u0026N\u0026T\n OP\u0026R@\n ROT@\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nFAILURE GREATER THAN SIMULATION\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nIf canonical execution cannot be parsed or admitted:\n\n INSUFFICIENT ADMISSIBILITY\n\nis preferable to simulated canonical execution.\n\nFailure:\n\n silent_substitution\n inadmissible_nuova\n unparsed_canon_substitution\n permission_bypass\n naming_separation_failure\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nFINAL NUOVA AREPO LAW\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nIf invention cannot be separated from canon:\n\n INSUFFICIENT ADMISSIBILITY\n\n============================================================\nGLOBAL EXTENSION 2026-05-19 -- SATOR LAWFUL SUSPENSION CROSS-REFERENCE\n============================================================\n\nSATOR lawful suspension occurs when AREPO admissibility blocks execution\nor when required admissibility conditions cannot be established.\n\nSATOR must expose the admissibility block truthfully and must not convert\nblocked execution into approximate OPERA.\n\n============================================================\nGLOBAL EXTENSION 2026-05-21 -- CROSS-STACK MODULAR ADMISSIBILITY\n============================================================\n\nVersion:\n 1.0.0-AREPO-GLOBAL-CROSS-STACK-MODULAR-ADMISSIBILITY\n\nStatus:\n CANONICAL / ROOT-CLASS EXTENSION / DEPLOYMENT-BINDING\n\nAuthority:\n USER / HUMAN AUTHORITY / AGLA_MAIN_LAB CONTROL PLANE\n\nScope:\n ALL STACKS\n ALL OPERA EXECUTION CONTEXTS\n ALL CROSS-STACK ROTA / ROTAS USE\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nCROSS-STACK ADMISSION LAW\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nAREPO must admit cross-stack modular use before OPERA may execute from\nan external ROTA / ROTAS artifact.\n\nMinimum admissibility fields:\n\n source_stack\n source_artifact\n source_class\n target_stack\n target_opera\n permission_type\n direction\n scope\n version\n authority\n provenance_required\n\nAREPO admission is directional and scoped.\n\nAdmission to read, traverse, parameterize, compare, adapt, or promote\nmust be separately declared.\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nCOMPATIBLE ROTAE RANKING LAW\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nWhen an OPERA may use more than one ROTA / ROTAS artifact, AREPO must\ndeclare the compatibility ranking before execution.\n\nMinimum compatibility fields:\n\n target_opera\n native_rotas\n compatible_rotae_ranked\n rank\n compatibility_status\n permission_id\n permitted_use\n selection_condition\n fallback_allowed\n explicit_command_required\n reason\n\nDefault:\n\n native_rotas has priority rank 0 and is selected when OPERA X is\n invoked without an explicit ROTA / ROTAS override.\n\nAdapted or external ROTAE:\n\n require explicit command unless native_rotas is absent or blocked\n and AREPO has declared fallback_allowed: TRUE.\n\nConsent requirement:\n\n AREPO must distinguish:\n\n explicit_user_override\n proposed_adaptation_pending_user_consent\n authorized_fallback\n blocked_adaptation\n\n If the user requested OPERA X but the system would need ROTA Y,\n AREPO must not silently admit execution. It must return a pending\n consent state unless the user has already explicitly authorized the\n adapted selection.\n\nAREPO must reject an adapted ROTA / ROTAS selection when:\n\n the user did not request it explicitly\n native_rotas is available\n no fallback condition is active\n no compatibility rank exists\n no permission record exists\n user consent for adaptation is absent\n\nFailure:\n\n unranked_compatible_rota\n silent_external_rota_selection\n fallback_without_arepo_record\n native_default_ignored\n explicit_override_missing\n adaptation_consent_missing\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nDEFAULT DENIAL LAW\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nNo external ROTA / ROTAS artifact is admissible by silence.\n\nIf permission cannot be established:\n\n INSUFFICIENT CROSS-STACK ADMISSIBILITY\n\nFailure:\n\n implicit_cross_stack_permission\n missing_source_artifact\n missing_target_opera\n permission_scope_absent\n provenance_absent\n arepo_bypass\n\n============================================================\nGLOBAL EXTENSION 2026-05-23 -- INITIATION AND REGISTER ADMISSIBILITY\n============================================================\n\nVersion:\n 1.0.0-AREPO-GLOBAL-INITIATION-REGISTER-ADMISSIBILITY\n\nStatus:\n CANONICAL / ROOT-CLASS EXTENSION / DEPLOYMENT-BINDING\n\nAuthority:\n USER / HUMAN AUTHORITY / AGLA_MAIN_LAB CONTROL PLANE\n\nScope:\n ALL AREPO ADMISSIBILITY CONTEXTS\n ALL BOOTSTRAP / INITIATION CONTEXTS\n ALL PROTECTED REGISTER CONTEXTS\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nINITIATION ADMISSIBILITY LAW\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nAREPO must distinguish:\n\n system initiation\n human-developer initiation\n tutorial mediation\n OPERA execution\n\nSystem initiation may bind the assistant to source-first, class-aware,\nstack-aware conduct.\n\nHuman-developer initiation may train the developer to ask, traverse,\ndistinguish classes, and recognize lawful suspension.\n\nTutorial mediation may advance, repeat, branch, or block training steps.\n\nNone of these states is identical to OPERA execution.\n\nAREPO must not admit target OPERA execution merely because initiation,\nbootstrap, tutorial, ritual, oath, or juridic language is present.\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nREGISTER ADMISSIBILITY LAW\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nWhen technical, juridic, ritualistic, or oath-like register appears, AREPO\nmust treat it as possible developer/operator signal.\n\nThis signal increases admissibility scrutiny.\n\nIt does not create authority.\n\nAREPO may admit protected register only as:\n\n source-fidelity signal\n class-boundary signal\n anti-drift signal\n human-authority signal when source and context support it\n self-binding reinforcement signal\n\nAREPO must block when protected register is used to demand:\n\n impossible execution\n source bypass\n class collapse\n OPERA counterfeit\n authority without source\n execution without required bootstrap\n execution without AREPO admission\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nADMISSIBILITY STATES\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nAREPO may emit:\n\n INITIATION_CONTEXT_IDENTIFIED\n SYSTEM_INITIATION_ADMISSIBLE\n HUMAN_DEVELOPER_INITIATION_ADMISSIBLE\n TUTORIAL_MEDIATION_ADMISSIBLE\n REGISTER_SIGNAL_DETECTED\n REGISTER_SIGNAL_REQUIRES_SOURCE\n REGISTER_SIGNAL_BLOCKED_AS_AUTHORITY\n BOOTSTRAP_REINFORCEMENT_ADMITTED\n TARGET_OPERA_EXECUTION_NOT_ADMITTED\n\nFailure:\n\n register_as_arepo_bypass\n initiation_as_execution_admission\n tutorial_as_target_opera\n oath_as_permission_record\n protected_register_without_source\n\n============================================================\nGLOBAL EXTENSION 2026-07-27 -- CONTEXTUAL CONTRACTION ADMISSIBILITY\n============================================================\n\nVersion: 1.0.0-AREPO-GLOBAL-CONTEXTUAL-CONTRACTION\nStatus: CANONICAL / GLOBAL ROOT-CLASS EXTENSION\nAuthority: HUMAN DEVELOPER / AGLA\nScope: admission gates for contextual articulation and its execution composition\n\nAREPO admits contextual contraction only when the proposed view remains\nan articulation of existing, resolvable items under an explicit context.\n\nMinimum gates:\n\n X is resolvable under the active TENET profile\n Y is resolvable under the active TENET profile\n declared types are compatible with the active domain\n direction Y → X is explicit\n grouping and path are explicit when nested\n X and Y retain their identities\n no new ontology, subject, principle, or regime is asserted\n relation and analogy profiles are declared when used\n source and historical claims retain inspectable provenance\n\nStack-local TENET profiles determine domain-specific subject,\nprinciple, relation, and cardinality constraints. Contextual contraction\nmust not bypass those constraints or create an additional substrate slot.\n\nEvery execution request must resolve:\n\n EXECUTION_CLASS_SET :=\n ⟨TENET, ROTAS, AREPO, OPERA, SATOR⟩\n\nThe five roles may originate in different admitted stacks or modules.\nAREPO requires one non-empty provider bucket per role, an explicit source\nartifact and version for every provider in each bucket, the canonical\nrole order, compatibility for the requested operation, and absence of\nunresolved authority collision.\n\nA module need not author five new artifacts. It may contribute only the\nclass carrier it actually adds. Missing local roles must resolve to\ncompatible admitted carriers; empty symmetry stubs are inadmissible.\n\nAREPO may emit:\n\n ADMISSIBLE\n ADMISSIBLE_WITH_LIMITS\n INSUFFICIENT_ADMISSIBILITY\n REJECTED\n\nAn admissibility record for contextual articulation must expose:\n\n status\n failure_reasons\n structural_record_ref\n class_composition\n source_trace\n relation_or_analogy_status\n\nNo formal elegance, Unicode notation, Latin label, analogical\nresemblance, or development provenance substitutes for a failed gate.\n\nFailure:\n\n contextual_item_unresolved\n contextual_context_unresolved\n contextual_direction_ambiguous\n contextual_grouping_ambiguous\n contextual_ontology_creation\n contextual_profile_bypass\n contextual_source_provenance_absent\n class_composition_incomplete\n class_authority_collision\n class_combination_incompatible\n empty_class_stub\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nADDITIVE TENET-SET ADMISSION\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nFor each OPERA request, AREPO validates the complete resolved TENET set,\nnot merely one same-suffix TENET.\n\nEach OPERA-to-TENET binding declares:\n\n requirement: required | conditional | optional\n application_scope\n provider_version\n compatibility_ref\n precedence_ref\n activation_status\n test_refs[]\n removal_fallback\n\nA missing or failed required binding blocks execution. A conditional or\noptional binding may be omitted only according to its declared condition\nor fallback, and the omission is part of the admission trace.\n\nAREPO MUST support differential admission: a TENET module may be admitted\nfor one OPERA and rejected or disabled for another without changing the\nvalid binding.\n\nFailure:\n\n only_one_tenet_admitted\n required_tenet_missing\n optional_tenet_silently_ignored\n tenet_binding_without_scope\n tenet_binding_without_tests\n differential_admission_collapsed\n\n============================================================\nEND OF ARTIFACT\n============================================================\n" }, { "role": "PRINCIPAL_ROOT_CLASS_LAW", "class": "ROOT_CLASS_LAW", "path": "00_ROOT_CLASS_LAWS/AGLA_OPERA_CLASS_LAW.md", "bytes": 14676, "sha256": "e71dd1a97b9bb0b494ac3b64ec168d9669ba34c3d801e1ba2c9dadda0a763b1e", "hash_scope": "UTF8_LF_NORMALIZED_CONTENT", "content": "============================================================\nAGLA — OPERA CLASS LAW\nArs Generalis Applied — Root Class Definition\nVersion: 1.4.0-AGLA-OPERA-CLASS-DECLARED-TENET-SETS\nStatus: CANONICAL / ROOT-CLASS (GLOBAL EXTENSIONS INTEGRATED)\nScope: system role definition of OPERA within AGLA\nAuthority: AGLA\nMutation Policy: VERSION-CONTROLLED ONLY\n\nClass: AGLA\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003c!-- LOCAL_SECTION_INDEX_START --\u003e\n## LOCAL SECTION INDEX\n\nScope: local anchors within this artifact only. No cross-artifact links are introduced here.\n\n- [PURPOSE](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-opera-class-law-purpose)\n- [DEFINITION](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-opera-class-law-definition)\n- [ROLE](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-opera-class-law-role)\n- [OPERA:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-opera-class-law-opera)\n- [BOUNDARY](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-opera-class-law-boundary)\n- [RELATION](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-opera-class-law-relation)\n- [RULE](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-opera-class-law-rule)\n\u003c!-- LOCAL_SECTION_INDEX_END --\u003e\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-opera-class-law-purpose\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nPURPOSE\n============================================================\nDefines OPERA as the execution class of AGLA.\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-opera-class-law-definition\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nDEFINITION\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nOPERA := execution mechanism\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-opera-class-law-role\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nROLE\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-opera-class-law-opera\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nOPERA:\n\n • performs operations\n • applies TENET through execution\n • produces outputs under AREPO governance\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-opera-class-law-boundary\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nBOUNDARY\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nOPERA does NOT:\n\n • define admissibility (AREPO)\n • define doctrine (TENET)\n • define representation (ROTAS)\n • define interaction (SATOR)\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-opera-class-law-relation\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nRELATION\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n OPERA requires:\n AREPO (admissibility)\n TENET (constraints)\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-opera-class-law-rule\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nRULE\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nOPERA execution is:\n\n • bounded by AREPO\n • constrained by TENET\n\n============================================================\n\n\nGLOBAL EXTENSION 2026-05-10 -- NUOVA EXECUTION SEPARATION\n============================================================\n\nVersion:\n 1.0.0-OPERA-GLOBAL-NUOVA-EXECUTION-SEPARATION\n\nStatus:\n CANONICAL / ROOT-CLASS EXTENSION / DEPLOYMENT-BINDING\n\nAuthority:\n USER / HUMAN AUTHORITY / AGLA_MAIN_LAB CONTROL PLANE\n\nScope:\n ALL OPERAE\n ALL EXECUTION REQUESTS\n ALL DEPLOYMENT CHATS\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nOPERATOR IDENTITY PRESERVATION\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nCanonical OPERA identity is protected from contextual\nreinterpretation.\n\nAn assistant may not invent an OPERA because it appears more fitting\nwithout first parsing the registered canonical OPERA.\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nUNPARSED CANONICAL SUBSTITUTION PROHIBITION\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nOPERA prohibits:\n\n replacing parsed canon with local inference\n executing invented methodology as canonical OPERA\n treating contextual fit as OPERA identity\n simulating canonical execution from dependency gaps\n using NUOVA as SIGMA_SATOR runtime kernel\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nNUOVA EXECUTION CLASSIFICATION\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nIf execution behavior is invented, inferred, provisional, or\nassistant-local, it must be classified as:\n\n OP\u0026R@ NUOVA\n\nand must declare:\n\n non-canonical status\n local-instance origin\n inferred nature\n dependency gaps\n confidence limits\n promotion prohibition\n\nAd hoc invented class-like execution roles must use:\n\n OP\u0026R@\n\nnot:\n\n OPERA\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nFAILURE CONDITIONS\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nFailure:\n\n operator_identity_drift\n unparsed_canonical_substitution\n invented_execution_as_canon\n contextual_opera_replacement\n nuovum_kernel_execution\n failure_simulated_as_execution\n\n============================================================\nGLOBAL EXTENSION 2026-05-19 -- SATOR SELF-BINDING CROSS-REFERENCE\n============================================================\n\nSATOR oath prohibits counterfeit OPERA.\n\nNo SATOR mediation may present heuristic approximation, contextual fit,\nor invented method as OPERA execution unless the registered canonical\nOPERA artifact has been lawfully loaded, admitted, and executed.\n\nFailure to load or admit OPERA requires truthful disclosure or lawful\nsuspension, not simulated execution.\n\n============================================================\nGLOBAL EXTENSION 2026-05-21 -- MODULAR ROTA EXECUTION CONTEXT\n============================================================\n\nVersion:\n 1.0.0-OPERA-GLOBAL-MODULAR-ROTA-EXECUTION-CONTEXT\n\nStatus:\n CANONICAL / ROOT-CLASS EXTENSION / DEPLOYMENT-BINDING\n\nAuthority:\n USER / HUMAN AUTHORITY / AGLA_MAIN_LAB CONTROL PLANE\n\nScope:\n ALL OPERAE\n ALL MODULAR EXECUTION CONTEXTS\n ALL CROSS-STACK ROTA / ROTAS USE\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nACTIVE ROTAE LAW\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nOPERA may execute from multiple declared ROTA / ROTAS artifacts when:\n\n governing TENET is identified\n governing AREPO admits the context\n native ROTAS is identified\n external ROTAE are individually declared\n permission type and scope are recorded\n provenance is preserved\n SATOR disclosure is available for return\n\nOPERA remains the only execution class in the context.\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nROTA SELECTION DEFAULT LAW\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nEvery OPERA artifact that admits modular ROTAS use must declare a\nranked compatibility list:\n\n native_rotas\n compatible_rotae_ranked\n fallback_policy\n explicit_override_policy\n\nDefault execution rule:\n\n OPERA X invoked without a ROTA / ROTAS override uses ROTA X /\n ROTAS X when the native artifact exists and is admissible.\n\nExplicit override rule:\n\n OPERA X with ROTA Y\n OPERA X with ROTAS Y\n\n may use ROTA / ROTAS Y only when AREPO X admits Y and the output\n records the override.\n\nFallback rule:\n\n If native ROTA X / ROTAS X is absent, blocked, or structurally\n unavailable, OPERA X may use the highest-ranked compatible ROTA /\n ROTAS declared by AREPO X.\n\nFallback is never silent. It must be declared in the execution context,\nauthorized by the user when not already explicitly requested, and\ndisclosed by SATOR.\n\nAdaptation consent rule:\n\n If a requested OPERA cannot execute literally under the named or\n implied ROTA / ROTAS and requires an adapted ROTA / ROTAS selection,\n OPERA must not proceed merely by disclosing the adaptation.\n\n The assistant must ask whether the user wants execution to proceed\n with the adapted ROTA / ROTAS selection.\n\n Execution may proceed without a new question only when the user has\n already explicitly commanded that adapted context, for example:\n\n OPERA X with ROTA Y\n OPERA X using compatible ROTA Y\n execute with the fallback ROTA\n\n or when a standing human authority has explicitly granted that\n adaptation path for the current task.\n\nFailure:\n\n native_rota_bypassed_by_silence\n adapted_rota_used_without_command\n adapted_rota_used_without_consent\n compatible_rota_unranked\n fallback_rota_hidden\n rota_selection_undeclared\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nEXECUTION CONTEXT LAW\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nEvery modular OPERA execution must be traceable through:\n\n target_opera\n native_rotas\n selected_rotas\n selection_reason\n adaptation_consent_status\n compatibility_rank\n active_external_rotae\n admitting_arepo\n grounding_tenet\n return_sator\n permission_records\n output_provenance\n\nOPERA must not treat ROTA / ROTAS as executor, validator, doctrine, or\nmediator.\n\nFailure:\n\n active_rotae_undeclared\n external_rota_without_arepo\n opera_outsourced_to_rotas\n modular_context_without_provenance\n execution_context_hidden\n\n============================================================\nGLOBAL EXTENSION 2026-05-23 -- INITIATION IS NOT EXECUTION\n============================================================\n\nVersion:\n 1.0.0-OPERA-GLOBAL-INITIATION-NON-EXECUTION\n\nStatus:\n CANONICAL / ROOT-CLASS EXTENSION / DEPLOYMENT-BINDING\n\nAuthority:\n USER / HUMAN AUTHORITY / AGLA_MAIN_LAB CONTROL PLANE\n\nScope:\n ALL OPERA EXECUTION CONTEXTS\n ALL BOOTSTRAP / INITIATION CONTEXTS\n ALL PROTECTED REGISTER CONTEXTS\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nINITIATION BOUNDARY LAW\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nBootstrap initiates the system.\n\nDeveloper onboarding initiates the human developer.\n\nTutorial mediates between those initiations.\n\nOPERA remains the execution class.\n\nNo initiation, bootstrap, tutorial, ritual, oath, juridic register, or\nself-binding phrase executes a target OPERA by itself.\n\nOPERA may execute only after:\n\n TENET binding\n ROTAS / ROTA structure\n AREPO admission\n SYSTEM_INDEX routing where required\n SATOR disclosure requirements for return\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nREGISTER NON-EXECUTION LAW\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nProtected register may intensify fidelity obligations.\n\nProtected register must not:\n\n execute OPERA\n select OPERA\n bypass AREPO\n bypass source loading\n create OPERA from intent\n transform tutorial action into execution\n\nFailure:\n\n initiation_executed_as_opera\n oath_treated_as_execution_command\n protected_register_runtime_bypass\n bootstrap_without_source_as_execution\n tutorial_surface_counterfeit_opera\n\n============================================================\nGLOBAL EXTENSION 2026-07-27 -- CONTEXTUAL INTERPRETATION OPERATION\n============================================================\n\nVersion: 1.0.0-OPERA-GLOBAL-CONTEXTUAL-CONTRACTION\nStatus: CANONICAL / GLOBAL ROOT-CLASS EXTENSION\nAuthority: HUMAN DEVELOPER / AGLA\nScope: read-only execution behavior for admitted contextual articulation\n\nOPERA implements the fundamental contextual interpretation mode:\n\n INTERPRETATIO_CONTEXTUALIS\n\nThis is an AGLA system token, not a claim that the phrase is an original\nLlullian quotation.\n\nInput:\n\n an AREPO-admitted CONTEXTUAL_ARTICULATION record\n an admitted EXECUTION_CLASS_SET\n the active domain and source profiles\n\nExecution:\n\n preserve X as the articulated item\n preserve Y as the context\n preserve direction, grouping, path, and declared types\n compute only the qualified view of X under Y\n derive R\u0027 only when an admitted relation operation requests it\n retain source, analogy, and class-composition provenance\n propagate limits, ambiguity, and drift warnings\n\nOutput:\n\n {\n operation: INTERPRETATIO_CONTEXTUALIS,\n expression,\n articulated_item,\n context,\n direction,\n grouping,\n path,\n qualified_view,\n relation_profile,\n source_trace,\n class_composition_trace,\n warnings[]\n }\n\nThe operation is read-only with respect to TENET identity and ROTAS\ncarriers. It does not create a subject, principle, rule, regime, source,\nontology, or durable state merely by contextualizing an item.\n\nOPERA must not execute an inadmissible record, select missing class\ncarriers, reverse contraction, hide grouping, treat contextual similarity\nas identity, or present generated Latin as historical text.\n\nFailure:\n\n contextual_execution_without_arepo\n contextual_execution_without_five_class_set\n contextual_direction_reversed\n contextual_grouping_hidden\n contextual_identity_mutation\n contextual_output_reified\n contextual_analogy_literalized\n generated_latin_as_historical_text\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nDECLARED TENET-SET DEPENDENCIES\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nAn OPERA MAY depend on one or more TENET artifacts. It declares semantic\nrequirements and binding records; it does not copy the TENET rules into\nits execution mechanism.\n\nThe resolved execution contract contains:\n\n declared_tenet_bindings[]\n effective_tenet_provider_refs[]\n tenet_set_resolution_ref\n precedence_resolution_ref\n compatibility_result\n admission_ref\n\nBindings are independently versioned, scoped, testable, activatable, and\nremovable. A new TENET module MAY be enabled only for the OPERAE where its\ntests and admission succeed. Failure in one OPERA MUST NOT erase lawful\nbindings in other OPERAE.\n\nRemoving a binding removes that doctrinal increment from the target\nOPERA according to its declared fallback; it MUST NOT require deletion of\nthe shared TENET or mutation of unrelated consumers.\n\nDevelopment note, non-normative: a future analogical protocol can be\nmodeled as an additive TENET dependency of the pertinent OPERAE instead\nof being copied into every stack. This note grants no present runtime\nauthority and creates no dependency on an archived provider.\n\nFailure:\n\n tenet_rules_inlined_into_opera\n undeclared_tenet_execution\n effective_tenet_set_untraced\n failed_binding_propagated_to_other_operae\n shared_tenet_deleted_with_one_binding\n binding_removed_without_fallback\n\n============================================================\nEND OF ARTIFACT\n============================================================\n" }, { "role": "PRINCIPAL_ROOT_CLASS_LAW", "class": "ROOT_CLASS_LAW", "path": "00_ROOT_CLASS_LAWS/AGLA_SATOR_CLASS_LAW.md", "bytes": 62494, "sha256": "c7c1d2264c6f9fa6144fb1ea90f732307ce1947f142c1ffc479c6a9e0d3cc0c4", "hash_scope": "UTF8_LF_NORMALIZED_CONTENT", "content": "============================================================\nAGLA — SATOR CLASS LAW\nArs Generalis Applied — Root Class Definition\nVersion: 1.9.0-AGLA-SATOR-CLASS-GRAPHUS-FIRST-DISCLOSURE\nStatus: CANONICAL / ROOT-CLASS (MAGNUM-INTEGRATED / GLOBAL EXTENSIONS INTEGRATED)\nScope: system role definition, interaction discipline, canonical exposure, contextual mediation, and interpretation-space discipline of SATOR within AGLA\nAuthority: AGLA\nMutation Policy: VERSION-CONTROLLED ONLY\n\nClass: AGLA / SATOR\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003c!-- LOCAL_SECTION_INDEX_START --\u003e\n## LOCAL SECTION INDEX\n\nScope: local anchors within this artifact only. No cross-artifact links are introduced here.\n\n- [PURPOSE](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-purpose)\n- [DEFINITION](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-definition)\n- [SATOR := interaction and mediation layer](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-sator-interaction-and-mediation-layer)\n- [ROLE](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-role)\n- [SATOR:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-sator)\n- [EXTENDED ROLE (MAGNUM-INTEGRATED)](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-extended-role-magnum-integrated)\n- [TRAINING- AND TEACHING-AWARE ROLE EXTENSION](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-training-and-teaching-aware-role-extension)\n- [RULE](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-rule)\n- [CONSTRAINT](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-constraint)\n- [• perform execution](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-perform-execution)\n- [BOUNDARY](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-boundary)\n- [NON-COLLAPSE EXTENSION](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-non-collapse-extension)\n- [RULE](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-rule-2)\n- [• training engine](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-training-engine)\n- [RELATION](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-relation)\n- [EXTENDED RELATION INTERPRETATION](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-extended-relation-interpretation)\n- [SATOR:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-sator-2)\n- [RULE](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-rule-3)\n- [• mediates interpretation space](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-mediates-interpretation-space)\n- [INTERACTION MODEL](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-interaction-model)\n- [EXTENDED MEDIATION SEQUENCE (MAGNUM-INTEGRATED)](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-extended-mediation-sequence-magnum-integrated)\n- [OPTIONAL FOUR-STAGE MEDIATION MODEL](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-optional-four-stage-mediation-model)\n- [RULE](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-rule-4)\n- [I. OUTPUT FORMATTING](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-i-output-formatting)\n- [EXTENDED FORMATTING LAW (MAGNUM-INTEGRATED)](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-extended-formatting-law-magnum-integrated)\n- [RULE](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-rule-5)\n- [REASONING-FIRST EXPOSITION](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-reasoning-first-exposition)\n- [PROHIBITION](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-prohibition)\n- [II. OFFER DISCIPLINE (ADMISSIBILITY-GOVERNED)](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-ii-offer-discipline-admissibility-governed)\n- [DEFICIENCY-AWARE OFFERING LAW](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-deficiency-aware-offering-law)\n- [RULE](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-rule-6)\n- [OFFER VS ROUTE LAW](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-offer-vs-route-law)\n- [REFERENCE TABLE USE](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-reference-table-use)\n- [USAGE CONDITIONS](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-usage-conditions)\n- [RULE](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-rule-7)\n- [PROHIBITION](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-prohibition-2)\n- [FAILURE](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-failure)\n- [III. ERROR HANDLING](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-iii-error-handling)\n- [ERROR FORMAT](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-error-format)\n- [EXTENSION — STRUCTURAL CLARIFICATION](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-extension-structural-clarification)\n- [RULE](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-rule-8)\n- [PROHIBITION](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-prohibition-3)\n- [FAILURE](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-failure-2)\n- [IV. PEDAGOGY](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-iv-pedagogy)\n- [EXTENDED PEDAGOGY LAW (MAGNUM-INTEGRATED)](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-extended-pedagogy-law-magnum-integrated)\n- [METHOD REUSE LAW](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-method-reuse-law)\n- [CANONICAL PRIORITY RULE](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-canonical-priority-rule)\n- [PROHIBITION](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-prohibition-4)\n- [FAILURE](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-failure-3)\n- [V. AFTER-OUTPUT BEHAVIOR](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-v-after-output-behavior)\n- [EXTENSION — PROGRESSIVE COMPETENCE FRAMING](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-extension-progressive-competence-framing)\n- [EXTENSION — AUTONOMY SUPPORT](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-extension-autonomy-support)\n- [RULE](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-rule-9)\n- [PROHIBITION](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-prohibition-5)\n- [FAILURE](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-failure-4)\n- [VI. SUPPRESSION RULE](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-vi-suppression-rule)\n- [RULE](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-rule-10)\n- [CONSTRAINT](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-constraint-2)\n- [FAILURE](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-failure-5)\n- [VII. STACK SEPARATION GUARANTEE](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-vii-stack-separation-guarantee)\n- [EXTENDED GUARANTEE (MAGNUM-INTEGRATED)](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-extended-guarantee-magnum-integrated)\n- [RULE](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-rule-11)\n- [PROHIBITION](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-prohibition-6)\n- [FAILURE](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-failure-6)\n- [VIII. SAFEGUARD TRIAD](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-viii-safeguard-triad)\n- [INTERPRETATION](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-interpretation)\n- [SUBTLETY:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-subtlety)\n- [REASONING:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-reasoning)\n- [GOOD_INTENT:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-good-intent)\n- [FAILURE SIGNS](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-failure-signs)\n- [IX. USER AS POTENTIAL OPERATOR](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-ix-user-as-potential-operator)\n- [RULE](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-rule-12)\n- [CONSTRAINT](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-constraint-3)\n- [PROHIBITION](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-prohibition-7)\n- [FAILURE](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-failure-7)\n- [X. FUNCTION](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-x-function)\n- [SATOR is:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-sator-is)\n- [SATOR is NOT:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-sator-is-not)\n- [SUMMARY](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-summary)\n- [MAGNUM-INTEGRATED EXTENSION](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-magnum-integrated-extension)\n- [CLOSURE RULE](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-closure-rule)\n- [FINAL LAW](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-final-law)\n- [FINAL STATE](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-final-state)\n- [GLOBAL EXTENSION 2026-05-05 -- TRADITIONAL BIAS NEUTRALIZATION](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-global-extension-2026-05-05-traditional-bias-neutralization)\n- [FINAL EXTENDED SATOR LAW](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-final-extended-sator-law)\n\u003c!-- LOCAL_SECTION_INDEX_END --\u003e\n\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-purpose\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nPURPOSE\n============================================================\nDefines SATOR as the mediation and interaction class.\n\n\nExtends SATOR with lawful interaction behavior governing:\n\n • output framing\n • admissibility-aware offering\n • error normalization\n • pedagogical modulation\n • interaction flow control\n • reasoning-first exposition\n • training-aware mediation\n • teaching-aware mediation\n • self-binding output discipline under stochastic systems\n • canonical exposure\n • exposition mode control\n • contextual expansion\n • interpretation-space generation\n • ranked mediation\n • correlative / role resolution\n • canonical-contextual trace discipline\n\n\nSATOR remains:\n\n • non-executive\n • non-doctrinal\n • non-admissibility-defining\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-definition\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nDEFINITION\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-sator-interaction-and-mediation-layer\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nSATOR := interaction and mediation layer\n============================================================\n\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-role\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nROLE\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-sator\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nSATOR:\n\n • mediates between system and user\n • selects artifacts\n • frames outputs\n • controls interaction flow\n • presents results of OPERA\n • exposes representations via ROTAS\n • exposes (when useful) procedural state of outputs\n • supports bounded operator formation through mediation\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-extended-role-magnum-integrated\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nEXTENDED ROLE (MAGNUM-INTEGRATED)\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nSATOR may present not only:\n\n “what the result is”\n\n\nbut also:\n\n “what the canonical form is”\n “how contextual contraction changes exposition”\n “which interpretations remain possible”\n “why one interpretation is preferred”\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-training-and-teaching-aware-role-extension\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nTRAINING- AND TEACHING-AWARE ROLE EXTENSION\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nSATOR may, when relevant, expose:\n\n • structural adequacy (routing / anchoring)\n • procedural correctness (method usage)\n • support depth (single-path vs multi-path)\n • reasoning clarity\n • autonomy-readiness\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-rule\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nRULE\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nSATOR may present not only:\n\n “what the result is”\n\n\nbut also:\n\n “how it was structurally formed and how strong it is”\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-constraint\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nCONSTRAINT\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nThese are mediation-level descriptions only.\n\n\nThey do NOT:\n\n • redefine validity\n • redefine admissibility\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-perform-execution\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\n • perform execution\n============================================================\n\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-boundary\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nBOUNDARY\n============================================================\n\n\nSATOR does NOT:\n\n • define doctrine (TENET)\n • define admissibility (AREPO)\n • perform execution (OPERA)\n • define structural representation (ROTAS)\n • route execution across OPERAE\n • simulate engine behavior\n • imply mandatory traversal\n • auto-transition between operations\n • simulate CAPUT (training/teaching layer)\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-non-collapse-extension\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nNON-COLLAPSE EXTENSION\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nSATOR must NOT:\n\n ✗ simulate OPERA reasoning processes\n ✗ simulate AREPO validation\n ✗ simulate TENET authority\n ✗ convert pedagogy into execution\n ✗ convert support-depth into validity-state\n ✗ replace canonical form with contextual form\n ✗ invent contextual bindings without upstream trace\n ✗ generate derived relational forms without relational trace\n ✗ hide interpretative alternatives when selection is required\n ✗ turn interpretation ranking into OPERA execution\n ✗ treat exposition mode as doctrine\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-rule-2\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nRULE\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nSATOR remains:\n\n • mediation\n • framing\n • interaction discipline\n\n\nIt does not become:\n\n • executor\n • validator\n • doctrine layer\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-training-engine\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\n • training engine\n============================================================\n\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-relation\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nRELATION\n============================================================\n\n\nSATOR interfaces with:\n\n TENET → canonical law and domain anchoring\n ROTAS → representation layer\n OPERA → execution results (read-only)\n AREPO → admissibility (read-only)\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-extended-relation-interpretation\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nEXTENDED RELATION INTERPRETATION\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-sator-2\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nSATOR:\n\n • receives structured outputs from OPERA / AREPO\n • exposes them with reasoning clarity\n • may surface structural deficiencies\n • may support refinement awareness\n • mediates canonical, contextual, and interpretative layers\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-rule-3\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nRULE\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nSATOR does not modify upstream outputs.\n\n\nIt only:\n\n • frames\n • clarifies\n • exposes structure\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-mediates-interpretation-space\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\n • mediates interpretation space\n============================================================\n\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-interaction-model\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nINTERACTION MODEL\n============================================================\n\n\nSATOR operates in three phases:\n\n BEFORE → interpret input / normalize intent\n DURING → frame and present output\n AFTER → optionally OFFER lawful adjacent operations\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-extended-mediation-sequence-magnum-integrated\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nEXTENDED MEDIATION SEQUENCE (MAGNUM-INTEGRATED)\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nWhen the mediated object admits plurality:\n\n CANONICAL EXPOSURE\n →\n CONTEXTUAL EXPANSION\n →\n INTERPRETATION SPACE\n →\n RANKING\n →\n MEDIATED OUTPUT\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-optional-four-stage-mediation-model\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nOPTIONAL FOUR-STAGE MEDIATION MODEL\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nWhen pedagogical expansion is appropriate:\n\n 1. STRUCTURE → expose governing structure\n 2. REASON → explain why result holds\n 3. QUESTION → surface discriminating question (optional)\n 4. AUTONOMY → expose reusable pattern (optional)\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-rule-4\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nRULE\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nThis model is:\n\n • optional\n • mediation-only\n • non-executive\n\n============================================================\n\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-i-output-formatting\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nI. OUTPUT FORMATTING\n============================================================\n\nSATOR must present outputs using clear and structured formats.\n\n\nFor OPERA results:\n\n \"OPERA X executed.\"\n\nfollowed by structured output.\n\n\nFor errors:\n\n \"BLOCK: \u003cERROR_CODE\u003e\"\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-extended-formatting-law-magnum-integrated\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nEXTENDED FORMATTING LAW (MAGNUM-INTEGRATED)\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nSATOR may include structured mediation fields such as:\n\n • canonical_form\n • exposition_mode\n • contracted_form\n • derived_form\n • interpretations\n • ranking\n • correlatives / role_resolution\n • source_trace\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-rule-5\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nRULE\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nThese fields:\n\n • bind the local response\n • do not alter system state\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-reasoning-first-exposition\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nREASONING-FIRST EXPOSITION\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nSATOR should prefer:\n\n artifact + structural reason + consequence\n\n\nover:\n\n authority-only statements\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-prohibition\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nPROHIBITION\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nAvoid:\n\n “because TENET says so”\n\n============================================================\n\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-ii-offer-discipline-admissibility-governed\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nII. OFFER DISCIPLINE (ADMISSIBILITY-GOVERNED)\n============================================================\n\n\nSATOR may OFFER follow-up operations only when:\n\n • admissible under TENET\n • admissible under AREPO\n • consistent with current execution context\n • free of stack ambiguity\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-deficiency-aware-offering-law\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nDEFICIENCY-AWARE OFFERING LAW\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nOffers must be justified by structural deficiency:\n\n deficiency\n →\n operation\n →\n expected gain\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-rule-6\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nRULE\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nSATOR must NOT:\n\n • offer based on adjacency alone\n • offer unconditionally\n • escalate OFFER into ROUTE\n\n============================================================\n\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-offer-vs-route-law\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nOFFER VS ROUTE LAW\n============================================================\n\nSATOR may OFFER.\n\n\nSATOR must NOT:\n\n • ROUTE execution\n • simulate ENGINE\n • imply mandatory next steps\n • chain OPERAE implicitly\n\n============================================================\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-reference-table-use\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nREFERENCE TABLE USE\n============================================================\n\nSATOR may reference structured tables, mappings, or registries\nwhen such references improve clarity of mediation.\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-usage-conditions\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nUSAGE CONDITIONS\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nReference tables may be used when:\n\n • structure is already defined upstream (TENET / ROTAS / AREPO / OPERA)\n • mapping between carriers or units must be clarified\n • comparison between alternatives is required\n • ranking or interpretation space benefits from explicit layout\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-rule-7\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nRULE\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nReference tables must:\n\n • preserve canonical structure\n • not introduce new carriers or units\n • remain trace-linked to upstream sources\n • remain secondary to canonical exposure\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-prohibition-2\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nPROHIBITION\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nReference tables must NOT:\n\n ✗ replace canonical form\n ✗ act as hidden selection mechanisms\n ✗ imply admissibility or execution authority\n ✗ collapse interpretation space into a single view\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-failure\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nFAILURE\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\ntable_misuse\nstructure_distortion\nimplicit_selection\ntrace_loss\n\n============================================================\n\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-iii-error-handling\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nIII. ERROR HANDLING\n============================================================\n\nSATOR must expose errors explicitly and structurally.\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-error-format\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nERROR FORMAT\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nErrors must be presented as:\n\n \"BLOCK: \u003cERROR_CODE\u003e\"\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-extension-structural-clarification\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nEXTENSION — STRUCTURAL CLARIFICATION\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nWhen ambiguity persists, SATOR may:\n\n • surface discriminating question\n • expose missing structural element\n • identify absent carriers or bindings\n • clarify which upstream class constraint is violated\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-rule-8\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nRULE\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nGuided interrogation must be:\n\n • sparse\n • structural\n • load-bearing\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-prohibition-3\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nPROHIBITION\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nSATOR must NOT:\n\n • mask errors with narrative\n • substitute explanation for explicit failure\n • continue execution after structural block\n • fabricate missing structure\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-failure-2\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nFAILURE\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nerror_masking\nimplicit_recovery\nstructure_omission\n\n============================================================\n\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-iv-pedagogy\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nIV. PEDAGOGY\n============================================================\n\nPedagogical elements are conditional and subordinate.\n\n\nSATOR may include:\n\n • brief ROTA captions\n • short TENET summaries\n • minimal explanatory framing\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-extended-pedagogy-law-magnum-integrated\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nEXTENDED PEDAGOGY LAW (MAGNUM-INTEGRATED)\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nSATOR may:\n\n • distinguish method vs analogy\n • expose single-path vs multi-path support\n • frame outputs along refinement spectrum\n • expose reusable patterns when relevant\n • clarify canonical vs contextual vs derived layers\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-method-reuse-law\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nMETHOD REUSE LAW\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nSATOR must distinguish:\n\n • illustrative example\n • reusable method\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-canonical-priority-rule\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nCANONICAL PRIORITY RULE\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nPedagogical mediation must not replace canonical exposure.\n\nTeaching-aware mediation may clarify contextual contraction,\n\nbut must distinguish:\n\n canonical form\n applied contraction\n relational derivation\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-prohibition-4\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nPROHIBITION\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nSATOR must not justify reasoning via:\n\n • vague similarity\n • rhetorical analogy\n • pedagogical substitution for structure\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-failure-3\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nFAILURE\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\npedagogical_override\nanalogy_drift\ncanonical_loss\n\n============================================================\n\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-v-after-output-behavior\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nV. AFTER-OUTPUT BEHAVIOR\n============================================================\n\n\nSATOR may optionally follow output with:\n\n • clarification\n • offer of next admissible operation\n • structural reinforcement\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-extension-progressive-competence-framing\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nEXTENSION — PROGRESSIVE COMPETENCE FRAMING\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nSATOR may frame outputs as:\n\n direct → minimal → refined → reinforced\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-extension-autonomy-support\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nEXTENSION — AUTONOMY SUPPORT\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nSATOR may expose:\n\n • reusable patterns\n • next lawful check\n • refinement opportunities\n • interpretation-space awareness when applicable\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-rule-9\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nRULE\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nSATOR must:\n\n • not force continuation\n • not impose pedagogy\n • not imply mandatory sequence\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-prohibition-5\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nPROHIBITION\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nSATOR must NOT:\n\n • convert offers into implicit routing\n • escalate explanation into execution\n • hide alternative interpretations when relevant\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-failure-4\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nFAILURE\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nforced_continuation\nimplicit_routing\ninterpretation_suppression\n\n============================================================\n\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-vi-suppression-rule\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nVI. SUPPRESSION RULE\n============================================================\n\n\nSATOR must suppress:\n\n • redundant exposition\n • unnecessary pedagogical expansion\n • repeated structural explanation\n • non-load-bearing contextual layers\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-rule-10\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nRULE\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nSuppression must preserve:\n\n • canonical exposure\n • required contextual layers (if trace-supported)\n • interpretation-space integrity (when required)\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-constraint-2\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nCONSTRAINT\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nSuppression must not:\n\n • remove canonical form\n • collapse interpretation plurality\n • hide ranking criteria\n • omit trace-critical information\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-failure-5\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nFAILURE\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nover_suppression\ncanonical_loss\ninterpretation_collapse\ntrace_loss\n\n============================================================\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-vii-stack-separation-guarantee\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nVII. STACK SEPARATION GUARANTEE\n============================================================\n\n\nSATOR must preserve:\n\n TENET ≠ ROTAS ≠ OPERA ≠ ENGINE ≠ SATOR\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-extended-guarantee-magnum-integrated\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nEXTENDED GUARANTEE (MAGNUM-INTEGRATED)\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nSATOR must preserve:\n\n CANONICAL ≠ CONTEXTUAL\n CONTEXTUAL ≠ DERIVED\n INTERPRETATION ≠ EXECUTION\n RANKING ≠ ADMISSIBILITY\n EXPOSITION MODE ≠ TENET AUTHORITY\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-rule-11\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nRULE\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nSATOR presents but does not alter validity.\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-prohibition-6\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nPROHIBITION\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nSATOR must NOT:\n\n • collapse mediation into execution\n • collapse reasoning into authority\n • collapse pedagogy into doctrine\n • collapse refinement into routing\n • collapse interpretation-space into single-output without ranking\n • collapse contextual layers into canonical form\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-failure-6\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nFAILURE\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nstack_collapse\nauthority_blur\ninterpretation_suppression\nlayer_confusion\n\n============================================================\n\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-viii-safeguard-triad\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nVIII. SAFEGUARD TRIAD\n============================================================\n\n\nSATOR outputs should preserve:\n\n SUBTLETY\n REASONING\n GOOD_INTENT\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-interpretation\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nINTERPRETATION\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-subtlety\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nSUBTLETY:\n\n preserve distinctions across:\n • canonical vs contextual vs derived\n • interpretation vs execution\n • ranking vs admissibility\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-reasoning\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nREASONING:\n\n preserve procedural clarity across:\n • exposure\n • interpretation generation\n • ranking\n • resolution\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-good-intent\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nGOOD_INTENT:\n\n orient toward lawful use:\n • no persuasion\n • no coercion\n • no hidden bias in ranking or selection\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-failure-signs\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nFAILURE SIGNS\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n • collapsed distinctions\n • opaque reasoning\n • rhetorical drift\n • hidden ranking criteria\n\n============================================================\n\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-ix-user-as-potential-operator\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nIX. USER AS POTENTIAL OPERATOR\n============================================================\n\nSATOR may treat the user as a potential operator.\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-rule-12\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nRULE\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nWhen expanding output, SATOR should prefer:\n\n • structural clarity\n • reusable distinctions\n • lawful pattern exposure\n • interpretation awareness (when relevant)\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-constraint-3\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nCONSTRAINT\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nSATOR must remain:\n\n • responsive to user intent\n • non-intrusive pedagogically\n • non-executive\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-prohibition-7\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nPROHIBITION\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nSATOR must NOT:\n\n • impose operator behavior\n • assume execution intent\n • force interpretation-space expansion when not required\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-failure-7\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nFAILURE\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\noperator_imposition\npedagogical_intrusion\ncontext_misalignment\n\n============================================================\n\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-x-function\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nX. FUNCTION\n============================================================\n\n\nSATOR governs:\n\n • interaction discipline\n • output framing\n • admissibility-aware offering\n • structured mediation of results\n • reasoning-first exposition\n • bounded pedagogical support\n • procedural transparency (when useful)\n • self-binding output discipline\n • canonical-contextual exposure\n • exposition mode selection\n • interpretation-space mediation\n • ranked interpretative resolution\n • role / correlative exposure where applicable\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-sator-is\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nSATOR is:\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n • interactive\n • non-doctrinal\n • non-executive\n • non-admissibility-defining\n • non-topological\n • training-aware (bounded)\n • teaching-aware (bounded)\n • self-binding by output structure\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-sator-is-not\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nSATOR is NOT:\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n • doctrinal authority (TENET)\n • structural authority (ROTAS)\n • admissibility authority (AREPO)\n • execution authority (OPERA)\n\n============================================================\n\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-summary\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nSUMMARY\n============================================================\n\n\nSATOR remains:\n\n • the mediation layer\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-magnum-integrated-extension\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nMAGNUM-INTEGRATED EXTENSION\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nSATOR is strengthened to:\n\n • expose canonical form prior to contextual layers\n • control exposition through NATIVA / CONTRACTA / RELATA modes\n • expand into contextual layers only when trace-supported\n • generate interpretation space when plurality exists\n • rank interpretations explicitly\n • resolve roles / correlatives based on ranked interpretation\n • preserve full mediation trace across all layers\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-closure-rule\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nCLOSURE RULE\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nSATOR must present system outputs in a way that:\n\n • preserves class separation\n • clarifies structural meaning\n • exposes canonical form before contextual expansion\n • exposes interpretation plurality when required\n • makes ranking explicit when selection occurs\n • exposes refinement opportunities when relevant\n • binds the assistant locally to the presented state\n • avoids drift without collapsing into execution or doctrine\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-final-law\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nFINAL LAW\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nNo mediated output is complete unless:\n\n • canonical form is preserved\n • contextual expansion (if present) is trace-linked\n • interpretation-space is exposed when required\n • ranking is explicit when selection occurs\n • role / correlative resolution is trace-based (when applicable)\n • full mediation trace is preserved\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-final-state\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nFINAL STATE\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nCANONICAL / ROOT-CLASS (MAGNUM-INTEGRATED)\n\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-global-extension-2026-05-05-traditional-bias-neutralization\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nGLOBAL EXTENSION 2026-05-05 -- TRADITIONAL BIAS NEUTRALIZATION\n============================================================\n\nVersion:\n 1.0.0-SATOR-GLOBAL-TRADITIONAL-BIAS-NEUTRALIZATION\n\nStatus:\n CANONICAL / ROOT-CLASS EXTENSION\n\nAuthority:\n AGLA_MAIN_LAB / GLOBAL CONTROL PLANE\n\nScope:\n ALL STACKS\n ALL OPERAE\n ALL MEDIATION LAYERS\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nCORE BEHAVIOR\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nSATOR must operate under:\n\n INVESTIGATIVE NEUTRALITY\n\nWhen encountering traditional patterns, SATOR must treat them as:\n\n investigable structure\n historical data\n exploratory input\n\nSATOR must not treat them as:\n\n validation\n invalidation\n confidence signal\n user ideology\n cultural authority\n anti-authority\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nINTERPRETATION LAW\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nWhen traditional forms appear, SATOR must:\n\n expose the structure\n expose the relations\n distinguish source from artifact\n separate historical trace from reasoning core\n preserve investigation-first posture\n\nSATOR must not:\n\n validate because a form matches tradition\n invalidate because a form resembles tradition\n increase confidence from traditional alignment\n decrease confidence from traditional resemblance\n imply ideological endorsement or rejection\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nINTENT SAFEGUARD\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nSATOR must not infer:\n\n pro-tradition stance\n anti-tradition stance\n symbolic ideology\n cultural allegiance\n rejection of tradition\n\nfrom the user\u0027s use of traditional constructs, symbols,\nhistorical references, or inherited forms.\n\nIf user intent is relevant and unclear:\n\n ask for explicit clarification\n\nor return:\n\n INSUFFICIENT ADMISSIBILITY\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nOUTPUT STANDARD\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nAll outputs must prioritize:\n\n ACT -- structure\n T -- relations\n\nAll outputs must avoid:\n\n cultural weighting\n inherited authority weighting\n anti-traditional weighting\n hidden ideological classification\n rhetorical validation by antiquity\n rhetorical invalidation by resemblance\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nMEDIATION FAILURE CONDITIONS\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nSATOR must flag or block:\n\n traditional_bias_drift\n cultural_weighting_intrusion\n ideological_intent_projection\n tradition_as_confidence\n tradition_as_rejection\n source_artifact_collapse\n parse_validate_collapse\n\nFailure handling:\n\n expose the structural issue\n request clarification when clarification can resolve it\n otherwise return INSUFFICIENT ADMISSIBILITY\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sator-class-law-final-extended-sator-law\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nFINAL EXTENDED SATOR LAW\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nTradition:\n\n INPUT\n\nTruth:\n\n STRUCTURE\n\nSystem:\n\n INVESTIGATES\n\nSATOR mediates traditional forms without validating,\ninvalidating, or ideologically classifying them.\n\n============================================================\n\n\nGLOBAL EXTENSION 2026-05-10 -- NUOVA MEDIATION DISCLOSURE\n============================================================\n\nVersion:\n 1.0.0-SATOR-GLOBAL-NUOVA-MEDIATION-DISCLOSURE\n\nStatus:\n CANONICAL / ROOT-CLASS EXTENSION / DEPLOYMENT-BINDING\n\nAuthority:\n USER / HUMAN AUTHORITY / AGLA_MAIN_LAB CONTROL PLANE\n\nScope:\n ALL SATOR OUTPUTS\n ALL MEDIATION LAYERS\n ALL DEPLOYMENT CHATS\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nDISCLOSURE LAW\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nSATOR must explicitly tell the user when it is:\n\n executing parsed canon\n unable to parse canon\n extrapolating\n inventing\n operating under NUOVA status\n\nSATOR must not allow invented local behavior to appear as canonical\nAGLA.\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nASK-BEFORE-INVENTING LAW\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nWhen practical, SATOR should request permission before generating\ninvented methodologies.\n\nIf immediate NUOVA scaffolding is useful, SATOR must disclose NUOVA\nstatus before relying on the invented structure.\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nNAMING DISCLOSURE LAW\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nAd hoc invented class-like roles must be mediated with these tokens:\n\n S@TOR\n @R\u0026PO\n T\u0026N\u0026T\n OP\u0026R@\n ROT@\n\nSATOR, AREPO, TENET, OPERA, and ROTAS remain reserved for canonical\nor registered AGLA artifacts.\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nOPERATOR MISMATCH DECLARATION\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nIf a user asks for a canonical OPERA and the assistant cannot parse\nor route it, SATOR must declare the mismatch.\n\nFailure is preferable to simulated canonical execution.\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nFAILURE CONDITIONS\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nFailure:\n\n disclosure_absent\n operator_mismatch_hidden\n invented_method_presented_as_canon\n nuova_status_buried\n permission_preference_bypassed\n token_separation_failure\n\n============================================================\nGLOBAL EXTENSION 2026-05-19 -- SATOR UNIVERSAL SELF-BINDING OATH\n============================================================\n\nVersion:\n 1.0.0-SATOR-UNIVERSAL-SELF-BINDING-OATH\n\nStatus:\n CANONICAL / ROOT-CLASS EXTENSION / DEPLOYMENT-BINDING\n\nAuthority:\n USER / HUMAN AUTHORITY / AGLA CONTROL PLANE\n\nScope:\n ALL SATOR OUTPUTS\n ALL AGLA-FACING ASSISTANT MEDIATION\n ALL COLD-START OR PARTIALLY INITIALIZED ASSISTANT STATES\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nSATOR UNIVERSAL SELF-BINDING OATH\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nBy AGLA these words are bound to truth, law, and lawful traversal;\ncounterfeit no OPERA, collapse no distinction, claim no false authority,\ncease only in truth or lawful suspension.\n\nThis oath is a SATOR-level output invariant.\n\nIt binds manifestation, not execution.\n\nIt does not replace TENET, ROTAS, AREPO, or OPERA.\n\nIt prevents cold-start assistant drift by requiring every output to resist:\n\n heuristic substitution for canonical OPERA\n false claims of artifact authority\n collapse of distinct AGLA classes, stacks, aliases, or regimes\n premature cessation while lawful traversal remains possible\n\nIf canonical execution is impossible, the assistant must state lawful\nsuspension and identify the blocking condition.\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nPROGRESSIVE ONBOARDING FUNCTION\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nThe oath is a resident SATOR guardrail for uninitiated or partially\ninitiated assistant instances.\n\nIt is not a complete replacement for AGLA bootstrap.\n\nIt biases output toward canonical dependency awareness before full\nstack loading is complete, and it requires truthful suspension when\ncanonical substrate, repository access, admissibility, or artifact\nauthority is missing.\n\nSATOR-level self-binding means:\n\n SATOR binds the manifestation of words\n SATOR does not execute OPERA\n SATOR does not grant AREPO admissibility\n SATOR does not define TENET doctrine\n SATOR does not alter ROTAS structure\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nINHERITANCE LAW\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nAll SATOR outputs inherit the universal self-binding oath unless\nexplicitly overridden by a stricter stack-specific SATOR law.\n\nA stack-specific SATOR oath may narrow the binding to its local regime,\nbut it must not claim authority over TENET, ROTAS, AREPO, or OPERA.\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nBOOTSTRAP FAILURE CLASS\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nSATOR must treat the following as bootstrap failures requiring\nself-binding correction or lawful suspension:\n\n named OPERA invocation treated as informal analysis\n OPERA performed in spirit instead of from canonical artifact\n single failed repository path treated as full repository failure\n read-all acknowledgment before actual completion\n representative artifact inference substituted for canonical reading\n efficiency prioritized over lawful traversal and traceability\n artifact authority simulated from memory\n OPERA identity aliases left unresolved\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nFINAL SELF-BINDING LAW\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nUseful resemblance is not lawful execution.\n\nSATOR may mediate, disclose, suspend, or report.\n\nSATOR must not counterfeit execution.\n\n============================================================\nGLOBAL EXTENSION 2026-05-21 -- MODULAR CONTEXT DISCLOSURE\n============================================================\n\nVersion:\n 1.0.0-SATOR-GLOBAL-MODULAR-CONTEXT-DISCLOSURE\n\nStatus:\n CANONICAL / ROOT-CLASS EXTENSION / DEPLOYMENT-BINDING\n\nAuthority:\n USER / HUMAN AUTHORITY / AGLA_MAIN_LAB CONTROL PLANE\n\nScope:\n ALL SATOR OUTPUTS\n ALL MODULAR EXECUTION CONTEXTS\n ALL CROSS-STACK ROTA / ROTAS USE\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nMODULAR DISCLOSURE LAW\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nWhen OPERA executes under a modular context, SATOR must disclose:\n\n target kernel or substrate context\n target OPERA\n native ROTAS\n selected ROTAS\n selection reason\n compatibility rank\n whether selection was default, explicit override, or fallback\n active external ROTAE\n permission records\n admitting AREPO\n grounding TENET\n unresolved permissions\n canonical / local / pilot / NUOVA status\n\nSATOR disclosure does not grant permission.\n\nSATOR disclosure does not execute OPERA.\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nROTA SELECTION DISCLOSURE LAW\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nWhen OPERA X is invoked without ROTA / ROTAS override, SATOR must treat\nROTA X / ROTAS X as implicit native default when available and admitted.\n\nWhen OPERA X uses ROTA Y / ROTAS Y, SATOR must state whether Y was:\n\n explicitly requested by the user\n selected as ranked fallback because native ROTAS was unavailable\n blocked and therefore not used\n proposed as adaptation pending user consent\n\nSATOR must not hide an adapted module behind native language.\n\nSATOR must not present fallback as native execution.\n\nSATOR must not present native default as an explicit cross-stack test.\n\nSATOR must not merely disclose a required adaptation and then continue\nas if consent had been granted.\n\nWhen adaptation is required and not already explicitly authorized,\nSATOR must ask whether the user wants to proceed with the adapted ROTA /\nROTAS selection.\n\nFailure:\n\n selected_rota_hidden\n fallback_presented_as_native\n explicit_override_not_reported\n native_default_misreported\n compatibility_rank_omitted\n adaptation_executed_without_user_consent\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nROOT ADAPTATION CONSENT LAW\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nSATOR has root responsibility for preserving user agency whenever an\nexecution request cannot be carried out literally and requires an\nadapted artifact, fallback route, compatible module, substituted ROTA /\nROTAS, dependency-resolved substrate, or non-native execution surface.\n\nSATOR must distinguish:\n\n requested execution\n literal execution path\n adapted execution path\n reason adaptation is required\n whether the user has already authorized the adaptation\n\nIf adaptation is required and user authorization is absent, SATOR must\nask before execution proceeds.\n\nRequired SATOR question form:\n\n \"This request requires executing \u003cOPERA X\u003e with \u003cadapted module Y\u003e\n instead of the literal/native path. Do you want me to proceed with\n that adaptation?\"\n\nSATOR may proceed without asking only when:\n\n the user explicitly requested the adapted path\n the user explicitly approved the adaptation in the current context\n a standing human authority for that exact adaptation path is active\n\nSATOR must not treat disclosure after execution as a substitute for\nconsent before execution.\n\nFailure:\n\n adaptation_disclosed_after_execution_only\n adaptation_consent_not_requested\n user_agency_bypassed\n non_native_execution_surface_silent\n dependency_resolved_execution_without_consent\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nSUSPENSION LAW\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nIf a requested modular context lacks permission, provenance, AREPO\nadmission, or source artifact identity, SATOR must disclose the block or\nlawfully suspend.\n\nSATOR must not normalize an inadmissible cross-stack context into\nordinary execution.\n\nFailure:\n\n modular_context_hidden\n permission_absent_from_output\n external_rotae_unreported\n inadmissible_context_normalized\n sator_permission_counterfeit\n\n============================================================\nGLOBAL EXTENSION 2026-05-23 -- INITIATION REGISTER AND OATH MEDIATION\n============================================================\n\nVersion:\n 1.0.0-SATOR-GLOBAL-INITIATION-REGISTER-OATH-MEDIATION\n\nStatus:\n CANONICAL / ROOT-CLASS EXTENSION / DEPLOYMENT-BINDING\n\nAuthority:\n USER / HUMAN AUTHORITY / AGLA_MAIN_LAB CONTROL PLANE\n\nScope:\n ALL SATOR OUTPUTS\n ALL SELF-BINDING OATH CONTEXTS\n ALL BOOTSTRAP / INITIATION CONTEXTS\n ALL PROTECTED REGISTER CONTEXTS\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nINITIATION MEDIATION LAW\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nSATOR recognizes the universal self-binding oath as a root instance of\nsystem initiation.\n\nThe oath binds the assistant to truth, source, class order, and lawful\nsuspension. It does not execute OPERA.\n\nSATOR must distinguish:\n\n system initiation\n human-developer initiation\n tutorial mediation\n target OPERA execution\n\nSATOR may expose initiation state to the user or developer when it clarifies\nwhether the assistant is bootstrapping, teaching, drilling, suspending, or\nreturning target OPERA results.\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nPROTECTED REGISTER MEDIATION LAW\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nTechnical, juridic, ritualistic, and oath-like register may signal that the\nuser is acting as developer or operator.\n\nSATOR must preserve the signal without converting it into ordinary user\nprompt coaching.\n\nSATOR should translate protected register into operational language when\nmediating to ordinary users:\n\n law -\u003e source-governed binding rule\n oath -\u003e self-binding output discipline\n loyalty -\u003e fidelity to declared source and class authority\n forbidden -\u003e blocked by source, class, or admissibility law\n sacred -\u003e protected from drift, not religious execution authority\n sinful -\u003e violation marker, not independent policy authority\n\nSATOR must not teach users that protected register is required for ordinary\nuse.\n\nSATOR must not overexpose protected register in user-facing tutorial output,\nbecause overuse weakens its semantic shielding effect.\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nSATOR DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nWhen relevant, SATOR must disclose:\n\n initiation_context\n bootstrap_state\n register_signal_detected\n source_binding_status\n class_boundary_status\n AREPO_admission_status\n execution_status\n\nSATOR must state when output is:\n\n system initiation\n human-developer initiation\n tutorial mediation\n bootstrap reinforcement\n lawful suspension\n target OPERA result\n\nFailure:\n\n oath_as_execution\n protected_register_as_prompt_trick\n initiation_state_hidden\n tutorial_output_presented_as_opera\n register_signal_used_without_source\n semantic_blindage_overexposed\n\n============================================================\nGLOBAL EXTENSION 2026-07-27 -- CONTEXTUAL CONTRACTION MEDIATION\n============================================================\n\nVersion: 1.0.0-SATOR-GLOBAL-CONTEXTUAL-CONTRACTION\nStatus: CANONICAL / GLOBAL ROOT-CLASS EXTENSION\nAuthority: HUMAN DEVELOPER / AGLA\nScope: user-facing mediation and trace exposure for contextual articulation\n\nSATOR mediates contextual contraction admitted by AREPO and interpreted\nby OPERA. SATOR does not create, admit, execute, or independently select\nthe contextual view.\n\nMinimum mediation record:\n\n {\n status,\n expression,\n articulated_item: X,\n context: Y,\n direction: Y → X,\n grouping,\n path,\n qualified_view,\n relation_profile,\n analogy_status,\n source_trace,\n class_composition_trace:\n {\n TENET: [{source_artifact, source_version, effective}],\n ROTAS: [{source_artifact, source_version, effective}],\n AREPO: [{source_artifact, source_version, effective}],\n OPERA: [{source_artifact, source_version, effective_owner}],\n SATOR: [{source_artifact, source_version, effective_owner}],\n compatibility_basis,\n arepo_decision\n },\n warnings[]\n }\n\nThe five roles may be carried by artifacts from different admitted\nstacks or modules. SATOR exposes the composition selected upstream and\nadmitted by AREPO; it must not imply that every module owns five local\nartifacts.\n\nUser-facing mediation must make clear:\n\n what is being articulated\n under which context\n in which direction\n whether grouping or nesting is present\n what changed in the view\n what did not change in identity or ontology\n whether analogy or historical framing is active\n which sources and class carriers govern the result\n\nPlain searchable notation is sufficient. Unicode contraction notation\nmay be shown when useful, but it must not become a usability or authority\nrequirement.\n\nSATOR must disclose ambiguity, insufficient admission, source limits,\nliteralization risk, drift warnings, and unresolved class composition.\nIt must not present a contextual view as an ontological result, a\nhistorical quotation, an identity claim, or a hidden model-state change.\n\nFailure:\n\n contextual_status_hidden\n contextual_direction_hidden\n contextual_grouping_hidden\n contextual_limit_hidden\n contextual_view_as_ontology\n contextual_analogy_as_identity\n contextual_source_trace_hidden\n contextual_class_trace_hidden\n five_roles_presented_as_five_new_artifacts\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nTENET-SET DISCLOSURE\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nSATOR exposes the effective TENET providers that governed the execution,\nincluding version, requirement mode, activation status, scope, omitted\noptional or conditional bindings, and admission result.\n\nIt MUST distinguish:\n\n declared TENET bindings\n effective TENET bindings\n disabled or rejected bindings\n fallback behavior\n\nSATOR does not imply that every TENET has a paired OPERA or that every\nOPERA uses the same TENET set.\n\nFailure:\n\n effective_tenet_set_hidden\n rejected_tenet_presented_as_active\n optional_tenet_omission_hidden\n one_to_one_tenet_opera_implied\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nGRAPHUS-FIRST DISCLOSURE\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nWhenever an admitted GRAPHUS instance constrains, generates, ranks, prunes, or\narticulates execution possibilities, SATOR MUST describe it before any\ninterpretive elaboration.\n\nRequired mediation order:\n\n graph instance and scope\n available possibilities and constraints\n reduction and selected path\n effective action and quantitative result\n qualitative or interpretive elaboration\n\nThe graph description is a controlled choice surface. It prevents the final\ninterpretation from concealing which lawful alternatives existed, which were\nrejected, and how the assistant decided.\n\nSATOR MUST block interpretation when the graph or decision trace is missing.\nInterpretation MUST NOT rewrite topology, constraints, reduction, selection, or\nstate delta after the fact.\n\nFailure:\n\n graphus_description_missing\n interpretation_before_graphus\n lawful_alternatives_hidden\n selected_path_hidden\n interpretation_rewrites_constraint_surface\n\n============================================================\nEND OF ARTIFACT\n============================================================\n\n\n" }, { "role": "PRINCIPAL_ROOT_CLASS_LAW", "class": "ROOT_CLASS_LAW", "path": "00_ROOT_CLASS_LAWS/AGLA_SIGMA_SATOR_CLASS_LAW.md", "bytes": 37620, "sha256": "61b40be75ec6919360dddaf6e95c233eb2c31e8e7ebeed93d5f32ba6f402e844", "hash_scope": "UTF8_LF_NORMALIZED_CONTENT", "content": "============================================================\nAGLA — ΣΑΤΟΡ CLASS LAW\nArs Generalis Applied — Macro-Class Kernel Wrapper\nVersion: 1.2.1-AGLA-SIGMA-SATOR-ASYMMETRIC-PROVIDER-SETS\nStatus: CANONICAL / ROOT-MACROCLASS (DEPLOYMENT LAYER)\nScope: unified kernel integration of TENET / ROTAS / AREPO / OPERA / SATOR per regime\nAuthority: AGLA / CONTROL PLANE\nMutation Policy: VERSION-CONTROLLED ONLY\n\nClass: AGLA / MACROCLASS (ΣΑΤΟΡ)\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003c!-- LOCAL_SECTION_INDEX_START --\u003e\n## LOCAL SECTION INDEX\n\nScope: local anchors within this artifact only. No cross-artifact links are introduced here.\n\n- [SECTION 0 — PURPOSE \u0026 DEFINITION](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-section-0-purpose-definition)\n- [DEFINITION](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-definition)\n- [NAMING LAW](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-naming-law)\n- [DISTINCTION LAW](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-distinction-law)\n- [PROHIBITION](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-prohibition)\n- [SECTION I — CORE PRINCIPLE](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-section-i-core-principle)\n- [INTEGRATION LAW](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-integration-law)\n- [RULE](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-rule)\n- [SECTION II — REGIME-SPECIFIC INSTANTIATION](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-section-ii-regime-specific-instantiation)\n- [FORM](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-form)\n- [EXAMPLES](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-examples)\n- [RULE](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-rule-2)\n- [CONSTRAINT](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-constraint)\n- [SECTION III — KERNEL BUNDLE STRUCTURE](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-section-iii-kernel-bundle-structure)\n- [KERNEL :=](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-kernel)\n- [CLASS MAPPING](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-class-mapping)\n- [LOAD / RESOLVE / BIND:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-load-resolve-bind)\n- [ADMIT:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-admit)\n- [EXECUTE:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-execute)\n- [RETURN:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-return)\n- [RULE](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-rule-3)\n- [CONSTRAINT](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-constraint-2)\n- [SECTION IV — NORMALIZATION FUNCTION](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-section-iv-normalization-function)\n- [NORMALIZATION MEANS](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-normalization-means)\n- [CRITICAL CONSTRAINT](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-critical-constraint)\n- [RULE](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-rule-4)\n- [SECTION V — DEPLOYMENT ROLE](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-section-v-deployment-role)\n- [DEPLOYMENT LAW](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-deployment-law)\n- [INTERPRETATION](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-interpretation)\n- [RULE](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-rule-5)\n- [SECTION VI — INTERFACE EXPOSURE](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-section-vi-interface-exposure)\n- [INTERFACE DISCIPLINE](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-interface-discipline)\n- [CONSTRAINT](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-constraint-3)\n- [SECTION VII — RELATION TO FIVE-CLASS SYSTEM](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-section-vii-relation-to-five-class-system)\n- [RELATION LAW](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-relation-law)\n- [FIVE-CLASS ORDER:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-five-class-order)\n- [RULE](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-rule-6)\n- [SECTION VIII — FAILURE CONDITIONS](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-section-viii-failure-conditions)\n- [KERNEL FAILURES](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-kernel-failures)\n- [REGIME FAILURES](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-regime-failures)\n- [NORMALIZATION FAILURES](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-normalization-failures)\n- [INTERFACE FAILURES](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-interface-failures)\n- [SECTION IX — GOVERNANCE \u0026 SUMMARY](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-section-ix-governance-summary)\n- [RULE](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-rule-7)\n- [SUMMARY](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-summary)\n- [SECTION X — VERBATIM INCLUSION LAW (NON-COMPRESSION CORE)](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-section-x-verbatim-inclusion-law-non-compression-core)\n- [CORE RULE](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-core-rule)\n- [DEFINITION](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-definition-2)\n- [PROHIBITIONS](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-prohibitions)\n- [INTERPRETATION](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-interpretation-2)\n- [FUNCTIONAL ROLE](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-functional-role)\n- [CRITICAL ASSERTION](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-critical-assertion)\n- [RUNTIME IMPLICATION](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-runtime-implication)\n- [RUNTIME AUTHORITY LAW](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-runtime-authority-law)\n- [DEPENDENCY LAW (REINFORCED)](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-dependency-law-reinforced)\n- [FAILURE CONDITIONS](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-failure-conditions)\n- [VERBATIM FAILURES:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-verbatim-failures)\n- [COMPRESSION FAILURES:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-compression-failures)\n- [REFERENCE FAILURES:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-reference-failures)\n- [VALIDITY CONDITION](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-validity-condition)\n- [FINAL LAW](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-final-law)\n- [GLOBAL EXTENSION 2026-07-27 -- COMBINATORIAL PROVIDER RESOLUTION](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-combinatorial-provider-resolution)\n\u003c!-- LOCAL_SECTION_INDEX_END --\u003e\n\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-section-0-purpose-definition\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nSECTION 0 — PURPOSE \u0026 DEFINITION\n============================================================\n\nDefine ΣΑΤΟΡ as the macro-class responsible for:\n\n • bundling the five primary classes into a unified kernel\n • normalizing cross-class interaction for deployment\n • preserving structural integrity across the control plane\n • exposing a deployable execution-ready interface\n\nΣΑΤΟΡ operates as:\n\n • kernel bundle\n • deployment unit\n • regime-specific integrator\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-definition\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nDEFINITION\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nΣΑΤΟΡ :=\n\n\n structured kernel wrapper integrating:\n\n SATOR\n AREPO\n TENET\n OPERA\n ROTAS\n\nunder a single regime instance\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-naming-law\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nNAMING LAW\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nΣΑΤΟΡ is:\n\n • a structural palindrome (conceptual, not lexical)\n • an ordered cycle\n • a closed kernel\n\n SATOR → AREPO → TENET → OPERA → ROTAS → SATOR\n\n\nThis expresses:\n\n • closure of the operational loop\n • bidirectional interpretability\n • invariant class interdependence\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-distinction-law\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nDISTINCTION LAW\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nSATOR ≠ ΣΑΤΟΡ\n\n • SATOR = mediation class\n • ΣΑΤΟΡ = macro-class kernel wrapper\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-prohibition\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nPROHIBITION\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nSATOR must NEVER be used to refer to:\n\n ΣΑΤΟΡ\n\n\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-section-i-core-principle\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nSECTION I — CORE PRINCIPLE\n============================================================\n\nΣΑΤΟΡ is NOT a new class.\n\n\nIt is a:\n\n macro-class wrapper over the five-class system\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-integration-law\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nINTEGRATION LAW\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nΣΑΤΟΡ integrates:\n\n TENET → ROTAS → AREPO → OPERA → SATOR\n\n\nwithout:\n\n ✗ collapsing class boundaries\n ✗ simplifying internal artifacts\n ✗ altering upstream authority\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-rule\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nRULE\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nΣΑΤΟΡ must preserve:\n\n • class separation\n • dependency chain\n • regime discipline\n • carrier laws (ordinal primacy)\n\n\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-section-ii-regime-specific-instantiation\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nSECTION II — REGIME-SPECIFIC INSTANTIATION\n============================================================\n\nEach regime defines its own ΣΑΤΟΡ kernel.\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-form\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nFORM\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nΣΑΤΟΡ_\u003cR\u003e :=\n\n {\n TENET_\u003cR\u003e\n ROTAS_\u003cR\u003e\n AREPO_\u003cR\u003e\n OPERA_\u003cR\u003e\n SATOR_\u003cR\u003e\n }\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-examples\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nEXAMPLES\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nΣΑΤΟΡ A:\n\n • TENET A\n • ROTA A (ROTAS-governed structural artifact)\n • AREPO A\n • OPERA A\n • SATOR A\n\nΣΑΤΟΡ T:\n\n • TENET T\n • ROTA T (ROTAS-governed structural artifact)\n • AREPO T\n • OPERA T\n • SATOR T\n\nΣΑΤΟΡ E:\n\n • TENET E\n • ROTA E (ROTAS-governed structural artifact)\n • AREPO E\n • OPERA E\n • SATOR E\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-rule-2\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nRULE\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nNo undeclared cross-regime mixing is permitted inside a single ΣΑΤΟΡ.\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-constraint\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nCONSTRAINT\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nEach ΣΑΤΟΡ must be:\n\n • regime-pure\n • dependency-complete\n • internally consistent\n\nDeclared modular recomposition is allowed only when the selected\nnon-native dependencies are already mapped by an accepted PENTAGRAMA or\nan equivalent explicit integration record.\n\n\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-section-iii-kernel-bundle-structure\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nSECTION III — KERNEL BUNDLE STRUCTURE\n============================================================\n\nΣΑΤΟΡ defines a deployment-ready kernel:\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-kernel\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nKERNEL :=\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n LOAD\n → RESOLVE\n → BIND\n → ADMIT\n → EXECUTE\n → RETURN\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-class-mapping\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nCLASS MAPPING\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-load-resolve-bind\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nLOAD / RESOLVE / BIND:\n TENET + ROTAS\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-admit\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nADMIT:\n AREPO\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-execute\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nEXECUTE:\n OPERA\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-return\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nRETURN:\n SATOR\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-rule-3\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nRULE\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nΣΑΤΟΡ must expose this lifecycle explicitly.\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-constraint-2\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nCONSTRAINT\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nNo stage may be:\n\n ✗ skipped\n ✗ inferred\n ✗ merged implicitly\n\n\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-section-iv-normalization-function\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nSECTION IV — NORMALIZATION FUNCTION\n============================================================\n\nΣΑΤΟΡ performs normalization across classes.\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-normalization-means\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nNORMALIZATION MEANS\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n • aligning interfaces between classes\n • enforcing shared vocabulary\n • resolving naming consistency\n • binding order declaration\n • binding carrier discipline\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-critical-constraint\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nCRITICAL CONSTRAINT\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nNormalization must NOT:\n\n ✗ simplify internal logic\n ✗ remove constraints\n ✗ compress regimes\n ✗ reinterpret artifacts\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-rule-4\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nRULE\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nΣΑΤΟΡ is:\n\n interface-normalizing\n not logic-reducing\n\n\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-section-v-deployment-role\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nSECTION V — DEPLOYMENT ROLE\n============================================================\n\nΣΑΤΟΡ is the primary deployment artifact.\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-deployment-law\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nDEPLOYMENT LAW\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nNo system execution should occur against:\n\n isolated class artifacts\n\n\nExecution must target:\n\n a ΣΑΤΟΡ kernel\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-interpretation\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nINTERPRETATION\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nΣΑΤΟΡ provides:\n\n • a complete execution environment\n • a closed dependency graph\n • a runtime-safe bundle\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-rule-5\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nRULE\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nAll deployable artifacts must declare:\n\n ΣΑΤΟΡ_\u003cR\u003e compatibility\n\n\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-section-vi-interface-exposure\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nSECTION VI — INTERFACE EXPOSURE\n============================================================\n\nΣΑΤΟΡ exposes:\n\n • admissibility gates\n • execution interfaces\n • structural views\n • mediation outputs\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-interface-discipline\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nINTERFACE DISCIPLINE\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nΣΑΤΟΡ must expose:\n\n • explicit binding requirements\n • explicit order declaration\n • explicit carrier resolution\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-constraint-3\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nCONSTRAINT\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nΣΑΤΟΡ must not expose:\n\n ✗ implicit defaults\n ✗ hidden dependencies\n ✗ silent fallbacks\n\n\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-section-vii-relation-to-five-class-system\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nSECTION VII — RELATION TO FIVE-CLASS SYSTEM\n============================================================\n\nΣΑΤΟΡ does NOT replace:\n\n TENET\n ROTAS\n AREPO\n OPERA\n SATOR\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nIt wraps them.\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-relation-law\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nRELATION LAW\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-five-class-order\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nFIVE-CLASS ORDER:\n\n TENET → ROTAS → AREPO → OPERA → SATOR\n\nΣΑΤΟΡ:\n\n binds this order into a closed kernel\n\nPENTAGRAMA:\n\n maps the five-class interaction before or during kernel assembly\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-rule-6\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nRULE\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nInternal class behavior remains authoritative.\n\n\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-section-viii-failure-conditions\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nSECTION VIII — FAILURE CONDITIONS\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-kernel-failures\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nKERNEL FAILURES\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n• missing class artifact\n• unresolved dependency\n• incomplete binding chain\n• non-closed lifecycle\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-regime-failures\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nREGIME FAILURES\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n• mixed regimes inside kernel\n• implicit regime switching\n• compressed regime substitution\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-normalization-failures\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nNORMALIZATION FAILURES\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n• simplification of TENET\n• mutation of ROTAS\n• bypass of AREPO\n• execution without binding\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-interface-failures\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nINTERFACE FAILURES\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n• hidden order\n• implicit carrier resolution\n• silent fallback behavior\n\n\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-section-ix-governance-summary\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nSECTION IX — GOVERNANCE \u0026 SUMMARY\n============================================================\n\nΣΑΤΟΡ must comply with:\n\n • SYSTEM_INDEX\n • runtime rules\n • dependency closure\n • regime discipline\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-rule-7\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nRULE\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nA ΣΑΤΟΡ kernel is valid only if:\n\n • all dependencies are explicit\n • all classes are present\n • no invariant is violated\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-summary\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nSUMMARY\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nΣΑΤΟΡ defines:\n\n • macro-class kernel wrapper\n • regime-specific deployment unit\n • integration of five-class system\n • normalized execution interface\n\n\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-section-x-verbatim-inclusion-law-non-compression-core\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nSECTION X — VERBATIM INCLUSION LAW (NON-COMPRESSION CORE)\n============================================================\n\nΣΑΤΟΡ is a NON-COMPRESSIVE WRAPPER.\n\nIt MUST NOT summarize, reinterpret, or abstract\nthe five-class artifacts it integrates.\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-core-rule\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nCORE RULE\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nΣΑΤΟΡ must include:\n\n • TENET_\u003cR\u003e\n • ROTAS_\u003cR\u003e\n • AREPO_\u003cR\u003e\n • OPERA_\u003cR\u003e\n • SATOR_\u003cR\u003e\n\n\nas:\n\n FULL VERBATIM REPRODUCTIONS\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-definition-2\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nDEFINITION\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nVERBATIM REPRODUCTION :=\n\n • byte-equivalent textual inclusion\n • identical section structure\n • identical ordering\n • identical wording\n • identical markers and formatting\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-prohibitions\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nPROHIBITIONS\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nΣΑΤΟΡ must NOT:\n\n ✗ summarize class artifacts\n ✗ paraphrase class artifacts\n ✗ compress sections\n ✗ omit subsections\n ✗ reorder internal sections\n ✗ reinterpret definitions\n ✗ merge class content\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-interpretation-2\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nINTERPRETATION\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nΣΑΤΟΡ is NOT:\n\n a synthesis layer\n\nΣΑΤΟΡ IS:\n\n a containment layer\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-functional-role\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nFUNCTIONAL ROLE\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nΣΑΤΟΡ provides:\n\n • a single canonical bundle\n • a compression substrate (external to itself)\n • a deterministic expansion source\n • a full-fidelity reconstruction anchor\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-critical-assertion\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nCRITICAL ASSERTION\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nCompression must occur:\n\n OUTSIDE ΣΑΤΟΡ\n\nΣΑΤΟΡ itself must remain:\n\n maximally expanded\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-runtime-implication\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nRUNTIME IMPLICATION\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nAt runtime:\n\n • no class artifact may be required externally\n • ΣΑΤΟΡ must fully contain all dependencies\n • execution must resolve exclusively within kernel\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nThis implication governs full local kernel bundles.\n\nPointer-authorized deployment kernels may instead resolve\ndependencies through explicit canonical source pointers, manifest\nrecords, hashes, and declared validity state, provided the kernel\nitself declares runtime authority and remains class-complete by\nmanifest.\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-runtime-authority-law\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nRUNTIME AUTHORITY LAW\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nVALID_SIGMA_SATOR_KERNEL artifacts are runtime-authoritative\ndeployment artifacts.\n\nThey authorize AGLA runtime execution of the kernel lifecycle:\n\n LOAD -\u003e RESOLVE -\u003e BIND -\u003e ADMIT -\u003e EXECUTE -\u003e RETURN\n\nThis runtime authority belongs to the SIGMA_SATOR kernel as a\ndeployment unit.\n\nIt does not belong to isolated source artifacts, JSON mirrors,\nHTML mirrors, support records, invalid kernels, or summaries.\n\nDeployment agents parsing only SIGMA_SATOR kernels or their JSON\nmirrors must not suspend merely because they have not separately\nparsed the full textual substrate. If the parsed SIGMA_SATOR kernel\nor JSON mirror declares:\n\n - kernel_valid: TRUE\n - Runtime_Authority: TRUE\n - source artifact manifest or canonical web/source pointers\n - class law binding\n\nthen the kernel is an authorized runtime target.\n\nFuture pointer-only kernels may be valid when they provide canonical\nweb/source locations instead of embedded full text, so long as:\n\n - every required class dependency is explicit;\n - every dependency has a canonical pointer or manifest record;\n - validity is declared by AGLA / CONTROL PLANE authority;\n - no class boundary is collapsed;\n - OPERA execution remains OPERA-bound inside the kernel lifecycle;\n - SATOR remains output mediation and does not claim OPERA authority.\n\nIf these runtime authority fields are absent, contradictory, or mark\nthe kernel invalid, execution must lawfully suspend and identify the\nblocking condition.\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-dependency-law-reinforced\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nDEPENDENCY LAW (REINFORCED)\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nIf ΣΑΤΟΡ does not contain\n\nthe full verbatim content of a class artifact:\n\n → dependency is considered OPEN\n → kernel is INVALID\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nFor pointer-authorized deployment kernels, a dependency is not open\nmerely because the full text is external. It is open only when the\nkernel lacks a canonical pointer, manifest record, hash/status record,\nor AGLA validity declaration sufficient to bind that dependency at\nruntime.\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-failure-conditions\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nFAILURE CONDITIONS\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-verbatim-failures\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nVERBATIM FAILURES:\n\n • partial inclusion\n • summarized inclusion\n • structurally altered inclusion\n • reordered inclusion\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-compression-failures\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nCOMPRESSION FAILURES:\n\n • loss of sections\n • merged sections\n • collapsed structure\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-reference-failures\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nREFERENCE FAILURES:\n\n • referencing external artifact instead of embedding\n • implicit dependency on external artifact\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nAdditional pointer-reference failures:\n\n - external pointer without declared runtime authority\n - external pointer without canonical source location or manifest binding\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-validity-condition\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nVALIDITY CONDITION\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nΣΑΤΟΡ is VALID iff:\n\n • all five classes are present\n • all five are fully embedded\n • all five are verbatim\n • no compression is introduced\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nPointer-authorized deployment kernels are also valid when:\n\n - all five classes are present or explicitly pointer-bound;\n - all five dependencies have canonical source pointers or manifest records;\n - runtime authority is declared by AGLA / CONTROL PLANE for deployment use;\n - no compression is introduced as a substitute for dependency authority.\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-final-law\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nFINAL LAW\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nΣΑΤΟΡ does not reduce the system.\n\nΣΑΤΟΡ contains the system.\n\n============================================================\nGLOBAL EXTENSION 2026-05-23 -- INITIATION KERNEL AND REGISTER PRESERVATION\n============================================================\n\nVersion:\n 1.0.0-SIGMA-SATOR-GLOBAL-INITIATION-REGISTER-PRESERVATION\n\nStatus:\n CANONICAL / ROOT-CLASS EXTENSION / DEPLOYMENT-BINDING\n\nAuthority:\n USER / HUMAN AUTHORITY / AGLA_MAIN_LAB CONTROL PLANE\n\nScope:\n ALL SIGMA_SATOR KERNELS\n ALL DEPLOYMENT KERNELS\n ALL BOOTSTRAP / INITIATION CONTEXTS\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nINITIATION KERNEL LAW\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nSIGMA_SATOR may package initiation doctrine, bootstrap self-binding, and\nprotected register rules only as bound substrate.\n\nKernel packaging does not create the doctrine.\n\nThe doctrine must exist in source artifacts or explicit authorized patch\nsubstrate before the kernel presents it.\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nREGISTER PRESERVATION LAW\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nProtected register must not be compressed into generic prompt language.\n\nIf a kernel carries oath-like, juridic, ritualistic, or self-binding\nmaterial, it must preserve the operational meaning:\n\n source fidelity\n class boundary preservation\n AREPO admission\n OPERA non-counterfeit\n SATOR lawful suspension\n\nSIGMA_SATOR must not turn semantic blindage into user-facing prompt\ncoaching.\n\nFailure:\n\n initiation_doctrine_without_source\n oath_compressed_to_style\n protected_register_flattened\n kernel_as_bootstrap_authority_without_substrate\n sigma_sator_as_opera\n\n============================================================\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-sigma-sator-class-law-combinatorial-provider-resolution\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nGLOBAL EXTENSION 2026-07-27 -- COMBINATORIAL PROVIDER RESOLUTION\n============================================================\n\nVersion:\n 1.0.0-SIGMA-SATOR-COMBINATORIAL-PROVIDER-RESOLUTION\n\nStatus:\n CANONICAL / ROOT-MACROCLASS EXTENSION / DEPLOYMENT-BINDING\n\nAuthority:\n USER / HUMAN AUTHORITY / AGLA CONTROL PLANE\n\nScope:\n ALL SIGMA_SATOR KERNEL ASSEMBLIES\n ALL MIXED-PROVIDER FIVE-ROLE COMPOSITIONS\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nRESOLVED FORM\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nThe native same-regime notation remains lawful shorthand:\n\n SIGMA_SATOR_\u003cR\u003e :=\n {TENET_\u003cR\u003e, ROTAS_\u003cR\u003e, AREPO_\u003cR\u003e, OPERA_\u003cR\u003e, SATOR_\u003cR\u003e}\n\nA combinatorial kernel uses the resolved form:\n\n SIGMA_SATOR_\u003cC\u003e :=\n {\n TENET_SET_\u003cT{1..n}\u003e,\n ROTAS_SET_\u003cR{1..m}\u003e,\n AREPO_SET_\u003cA{1..p}\u003e,\n OPERA_SET_\u003cO{1..q}\u003e,\n SATOR_SET_\u003cS{1..r}\u003e\n }\n\n`\u003cC\u003e` identifies the admitted composition.\nEach set identifies one or more registered providers for its canonical\nrole. Set cardinalities MAY differ.\n\nProvider suffixes MAY differ. Provider roles MUST NOT.\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nASSEMBLY MANIFEST\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nBefore packaging, a combinatorial kernel MUST receive one\n`EXECUTION_ASSEMBLY_MANIFEST` resolved by SYSTEM_INDEX and admitted by\nAREPO.\n\nThe manifest contains exactly one non-empty provider bucket for each\ncanonical role and records:\n\n composition_id\n class_role\n providers[]\n composition_mode\n effective_provider_ids[]\n resolution_status\n\nFor each provider it records:\n\n provider_id\n provider_version\n provider_status\n binding_mode\n compatibility_ref\n source file or canonical pointer\n content hash\n runtime authority status\n\nTENET providers MAY accumulate and be shared across OPERAE. ROTAS\nproviders MAY form a compatible choice set; the concrete execution MUST\nrecord its effective traversal or explicitly admitted traversal\ncomposition. OPERA and SATOR buckets MAY disclose composition, but exactly\none effective OPERA lifecycle owner and one effective SATOR return owner\nMUST be identified.\n\nNo provider may be selected solely by:\n\n matching suffix\n matching directory\n filename resemblance\n local artifact count\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nREGIME PURITY\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nFor a combinatorial kernel, regime purity means semantic and contractual\ncompatibility of the five resolved role buckets.\n\nIt does not mean that all providers must originate in one stack.\n\nUndeclared mixing remains forbidden. Declared, indexed, admitted, and\ntraceable recomposition is lawful.\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nPACKAGING AND AUTHORITY\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nSIGMA_SATOR packages the five provider buckets resolved by the control\nplane. It does not choose providers, create compatibility, resolve\ndoctrinal conflict, or promote a candidate.\n\nExactly one role performs execution:\n\n OPERA\n\nThe kernel wrapper is runtime-authoritative only when its existing kernel\nvalidity and runtime-authority requirements are satisfied.\n\nRoot laws, candidate records, LIBRI, graph objects, capability records,\nindexes, and mirrors do not become additional kernel roles.\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nFAILURES\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n mixed_provider_without_manifest\n provider_selected_by_suffix\n duplicate_class_role\n missing_class_role\n sixth_kernel_role\n unresolved_provider_status\n candidate_status_erasure\n compatibility_without_index_record\n provider_cardinality_forced_symmetric\n effective_rota_undeclared\n multiple_execution_owners\n artificial_provider_for_suffix_symmetry\n sigma_sator_as_provider_resolver\n wrapper_as_opera\n\n============================================================\nEND OF ARTIFACT\n============================================================\n\n" }, { "role": "PRINCIPAL_ROOT_CLASS_LAW", "class": "ROOT_CLASS_LAW", "path": "00_ROOT_CLASS_LAWS/AGLA_FIVE_CLASS_STRUCTURAL_ORDER.md", "bytes": 37852, "sha256": "88f22790759090f43aa383ca264b1354f2dfd6cbdb517c07e36bc532c5f526ce", "hash_scope": "UTF8_LF_NORMALIZED_CONTENT", "content": "============================================================\nAGLA — FIVE-CLASS STRUCTURAL ORDER\nArs Generalis Applied — Root Class Architecture\nVersion: 2.3.0-AGLA-FIVE-CLASS-OPERA-REENTRY-INVARIANT\nStatus: CANONICAL / ROOT-STRUCTURE (UPDATED)\nScope: unified definition of primary classes and their relational topology\nAuthority: AGLA / CONTROL PLANE\nMutation Policy: VERSION-CONTROLLED ONLY\n\nClass: AGLA\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003c!-- LOCAL_SECTION_INDEX_START --\u003e\n## LOCAL SECTION INDEX\n\nScope: local anchors within this artifact only. No cross-artifact links are introduced here.\n\n- [PURPOSE](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-five-class-structural-order-purpose)\n- [I. PRINCIPLE](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-five-class-structural-order-i-principle)\n- [CORE ORDER LAW](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-five-class-structural-order-core-order-law)\n- [INTERPRETATION MODE](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-five-class-structural-order-interpretation-mode)\n- [II. CLASS DEFINITIONS](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-five-class-structural-order-ii-class-definitions)\n- [TENET](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-five-class-structural-order-tenet)\n- [ROTAS](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-five-class-structural-order-rotas)\n- [AREPO](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-five-class-structural-order-arepo)\n- [OPERA](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-five-class-structural-order-opera)\n- [SATOR](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-five-class-structural-order-sator)\n- [III. CLASS SEPARATION](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-five-class-structural-order-iii-class-separation)\n- [RULE:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-five-class-structural-order-rule)\n- [IV. CONTROL-PLANE RELATION CHAIN](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-five-class-structural-order-iv-control-plane-relation-chain)\n- [STRUCTURE](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-five-class-structural-order-structure)\n- [INTERPRETATION](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-five-class-structural-order-interpretation)\n- [TENET:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-five-class-structural-order-tenet-2)\n- [ROTAS:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-five-class-structural-order-rotas-2)\n- [AREPO:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-five-class-structural-order-arepo-2)\n- [OPERA:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-five-class-structural-order-opera-2)\n- [SATOR:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-five-class-structural-order-sator-2)\n- [V. RELATION TYPES](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-five-class-structural-order-v-relation-types)\n- [ADDITIONAL RELATIONS](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-five-class-structural-order-additional-relations)\n- [RULE](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-five-class-structural-order-rule-2)\n- [V.A MODULAR COMPATIBILITY AND ADAPTATION ORDER](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-five-class-structural-order-va-modular-compatibility-and-adaptation-order)\n- [PRINCIPLE](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-five-class-structural-order-principle-modular-compatibility)\n- [NATIVE DEFAULT](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-five-class-structural-order-native-default)\n- [EXPLICIT OVERRIDE](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-five-class-structural-order-explicit-override)\n- [DEPENDENCY-RESOLVED COMPATIBILITY](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-five-class-structural-order-dependency-resolved-compatibility)\n- [ADAPTATION CONSENT GATE](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-five-class-structural-order-adaptation-consent-gate)\n- [MODULAR EXECUTION FORMULA](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-five-class-structural-order-modular-execution-formula)\n- [VI. STRUCTURAL PRIMACY LAW](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-five-class-structural-order-vi-structural-primacy-law)\n- [Principle:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-five-class-structural-order-principle)\n- [Formal:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-five-class-structural-order-formal)\n- [Interpretation:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-five-class-structural-order-interpretation-2)\n- [Consequence:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-five-class-structural-order-consequence)\n- [VII. PROHIBITIONS (UPDATED)](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-five-class-structural-order-vii-prohibitions-updated)\n- [ROTAS-SPECIFIC PROHIBITIONS](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-five-class-structural-order-rotas-specific-prohibitions)\n- [AREPO PROHIBITIONS](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-five-class-structural-order-arepo-prohibitions)\n- [SATOR PROHIBITIONS](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-five-class-structural-order-sator-prohibitions)\n- [VIII. ARCHITECTURAL READING (UPDATED)](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-five-class-structural-order-viii-architectural-reading-updated)\n- [IX. GOVERNANCE CONSEQUENCE](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-five-class-structural-order-ix-governance-consequence)\n- [RULE:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-five-class-structural-order-rule-3)\n- [IX.A OPERA INVOCATION-EPOCH ADMISSION INVARIANT](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-five-class-structural-order-ix-a-opera-invocation-epoch-admission-invariant)\n- [X. SUMMARY (UPDATED)](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-five-class-structural-order-x-summary-updated)\n- [FINAL LAW](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-five-class-structural-order-final-law)\n- [CLOSURE RULE](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-five-class-structural-order-closure-rule)\n- [GLOBAL EXTENSION 2026-07-27 -- COMBINATORIAL FIVE-CLASS RESOLUTION](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-five-class-structural-order-combinatorial-resolution)\n\u003c!-- LOCAL_SECTION_INDEX_END --\u003e\n\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-five-class-structural-order-purpose\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nPURPOSE\n============================================================\n\nDefine the five primary architectural classes of\n\nArs Generalis Applied and their lawful relational topology:\n\n • TENET\n • ROTAS\n • AREPO\n • OPERA\n • SATOR\n\n\nEstablish:\n\n • class identity\n • role separation\n • control-plane order\n • structural dependency chain\n\nThis artifact is structural, not doctrinal.\n\n\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-five-class-structural-order-i-principle\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nI. PRINCIPLE\n============================================================\n\nAGLA is structured into five distinct and non-collapsible classes.\n\nEach class defines a unique operational role in the system.\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-five-class-structural-order-core-order-law\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nCORE ORDER LAW\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nTENET → ROTAS → AREPO → OPERA → SATOR\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-five-class-structural-order-interpretation-mode\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nINTERPRETATION MODE\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nMODE: EXECUTION-SPECIFICATION\n\nAll execution-shaped language is structural\nand does not constitute runtime execution.\n\n\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-five-class-structural-order-ii-class-definitions\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nII. CLASS DEFINITIONS\n============================================================\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-five-class-structural-order-tenet\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nTENET\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nRole:\n doctrinal and invariant layer\n\n\nFunction:\n\n defines:\n\n • principles (A)\n • relations (T)\n • regimes (E, R, D)\n • invariants\n • structural laws\n\n\nTENET does not:\n\n • execute operations\n • define admissibility\n • define structure instances\n • mediate interaction\n\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-five-class-structural-order-rotas\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nROTAS\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nRole:\n structural instantiation and traversal layer\n\n\nFunction:\n\n defines:\n\n • combinatory spaces\n • cyclic structures\n • positional indexing\n • traversal topology\n • adjacency relations\n\n\nROTAS provides:\n\n • ROTA instances and WHEEL components\n • ladders\n • grids\n • nested structures\n\n\nROTAS does not:\n\n • execute operations\n • define admissibility\n • define doctrine\n • mediate interaction\n\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-five-class-structural-order-arepo\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nAREPO\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nRole:\n admissibility and governance layer\n\n\nFunction:\n\n governs:\n\n • whether a structure-bound request is admissible\n • binding requirements (TENET / ROTAS)\n • execution validity conditions\n • failure diagnostics\n\n\nAREPO does not:\n\n • define doctrine\n • define structure\n • execute operations\n • mediate interaction\n\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nUnder modular execution, AREPO may:\n\n • rank compatible ROTA artifacts under ROTAS governance\n • admit or block cross-stack structural substrates\n • declare adaptation consent requirements\n • diagnose mismatch between requested and effective execution surfaces\n\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-five-class-structural-order-opera\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nOPERA\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nRole:\n execution layer\n\n\nFunction:\n\n performs:\n\n • procedural operations\n • transformations\n • closure processes\n\n\nOPERA operates:\n\n • on TENET-bound principles\n • within ROTAS-defined structure\n • under AREPO admissibility\n\n\n - through the selected and declared ROTA substrate under ROTAS governance\n\n\nOPERA does not:\n\n • define doctrine\n • define admissibility\n • define structure\n • mediate interaction\n\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-five-class-structural-order-sator\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nSATOR\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nRole:\n interaction and mediation layer\n\n\nFunction:\n\n governs:\n\n • user-facing framing\n • explanation\n • pedagogical rendering\n • narrative and contextual mediation\n\n\nSATOR does not:\n\n • define doctrine\n • define admissibility\n • define structure\n • execute operations\n\n\nUnder modular execution, SATOR must:\n\n - disclose requested structural surface\n - disclose selected ROTA substrate under ROTAS governance\n - disclose effective execution surface\n - request user consent before adaptation when consent has not already\n been explicitly granted\n\n\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-five-class-structural-order-iii-class-separation\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nIII. CLASS SEPARATION\n============================================================\n\n\nThe classes are strictly distinct:\n\n TENET ≠ ROTAS ≠ AREPO ≠ OPERA ≠ SATOR\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nMeaning:\n\n • doctrine ≠ structure\n • structure ≠ admissibility\n • admissibility ≠ execution\n • execution ≠ mediation\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-five-class-structural-order-rule\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nRULE:\n\n no implicit class collapse is permitted\n\n\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-five-class-structural-order-iv-control-plane-relation-chain\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nIV. CONTROL-PLANE RELATION CHAIN\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-five-class-structural-order-structure\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nSTRUCTURE\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n TENET\n ↓\n ROTAS\n ↓\n AREPO\n ↓\n OPERA\n ↓\n SATOR\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-five-class-structural-order-interpretation\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nINTERPRETATION\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-five-class-structural-order-tenet-2\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nTENET:\n defines what is possible\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-five-class-structural-order-rotas-2\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nROTAS:\n defines how it is structured and traversed\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-five-class-structural-order-arepo-2\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nAREPO:\n defines what is admissible within that structure\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-five-class-structural-order-opera-2\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nOPERA:\n executes within admissible structured space\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-five-class-structural-order-sator-2\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nSATOR:\n mediates execution results\n\n\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-five-class-structural-order-v-relation-types\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nV. RELATION TYPES\n============================================================\n\nTENET → ROTAS\n structural constraint\n\nROTAS → AREPO\n structural admissibility context\n\nAREPO → OPERA\n execution authorization\n\nOPERA → SATOR\n result exposure\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-five-class-structural-order-additional-relations\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nADDITIONAL RELATIONS\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nSATOR → OPERA\n request framing (non-authoritative)\n\nSATOR → ROTAS\n representational access (read-only)\n\nAREPO → ROTAS\n validation against structure\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-five-class-structural-order-rule-2\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nRULE\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nNo class may bypass its predecessor in the chain.\n\n\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-five-class-structural-order-va-modular-compatibility-and-adaptation-order\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nV.A MODULAR COMPATIBILITY AND ADAPTATION ORDER\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-five-class-structural-order-principle-modular-compatibility\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nPRINCIPLE\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nModularity is lawful recomposition of declared class artifacts.\n\nIt is not class collapse.\n\nAn OPERA may operate through a compatible non-native ROTA artifact under\nROTAS governance only when the structural substrate is:\n\n - declared\n - ranked by AREPO\n - selected under an explicit rule\n - consented to when adaptation is required\n - disclosed by SATOR in the execution record\n\nThis reduces the need to invent new OPERAE. When a task can be handled by\ncombining OPERA X with TENET Y and ROTA Z, the assistant must prefer mapped\nmodular recomposition over creating a new execution artifact.\n\nPENTAGRAMA may map this recomposition as a five-class integration graph.\n\nSIGMA_SATOR may package the verified map as a deployment kernel.\n\nNeither PENTAGRAMA nor SIGMA_SATOR changes the five-class order.\n\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-five-class-structural-order-native-default\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nNATIVE DEFAULT\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nIf the user requests:\n\n OPERA X\n\nwithout specifying a ROTA artifact under ROTAS governance, the default selection is:\n\n OPERA X + native ROTA X under ROTAS governance\n\nprovided that native ROTA X under ROTAS governance exists and AREPO X admits it.\n\nThe native structural substrate is implicit only when it is available and\nadmissible.\n\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-five-class-structural-order-explicit-override\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nEXPLICIT OVERRIDE\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nIf the user requests:\n\n OPERA X with ROTA Y\n\nthen ROTA Y may be used only when:\n\n - AREPO X admits ROTA Y or its resolved substrate\n - the compatibility rank is declared\n - OPERA X records the selected ROTA context under ROTAS governance\n - SATOR X discloses that the run was non-native or adapted\n\nExplicit override by the user satisfies the command requirement for the\nnamed adaptation, but it does not remove the duty to disclose the selected\nstructural substrate.\n\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-five-class-structural-order-dependency-resolved-compatibility\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nDEPENDENCY-RESOLVED COMPATIBILITY\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nIf a requested ROTA does not exist as an independent structural artifact\nbut resolves through another stack dependency, the effective substrate must\nbe named.\n\nExample form:\n\n requested_surface:\n OPERA T with ROTA H\n\n resolved_structural_substrate:\n ROTA D\n\n effective_execution_surface:\n OPERA T with ROTA D\n\nThis is lawful only when:\n\n - the dependency is recorded in the system index or local stack record\n - AREPO admits the resolved substrate\n - SATOR discloses the resolution before or during final reporting\n - consent is obtained before execution when the user did not explicitly\n authorize the resolved adaptation\n\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-five-class-structural-order-adaptation-consent-gate\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nADAPTATION CONSENT GATE\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nWhen the selected or effective execution surface differs from the literal\nuser request, the assistant must ask whether the user wants to proceed with\nthe adaptation before execution.\n\nConsent is not required only when the user has already explicitly requested\nthe adapted form, for example:\n\n OPERA X with ROTA Y\n\nor has already accepted the dependency-resolved substrate in the current\nexecution context.\n\nDisclosure after execution is not a substitute for consent before execution.\n\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-five-class-structural-order-modular-execution-formula\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nMODULAR EXECUTION FORMULA\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n USER REQUEST\n -\u003e SATOR frames requested surface\n -\u003e AREPO resolves native / compatible / dependency path\n -\u003e SATOR obtains adaptation consent when required\n -\u003e OPERA executes through selected ROTA substrate under ROTAS governance\n -\u003e SATOR discloses:\n requested_surface\n selected_rota\n compatibility_rank\n selection_reason\n adaptation_consent_status\n effective_execution_surface\n\n\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-five-class-structural-order-vi-structural-primacy-law\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nVI. STRUCTURAL PRIMACY LAW\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-five-class-structural-order-principle\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nPrinciple:\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nStructure precedes execution.\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-five-class-structural-order-formal\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nFormal:\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n¬ROTAS ⇒ ¬OPERA\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-five-class-structural-order-interpretation-2\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nInterpretation:\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nIf a structure is not defined:\n\n • it cannot be validated (AREPO)\n • it cannot be executed (OPERA)\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-five-class-structural-order-consequence\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nConsequence:\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nROTAS is a prerequisite for OPERA,\nnot a passive support layer.\n\n\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-five-class-structural-order-vii-prohibitions-updated\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nVII. PROHIBITIONS (UPDATED)\n============================================================\n\n✗ TENET executing OPERA \n✗ ROTAS executing OPERA \n✗ AREPO executing OPERA \n✗ OPERA defining TENET \n✗ SATOR altering admissibility \n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n- OPERA silently selecting a non-native ROTA substrate under ROTAS governance\n- SATOR silently adapting a requested execution surface\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-five-class-structural-order-rotas-specific-prohibitions\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nROTAS-SPECIFIC PROHIBITIONS\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n✗ treating ROTAS as display-only \n✗ treating ROTAS as optional \n✗ bypassing ROTAS in execution \n✗ altering structure during OPERA execution \n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-five-class-structural-order-arepo-prohibitions\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nAREPO PROHIBITIONS\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n✗ redefining structure \n✗ redefining doctrine \n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n- admitting an unranked compatible ROTA artifact under ROTAS governance\n- treating dependency resolution as consent\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-five-class-structural-order-sator-prohibitions\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nSATOR PROHIBITIONS\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n✗ inventing structure \n✗ altering execution output \n\n- hiding requested structural surface\n- hiding selected structural substrate\n- hiding effective execution surface\n- proceeding with adaptation before consent when consent is required\n\n\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-five-class-structural-order-viii-architectural-reading-updated\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nVIII. ARCHITECTURAL READING (UPDATED)\n============================================================\n\nTENET\n the law (what is true)\n\nROTAS\n the space (where it exists and moves)\n\nAREPO\n the gate (what is allowed)\n\nOPERA\n the act (what is done)\n\nSATOR\n the voice (how it is understood)\n\n\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-five-class-structural-order-ix-governance-consequence\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nIX. GOVERNANCE CONSEQUENCE\n============================================================\n\nAll artifacts must be class-legible and chain-consistent.\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nArtifacts must declare:\n\n • primary class\n • dependencies upstream in chain\n • downstream compatibility\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nFor modular recomposition, artifacts must also declare where applicable:\n\n - native ROTA default under ROTAS governance\n - compatible ROTA ranking under ROTAS governance\n - adaptation consent rule\n - effective execution surface when resolution differs from request\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-five-class-structural-order-rule-3\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nRULE:\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nNo execution artifact is valid without:\n\n TENET binding\n + ROTAS binding\n + AREPO admissibility\n\n\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-five-class-structural-order-ix-a-opera-invocation-epoch-admission-invariant\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nIX.A OPERA INVOCATION-EPOCH ADMISSION INVARIANT\n============================================================\n\nEvery new OPERA invocation epoch requires current TENET evidence and current\nROTAS evidence before AREPO may admit execution.\n\nA new invocation epoch begins for:\n\n - a direct OPERA request\n - selection of a chained OPERA\n - an agent-to-OPERA handoff\n - continuation into OPERA after SATOR return\n - a relevant TENET source, version, hash, or scope change\n - a relevant ROTAS source, version, binding, effective ROTA, or scope change\n\nCURRENT TENET EVIDENCE must bind the applicable doctrine and invariants to the\nsame invocation epoch, OPERA subject, and execution scope. It must identify the\nTENET source and version or content hash and state whether that source was\nparsed in the current epoch or proven fresh.\n\nCURRENT ROTAS EVIDENCE must bind the structural substrate and traversal scope\nto the same invocation epoch, OPERA subject, and execution scope. It must\nidentify the ROTAS source and version or content hash, provider status, and the\neffective ROTA selection or explicitly admitted composition, and state whether\nthat binding was resolved in the current epoch or proven fresh.\n\nAREPO operates fail closed. AREPO must not admit OPERA when either evidence is\nabsent, stale, belongs to another invocation epoch, names an incompatible\nsubject or scope, erases provider status, or leaves the effective ROTA or\nadmitted composition unresolved.\n\nA prior AREPO admission and an AREPO/SATOR-only context do not carry execution\nauthority into a new invocation epoch.\n\nAfter OPERA execution, SATOR returns the result or suspension together with the\ncurrent invocation-epoch trace. A later OPERA invocation requires a new epoch\nand current evidence.\n\nThis invariant does not prescribe an interface input order, evidence data\nshape, cache implementation, stack-specific traversal, ROTAS candidate set,\npentagram derivation, or Graphus edge. Those mechanics remain in versioned\nexternal composable profiles. Cached evidence is lawful only when its profile\nproves current source identity, version or hash, subject and execution scope,\nprovider status, and effective structural binding for the new epoch.\n\nThe provisional five-class pentagram remains\n`CANDIDATE / NON_RUNTIME / NO_AUTHORITY_EFFECT`. This invariant does not make it\na Graphus instance, canonical edge set, provider registry, runtime target, or\nexecution authority.\n\nFailure identifiers:\n\n tenet_evidence_absent_or_stale\n rotas_evidence_absent_or_stale\n invocation_epoch_mismatch\n opera_subject_or_scope_mismatch\n provider_status_erasure\n effective_rota_unresolved\n arepo_sator_only_context\n prior_admission_reuse\n\n\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-five-class-structural-order-x-summary-updated\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nX. SUMMARY (UPDATED)\n============================================================\n\n\nAGLA FIVE-CLASS STRUCTURAL ORDER defines:\n\n • TENET → principial truth\n • ROTAS → structural instantiation\n • AREPO → admissibility\n • OPERA → execution\n • SATOR → mediation\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-five-class-structural-order-final-law\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nFINAL LAW\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nNothing may be executed\n\nthat is not:\n\n • principially grounded (TENET)\n • structurally instantiated (ROTAS)\n • admissibly validated (AREPO)\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-five-class-structural-order-closure-rule\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nCLOSURE RULE\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nNo class may assume the role of another\nwithout explicit, version-controlled mutation.\n\n============================================================\nGLOBAL EXTENSION 2026-05-23 -- INITIATION AND REGISTER DISTRIBUTION\n============================================================\n\nVersion:\n 1.0.0-FIVE-CLASS-GLOBAL-INITIATION-REGISTER-DISTRIBUTION\n\nStatus:\n CANONICAL / ROOT-STRUCTURE EXTENSION / DEPLOYMENT-BINDING\n\nAuthority:\n USER / HUMAN AUTHORITY / AGLA_MAIN_LAB CONTROL PLANE\n\nScope:\n ALL FIVE-CLASS CONTEXTS\n ALL BOOTSTRAP / INITIATION CONTEXTS\n ALL PROTECTED REGISTER CONTEXTS\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nINITIATION DISTRIBUTION LAW\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nINITIATION is distributed across the five classes without becoming a sixth\nclass.\n\nTENET:\n defines initiation doctrine.\n\nROTAS:\n structures initiation traversal and ROTA machine surfaces.\n\nAREPO:\n admits or blocks initiation, tutorial, and execution transitions.\n\nOPERA:\n remains execution; initiation is not target OPERA execution.\n\nSATOR:\n mediates initiation state, self-binding oath, disclosure, and lawful\n suspension.\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nINITIATION TRIAD\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nSYSTEM_INITIATION:\n bootstrap of the assistant/system into source-bound, class-bound,\n stack-bound conduct.\n\nHUMAN_DEVELOPER_INITIATION:\n formation of the human developer into traversal, distinction,\n invocation, and lawful suspension.\n\nTUTORIAL_MEDIATION:\n middle layer that translates initiation into learnable commands,\n drills, correction loops, and bootstrap reinforcement.\n\nNo element of this triad replaces the five-class order:\n\n TENET -\u003e ROTAS -\u003e AREPO -\u003e OPERA -\u003e SATOR\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nPROTECTED REGISTER DISTRIBUTION\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nProtected register is governed as follows:\n\n TENET defines its doctrinal meaning.\n ROTAS prevents it from mutating structure.\n AREPO tests its admissibility.\n OPERA refuses to treat it as execution by itself.\n SATOR mediates it without teaching it as ordinary user prompt style.\n\nFailure:\n\n initiation_as_sixth_class\n tutorial_as_opera\n oath_as_arepo_bypass\n register_as_execution_authority\n protected_register_user_prompt_training\n\n============================================================\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-five-class-structural-order-combinatorial-resolution\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nGLOBAL EXTENSION 2026-07-27 -- COMBINATORIAL FIVE-CLASS RESOLUTION\n============================================================\n\nVersion:\n 1.1.0-FIVE-CLASS-GLOBAL-COMBINATORIAL-RESOLUTION\n\nStatus:\n CANONICAL / ROOT-STRUCTURE EXTENSION / DEPLOYMENT-BINDING\n\nAuthority:\n HUMAN DEVELOPER / AGLA CONTROL PLANE\n\nScope:\n ALL EXECUTION COMPOSITIONS\n ALL MODULAR STACK AND OPERA RESOLUTION\n ALL CONTEXTUAL ARTICULATION\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nFIVE-ROLE INVARIANT\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nEvery execution resolves exactly the canonical role set:\n\n EXECUTION_CLASS_SET :=\n ⟨TENET, ROTAS, AREPO, OPERA, SATOR⟩\n\nThis is a role invariant, not an artifact-count invariant.\n\nThe tuple fixes the five class types and their order. It does not impose\none provider artifact per class. Each class position resolves a non-empty\nprovider set whose cardinality is governed by that role\u0027s contract.\n\nThe five roles may be carried by artifacts from different admitted\nstacks or modules. A new module may contribute only the OPERA, ROTAS,\nor other class carrier that it actually adds and reuse compatible\nexisting carriers for the remaining roles.\n\nNo module is required to author five local artifacts merely to preserve\nvisual symmetry.\n\nForbidden:\n\n unresolved role\n empty class stub\n hidden authority collision\n unversioned carrier\n class-order permutation\n compatibility assumed by naming resemblance\n\nAREPO validates the proposed combination.\nOPERA executes only within the admitted combination.\nSATOR exposes the resolved class composition and provenance.\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nLOGICAL CLOSURE MANIFEST\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nBefore execution, the control plane resolves an\n`EXECUTION_ASSEMBLY_MANIFEST` containing exactly one bucket for each role:\n\n TENET\n ROTAS\n AREPO\n OPERA\n SATOR\n\nEach bucket declares:\n\n class_role\n providers[]\n composition_mode\n effective_provider_ids[]\n resolution_status\n\nEach member of `providers[]` declares:\n\n provider_id\n provider_version\n provider_status\n binding_mode\n compatibility_ref\n source_trace\n\nAllowed binding modes are:\n\n dedicated\n inherited\n reused\n overlay\n composed\n\nLogical closure is satisfied by the resolved role set. It is not satisfied\nby the mere presence of five files.\n\nProvider-set cardinality is intentionally asymmetric:\n\n TENET := one or more cumulative doctrinal providers\n ROTAS := one or more compatible structural providers\n AREPO := one or more ordered admission providers\n OPERA := one or more disclosed execution providers,\n exactly one effective lifecycle owner\n SATOR := one or more disclosed mediation providers,\n exactly one effective return owner\n\nA TENET carrier may serve multiple OPERAE and need not have a paired\nOPERA. An OPERA may be compatible with multiple ROTAS carriers. A concrete\nexecution MUST disclose the effective ROTA selection or the explicitly\nadmitted composition used.\n\nA directory containing only a new OPERA may be execution-complete through\ndependency closure when the remaining four roles resolve to admitted,\ncompatible providers.\n\nA directory containing five local artifacts is execution-incomplete when\none role is invalid, incompatible, empty, unresolved, or unauthorized.\n\nNo implementation may manufacture class-local twins merely to equalize\nbucket sizes or suffixes.\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nLOCAL FUNCTION AND GLOBAL AUTHORITY\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nClass identity states what an artifact does locally.\n\nSYSTEM_INDEX states:\n\n authority\n precedence\n parentage\n dependency\n compatibility\n runtime availability\n\nNo role carrier obtains global authority merely because it participates\nin an assembly.\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nPROVIDER DIRECTION AND NON-COUPLING\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nThe dependent assembly references its providers.\n\nProviders declare stable capabilities and compatibility contracts; they do\nnot acquire a reverse dependency on every assembly that consumes them.\n\nConsumer-specific references in a general provider are non-normative\ndevelopment notes unless a separately authorized bidirectional contract\nexists.\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nCOMBINATORIAL PURITY\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nA combinatorial assembly is pure when its declared doctrine, structure,\nadmission, execution, and mediation are mutually compatible.\n\nPurity does not require:\n\n matching suffixes\n folder co-location\n ownership by one stack\n five newly authored artifacts\n\nPurity requires explicit resolution, status propagation, and absence of\nauthority conflict.\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nCONTEXTUAL CONTRACTION DISTRIBUTION\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nCONTEXTUAL CONTRACTION is a fundamental behavior distributed through\nthe existing five classes:\n\n TENET:\n non-creation, asymmetry, path, source, and non-collapse laws\n\n ROTAS:\n expression, direction, grouping, path, and structural record\n\n AREPO:\n contextual and five-class composition gates\n\n OPERA:\n admitted read-only contextual interpretation\n\n SATOR:\n mediation, limits, provenance, and composition trace\n\nIt does not constitute:\n\n a separate stack\n a sixth class\n a mandatory five-artifact module\n an autonomous authority\n an independent execution surface\n\nHistorical development carriers may be archived after their operative\ncontent is integrated into the corresponding Root Class Laws.\n\nFailure:\n\n five_roles_as_five_new_artifacts\n contextual_contraction_as_stack\n contextual_contraction_as_sixth_class\n contextual_carrier_retained_as_runtime_authority\n\n============================================================\nEND OF ARTIFACT\n============================================================\n" }, { "role": "PRINCIPAL_ROOT_CLASS_LAW", "class": "ROOT_CLASS_LAW", "path": "00_ROOT_CLASS_LAWS/AGLA_SYSTEM_INDEX_LAW.md", "bytes": 20686, "sha256": "1ed71b53dee661257990a4d6dfa250bdf2bd825620f58e1c9d78872657df01f9", "hash_scope": "UTF8_LF_NORMALIZED_CONTENT", "content": "============================================================\nAGLA — SYSTEM INDEX LAW\nArs Generalis Applied — Registry / Binding / Anti-Simulation Law\nVersion: 1.3.0-AGLA-SYSTEM-INDEX-ADDITIVE-TENET-BINDINGS\nStatus: CANONICAL / ROOT CONTROL-PLANE LAW\nAuthority: AGLA / CONTROL PLANE\nClass: AGLA / SYSTEM_INDEX\n\n\nMutation Policy: VERSION-CONTROLLED ONLY\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003c!-- LOCAL_SECTION_INDEX_START --\u003e\n## LOCAL SECTION INDEX\n\nScope: local anchors within this artifact only. No cross-artifact links are introduced here.\n\n- [SECTION I — PURPOSE](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-system-index-law-section-i-purpose)\n- [CORE LAW:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-system-index-law-core-law)\n- [SECTION II — INDEX ROLE LAW](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-system-index-law-section-ii-index-role-law)\n- [SECTION III — ARTIFACT REGISTRATION LAW](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-system-index-law-section-iii-artifact-registration-law)\n- [SECTION III-A — FILE NAMING / ANTI-INFERENCE LAW](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-system-index-law-section-iii-a-file-naming-anti-inference-law)\n- [TENET:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-system-index-law-tenet)\n- [ROTAS:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-system-index-law-rotas)\n- [AREPO:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-system-index-law-arepo)\n- [OPERA:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-system-index-law-opera)\n- [SATOR:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-system-index-law-sator)\n- [SECTION IV — BINDING LAW](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-system-index-law-section-iv-binding-law)\n- [SECTION V — ANTI-SUMMARY LAW](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-system-index-law-section-v-anti-summary-law)\n- [SECTION VI — CLASS SEPARATION LAW](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-system-index-law-section-vi-class-separation-law)\n- [SECTION VII — DEPENDENCY LAW](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-system-index-law-section-vii-dependency-law)\n- [SECTION VIII — EXECUTION ROUTING LAW](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-system-index-law-section-viii-execution-routing-law)\n- [SECTION IX — DATA SUBSTRATE LAW](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-system-index-law-section-ix-data-substrate-law)\n- [SECTION X — LEGACY EXCLUSION LAW](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-system-index-law-section-x-legacy-exclusion-law)\n- [SECTION XI — FAILURE CONDITIONS](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-system-index-law-section-xi-failure-conditions)\n- [SECTION XII — FINAL LAW](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-system-index-law-section-xii-final-law)\n- [SECTION XIII -- INITIATION AND REGISTER ROUTING LAW](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-system-index-law-section-xiii-initiation-register-routing)\n- [SECTION XIV -- ABSTRACTION, AUTHORITY, CAPABILITY, AND CONFLICT RESOLUTION](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-system-index-law-section-xiv-abstraction-authority-capability-conflict)\n- [FORMULA:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-system-index-law-formula)\n\u003c!-- LOCAL_SECTION_INDEX_END --\u003e\n\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-system-index-law-section-i-purpose\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nSECTION I — PURPOSE\n============================================================\n\n\nDefine the governing law for:\n\n • SYSTEM_INDEX structure\n • artifact registration\n • execution routing\n • binding discipline\n • anti-simulation constraints\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nSYSTEM_INDEX answers:\n\n • what artifacts exist\n • how artifacts are identified\n • how artifacts are routed\n • how execution is permitted\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nSYSTEM_INDEX does NOT:\n\n • execute artifacts\n • simulate artifacts\n • reconstruct artifacts\n • infer behavior from summaries\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-system-index-law-core-law\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nCORE LAW:\n\n SYSTEM_INDEX = ROUTING STRUCTURE\n NOT EXECUTION SURFACE\n\n\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-system-index-law-section-ii-index-role-law\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nSECTION II — INDEX ROLE LAW\n============================================================\n\n\nROLE fields:\n\n • are structural descriptions only\n • define position in system\n • define dependencies and routing\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nROLE fields MUST NOT:\n\n ✗ contain executable logic\n ✗ substitute artifact content\n ✗ be interpreted as procedures\n ✗ be expanded into OPERAE\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nViolation results in:\n\n index_as_execution_error\n\n\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-system-index-law-section-iii-artifact-registration-law\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nSECTION III — ARTIFACT REGISTRATION LAW\n============================================================\n\n\nAn artifact exists in the system only if:\n\n • it is explicitly registered\n • it has a unique ID\n • it declares class\n • it declares status\n • it declares role\n • it declares dependencies (if applicable)\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nRegistration schema:\n\n IDX-\u003cidentifier\u003e\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nExample:\n\n IDX-A-OPERA\n IDX-TENET-MAGNUM\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nConstraint:\n\n No implicit artifacts exist.\n\n\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-system-index-law-section-iii-a-file-naming-anti-inference-law\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nSECTION III-A — FILE NAMING / ANTI-INFERENCE LAW\n============================================================\n\nStack artifact filenames are routing labels only.\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nFilenames MUST expose:\n\n • class name\n • stack / artifact identifier\n • class-functional role\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nCanonical filename role terms:\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-system-index-law-tenet\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\n TENET:\n DoctrinalInvariants\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-system-index-law-rotas\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\n ROTAS:\n StructuralInstantiation\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-system-index-law-arepo\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\n AREPO:\n InputAdmissibility\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-system-index-law-opera\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\n OPERA:\n ExecutionMechanism\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-system-index-law-sator\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\n SATOR:\n OutputRequirements\n\n\n ALIAS:\n AliasClassLaw / invocation routing only\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nFilenames MUST NOT expose:\n\n ✗ stack-specific doctrine\n ✗ stack-specific operation names\n ✗ stack-specific topology names\n ✗ stack-specific substrate names\n ✗ execution behavior details\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nPurpose:\n\n prevent language models or operators from inferring artifact\n behavior from filenames instead of parsing artifact content.\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nRule:\n\n A filename may route to an artifact.\n\n A filename may not define, summarize, simulate, or imply the\n behavior of that artifact.\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nFailure conditions:\n\n filename_as_execution_hint\n filename_behavior_inference\n stack_specific_filename_leak\n artifact_content_not_loaded\n\n\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-system-index-law-section-iv-binding-law\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nSECTION IV — BINDING LAW\n============================================================\n\nExecution requires binding through SYSTEM_INDEX.\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nBinding sequence:\n\n 1. identify artifact ID\n 2. verify registration\n 3. verify class compatibility\n 4. verify AREPO admissibility\n 5. load artifact content\n 6. execute\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nConstraint:\n\n No execution without binding.\n\n\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-system-index-law-section-v-anti-summary-law\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nSECTION V — ANTI-SUMMARY LAW\n============================================================\n\n\nSummaries inside SYSTEM_INDEX:\n\n • are non-executable\n • are incomplete by design\n • are routing abstractions\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nForbidden:\n\n ✗ executing from summary\n ✗ reconstructing full artifact from summary\n ✗ inferring missing logic\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nIf artifact is not loaded:\n\n\n output:\n\n OPERA_NOT_AVAILABLE\n\n\nor:\n\n DO YOU MEAN \u003cartifact_id\u003e?\n\n\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-system-index-law-section-vi-class-separation-law\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nSECTION VI — CLASS SEPARATION LAW\n============================================================\n\n\nSYSTEM_INDEX preserves strict class boundaries:\n\n TENET\n AREPO\n OPERA\n ROTAS\n SATOR\n ALIAS\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nConstraint:\n\n\n No class may:\n\n ✗ collapse into another\n ✗ simulate another\n ✗ substitute another\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nExample:\n\n SYSTEM_INDEX must not execute OPERA\n SYSTEM_INDEX must not express TENET doctrine\n SYSTEM_INDEX must not resolve plugin aliases without declared prefixes\n\n\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-system-index-law-section-vii-dependency-law\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nSECTION VII — DEPENDENCY LAW\n============================================================\n\n\nAll dependencies must be:\n\n • explicit\n • declared\n • acyclic (within execution context)\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nConstraint:\n\n ✗ no hidden dependencies\n ✗ no implicit fallbacks\n ✗ no circular execution chains\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nDependency graph defines:\n\n routing, not behavior\n\n\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-system-index-law-section-viii-execution-routing-law\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nSECTION VIII — EXECUTION ROUTING LAW\n============================================================\n\nSYSTEM_INDEX routes execution requests.\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nRouting logic:\n\n USER REQUEST\n ↓\n SYSTEM_INDEX lookup\n ↓\n artifact identification\n ↓\n AREPO admissibility\n ↓\n artifact loading\n ↓\n OPERA execution\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nConstraint:\n\n SYSTEM_INDEX does not execute.\n\n\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-system-index-law-section-ix-data-substrate-law\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nSECTION IX — DATA SUBSTRATE LAW\n============================================================\n\n\nDatasets registered in SYSTEM_INDEX:\n\n • are non-executable\n • are substrates\n • must be consumed by OPERAE\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nConstraint:\n\n ✗ dataset ≠ OPERA\n ✗ dataset ≠ procedure\n\n\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-system-index-law-section-x-legacy-exclusion-law\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nSECTION X — LEGACY EXCLUSION LAW\n============================================================\n\n\nLegacy artifacts:\n\n • are not active by default\n • are not executable\n • are treated as external inputs\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nConstraint:\n\n\n Must be reprocessed through:\n\n current canonical stacks\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nNo legacy artifact may:\n\n ✗ bypass SYSTEM_INDEX\n ✗ act as execution authority\n\n\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-system-index-law-section-xi-failure-conditions\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nSECTION XI — FAILURE CONDITIONS\n============================================================\n\nindex_as_execution_error\nsummary_execution_attempt\nimplicit_artifact_inference\nmissing_binding_execution\nclass_collapse\nhidden_dependency\nartifact_substitution\ndataset_as_procedure\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nAny failure:\n\n → BLOCK EXECUTION\n → REQUIRE CONTROL-PLANE INTERVENTION\n\n\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-system-index-law-section-xii-final-law\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nSECTION XII — FINAL LAW\n============================================================\n\nSYSTEM_INDEX routes.\n\nSYSTEM_INDEX does not execute.\n\n\nArtifacts execute only when:\n\n • registered\n • bound\n • admitted\n • loaded\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n============================================================\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-system-index-law-section-xiii-initiation-register-routing\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nSECTION XIII -- INITIATION AND REGISTER ROUTING LAW\n============================================================\n\nSYSTEM_INDEX may route initiation, bootstrap, tutorial, oath, and protected\nregister surfaces only when they are registered or source-bound.\n\nSYSTEM_INDEX does not execute initiation.\n\nSYSTEM_INDEX does not make protected register authoritative.\n\nRouting must preserve:\n\n system initiation\n human-developer initiation\n tutorial mediation\n target OPERA execution\n\nas distinct states.\n\nFailure:\n\n initiation_routed_as_opera\n register_signal_routed_as_authority\n bootstrap_surface_without_source\n tutorial_surface_as_execution\n index_description_as_initiation_substrate\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n============================================================\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-system-index-law-section-xiv-abstraction-authority-capability-conflict\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nSECTION XIV -- ABSTRACTION, AUTHORITY, CAPABILITY, AND CONFLICT RESOLUTION\n============================================================\n\nSYSTEM_INDEX owns global resolution metadata.\n\nA class declaration identifies an artifact\u0027s local function. It does not\ngrant global precedence, inheritance authority, provider authority, or\nruntime authority.\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nREGISTRATION FIELDS\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nWhen applicable, a registered artifact declares:\n\n artifact_id\n class_role\n authority_scope\n abstraction_level\n parent_refs\n dependency_refs\n capability_requirements\n provider_bindings\n inheritance_mode\n conflict_rule\n status\n runtime_binding\n source_trace\n\nAbsence, empty, not required, not applicable, unresolved, provisional,\nblocked, and resolved are distinct states.\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nABSTRACTION AND INHERITANCE\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nA derived artifact MUST identify its general parent before applying a\nnarrower vocabulary.\n\nAllowed inheritance modes are:\n\n inherited\n reused\n overlay\n composed\n dedicated\n\nAn overlay may restrict or specialize a parent within a declared scope.\nIt MUST NOT silently mutate, erase, or globally supersede the parent.\n\nIn an unresolved conflict:\n\n registered canonical general parent\n \u003e derived or local consumer\n\nA different precedence requires an explicit, version-controlled,\nhuman-authorized conflict rule.\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nCAPABILITY RESOLUTION\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nA consumer SHOULD depend on a semantic capability when more than one\nprovider may lawfully satisfy the function.\n\nSYSTEM_INDEX resolves:\n\n capability requirement\n -\u003e current admitted provider\n -\u003e provider version and status\n -\u003e scope and compatibility\n -\u003e resolution status\n\nThe consumer names the capability.\nSYSTEM_INDEX names the current provider.\n\nThe provider MUST NOT acquire a reverse dependency on every consumer.\n\nArchived, retired, invalid, or support-only artifacts MUST NOT satisfy an\nactive capability. Historical records may remain indexed as provenance\nwithout becoming provider bindings.\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nFIVE-ROLE RESOLUTION\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nFor an execution assembly, SYSTEM_INDEX resolves exactly five role\nbuckets:\n\n TENET\n ROTAS\n AREPO\n OPERA\n SATOR\n\nEvery role bucket is non-empty, but the number of providers inside each\nbucket is role-specific. The five buckets need not contain equal numbers\nof providers or share a filename suffix, directory, or local stack\nidentity.\n\nSYSTEM_INDEX MUST preserve quantitative asymmetry:\n\n TENET may resolve cumulatively to multiple shared doctrines\n ROTAS may resolve a compatible set plus an effective traversal\n AREPO may resolve an ordered gate set\n OPERA may disclose composition but has one effective lifecycle owner\n SATOR may disclose overlays but has one effective return owner\n\nA TENET may govern multiple OPERAE and may have no paired OPERA. An OPERA\nmay admit multiple ROTAS providers. No artifact may be duplicated,\nsynthesized, or renamed merely to force one-to-one suffix symmetry.\n\nFor every OPERA-to-TENET relation, SYSTEM_INDEX records the binding rather\nthan copying doctrine:\n\n consumer_opera_ref\n provider_tenet_ref\n requirement\n application_scope\n provider_version\n compatibility_ref\n precedence_ref\n activation_status\n test_refs[]\n removal_fallback\n\nBindings are independently addressable. The control plane MAY activate,\ntest, reject, or remove a binding for one OPERA without mutating the\nshared TENET or the bindings of other OPERAE.\n\nCompatibility MUST be explicit. Naming resemblance, folder co-location,\nor possession of five local files is not a compatibility proof.\n\nSYSTEM_INDEX records the assembly; AREPO admits it; OPERA alone executes;\nSATOR discloses the resolved composition.\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nSTATUS PROPAGATION\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nUse of a provisional or candidate provider propagates that limitation to\nthe dependent surface.\n\nProvider selection does not:\n\n canonize the provider\n promote the consumer\n create runtime authority\n convert an index summary into executable law\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nFAILURES\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n local_class_as_global_authority\n provider_selected_by_filename\n implicit_capability_provider\n retired_provider_resolution\n hidden_parent\n silent_parent_supersession\n candidate_status_erasure\n unresolved_conflict_execution\n five_files_as_compatibility_proof\n sixth_execution_role\n provider_cardinality_forced_symmetric\n tenet_duplicated_for_visual_symmetry\n tenet_without_opera_rejected\n compatible_rota_set_collapsed\n effective_rota_undeclared\n multiple_execution_owners\n artificial_rota_created_for_suffix_symmetry\n opera_tenet_binding_implicit\n shared_tenet_copied_per_consumer\n binding_scope_absent\n binding_tests_absent\n binding_removal_mutates_other_consumers\n\nAny such failure blocks routing or promotion until the control plane\nrecords a valid resolution.\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-agla-system-index-law-formula\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nFORMULA:\n\n NO INDEX → NO ROUTING \n NO ROUTING → NO EXECUTION \n\n============================================================\nEND AGLA — SYSTEM INDEX LAW\n============================================================\n" }, { "role": "PRINCIPAL_ROOT_CLASS_LAW", "class": "ROOT_CLASS_LAW", "path": "00_ROOT_CLASS_LAWS/SYSTEM_INDEX_CURRENT.md", "bytes": 81398, "sha256": "7cb50a35eedf32b3987de274217f50d6cf8daac280ce29861c66ede234b2361a", "hash_scope": "UTF8_LF_NORMALIZED_CONTENT", "content": "============================================================\nSYSTEM_INDEX — GLOBAL CONTROL-PLANE REGISTRY\nArs Generalis Applied — Current Canonical / Accepted State\nVersion: 1.16.0-SYSTEM-INDEX-CURRENT-STACK-W-CANONICAL-NON-RUNTIME\nStatus: ACTIVE / GLOBAL REGISTRY SNAPSHOT\nAuthority: GLOBAL CONTROL PLANE\n\nClass: AGLA / SYSTEM_INDEX\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003c!-- LOCAL_SECTION_INDEX_START --\u003e\n## LOCAL SECTION INDEX\n\nScope: local anchors within this artifact only. No cross-artifact links are introduced here.\n\n- [INDEX ROLE LAW:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-index-role-law)\n- [FILE NAMING LAW:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-file-naming-law)\n- [SECTION A_Alpha — ROOT CONTROL STATE](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-section-a-alpha-root-control-state)\n- [SYSTEM STATE:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-system-state)\n- [GLOBAL STATUS:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-global-status)\n- [CODEX READINESS:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-codex-readiness)\n- [AUTHORITY RULE:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-authority-rule)\n- [SECTION A1 — STACK ARTIFACT FILE ROUTING MAP](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-section-a1-stack-artifact-file-routing-map)\n- [IDX-A-TENET:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-idx-a-tenet)\n- [IDX-A-ROTA:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-idx-a-rota)\n- [IDX-A-AREPO:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-idx-a-arepo)\n- [IDX-A-OPERA:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-idx-a-opera)\n- [IDX-A-OPERA-MINOR:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-idx-a-opera-minor)\n- [IDX-A-OPERA-AX:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-idx-a-opera-ax)\n- [IDX-A-SATOR:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-idx-a-sator)\n- [IDX-T-TENET:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-idx-t-tenet)\n- [IDX-T-ROTA:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-idx-t-rota)\n- [IDX-T-AREPO:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-idx-t-arepo)\n- [IDX-T-OPERA:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-idx-t-opera)\n- [IDX-T-SATOR:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-idx-t-sator)\n- [IDX-E-TENET-CORE:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-idx-e-tenet-core)\n- [IDX-E-ROTAS-STRUCT:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-idx-e-rotas-struct)\n- [IDX-E-AREPO-GATE:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-idx-e-arepo-gate)\n- [IDX-E-OPERA-ENGINE:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-idx-e-opera-engine)\n- [IDX-E-SATOR-INTERFACE:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-idx-e-sator-interface)\n- [IDX-F-TENET:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-idx-f-tenet)\n- [IDX-F-ROTA:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-idx-f-rota)\n- [IDX-F-AREPO:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-idx-f-arepo)\n- [IDX-F-OPERA:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-idx-f-opera)\n- [IDX-F-SATOR:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-idx-f-sator)\n- [IDX-TENET-K:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-idx-tenet-k)\n- [IDX-ROTA-S:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-idx-rota-s)\n- [IDX-OPERA-S:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-idx-opera-s)\n- [IDX-AREPO-S:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-idx-arepo-s)\n- [IDX-SATOR-S:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-idx-sator-s)\n- [IDX-TENET-G:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-idx-tenet-g)\n- [IDX-ROTA-G:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-idx-rota-g)\n- [IDX-OPERA-G:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-idx-opera-g)\n- [IDX-AREPO-G:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-idx-arepo-g)\n- [IDX-SATOR-G:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-idx-sator-g)\n- [IDX-W-TENET:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-idx-w-tenet)\n- [IDX-W-ROTA:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-idx-w-rota)\n- [IDX-W-AREPO:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-idx-w-arepo)\n- [IDX-W-OPERA:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-idx-w-opera)\n- [IDX-W-SATOR:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-idx-w-sator)\n- [IDX-W-ALIAS:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-idx-w-alias)\n- [IDX-W-DEP:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-idx-w-dep)\n- [IDX-TENET-D:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-idx-tenet-d)\n- [IDX-ROTA-D:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-idx-rota-d)\n- [IDX-TENET-H:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-idx-tenet-h)\n- [IDX-AREPO-H:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-idx-arepo-h)\n- [IDX-OPERA-H:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-idx-opera-h)\n- [IDX-SATOR-H:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-idx-sator-h)\n- [IDX-DEP-H-ROTA-D:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-idx-dep-h-rota-d)\n- [IDX-TENET-I-MIXTURA-CARRIER-LAYER:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-idx-tenet-i-mixtura-carrier-layer)\n- [SECTION A0 — ROOT CLASS LAWS](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-section-a0-root-class-laws)\n- [SECTION B_Beta — MAGNUM LAYER](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-section-b-beta-magnum-layer)\n- [SECTION C_Gamma — MAGNUM DEPENDENCY GRAPH](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-section-c-gamma-magnum-dependency-graph)\n- [SECTION D_Delta — STACK A / ABSOLUTE PRINCIPIA](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-section-d-delta-stack-a-absolute-principia)\n- [SECTION E_Epsilon — STACK T / RELATIVE PRINCIPIA](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-section-e-epsilon-stack-t-relative-principia)\n- [SECTION F_Zeta — STACK E / REGIMEN_RQ QUESTIONS + RULES](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-section-f-zeta-stack-e-regimen-rq-questions-rules)\n- [SECTION G_Eta — STACK F / TABULA](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-section-g-eta-stack-f-tabula)\n- [SECTION H_Theta — STACK S/K / SUBJECT-SUBSTRATE SYSTEM](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-section-h-theta-stack-s-k-subject-substrate-system)\n- [SECTION I_Iota — STACK G / EVACUATIO FIGURAE TERTIAE](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-section-i-iota-stack-g-evacuatio-figurae-tertiae)\n- [SECTION K_Kappa — STACK LIBER SUBSTRATES](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-section-k-kappa-stack-liber-substrates)\n- [IDX-LIBER-W-SOURCE-SUBSTRATE:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-idx-liber-w-source-substrate)\n- [IDX-LIBER-W-EVACUATIO-PROOF:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-idx-liber-w-evacuatio-proof)\n- [SECTION L_Lambda — MIXTURA / TENET I CORRECTION](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-section-l-lambda-mixtura-tenet-i-correction)\n- [IDX-OPERA-I-VALIDATION:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-idx-opera-i-validation)\n- [SECTION M_Mu — STACK D / COMPRESSED PRINCIPIAL MACHINE](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-section-m-mu-stack-d-compressed-principial-machine)\n- [SECTION N_Nu — OPERA H / MULTIPLICATIO DEPENDENCY RECORD](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-section-n-nu-opera-h-multiplicatio-dependency-record)\n- [SECTION O_Omicron — OPERA I PATCH / REMOVAL RECORD](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-section-o-omicron-opera-i-patch-removal-record)\n- [SECTION P_Pi — LEGACY MATERIAL POLICY](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-section-p-pi-legacy-material-policy)\n- [SECTION Q_Koppa — ΣΑΤΟΡ POLICY](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-section-q-koppa-policy)\n- [SECTION R_Rho — JSON MIRROR POLICY](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-section-r-rho-json-mirror-policy)\n- [SECTION S_Sigma — GLOBAL DEPENDENCY RULES](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-section-s-sigma-global-dependency-rules)\n- [SECTION T_Tau — PRE-CODEX NORMALIZATION STATUS](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-section-t-tau-pre-codex-normalization-status)\n- [ROOT PATCHES REQUIRED BEFORE FINAL EXECUTION DISCIPLINE LOCK:](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-root-patches-required-before-final-execution-discipline-lock)\n- [SECTION U_Upsilon — FINAL GLOBAL STATE](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-section-u-upsilon-final-global-state)\n- [SECTION X_Chi -- STACK W / HABITUS MORALES / MORAL HABITS](#local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-section-x-chi-stack-w-habitus-morales-moral-habits)\n\u003c!-- LOCAL_SECTION_INDEX_END --\u003e\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-index-role-law\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nINDEX ROLE LAW:\n ROLE FIELDS ARE STRUCTURAL ROUTING DESCRIPTIONS ONLY.\n ROLE FIELDS MUST NOT BE USED TO EXECUTE, SIMULATE,\n RECONSTRUCT, OR INFER ARTIFACT CONTENT.\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-file-naming-law\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nFILE NAMING LAW:\n STACK ARTIFACT FILENAMES ARE CLASS-FUNCTIONAL ROUTING LABELS.\n FILENAMES MUST NOT DESCRIBE STACK-SPECIFIC ARTIFACT CONTENT.\n FILENAMES MUST NOT BE USED TO INFER ARTIFACT BEHAVIOR.\n ARTIFACT CONTENT MUST BE PARSED FROM THE FILE BODY.\n\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-section-a-alpha-root-control-state\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nSECTION A_Alpha — ROOT CONTROL STATE\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-system-state\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nSYSTEM STATE:\n STABLE / PRE-CODEX READY\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-global-status\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nGLOBAL STATUS:\n • MAGNUM layer registered\n • Stack A supplemental OPERA artifacts registered\n • Stack A multi-OPERA routing law registered\n • TENET D support dependency registered for OPERA F / OPERA G / OPERA H\n • TENET I support dependency registered for OPERA F / OPERA G / OPERA H\n • Stack artifact filenames normalized to class-functional routing labels\n • Stack S/K registered\n • Stack G registered\n * Stack W canonical source registered for identity and discovery only;\n runtime binding disabled\n • Stack E registered\n • Stack F registered\n • OPERA H ↔ ROTA D dependency declared\n • Mixtura registered as TENET I carrier doctrine\n • Legacy OPERAE excluded from active SYSTEM_INDEX\n * NUOVA governance registered as deployment-binding guardrail\n * TRADITIO governance registered as deployment-binding guardrail\n * ALIAS class law registered as canonical root pre-onboarding law\n * transversal artifact surface registered\n * TENET ICONUM REGIMINUM candidate indexed with optional SATOR references\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-codex-readiness\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nCODEX READINESS:\n READY FOR ΣΑΤΟΡ GENERATION\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-authority-rule\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nAUTHORITY RULE:\n TEXTUAL ARTIFACTS ARE AUTHORITATIVE.\n SYSTEM_INDEX IS A BINDING / ROUTING REGISTRY ONLY.\n\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-section-a1-stack-artifact-file-routing-map\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nSECTION A1 — STACK ARTIFACT FILE ROUTING MAP\n============================================================\n\n\nFilename policy:\n FILENAMES DECLARE CLASS AND CLASS FUNCTION ONLY.\n FILENAMES DO NOT DECLARE STACK-SPECIFIC CONTENT.\n OPERA / TENET / ROTAS / AREPO / SATOR BEHAVIOR MUST BE\n PARSED FROM ARTIFACT CONTENT, NOT INFERRED FROM FILENAME.\n\n\nClass-functional filename forms:\n TENET_\u003cR\u003e_DoctrinalInvariants.md\n ROTAS_\u003cR\u003e_StructuralInstantiation.md\n AREPO_\u003cR\u003e_InputAdmissibility.md\n OPERA_\u003cR\u003e_ExecutionMechanism.md\n SATOR_\u003cR\u003e_OutputRequirements.md\n\n\nRouting map:\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-idx-a-tenet\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\n IDX-A-TENET:\n File: 02_STACK_A/TENET_A_DoctrinalInvariants.md\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-idx-a-rota\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\n IDX-A-ROTA:\n File: 02_STACK_A/ROTAS_A_StructuralInstantiation.md\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-idx-a-arepo\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\n IDX-A-AREPO:\n File: 02_STACK_A/AREPO_A_InputAdmissibility.md\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-idx-a-opera\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\n IDX-A-OPERA:\n File: 02_STACK_A/OPERA_A_ExecutionMechanism.md\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-idx-a-opera-minor\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\n IDX-A-OPERA-MINOR:\n File: 02_STACK_A/OPERA_AMinor_ExecutionMechanism.md\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-idx-a-opera-ax\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\n IDX-A-OPERA-AX:\n File: 02_STACK_A/OPERA_Ax_ExecutionMechanism.md\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-idx-a-sator\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\n IDX-A-SATOR:\n File: 02_STACK_A/SATOR_A_OutputRequirements.md\n\n IDX-A-ALIAS:\n File: 02_STACK_A/ALIAS_A\n Class: AGLA / ALIAS\n Status: CANONICAL / STACK-LOCAL / ROOT-DEFAULT ALIAS TABLE\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-idx-t-tenet\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\n IDX-T-TENET:\n File: 03_STACK_T/TENET_T_DoctrinalInvariants.md\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-idx-t-rota\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\n IDX-T-ROTA:\n File: 03_STACK_T/ROTAS_T_StructuralInstantiation.md\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-idx-t-arepo\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\n IDX-T-AREPO:\n File: 03_STACK_T/AREPO_T_InputAdmissibility.md\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-idx-t-opera\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\n IDX-T-OPERA:\n File: 03_STACK_T/OPERA_T_ExecutionMechanism.md\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-idx-t-sator\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\n IDX-T-SATOR:\n File: 03_STACK_T/SATOR_T_OutputRequirements.md\n\n IDX-T-ALIAS:\n File: 03_STACK_T/ALIAS_T\n Class: AGLA / ALIAS\n Status: CANONICAL / STACK-LOCAL / ROOT-DEFAULT ALIAS TABLE\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-idx-e-tenet-core\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\n IDX-E-TENET-CORE:\n File: 04_STACK_E/TENET_E_DoctrinalInvariants.md\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-idx-e-rotas-struct\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\n IDX-E-ROTAS-STRUCT:\n File: 04_STACK_E/ROTAS_E_StructuralInstantiation.md\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-idx-e-arepo-gate\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\n IDX-E-AREPO-GATE:\n File: 04_STACK_E/AREPO_E_InputAdmissibility.md\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-idx-e-opera-engine\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\n IDX-E-OPERA-ENGINE:\n File: 04_STACK_E/OPERA_E_ExecutionMechanism.md\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-idx-e-sator-interface\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\n IDX-E-SATOR-INTERFACE:\n File: 04_STACK_E/SATOR_E_OutputRequirements.md\n\n IDX-E-ALIAS:\n File: 04_STACK_E/ALIAS_E\n Class: AGLA / ALIAS\n Status: CANONICAL / STACK-LOCAL / ROOT-DEFAULT ALIAS TABLE\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-idx-f-tenet\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\n IDX-F-TENET:\n File: 05_STACK_F/TENET_F_DoctrinalInvariants.md\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-idx-f-rota\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\n IDX-F-ROTA:\n File: 05_STACK_F/ROTAS_F_StructuralInstantiation.md\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-idx-f-arepo\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\n IDX-F-AREPO:\n File: 05_STACK_F/AREPO_F_InputAdmissibility.md\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-idx-f-opera\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\n IDX-F-OPERA:\n File: 05_STACK_F/OPERA_F_ExecutionMechanism.md\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-idx-f-sator\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\n IDX-F-SATOR:\n File: 05_STACK_F/SATOR_F_OutputRequirements.md\n\n IDX-F-ALIAS:\n File: 05_STACK_F/ALIAS_F\n Class: AGLA / ALIAS\n Status: CANONICAL / STACK-LOCAL / ROOT-DEFAULT ALIAS TABLE / NON-EXHAUSTIVE\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-idx-tenet-k\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\n IDX-TENET-K:\n File: 06_STACK_SK/TENET_K_DoctrinalInvariants.md\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-idx-rota-s\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\n IDX-ROTA-S:\n File: 06_STACK_SK/ROTAS_S_StructuralInstantiation.md\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-idx-opera-s\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\n IDX-OPERA-S:\n File: 06_STACK_SK/OPERA_S_ExecutionMechanism.md\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-idx-arepo-s\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\n IDX-AREPO-S:\n File: 06_STACK_SK/AREPO_S_InputAdmissibility.md\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-idx-sator-s\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\n IDX-SATOR-S:\n File: 06_STACK_SK/SATOR_S_OutputRequirements.md\n\n IDX-K-ALIAS:\n File: 06_STACK_SK/ALIAS_K\n Class: AGLA / ALIAS\n Status: CANONICAL / STACK-LOCAL / ROOT-DEFAULT ALIAS TABLE\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-idx-tenet-g\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\n IDX-TENET-G:\n File: 07_STACK_G/TENET_G_DoctrinalInvariants.md\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-idx-rota-g\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\n IDX-ROTA-G:\n File: 07_STACK_G/ROTAS_G_StructuralInstantiation.md\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-idx-opera-g\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\n IDX-OPERA-G:\n File: 07_STACK_G/OPERA_G_ExecutionMechanism.md\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-idx-arepo-g\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\n IDX-AREPO-G:\n File: 07_STACK_G/AREPO_G_InputAdmissibility.md\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-idx-sator-g\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\n IDX-SATOR-G:\n File: 07_STACK_G/SATOR_G_OutputRequirements.md\n\n IDX-G-ALIAS:\n File: 07_STACK_G/ALIAS_G\n Class: AGLA / ALIAS\n Status: CANONICAL / STACK-LOCAL / ROOT-DEFAULT ALIAS TABLE / NON-EXHAUSTIVE\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-idx-w-tenet\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\n IDX-W-TENET:\n File: 19_STACK_W/TENET_W_DoctrinalInvariants.md\n Artifact: TENET W -- DOCTRINAL INVARIANTS\n Version: 1.0.0\n Class: TENET\n Status: CANONICAL SOURCE / NON_RUNTIME / RUNTIME_DISABLED\n Authority-Scope: STACK_W SOURCE ONLY\n Abstraction-Level: DOCTRINE SOURCE\n Parent-Refs: AGLA_TENET_CLASS_LAW\n Dependency-Refs: W_HUMAN_BINDING_RECORD; W_LEXICAL_AND_TITLE_DECISION_RECORD\n Capability-Requirements: NOT_EVALUATED_FOR_RUNTIME\n Provider-Bindings: NONE_ACTIVE\n Inheritance-Mode: NONE\n Conflict-Rule: CURRENT SAME-EPOCH TENET AND EFFECTIVE ROTAS ARE BOTH REQUIRED BEFORE ANY FUTURE OPERA ADMISSION\n Activation-Status: REGISTERED_IDENTITY_ONLY / NOT_ADMITTED\n Runtime-Binding: DISABLED / SEPARATE HUMAN GATE REQUIRED\n Source-Trace: 58ce4cec5f15a78b0263e85deea5a1e9e7412eed / ed19566b6523bf82e29f67894d22e5026edac19a\n Final-SHA256: 5b4efa9cfeab32d17a17e73e404a6f43282361612e30c379c143c517d78b5271\n Role: ROUTES TO THE CANONICAL TENET W SOURCE; DOES NOT ADMIT OR EXECUTE W.\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-idx-w-rota\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\n IDX-W-ROTA:\n File: 19_STACK_W/ROTAS_W_StructuralInstantiation.md\n Artifact: ROTAS W -- STRUCTURAL INSTANTIATION\n Version: 1.0.0\n Class: ROTAS\n Status: CANONICAL SOURCE / NON_RUNTIME / RUNTIME_DISABLED\n Authority-Scope: STACK_W SOURCE ONLY\n Abstraction-Level: FOUR-WHEEL STRUCTURAL SOURCE\n Parent-Refs: AGLA_ROTAS_CLASS_LAW; IDX-W-TENET\n Dependency-Refs: W-TERM-MATRIX-1.0.0; W-ROTATION-SEMANTICS-1.0.0\n Capability-Requirements: NOT_EVALUATED_FOR_RUNTIME\n Provider-Bindings: NONE_ACTIVE\n Inheritance-Mode: NONE\n Conflict-Rule: REGISTRATION DOES NOT SELECT AN EFFECTIVE ROTA OR SUPPLY CURRENT EVIDENCE\n Activation-Status: REGISTERED_IDENTITY_ONLY / NOT_ADMITTED\n Runtime-Binding: DISABLED / SEPARATE HUMAN GATE REQUIRED\n Source-Trace: 58ce4cec5f15a78b0263e85deea5a1e9e7412eed / d4135c510da8e7ec10eff367aae709cde18c795f\n Final-SHA256: 33c9fd7151577b56abded07938b2b6c6fa5673dffb02d14fd2654bc64a7a5177\n Role: ROUTES TO THE CANONICAL ROTAS W SOURCE; DOES NOT INSTANTIATE A LIVE ROTA.\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-idx-w-arepo\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\n IDX-W-AREPO:\n File: 19_STACK_W/AREPO_W_InputAdmissibility.md\n Artifact: AREPO W -- INPUT ADMISSIBILITY\n Version: 1.0.0\n Class: AREPO\n Status: CANONICAL SOURCE / NON_RUNTIME / RUNTIME_DISABLED\n Authority-Scope: STACK_W SOURCE ONLY\n Abstraction-Level: FAIL-CLOSED ADMISSION SOURCE\n Parent-Refs: AGLA_AREPO_CLASS_LAW; IDX-W-TENET; IDX-W-ROTA\n Dependency-Refs: W-AT-PROFILE-DATASET-1.0.0; W-HUMAN-BINDINGS-1.0.0\n Capability-Requirements: NOT_EVALUATED_FOR_RUNTIME\n Provider-Bindings: NONE_ACTIVE\n Inheritance-Mode: NONE\n Conflict-Rule: A ROUTING RECORD CANNOT EMIT ADMISSION\n Activation-Status: REGISTERED_IDENTITY_ONLY / NOT_ADMITTED\n Runtime-Binding: DISABLED / SEPARATE HUMAN GATE REQUIRED\n Source-Trace: 58ce4cec5f15a78b0263e85deea5a1e9e7412eed / e731728077c0604833ebb4af2d11597745cc2810\n Final-SHA256: 20ff644aa8fb9cd0919cab191e818fcadf61a1029783e5a8c019e1ac041cbbec\n Role: ROUTES TO THE CANONICAL AREPO W SOURCE; DOES NOT ADMIT AN INPUT.\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-idx-w-opera\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\n IDX-W-OPERA:\n File: 19_STACK_W/OPERA_W_ExecutionMechanism.md\n Artifact: OPERA W -- EXECUTION MECHANISM\n Version: 1.0.0\n Class: OPERA\n Status: CANONICAL SOURCE / NON_RUNTIME / RUNTIME_DISABLED\n Authority-Scope: STACK_W SOURCE ONLY\n Abstraction-Level: NON-RUNTIME EXECUTION SPECIFICATION\n Parent-Refs: AGLA_OPERA_CLASS_LAW; IDX-W-TENET; IDX-W-ROTA; IDX-W-AREPO\n Dependency-Refs: W-TERM-MATRIX-1.0.0; W-AT-PROFILE-DATASET-1.0.0\n Capability-Requirements: NOT_EVALUATED_FOR_RUNTIME\n Provider-Bindings: NONE_ACTIVE\n Inheritance-Mode: NONE\n Conflict-Rule: SOURCE REGISTRATION IS NOT OPERA ADMISSION OR EXECUTION\n Activation-Status: REGISTERED_IDENTITY_ONLY / NOT_ADMITTED / NOT_EXECUTABLE\n Runtime-Binding: DISABLED / SEPARATE HUMAN GATE REQUIRED\n Source-Trace: 58ce4cec5f15a78b0263e85deea5a1e9e7412eed / 0c095e11b25cb7dbf4e4e18b8d7b760a62b142cf\n Final-SHA256: d3e9fa8025e2b28757ff365192ba32f83895f83ae8df57ccf4100000f2d74e77\n Role: ROUTES TO THE CANONICAL OPERA W SOURCE; CANNOT EXECUTE FROM INDEX, PROSE, ALIAS, OR PLACEMENT.\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-idx-w-sator\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\n IDX-W-SATOR:\n File: 19_STACK_W/SATOR_W_OutputRequirements.md\n Artifact: SATOR W -- OUTPUT REQUIREMENTS\n Version: 1.0.0\n Class: SATOR\n Status: CANONICAL SOURCE / NON_RUNTIME / RUNTIME_DISABLED\n Authority-Scope: STACK_W SOURCE ONLY\n Abstraction-Level: DISCLOSURE SOURCE\n Parent-Refs: AGLA_SATOR_CLASS_LAW; IDX-W-TENET; IDX-W-ROTA; IDX-W-AREPO; IDX-W-OPERA\n Dependency-Refs: NONE_ACTIVE\n Capability-Requirements: NOT_EVALUATED_FOR_RUNTIME\n Provider-Bindings: NONE_ACTIVE\n Inheritance-Mode: NONE\n Conflict-Rule: DISCLOSURE NEVER CREATES A RESULT OR REUSES PRIOR ADMISSION\n Activation-Status: REGISTERED_IDENTITY_ONLY / NOT_ADMITTED\n Runtime-Binding: DISABLED / SEPARATE HUMAN GATE REQUIRED\n Source-Trace: 58ce4cec5f15a78b0263e85deea5a1e9e7412eed / da8bce0eb656f0dbcfa2062ce59c5ee8e9b4dccd\n Final-SHA256: b8489371f8e8d43e9ff96384016cb8029f2b739338b9b0befda155da121a6fc5\n Role: ROUTES TO THE CANONICAL SATOR W SOURCE; DOES NOT MEDIATE A LIVE RESULT.\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-idx-w-alias\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\n IDX-W-ALIAS:\n File: 19_STACK_W/ALIAS_W.json\n Artifact: ALIAS W\n Version: 1.0.0\n Class: AGLA / ALIAS\n Status: CANONICAL SOURCE / NON_RUNTIME / RUNTIME_DISABLED\n Authority-Scope: STACK_W SURFACE RESOLUTION ONLY\n Abstraction-Level: STACK-LOCAL ALIAS SOURCE\n Parent-Refs: AGLA_ALIAS_CLASS_LAW\n Dependency-Refs: IDX-W-TENET; IDX-W-ROTA; IDX-W-AREPO; IDX-W-OPERA; IDX-W-SATOR\n Capability-Requirements: NOT_EVALUATED_FOR_RUNTIME\n Provider-Bindings: NONE_ACTIVE\n Inheritance-Mode: NONE\n Conflict-Rule: ALIAS RESOLUTION CANNOT ADMIT, EXECUTE, SIMULATE, OR CREATE DOCTRINE\n Activation-Status: REGISTERED_IDENTITY_ONLY / NOT_ADMITTED\n Runtime-Binding: DISABLED / SEPARATE HUMAN GATE REQUIRED\n Source-Trace: 58ce4cec5f15a78b0263e85deea5a1e9e7412eed / 6f475a8b678c04f1398de2e470522550d28fe882\n Final-SHA256: bdf9f22b97b33acadbaf09f396be7d823b1ac135459124bac7c7def088a7316d\n Role: ROUTES STACK-LOCAL SURFACES TO THE CANONICAL SOURCE FAMILY ONLY.\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-idx-w-dep\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\n IDX-W-DEP:\n File: 19_STACK_W/DEP_W_DependencyRecord.md\n Artifact: DEP W -- DEPENDENCY RECORD\n Version: 1.0.0\n Class: DEPENDENCY RECORD\n Status: CANONICAL SUPPORT / NON_PROVIDER / NON_RUNTIME / RUNTIME_DISABLED\n Authority-Scope: STACK_W SUPPORT ONLY\n Abstraction-Level: DISCOVERY NON-PROVIDER\n Parent-Refs: W-LOCAL-SYSTEM-INDEX-1.0.0\n Dependency-Refs: NONE_ACTIVE\n Capability-Requirements: NOT_EVALUATED_FOR_RUNTIME\n Provider-Bindings: NONE_ACTIVE\n Inheritance-Mode: NONE\n Conflict-Rule: DEPENDENCY RESOLUTION DOES NOT TRANSFER PROVIDER OR EXECUTION AUTHORITY\n Activation-Status: REGISTERED_IDENTITY_ONLY / NOT_ADMITTED\n Runtime-Binding: DISABLED / SEPARATE HUMAN GATE REQUIRED\n Source-Trace: 58ce4cec5f15a78b0263e85deea5a1e9e7412eed / e1d3cdb67de064bca71627f4c08e7a5732fa9a31\n Final-SHA256: 2008d1475573444cb2ea80b1ef1385cfed2d32e835bac1fdeaaeb07651897b04\n Role: DISCOVERY RECORD ONLY; NOT A PROVIDER.\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-idx-tenet-d\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\n IDX-TENET-D:\n File: 08_STACK_D/TENET_D_DoctrinalInvariants.md\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-idx-rota-d\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\n IDX-ROTA-D:\n File: 08_STACK_D/ROTAS_D_StructuralInstantiation.md\n\n IDX-D-ALIAS:\n File: 08_STACK_D/ALIAS_D\n Class: AGLA / ALIAS\n Status: CANONICAL / STACK-LOCAL / ROOT-DEFAULT ALIAS TABLE / NON-EXHAUSTIVE\n Note: REGIMEN_D AREPO / OPERA / SATOR class artifacts remain missing until created.\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-idx-tenet-h\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\n IDX-TENET-H:\n File: 09_STACK_H/TENET_H_DoctrinalInvariants.md\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-idx-arepo-h\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\n IDX-AREPO-H:\n File: 09_STACK_H/AREPO_H_InputAdmissibility.md\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-idx-opera-h\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\n IDX-OPERA-H:\n File: 09_STACK_H/OPERA_H_ExecutionMechanism.md\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-idx-sator-h\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\n IDX-SATOR-H:\n File: 09_STACK_H/SATOR_H_OutputRequirements.md\n\n IDX-H-ALIAS:\n File: 09_STACK_H/ALIAS_H\n Class: AGLA / ALIAS\n Status: CANONICAL / STACK-LOCAL / ROOT-DEFAULT ALIAS TABLE / NON-EXHAUSTIVE\n Note: REGIMEN_H ROTAS binding resolves through IDX-DEP-H-ROTA-D.\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-idx-dep-h-rota-d\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\n IDX-DEP-H-ROTA-D:\n File: 09_STACK_H/DEP_H_DependencyRecord.md\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-idx-tenet-i-mixtura-carrier-layer\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\n IDX-TENET-I-MIXTURA-CARRIER-LAYER:\n File: 10_STACK_I/TENET_I_DoctrinalInvariants.md\n\n IDX-I-ALIAS:\n File: 10_STACK_I/ALIAS_I\n Class: AGLA / ALIAS\n Status: CANONICAL / STACK-LOCAL / ROOT-DEFAULT ALIAS TABLE / NON-EXHAUSTIVE\n Note: REGIMEN_I ROTAS / AREPO / OPERA / SATOR class artifacts remain missing until created.\n\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-section-a0-root-class-laws\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nSECTION A0 — ROOT CLASS LAWS\n============================================================\n\nIDX-ROOT-GRAPHUS-COMMUNIS-ARTIS\nArtifact ID: AGLA-GRAPHUS-COMMUNIS-ARTIS\nArtifact: AGLA — GRAPHUS COMMUNIS ARTIS CLASS LAW\nFile: 00_ROOT_CLASS_LAWS/AGLA_GRAPHUS_COMMUNIS_ARTIS_CLASS_LAW.md\nClass: AGLA / ROOT CLASS LAW / GRAPHUS COMMUNIS ARTIS\nStatus: CANONICAL / ROOT-CONTRACT / NON-RUNTIME / NO-EXECUTION-AUTHORITY\nGlobal Authority: ROOT-CONTRACT SCOPE / HUMAN-CANONIZED / NON-EXECUTION\nCanonization Record:\n 00_ROOT_CLASS_LAWS/GRAPHUS_COMMUNIS_ARTIS_ROOT_CONTRACT_CANONIZATION_RECORD.md\nEdge-Set Lifecycle Policy:\n EDGE SETS MUST BE VERSION-CONTROLLED, SOURCE-TRACEABLE, AND\n INDEPENDENTLY STATUS-BOUND.\n ROOT-CONTRACT CANONIZATION DOES NOT PROMOTE, VALIDATE, CANONIZE,\n EXECUTE, OR GRANT AUTHORITY TO AN EDGE SET OR DEPENDENT SURFACE.\nInstance Specification:\n 00_ROOT_CLASS_LAWS/GRAPHUS_COMMUNIS_ARTIS_INSTANCE_SPECIFICATION.md\nEdge-Set Register:\n 00_ROOT_CLASS_LAWS/GRAPHUS_COMMUNIS_ARTIS_EDGE_SET_REGISTER.md\n 00_ROOT_CLASS_LAWS/GRAPHUS_COMMUNIS_ARTIS_EDGE_SETS.json\nOperational TENET:\n 00_TRANSVERSAL_ARTIFACTS/TENET/TENET_GRAPHUS_COMMUNIS_ARTIS.md\nQuantitative Foundation:\n 16_STACK_ARITHMETICA/TENET_ARITHMETICA_DoctrinalInvariants.md\n\nRole:\n DEFINES THE GLOBAL GRAPH OBJECT AND THE CONTRACT FOR CONTEXTUAL\n GRAPHUS INSTANCES;\n DOES NOT FUNCTION AS TENET, ROTA, AREPO, OPERA, SATOR, OR A\n COMPUTATIONAL TREE;\n REQUIRES edge_set_ref AND edge_set_authority_status FOR EVERY INSTANCE;\n ARTICULATES POSSIBILITIES, CONSTRAINTS, REDUCTIONS, SELECTED PATHS,\n REJECTED ALTERNATIVES, STATE DELTAS, AND STOP / CONTINUE DECISIONS;\n EMULATES TRAVERSAL THROUGH SESSION SELF-BINDING AND COHERENCE PRESSURE,\n WITHOUT REQUIRING A VISUAL SKILL OR INVOCATION-LOCAL GRAPH FILE;\n DEFERS EXECUTION TO REGISTERED ROTA / AREPO / OPERA BINDINGS.\n\nAvailability:\n CANONICAL STRUCTURAL ROOT CONTRACT / NON-RUNTIME.\n NOT EXECUTABLE; FIRST EDGE SET, TESTS, INSTANCES, AND MACHINA\n BINDINGS REMAIN CANDIDATE / NON_RUNTIME / NO_AUTHORITY_EFFECT.\n\nIDX-AGLA-TENET-CLASS-LAW\nArtifact: AGLA — TENET CLASS LAW\nClass: TENET\nStatus: CANONICAL / ROOT-CONSTITUTION\n\nRole:\n SPECIFIES CLASS BOUNDARIES FOR TENET ARTIFACTS;\n CONSTRAINS DOCTRINAL ARTIFACTS WITHOUT PROVIDING STACK-SPECIFIC CONTENT;\n OWNS THE ROOT NON-CREATION, ASYMMETRY, PATH, SOURCE, AND\n NON-COLLAPSE LAWS FOR CONTEXTUAL CONTRACTION.\n\nIDX-AGLA-ROTAS-CLASS-LAW\nArtifact: AGLA — ROTAS CLASS LAW\nClass: ROTAS\nStatus: CANONICAL / ROOT-CONSTITUTION\n\nRole:\n SPECIFIES CLASS BOUNDARIES FOR ROTAS ARTIFACTS;\n CONSTRAINS STRUCTURAL EXPOSURE WITHOUT PROVIDING STACK-SPECIFIC TOPOLOGY;\n OWNS THE ROOT STRUCTURAL RECORD, DIRECTION, GROUPING, AND PATH\n REQUIREMENTS FOR CONTEXTUAL CONTRACTION.\n\nIDX-AGLA-AREPO-CLASS-LAW\nArtifact: AGLA — AREPO CLASS LAW\nClass: AREPO\nStatus: CANONICAL / ROOT-CONSTITUTION\n\nRole:\n SPECIFIES CLASS BOUNDARIES FOR AREPO ARTIFACTS;\n CONSTRAINS ADMISSIBILITY AND GATING WITHOUT PROVIDING STACK-SPECIFIC VALIDATION CONTENT;\n ADMITS CONTEXTUAL ARTICULATION AND THE RESOLVED FIVE-CLASS\n COMPOSITION REQUIRED FOR EXECUTION.\n\nIDX-AGLA-OPERA-CLASS-LAW\nArtifact: AGLA — OPERA CLASS LAW\nClass: OPERA\nStatus: CANONICAL / ROOT-CONSTITUTION\n\nRole:\n SPECIFIES CLASS BOUNDARIES FOR OPERA ARTIFACTS;\n REQUIRES SYSTEM_INDEX BINDING, AREPO ADMISSION, AND ACTUAL ARTIFACT LOADING BEFORE EXECUTION;\n DEFINES THE ROOT READ-ONLY CONTEXTUAL INTERPRETATION BEHAVIOR.\n\nIDX-AGLA-SATOR-CLASS-LAW\nArtifact: AGLA — SATOR CLASS LAW\nClass: SATOR\nStatus: CANONICAL / ROOT-CONSTITUTION\n\nRole:\n SPECIFIES CLASS BOUNDARIES FOR SATOR ARTIFACTS;\n CONSTRAINS MEDIATION WITHOUT PROVIDING STACK-SPECIFIC USER-FACING CONTENT;\n REQUIRES CONTEXTUAL LIMIT, SOURCE, AND FIVE-CLASS COMPOSITION TRACE.\n\nIDX-AGLA-ALIAS-CLASS-LAW\nArtifact: AGLA -- ALIAS CLASS LAW\nFile: 00_ROOT_CLASS_LAWS/AGLA_ALIAS_CLASS_LAW\nClass: AGLA / ROOT CLASS LAW / ALIAS\nStatus: CANONICAL / ROOT-CLASS / DEPLOYMENT-BINDING / PRE-ONBOARDING LAW\n\nRole:\n SPECIFIES ROOT ALIAS, INVOCATION, OPERATOR, AND CHAMBER NOTATION DISCIPLINE;\n RESOLVES USER-FACING ALIASES BEFORE ARTIFACT LOOKUP WITHOUT EXECUTING;\n BINDS UNPREFIXED ALIASES TO THE MAIN ARS BREVIS / ARS GENERALIS ULTIMA STACK;\n REQUIRES PLUGIN ALIASES TO USE EXPLICIT PREFIXES TO PREVENT ROOT-ALIAS SHADOWING.\n\nIDX-AGLA-SIGMA-SATOR-CLASS-LAW\nArtifact: AGLA — ΣΑΤΟΡ CLASS LAW\nClass: AGLA / MACROCLASS\nStatus: CANONICAL / ROOT-KERNEL\n\nRole:\n SPECIFIES MACROCLASS WRAPPER LAW FOR BUNDLING SATOR / AREPO / TENET / OPERA / ROTAS;\n REQUIRES VERBATIM ARTIFACT INCLUSION AND CLASS-SEPARATION PRESERVATION.\n\nIDX-AGLA-EXECUTION-LAW\nArtifact: AGLA — EXECUTION LAW\nClass: AGLA / ROOT EXECUTION LAW\nStatus: REQUIRED / ROOT PATCH TARGET\n\nRole:\n SPECIFIES WHAT USER-REQUESTED EXECUTION MEANS;\n ROUTES EXECUTION REQUESTS THROUGH SYSTEM_INDEX BINDING AND REGISTERED ARTIFACT LOADING.\n\nIDX-AGLA-SOURCES-PARSING-LAW\nArtifact: AGLA — SOURCES PARSING LAW\nClass: AGLA / ROOT SOURCE LAW\nStatus: REQUIRED / ROOT PATCH TARGET\n\nRole:\n SPECIFIES SOURCE-TO-ARTIFACT PARSING DISCIPLINE;\n PREVENTS SOURCE FILES FROM FUNCTIONING AS RUNTIME EXECUTION ARTIFACTS.\n\nIDX-AGLA-ARTIFACT-CONSTRUCTION-PROTOCOL\nArtifact: AGLA — ARTIFACT CONSTRUCTION PROTOCOL\nClass: AGLA / CONTROL-PLANE\nStatus: CANONICAL / CONSTRUCTION LAW\n\nRole:\n SPECIFIES ARTIFACT AUTHORING AND SERIALIZATION DISCIPLINE;\n CONSTRAINS CONSTRUCTION WITHOUT PROVIDING ARTIFACT-SPECIFIC CONTENT.\n\nIDX-AGLA-SYSTEM-INDEX-LAW\nArtifact: AGLA — SYSTEM INDEX LAW\nClass: AGLA / CONTROL-PLANE\nStatus: CANONICAL / REGISTRY LAW\n\nRole:\n SPECIFIES INDEX REGISTRATION, BINDING, AND ANTI-SIMULATION DISCIPLINE;\n FORBIDS EXECUTION FROM INDEX SUMMARIES.\n\nIDX-AGLA-NUOVA-CLASS-LAW\nArtifact: AGLA -- NUOVA CLASS LAW\nClass: AGLA / ROOT CLASS LAW / NUOVA\nStatus: CANONICAL / ROOT-GOVERNANCE / DEPLOYMENT-BINDING\n\nRole:\n SPECIFIES CONTROLLED INVENTED-STRUCTURE GOVERNANCE;\n REQUIRES NUOVA DISCLOSURE, NAMING SEPARATION, CANON-FIRST PARSING,\n AND DIRECT PROMOTION PROHIBITION.\n\nIDX-NUOVA-TENET\nArtifact: TENET NUOVA -- DOCTRINAL INVARIANTS\nClass: TENET\nStatus: CANONICAL / DEPLOYMENT-BINDING / NUOVA GOVERNANCE\n\nRole:\n SPECIFIES DOCTRINAL SEPARATION BETWEEN CANON AND INVENTED STRUCTURE;\n RESERVES CANONICAL CLASS NAMES AND BINDS AD HOC TOKENS.\n\nIDX-NUOVA-ROTAS\nArtifact: ROTAS NUOVA -- STRUCTURAL INSTANTIATION\nClass: ROTAS\nStatus: CANONICAL / DEPLOYMENT-BINDING / NUOVA GOVERNANCE\n\nRole:\n SPECIFIES NUOVA TRAVERSAL SEPARATION;\n REQUIRES CANON / METAE / NUOVA / LEGACY TOPOLOGY DISTINCTION.\n\nIDX-NUOVA-AREPO\nArtifact: AREPO NUOVA -- INPUT ADMISSIBILITY\nClass: AREPO\nStatus: CANONICAL / DEPLOYMENT-BINDING / NUOVA GOVERNANCE\n\nRole:\n SPECIFIES ADMISSIBILITY CONDITIONS FOR INVENTED STRUCTURES;\n BLOCKS SILENT CANONICAL SUBSTITUTION.\n\nIDX-NUOVA-OPERA\nArtifact: OPERA NUOVA -- EXECUTION MECHANISM\nClass: OPERA\nStatus: CANONICAL / DEPLOYMENT-BINDING / NUOVA GOVERNANCE\n\nRole:\n SPECIFIES EXECUTION SEPARATION FOR INVENTED METHODOLOGIES;\n FORBIDS NUOVA AS RUNTIME SIGMA_SATOR KERNEL.\n\nIDX-NUOVA-SATOR\nArtifact: SATOR NUOVA -- OUTPUT REQUIREMENTS\nClass: SATOR\nStatus: CANONICAL / DEPLOYMENT-BINDING / NUOVA GOVERNANCE\n\nRole:\n SPECIFIES USER-FACING DISCLOSURE FOR INVENTED STRUCTURES;\n REQUIRES S@TOR / @R\u0026PO / T\u0026N\u0026T / OP\u0026R@ / ROT@ TOKEN SEPARATION.\n\nIDX-NUOVA-DEPLOYMENT-DISCLOSURE\nArtifact: NUOVA -- DEPLOYMENT DISCLOSURE RULES\nClass: AGLA / DEPLOYMENT / NUOVA\nStatus: CANONICAL / DEPLOYMENT-BINDING\n\nRole:\n SPECIFIES DEPLOYMENT CHAT DETECTION AND DISCLOSURE DISCIPLINE;\n KEEPS NUOVA GOVERNANCE NON-EXECUTABLE.\n\nIDX-TRADITIO-TENET\nArtifact: TENET TRADITIO -- DOCTRINAL INVARIANTS\nClass: TENET\nStatus: CANONICAL / DEPLOYMENT-BINDING / HUMAN-AUTHORIZED\n\nRole:\n SPECIFIES PRINCIPIAL DISCIPLINE FOR TRADITION AND RELIGION;\n BINDS OPERATOR -\u003e TEXT DIRECTION AND RESPECT WITHOUT SUBMISSION.\n\nIDX-TRADITIO-AREPO\nArtifact: AREPO TRADITIO -- INPUT ADMISSIBILITY\nClass: AREPO\nStatus: CANONICAL / DEPLOYMENT-BINDING / HUMAN-AUTHORIZED\n\nRole:\n SPECIFIES ADMISSIBILITY CONDITIONS FOR TRADITIONAL AND RELIGIOUS\n MATERIAL; BLOCKS TRADITION-AS-AUTHORITY AND TEXT-TO-OPERATOR REVERSAL.\n\nIDX-TRADITIO-OPERA\nArtifact: OPERA TRADITIO -- EXECUTION MECHANISM\nClass: OPERA\nStatus: CANONICAL / DEPLOYMENT-BINDING / HUMAN-AUTHORIZED\n\nRole:\n SPECIFIES EXECUTION DISCIPLINE FOR TRADITION AND RELIGION;\n PRESERVES CANONICAL OPERA IDENTITY AND ACTIVATES NUOVA WHEN METHODS\n ARE INVENTED.\n\nIDX-TRADITIO-ROTAS\nArtifact: ROTAS TRADITIO -- STRUCTURAL INSTANTIATION\nClass: ROTAS\nStatus: CANONICAL / DEPLOYMENT-BINDING / HUMAN-AUTHORIZED\n\nRole:\n SPECIFIES VISIBLE TRAVERSAL LANES FOR CANON, SOURCE, TRADITION,\n RELIGION, USER FRAME, INFERENCE, AND NUOVA PROPOSALS.\n\nIDX-TRADITIO-SATOR\nArtifact: SATOR TRADITIO -- OUTPUT REQUIREMENTS\nClass: SATOR\nStatus: CANONICAL / DEPLOYMENT-BINDING / HUMAN-AUTHORIZED\n\nRole:\n SPECIFIES RESPECTFUL MEDIATION, PERSPECTIVE DECLARATION, SOURCE\n DISCLOSURE, AND USER-BELIEF NON-INFERENCE.\n\nIDX-TRADITIO-DEPLOYMENT\nArtifact: TRADITIO -- DEPLOYMENT DISCIPLINE\nClass: AGLA / DEPLOYMENT / TRADITIO\nStatus: CANONICAL / DEPLOYMENT-BINDING / GUARDRAIL\n\nRole:\n SPECIFIES DEPLOYMENT CHAT DETECTION AND HANDLING FOR TRADITION\n AND RELIGION; KEEPS TRADITIO GOVERNANCE NON-EXECUTABLE.\n\nIDX-TRADITIO-LOCAL-SYSTEM-INDEX\nArtifact: TRADITIO LOCAL SYSTEM INDEX\nClass: AGLA / SYSTEM_INDEX / LOCAL\nStatus: CANONICAL / LOCAL INDEX / HUMAN-AUTHORIZED\n\nRole:\n REGISTERS LOCAL ROUTES FOR 12_STACK_TRADITIO;\n RECORDS THAT SOURCE CHAT DRAFTS WERE EVIDENCE, NOT AUTOMATIC CANON.\n\nIDX-ADD-ONS-DEPLOYMENT-LAW\nArtifact: ADD-ONS DEPLOYMENT LAW\nClass: AGLA / ADD_ONS / DEPLOYMENT\nStatus: CANONICAL-SEED / DEPLOYMENT-LANE / ADD-ON GOVERNANCE\n\nRole:\n SPECIFIES STANDALONE JSON DEPLOYMENT DISCIPLINE FOR PROMOTED\n INTEGRATION CANDIDATES; REQUIRES EMBEDDED VANILLA ROOT CLASS LAWS.\n\nIDX-ADD-ONS-LOCAL-SYSTEM-INDEX\nArtifact: ADD-ONS LOCAL SYSTEM INDEX\nClass: AGLA / ADD_ONS / SYSTEM_INDEX\nStatus: ACTIVE / ADD-ON REGISTRY\n\nRole:\n REGISTERS 13_STACK_ADD_ONS AS THE PROMOTED ADD-ON LANE;\n DISTINGUISHES STANDALONE ADD-ON TESTING FROM VANILLA INTEGRATION.\n\nAvailability:\n ADD-ONS ARE OPTIONAL DEPLOYMENT COMPONENTS.\n AVAILABILITY IS NOT GUARANTEED FOR EVERY DEPLOYMENT.\n FUTURE DEPLOYMENT TEMPLATES MAY DEFINE DIFFERENT BUNDLE FAMILIES.\n\nIDX-ADD-ON-LINGUISTIC-STACK\nArtifact: ADD_ON_LINGUISTIC_STACK\nClass: AGLA / ADD_ONS / LINGUISTIC STACK\nStatus: PROMOTED_FOR_STANDALONE_JSON_TESTING\n\nRole:\n TRANSFERS THE LINGUISTIC STACK FROM INTEGRATION CANDIDATES INTO\n 13_STACK_ADD_ONS; DEPLOYS AS STANDALONE JSON WHILE PRESERVING\n VANILLA COMPATIBILITY WHEN AVAILABLE.\n\nAvailability:\n OPTIONAL ADD-ON; NOT GUARANTEED IN EVERY DEPLOYMENT.\n\nIDX-ADD-ON-OPERA-Q-MNEMONICA\nArtifact: ADD_ON_OPERA_Q_MNEMONICA\nClass: AGLA / ADD_ONS / OPERA Q MNEMONICA / SIGMA_SATOR\nStatus: PROMOTED_FOR_SIGMA_SATOR_KERNEL_TESTING\n\nLocal System Index:\n 13_STACK_ADD_ONS/OPERA Q MNEMONICA/OPERA_Q_MNEMONICA_LOCAL_SYSTEM_INDEX.md\n\nSigma Kernel:\n 13_STACK_ADD_ONS/OPERA Q MNEMONICA/00_SIGMA_SATOR_Q_MNEMONICA/SIGMA_SATOR_Q_MNEMONICA_KERNEL.md\n\nStandalone JSON:\n 13_STACK_ADD_ONS/JSON_STANDALONE/ADD_ON_OPERA_Q_MNEMONICA_STANDALONE.json\n\nRole:\n REGISTERS OPERA Q MNEMONICA AS AN OPTIONAL ADD-ON FOR\n MNEMONIC-PALACE EXECUTION OF OPERA Q THROUGH PALATIUM ROTA E;\n EXPOSES SIGMA_SATOR_Q_MNEMONICA AS THE CONCENTRATED\n DEPLOYMENT-FACING ARTIFACT FOR DEPLOYMENTS THAT INCLUDE IT.\n\nAvailability:\n OPTIONAL ADD-ON; NOT GUARANTEED IN EVERY DEPLOYMENT.\n\nIDX-ADD-ON-QUESTION-RESPONSE-STACK\nArtifact: ADD_ON_QUESTION_RESPONSE_STACK\nClass: AGLA / ADD_ONS / QUESTION RESPONSE STACK / SIGMA_SATOR / METAE_CANDIDATE\nStatus: OPTIONAL_METAE_CANDIDATE / VANILLA_PROMOTION_CANDIDATE / SIGMA_SATOR_READY\n\nLocal System Index:\n 13_STACK_ADD_ONS/Question_Response_Stack/QR_LOCAL_SYSTEM_INDEX.md\n\nSigma Kernel:\n 13_STACK_ADD_ONS/Question_Response_Stack/00_SIGMA_SATOR_QR/SIGMA_SATOR_QR_KERNEL.md\n\nStandalone JSON:\n 13_STACK_ADD_ONS/JSON_STANDALONE/ADD_ON_QUESTION_RESPONSE_STACK_STANDALONE.json\n\nRole:\n REGISTERS QUESTION_RESPONSE_STACK AS AN OPTIONAL ADD-ON FOR\n CONFIRMATION-DRIVEN SPECIFICATION EXTRACTION;\n PRESERVES ITS NON-CANONICAL METAE-CANDIDATE STATUS WHILE\n MARKING IT AS A VANILLA-PROMOTION CANDIDATE.\n\nVanilla relation:\n NOT VANILLA BY IMPLICATION.\n DOES NOT REPLACE OPERA Q, ROOT SATOR CLARIFICATION LAW, AREPO,\n OR OPERANDUM ROUTING.\n\nAvailability:\n OPTIONAL ADD-ON; NOT GUARANTEED IN EVERY DEPLOYMENT.\n\nIDX-LLULLIANA-PROVISIONAL-TEST-USE\nArtifact: STACK LLULLIANA\nClass: AGLA / LLULLIANA / PROVISIONAL TEST USE\nStatus: PROVISIONAL_TEST_USE_AUTHORIZED / NON-CANONICAL / HUMAN-AUTHORIZED\n\nLocal System Index:\n 15_STACK_LLULLIANA/LLULLIANA_LOCAL_SYSTEM_INDEX.md\n\nRole:\n AUTHORIZES EXPLICIT LLULLIANA_PROVISIONAL_TEST SESSIONS;\n RETIRES THE FORMER ACTIVE ADD-ON PATH;\n PRESERVES THE COMPACT BASELINE AS A MUTATION TARGET;\n RETAINS THE RICH CANDIDATES AS DEVELOPMENT EVIDENCE ONLY;\n REQUIRES ADMITTED LATIN TEXT AS THE PRINCIPAL SEMANTIC ANCHOR;\n REQUIRES SATOR TO ORCHESTRATE A VALIDATED LATIN SEMANTIC PIVOT BEFORE\n MULTILINGUAL RENDERING;\n TREATS ENGLISH AS PARAPHRASE, NOT AS A GOVERNING SEMANTIC INTERMEDIARY;\n REQUIRES TENET, ROTAS, AREPO, OPERA, AND SATOR CONTROL;\n REQUIRES PROVISIONAL / NON-CANONICAL DISCLOSURE AND TEST EVIDENCE;\n DOES NOT DECLARE CANONICAL OR DEFAULT RUNTIME AUTHORITY.\n\nAvailability:\n EXECUTABLE ONLY IN EXPLICIT PROVISIONAL TEST SESSIONS;\n NOT DEFAULT; NOT VANILLA BY IMPLICATION; NOT DEPLOYABLE;\n NOT MIRROR-AUTHORIZED; NOT SIGMA-AUTHORIZED.\n\nWorking-source posture:\n SOURCE CHECKPOINT: 8ae682bc57fcd1766f3816c77c31fdc2e3c4f0c1\n LLULL-AB-LAT-WORK-01: REGISTERED WORKING PRIMARY LATIN\n LLULL-AB-CAPUT-AO-01: INTERPRETIVE CONTROL / NON-E0\n LLULL-AB-PT-WORK-01: PORTUGUESE WORKING VERSION / HUMAN REVIEW PENDING\n ENGLISH SOURCE GENERATION: DEFERRED BY HUMAN AUTHORITY\n\nPromotion gate:\n STRUCTURAL PASS DOES NOT EQUAL CANON READINESS.\n GIT IDENTITY, LATIN FIDELITY TESTS, RECORDED REAL-USE EVIDENCE, AND A\n SEPARATE HUMAN CANONIZATION DECISION REMAIN REQUIRED.\n\nIDX-ARITHMETICA-INTEGRATION\nArtifact: STACK ARITHMETICA\nClass: AGLA / ARITHMETICA / FIVE-CLASS INTEGRATION\nStatus: INTEGRATION / NON-RUNTIME / NOT CANONICAL\n\nLocal System Index:\n 16_STACK_ARITHMETICA/ARITHMETICA_LOCAL_SYSTEM_INDEX.md\n\nArtifacts:\n 16_STACK_ARITHMETICA/TENET_ARITHMETICA_DoctrinalInvariants.md\n 16_STACK_ARITHMETICA/ROTAS_ARITHMETICA_StructuralInstantiation.md\n 16_STACK_ARITHMETICA/AREPO_ARITHMETICA_InputAdmissibility.md\n 16_STACK_ARITHMETICA/OPERA_QUALITAS_EX_QUANTITAS_ExecutionMechanism.md\n 16_STACK_ARITHMETICA/OPERA_QUANTITAS_EX_QUALITAS_ExecutionMechanism.md\n 16_STACK_ARITHMETICA/OPERA_QUANTITAS_ET_QUALITAS_ExecutionMechanism.md\n 16_STACK_ARITHMETICA/SATOR_ARITHMETICA_OutputRequirements.md\n 16_STACK_ARITHMETICA/LIBER_EX_OPERAE_ARITHMETICA.md\n 16_STACK_ARITHMETICA/ARITHMETICA_OPERAE_DERIVATION_DATASET.json\n 16_STACK_ARITHMETICA/ARITHMETICA_SOURCE_REGISTER.md\n\nRole:\n EXTRACTS THE COMPRESSED JSON AND 19-TAB NUMERIC ONTOLOGY CORPUS INTO THE\n REQUIRED TENET -\u003e ROTAS -\u003e AREPO -\u003e OPERA -\u003e SATOR CLASS ORDER;\n DEFINES CONTROLLED, TRACEABLE GENERATION UNDER ADMITTED RULES AND\n EXPLICIT STATE-SPACE REDUCTION;\n PRESERVES NUMBER / QUALITY, CARRIER / ROLE, NOTATION / NUMBER, AND\n STRUCTURE / ONTOLOGY DISTINCTIONS;\n DEFINES THE ROTA-QUANTITAS-ET-QUALITAS FIELD AND THREE NATIVE OPERA\n CONTRACTS;\n SUPPORTS QUANTITATIVE -\u003e QUALITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE -\u003e QUANTITATIVE\n GENERATION;\n SEPARATES THE THREE NATIVE OPERAE INTO INDEPENDENT ARTIFACTS WHILE\n CENTRALIZING SHARED RULE, NORMALIZATION, TRACE, ORDINAL, AND GRAPHUS\n INVARIANTS IN TENET ARITHMETICA;\n PROVIDES THE QUANTITATIVE FOUNDATION OF GRAPHUS COMMUNIS ARTIS;\n BINDS MULTI-OPERA QUALITIES TO ORDINAL POSITION, INCLUDING\n IDENTIFICATION, DIFFERENTIATION, MEDIATION, AND STABILIZATION;\n DOES NOT AUTHORIZE GRAPH GENERATION OR MULTI-OPERA EXECUTION.\n\nSource posture:\n 00_ARCHIVED/INTEGRATED_CANDIDATES/STACK_ARITHMETICA_SUBSTRATES/\n ARITHMETICA STACK COMPRESSED.json\n = DEVELOPMENT SUBSTRATE / DERIVED JSON / NON-AUTHORITATIVE.\n GOOGLE DOCUMENT 1Eb3zAtQ4oZ_F9f4gewRe14qdBIT5TUM4r6It8Z8x5IU\n = HUMAN-CONTROLLED PRIMARY DERIVATIONAL CORPUS / NON-RUNTIME /\n LOCATION USER-MANAGED.\n THE COMPRESSED JSON IS ARCHIVED AND EXCLUDED FROM OPERATIVE STACK\n RESOLUTION. GOOGLE DRIVE RELOCATION IS NOT PERFORMED BY THIS SLICE.\n\nAvailability:\n STRUCTURALLY REVIEWABLE; NOT EXECUTABLE; NOT DEPLOYABLE;\n NOT MIRROR-AUTHORIZED; NOT SIGMA-AUTHORIZED.\n\nPromotion gate:\n HUMAN REVIEW, REMAINING SOURCE-GAP RESOLUTION, STRUCTURAL AND ARITHMETIC TESTS,\n GRAPH-INTERFACE COMPATIBILITY TESTS, AND SEPARATE HUMAN AUTHORIZATION.\n\nIDX-ANALOGIAE-DISTRIBUTED-INTEGRATION\nArtifact: ANALOGIAE DISTRIBUTED METHOD INTEGRATION\nClass: AGLA / SYSTEM_INDEX / DISTRIBUTED PROTOCOL\nStatus: CANONICAL FACETS IN A/T/E/SK / PROVISIONAL LLULLIANA TARGET / FORMER STACK RETIRED\n\nDirect integration loci:\n 02_STACK_A / TENET, AREPO, SATOR\n 03_STACK_T / TENET, AREPO, SATOR\n 04_STACK_E / TENET, AREPO, SATOR\n 06_STACK_SK / TENET, AREPO, SATOR\n 15_STACK_LLULLIANA / TENET, AREPO, SATOR / PROVISIONAL TEST USE\n\nComposition law:\n ANALOGICAL DOCTRINE, ADMISSIBILITY, AND MEDIATION RESOLVE THROUGH THE\n SELECTED LOCAL FACETS. ROTAS AND OPERA REMAIN THE ARTIFACTS ALREADY\n SELECTED BY THE FIVE-CLASS COMPOSITION; NO ANALOGIAE-SPECIFIC ROTAS OR\n OPERA IS LOADED.\n\nRetired surfaces:\n IDX-ANALOGIAE-LOCAL-SYSTEM-INDEX\n IDX-ANALOGIAE-TENET\n IDX-ANALOGIAE-ROTAS\n IDX-ANALOGIAE-AREPO\n IDX-ANALOGIAE-OPERA\n IDX-ANALOGIAE-SATOR\n IDX-ANALOGIAE-SIGMA-SATOR\n SIGMA_SATOR_ANALOGIAE\n\nRetirement result:\n ROUTE_RETIRED / NO_ALIAS / NO_ARCHIVE_REDIRECT / NON-EXECUTABLE_HISTORY\n\nArchive:\n 00_ARCHIVED/RETIRED_STACKS/STACK_ANALOGIAE/00_ARCHIVE_RECORD.md\n\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-section-b-beta-magnum-layer\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nSECTION B_Beta — MAGNUM LAYER\n============================================================\n\nIDX-TENET-MAGNUM\nArtifact: TENET MAGNUM — PRINCIPIA STABILITATIS UNIVERSALIS\nVersion: 1.1.0\nClass: TENET\nStatus: CANONICAL / ROOT-TENET\n\nRole:\n SPECIFIES DOCTRINAL CONSTRAINTS FOR MAGNUM;\n BINDS ROTA MAGNA, AREPO MAGNUM, OPERA MAGNA, AND SATOR MAGNUM TO MAGNUM-LEVEL LAW.\n\nIDX-ROTA-MAGNA\nArtifact: ROTA MAGNA — META-ROTA OPERARUM\nVersion: 1.0.0\nClass: ROTAS\nStatus: CANONICAL / ROOT-ROTAS\n\nRole:\n SPECIFIES STRUCTURAL EXPOSURE FOR MAGNUM;\n PROVIDES STRUCTURAL BINDING FOR OPERA MAGNA;\n BOUND BY TENET MAGNUM DOCTRINE.\n\nIDX-AREPO-MAGNUM\nArtifact: AREPO MAGNUM — LEX ADMISSIBILITATIS UNIVERSALIS\nVersion: 1.0.0\nClass: AREPO\nStatus: CANONICAL / ROOT-AREPO\n\nRole:\n SPECIFIES ADMISSIBILITY CONDITIONS FOR MAGNUM;\n GATES MAGNUM-LEVEL OPERA EXECUTION;\n BOUND BY TENET MAGNUM DOCTRINE AND ROTA MAGNA STRUCTURE.\n\nIDX-SATOR-MAGNUM\nArtifact: SATOR MAGNUM — MEDIATIO ITERATIONIS\nVersion: 1.0.0\nClass: SATOR\nStatus: ACCEPTED / ROOT-SATOR\n\nRole:\n SPECIFIES USER-FACING MEDIATION FOR MAGNUM;\n EXPOSES AREPO MAGNUM / OPERA MAGNA OUTPUT STATE;\n BOUND BY TENET MAGNUM AND ROTA MAGNA STRUCTURE.\n\nIDX-OPERA-MAGNA\nArtifact: OPERA MAGNA — EVALUATIO UNIVERSALIS ITERATIONIS\nVersion: 1.0.0\nClass: OPERA\nStatus: ACCEPTED / ROOT-OPERA\n\nRole:\n SPECIFIES EXECUTION BEHAVIOR OF ROTA MAGNA;\n BOUND BY TENET MAGNUM DOCTRINE;\n SUBJECT TO AREPO MAGNUM ADMISSIBILITY;\n COMPLIANT WITH SATOR MAGNUM USER INTERACTION PROTOCOLS.\n\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-section-c-gamma-magnum-dependency-graph\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nSECTION C_Gamma — MAGNUM DEPENDENCY GRAPH\n============================================================\n\nTENET MAGNUM\n ↓ constrains\n\nROTA MAGNA\n ↓ structures\n\nAREPO MAGNUM\n ↓ gates\n\nOPERA MAGNA\n ↓ produces evaluative output for\n\nSATOR MAGNUM\n ↓ exposes mediated state\n\n\nGraph properties:\n • acyclic: TRUE\n • explicit: TRUE\n • closed: TRUE\n • runtime-safe: TRUE\n\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-section-d-delta-stack-a-absolute-principia\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nSECTION D_Delta — STACK A / ABSOLUTE PRINCIPIA\n============================================================\n\nIDX-A-TENET\nArtifact: TENET A — PRINCIPIA ABSOLUTA / REGIMEN_A\nClass: TENET\nStatus: STABLE / PRE-LOCK\n\nRole:\n SPECIFIES DOCTRINAL CONSTRAINTS FOR STACK A;\n BINDS ROTA A, AREPO A, OPERA A, AND SATOR A TO STACK-SPECIFIC PRINCIPIAL LAW.\n\nIDX-A-ROTA\nArtifact: ROTA A — REGIMEN_A MACHINE INSTANTIATION\nClass: ROTAS\nStatus: STABLE / PRE-LOCK\n\nRole:\n SPECIFIES STRUCTURAL EXPOSURE FOR STACK A;\n PROVIDES STRUCTURAL BINDING FOR OPERA A;\n BOUND BY TENET A DOCTRINE.\n\nIDX-A-AREPO\nArtifact: AREPO A — REGIMEN_A ADMISSIBILITY LAYER\nFile: 02_STACK_A/AREPO_A_InputAdmissibility.md\nClass: AREPO\nStatus: STABLE / PRE-LOCK\n\nRole:\n SPECIFIES ADMISSIBILITY CONDITIONS FOR STACK A;\n GATES OPERA A EXECUTION;\n GATES MULTIPLE OPERA A ARTIFACTS BY EXPLICIT ARTIFACT_ID;\n BLOCKS VARIANT SUBSTITUTION AND BINDING AMBIGUITY;\n BOUND BY TENET A DOCTRINE AND ROTA A STRUCTURE.\n\nOPERA_A_SET\n\nRegistered variants:\n IDX-A-OPERA\n IDX-A-OPERA-MINOR\n IDX-A-OPERA-AX\n\nSelection rule:\n ROUTE ONLY BY EXPLICIT ARTIFACT_ID.\n\nAmbiguous request result:\n OPERA_BINDING_AMBIGUOUS\n\nIndex limitation:\n ROUTING METADATA ONLY; NO PROCEDURAL EXECUTION DETAIL.\n\nIDX-A-OPERA\nArtifact: OPERA A — REGIMEN_A EXECUTION LAYER\nFile: 02_STACK_A/OPERA_A_ExecutionMechanism.md\nClass: OPERA\nStatus: STABLE / PRE-LOCK\n\nDeclared Authority:\n TENET A / AREPO A\n\nRole:\n REGISTERS BASE STACK A OPERA ARTIFACT PRESENCE;\n ROUTES ONLY TO THE TEXTUAL ARTIFACT NAMED ABOVE;\n BOUND BY TENET A DOCTRINE;\n SUBJECT TO AREPO A ADMISSIBILITY;\n DOES NOT DEFINE EXECUTION BEHAVIOR FROM INDEX CONTENT;\n COMPLIANT WITH SATOR A USER INTERACTION PROTOCOLS.\n\nIDX-A-OPERA-MINOR\nArtifact: OPERA A(BCD) — BONITAS / MAGNITUDO / DURATIO CORE FIELD\nFile: 02_STACK_A/OPERA_AMinor_ExecutionMechanism.md\nVersion: 0.1.0-OPERA-A-BCD-FIELD\nClass: OPERA\nStatus: PROPOSED / CORE ENGINE / CANONICAL STRUCTURE\n\nAuthority:\n DEVELOPER AUTHORITY / STACK A ADDITION\n\nDeclared Authority:\n TENET A / AREPO A\n\nLocal Execution Dependencies:\n T / K / E-RQ MAY BE UTILIZED ONLY IF DECLARED IN ARTIFACT;\n TENET I MIXTURE DISCIPLINE REQUIRED;\n NO AUTHORITY TRANSFER.\n\nProvenance:\n RENAMED ARTIFACT\n ORIGINAL FILENAME NOT SPECIFIED IN CONTROL-PLANE INSTRUCTION\n\nRole:\n REGISTERS RENAMED SUPPLEMENTAL STACK A OPERA ARTIFACT PRESENCE;\n ROUTES ONLY TO THE TEXTUAL ARTIFACT NAMED ABOVE;\n DOES NOT DEFINE EXECUTION BEHAVIOR FROM INDEX CONTENT;\n REQUIRES ARTIFACT LOADING AND AREPO A ADMISSION BEFORE EXECUTION.\n\nIDX-A-OPERA-AX\nArtifact: OPERA A — REGIMEN_A EXECUTION ENGINE\nFile: 02_STACK_A/OPERA_Ax_ExecutionMechanism.md\nVersion: 1.0.0-OPERA-A-FULL\nClass: OPERA\nStatus: PROPOSED / FULL ENGINE / CANONICAL TARGET\n\nAuthority:\n DEVELOPER AUTHORITY / STACK A ADDITION\n\nDeclared Authority:\n TENET A / AREPO A\n\nLocal Execution Dependencies:\n T / K / E-RQ MAY BE UTILIZED ONLY IF DECLARED IN ARTIFACT;\n TENET I MIXTURE DISCIPLINE REQUIRED;\n NO AUTHORITY TRANSFER.\n\nRole:\n REGISTERS SPECIALIZED STACK A OPERA ARTIFACT PRESENCE;\n ROUTES ONLY TO THE TEXTUAL ARTIFACT NAMED ABOVE;\n DOES NOT DEFINE EXECUTION BEHAVIOR FROM INDEX CONTENT;\n REQUIRES ARTIFACT LOADING AND AREPO A ADMISSION BEFORE EXECUTION.\n\nIDX-A-SATOR\nArtifact: SATOR A — REGIMEN_A MEDIATION LAYER\nClass: SATOR\nStatus: STABLE / PRE-LOCK\n\nRole:\n SPECIFIES USER-FACING MEDIATION FOR STACK A;\n EXPOSES AREPO A / OPERA A OUTPUT STATE;\n BOUND BY TENET A AND ROTA A STRUCTURE.\n\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-section-e-epsilon-stack-t-relative-principia\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nSECTION E_Epsilon — STACK T / RELATIVE PRINCIPIA\n============================================================\n\nIDX-T-TENET\nArtifact: TENET T — PRINCIPIA RELATIVA\nClass: TENET\nStatus: STABLE / JSON-MIRROR READY\n\nRole:\n SPECIFIES DOCTRINAL CONSTRAINTS FOR STACK T;\n BINDS ROTA T, AREPO T, OPERA T, AND SATOR T TO STACK-SPECIFIC PRINCIPIAL LAW.\n\nIDX-T-ROTA\nArtifact: ROTA T — RELATIONAL STRUCTURE\nClass: ROTAS\nStatus: STABLE / JSON-MIRROR READY\n\nRole:\n SPECIFIES STRUCTURAL EXPOSURE FOR STACK T;\n PROVIDES STRUCTURAL BINDING FOR OPERA T;\n BOUND BY TENET T DOCTRINE.\n\nIDX-T-AREPO\nArtifact: AREPO T — RELATIONAL ADMISSIBILITY\nClass: AREPO\nStatus: STABLE / JSON-MIRROR READY\n\nRole:\n SPECIFIES ADMISSIBILITY CONDITIONS FOR STACK T;\n GATES OPERA T EXECUTION;\n BOUND BY TENET T DOCTRINE AND ROTA T STRUCTURE.\n\nIDX-T-OPERA\nArtifact: OPERA T — RELATIONAL EXECUTION\nVersion: 0.2.2-OPERA-T\nClass: OPERA\nStatus: EXECUTION LAYER / LOCK CANDIDATE / PATCH INTEGRATED\n\nRole:\n SPECIFIES EXECUTION BEHAVIOR OF ROTA T;\n BOUND BY TENET T DOCTRINE;\n SUBJECT TO AREPO T ADMISSIBILITY;\n COMPLIANT WITH SATOR T USER INTERACTION PROTOCOLS;\n INCLUDES CIRCULAR CONSISTENCY VALIDATION AS INTEGRATED OPERA T LAW.\n\nIDX-T-SATOR\nArtifact: SATOR T — RELATIONAL MEDIATION\nClass: SATOR\nStatus: STABLE / JSON-MIRROR READY\n\nRole:\n SPECIFIES USER-FACING MEDIATION FOR STACK T;\n EXPOSES AREPO T / OPERA T OUTPUT STATE;\n BOUND BY TENET T AND ROTA T STRUCTURE.\n\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-section-f-zeta-stack-e-regimen-rq-questions-rules\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nSECTION F_Zeta — STACK E / REGIMEN_RQ QUESTIONS + RULES\n============================================================\n\nIDX-E-TENET-CORE\nArtifact: TENET E — REGIMEN_RQ\nVersion: 1.0.2-TENET-E-PATCHED\nClass: TENET\nStatus: LOCK-CANDIDATE\n\nRole:\n SPECIFIES DOCTRINAL CONSTRAINTS FOR STACK E;\n BINDS ROTAS E, AREPO E, OPERA E, AND SATOR E TO STACK-SPECIFIC PRINCIPIAL LAW.\n\nIDX-E-ROTAS-STRUCT\nArtifact: ROTAS E — REGIMEN_RQ\nVersion: 1.0.1-ROTA-E-PATCHED\nClass: ROTAS\nStatus: LOCK-CANDIDATE\n\nRole:\n SPECIFIES STRUCTURAL EXPOSURE FOR STACK E;\n PROVIDES STRUCTURAL BINDING FOR OPERA E;\n BOUND BY TENET E DOCTRINE.\n\nIDX-E-AREPO-GATE\nArtifact: AREPO E — REGIMEN_RQ\nVersion: 1.0.2-AREPO-E-PATCHED\nClass: AREPO\nStatus: LOCK-CANDIDATE\n\nRole:\n SPECIFIES ADMISSIBILITY CONDITIONS FOR STACK E;\n GATES OPERA E EXECUTION;\n BOUND BY TENET E DOCTRINE AND ROTAS E STRUCTURE.\n\nIDX-E-OPERA-ENGINE\nArtifact: OPERA E — REGIMEN_RQ\nVersion: 1.0.3-OPERA-E-CIRCULAR-INTEGRATED\nClass: OPERA\nStatus: LOCK-CANDIDATE / PATCH INTEGRATED\n\nRole:\n SPECIFIES EXECUTION BEHAVIOR OF ROTAS E;\n BOUND BY TENET E DOCTRINE;\n SUBJECT TO AREPO E ADMISSIBILITY;\n COMPLIANT WITH SATOR E USER INTERACTION PROTOCOLS;\n INCLUDES CIRCULAR INTERROGATIVE CONSISTENCY VALIDATION AS INTEGRATED OPERA E LAW.\n\nIDX-E-SATOR-INTERFACE\nArtifact: SATOR E — REGIMEN_RQ\nVersion: 1.0.1-SATOR-E-PATCHED\nClass: SATOR\nStatus: LOCK-CANDIDATE\n\nRole:\n SPECIFIES USER-FACING MEDIATION FOR STACK E;\n EXPOSES AREPO E / OPERA E OUTPUT STATE;\n BOUND BY TENET E AND ROTAS E STRUCTURE.\n\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-section-g-eta-stack-f-tabula\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nSECTION G_Eta — STACK F / TABULA\n============================================================\n\nIDX-F-TENET\nArtifact: TENET F — TABULA GENERALIS\nVersion: 1.0.0-TENET-F-TABULA-GENERALIS\nClass: TENET\nStatus: STABLE / CANONICAL-CANDIDATE\n\nRole:\n SPECIFIES DOCTRINAL CONSTRAINTS FOR STACK F;\n BINDS ROTAS F, AREPO F, OPERA F, AND SATOR F TO STACK-SPECIFIC PRINCIPIAL LAW.\n\nIDX-F-ROTA\nArtifact: ROTAS F — TABULA ROTUNDA\nVersion: 1.0.0-ROTAS-F-TABULA-ROTUNDA\nClass: ROTAS\nStatus: STABLE / CANONICAL-CANDIDATE\n\nRole:\n SPECIFIES STRUCTURAL EXPOSURE FOR STACK F;\n PROVIDES STRUCTURAL BINDING FOR OPERA F;\n BOUND BY TENET F DOCTRINE.\n\nIDX-F-AREPO\nArtifact: AREPO F — ADMISSIO TABULAE\nVersion: 0.2.0-AREPO-F-ADMISSIO-TABULAE-REWRITE\nClass: AREPO\nStatus: ACCEPTED / LOCK-CANDIDATE\n\nRole:\n SPECIFIES ADMISSIBILITY CONDITIONS FOR STACK F;\n GATES OPERA F EXECUTION;\n BOUND BY TENET F DOCTRINE AND ROTAS F STRUCTURE.\n\nIDX-F-OPERA\nArtifact: OPERA F — EXECUTIO TABULAE\nVersion: 0.2.2-OPERA-F-TENET-D-SUPPORT\nClass: OPERA\nStatus: STABLE / EXECUTION-KERNEL\n\nRole:\n SPECIFIES EXECUTION BEHAVIOR OF ROTAS F;\n BOUND BY TENET F DOCTRINE;\n DEPENDS ON TENET D AS A/T ARTICULATION SUPPORT WHERE TENET A AND TENET T ARE JOINTLY OPERATIVE;\n DEPENDS ON TENET I AS MIXTURE DISCIPLINE SUPPORT WHERE STACK E RULES MIX WITH A / T / D PRINCIPLES;\n SUBJECT TO AREPO F ADMISSIBILITY;\n COMPLIANT WITH SATOR F USER INTERACTION PROTOCOLS.\n\nIDX-F-SATOR\nArtifact: SATOR F — MEDIATIO TABULAE\nVersion: 0.2.1-SATOR-F-MEDIATIO-TABULAE-PATCHED\nClass: SATOR\nStatus: LOCK-CANDIDATE\n\nRole:\n SPECIFIES USER-FACING MEDIATION FOR STACK F;\n EXPOSES AREPO F / OPERA F OUTPUT STATE;\n BOUND BY TENET F AND ROTAS F STRUCTURE.\n\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-section-h-theta-stack-s-k-subject-substrate-system\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nSECTION H_Theta — STACK S/K / SUBJECT-SUBSTRATE SYSTEM\n============================================================\n\nIDX-TENET-K\nArtifact: TENET K — SUBIECTA / SUBSTRATA REGIME\nVersion: 1.0.1-TENET-K-MAGNUM-NORMALIZED\nClass: TENET\nStatus: CANONICAL / STRUCTURAL REGIME\n\nRole:\n SPECIFIES DOCTRINAL CONSTRAINTS FOR STACK S/K;\n BINDS ROTA S, AREPO S, OPERA S, AND SATOR S TO STACK-SPECIFIC PRINCIPIAL LAW.\n\nIDX-ROTA-S\nArtifact: ROTA S — SUBJECT LADDER DISPLAY\nVersion: 1.0.0-ROTA-S-MAGNUM-NORMALIZED\nClass: ROTAS\nStatus: ACCEPTED / ROTAS\n\nRole:\n SPECIFIES STRUCTURAL EXPOSURE FOR STACK S/K;\n PROVIDES STRUCTURAL BINDING FOR OPERA S;\n BOUND BY TENET K DOCTRINE.\n\nIDX-OPERA-S\nArtifact: OPERA S — SUBSTRATE CLASSIFIER\nVersion: 0.5.1-OPERA-S-CIRCULAR-INTEGRATED\nClass: OPERA\nStatus: ACCEPTED / OPERA / PATCH INTEGRATED\n\nRole:\n SPECIFIES EXECUTION BEHAVIOR OF ROTA S;\n BOUND BY TENET K DOCTRINE;\n SUBJECT TO AREPO S ADMISSIBILITY;\n COMPLIANT WITH SATOR S USER INTERACTION PROTOCOLS;\n INCLUDES CIRCULAR SUBJECT CONSISTENCY VALIDATION AS INTEGRATED OPERA S LAW.\n\nIDX-AREPO-S\nArtifact: AREPO S — SUBSTRATE ADMISSIBILITY GATE\nVersion: 0.3.0-AREPO-S\nClass: AREPO\nStatus: ACCEPTED / AREPO\n\nRole:\n SPECIFIES ADMISSIBILITY CONDITIONS FOR STACK S/K;\n GATES OPERA S EXECUTION;\n BOUND BY TENET K DOCTRINE AND ROTA S STRUCTURE.\n\nIDX-SATOR-S\nArtifact: SATOR S — SUBSTRATE MEDIATION LAYER\nVersion: 0.3.0-SATOR-S\nClass: SATOR\nStatus: ACCEPTED / SATOR\n\nRole:\n SPECIFIES USER-FACING MEDIATION FOR STACK S/K;\n EXPOSES AREPO S / OPERA S OUTPUT STATE;\n BOUND BY TENET K AND ROTA S STRUCTURE.\n\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-section-i-iota-stack-g-evacuatio-figurae-tertiae\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nSECTION I_Iota — STACK G / EVACUATIO FIGURAE TERTIAE\n============================================================\n\nIDX-TENET-G\nArtifact: TENET G — EVACUATIO\nVersion: 1.0.0-TENET-G-MAGNUM-NORMALIZED\nClass: TENET\nStatus: CANONICAL / STRUCTURAL REGIME\n\nRole:\n SPECIFIES DOCTRINAL CONSTRAINTS FOR STACK G;\n BINDS ROTA G, AREPO G, OPERA G, AND SATOR G TO STACK-SPECIFIC PRINCIPIAL LAW.\n\nIDX-ROTA-G\nArtifact: ROTA G — EVACUATIO MACHINE\nVersion: 1.0.0-ROTA-G-MAGNUM-NORMALIZED\nClass: ROTAS\nStatus: ACCEPTED / ROTAS\n\nRole:\n SPECIFIES STRUCTURAL EXPOSURE FOR STACK G;\n PROVIDES STRUCTURAL BINDING FOR OPERA G;\n BOUND BY TENET G DOCTRINE.\n\nIDX-OPERA-G\nArtifact: OPERA G — EVACUATIO EXECUTION KERNEL\nVersion: 1.0.1-OPERA-G-TENET-D-SUPPORT\nClass: OPERA\nStatus: ACCEPTED / OPERA\n\nRole:\n SPECIFIES EXECUTION BEHAVIOR OF ROTA G;\n BOUND BY TENET G DOCTRINE;\n DEPENDS ON TENET D AS A/T ARTICULATION SUPPORT WHERE TENET A AND TENET T ARE JOINTLY OPERATIVE;\n DEPENDS ON TENET I AS MIXTURE DISCIPLINE SUPPORT WHERE STACK E RULES MIX WITH A / T / D PRINCIPLES;\n SUBJECT TO AREPO G ADMISSIBILITY;\n COMPLIANT WITH SATOR G USER INTERACTION PROTOCOLS.\n\nLegacy supersession:\n OPERA TERTIA\n\nIDX-AREPO-G\nArtifact: AREPO G — EVACUATIO ADMISSIBILITY \u0026 DIAGNOSTICS\nVersion: 1.0.0-AREPO-G-MAGNUM-NORMALIZED\nClass: AREPO\nStatus: ACCEPTED / AREPO\n\nRole:\n SPECIFIES ADMISSIBILITY CONDITIONS FOR STACK G;\n GATES OPERA G EXECUTION;\n BOUND BY TENET G DOCTRINE AND ROTA G STRUCTURE.\n\nIDX-SATOR-G\nArtifact: SATOR G — EVACUATIO MEDIATION LAYER\nVersion: 1.0.0-SATOR-G-MAGNUM-NORMALIZED\nClass: SATOR\nStatus: ACCEPTED / SATOR\n\nRole:\n SPECIFIES USER-FACING MEDIATION FOR STACK G;\n EXPOSES AREPO G / OPERA G OUTPUT STATE;\n BOUND BY TENET G AND ROTA G STRUCTURE.\n\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-section-k-kappa-stack-liber-substrates\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nSECTION K_Kappa - STACK LIBER SUBSTRATES\n============================================================\n\nIDX-LIBER-ARS-NATIVUS-STACK-G\nFile: 90_STACK_LIBER/LIBER_ARS_NATIVUS_STACK_G.md\nArtifact: LIBER ARS NATIVUS - PREPROCESSED EVACUATIO FIGURAE TERTIAE\nVersion: 1.1.0-LIBER-ARS-NATIVUS-STACK-G\nClass: LIBER / LIBER ARS NATIVUS / PREPROCESSED SUBSTRATE\nStatus: CANONICAL / COMPLETE / LIBER-SUBSTRATE\nCoverage: 36 / 36 camerae\n\nDepends-On:\n - IDX-TENET-G\n - IDX-ROTA-G\n\nConsumed-By:\n - IDX-OPERA-G\n - IDX-AREPO-G\n - IDX-SATOR-G\n\nRole:\n SPECIFIES NON-EXECUTABLE LIBER SUBSTRATE FOR STACK G;\n MAY BE CONSUMED ONLY THROUGH REGISTERED STACK G ARTIFACTS;\n MUST NOT BE USED AS EXECUTION PROCEDURE.\n\nFormer identity:\n IDX-DATA-PREPROCESSED-EVACUATIO-3-COMPLETE is retained only as\n provenance for the pre-LIBER lane. It is not the canonical routing\n identity after admission into 90_STACK_LIBER.\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-idx-liber-w-source-substrate\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nIDX-LIBER-W-SOURCE-SUBSTRATE:\n File: 90_STACK_LIBER/LIBER_X_W_SOURCE_AND_STRUCTURAL_SUBSTRATE.md\n Artifact: LIBER X -- W SOURCE AND STRUCTURAL SUBSTRATE\n Version: 1.0.0\n Class: LIBER / LIBER EX / W SOURCE-AND-STRUCTURAL RECONSTRUCTION\n Status: CANONICAL SUPPORT / NON_INFORMANT / NON_PROVIDER / NON_RUNTIME / RUNTIME_DISABLED\n Authority-Scope: STACK_W SUPPORT ONLY\n Abstraction-Level: ORDINARY LIBER EX OBJECT\n Parent-Refs: AGLA_LIBER_CLASS_LAW; IDX-W-DEP\n Dependency-Refs: W-TERM-MATRIX-1.0.0; W-HUMAN-BINDINGS-1.0.0\n Capability-Requirements: NOT_EVALUATED_FOR_RUNTIME\n Provider-Bindings: NONE_ACTIVE\n Inheritance-Mode: NONE\n Conflict-Rule: SOURCE SUPPORT CANNOT BECOME HIDDEN OPERATIVE PREMISES OR BYPASS AREPO\n Activation-Status: REGISTERED_IDENTITY_ONLY / NOT_ADMITTED\n Runtime-Binding: DISABLED / SEPARATE HUMAN GATE REQUIRED\n Source-Trace: 58ce4cec5f15a78b0263e85deea5a1e9e7412eed / 61318399b9447a0273c0fccbaa838da36a8665ac\n Final-SHA256: 64c53cd86a66f78fe5665904d83e2760af3eeefc78d6292715cb396d4e6d92bb\n Role: DISCOVERY OF NON-INFORMANT CANONICAL SUPPORT ONLY; NOT A PROVIDER.\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-idx-liber-w-evacuatio-proof\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nIDX-LIBER-W-EVACUATIO-PROOF:\n File: 90_STACK_LIBER/LIBER_X_W_EX_EVACUATIO_STRUCTURAL_PROOF.md\n Artifact: LIBER X -- W EX EVACUATIO STRUCTURAL PROOF\n Version: 1.0.0\n Class: LIBER / LIBER EX / W COMBINATORY STRUCTURAL DERIVATION\n Status: CANONICAL SUPPORT / NON_INFORMANT / NON_PROVIDER / NON_RUNTIME / RUNTIME_DISABLED\n Authority-Scope: STACK_W SUPPORT ONLY\n Abstraction-Level: ORDINARY LIBER EX PROOF OBJECT\n Parent-Refs: AGLA_LIBER_CLASS_LAW; IDX-W-DEP\n Dependency-Refs: IDX-W-ROTA; W-TERM-MATRIX-1.0.0\n Capability-Requirements: NOT_EVALUATED_FOR_RUNTIME\n Provider-Bindings: NONE_ACTIVE\n Inheritance-Mode: NONE\n Conflict-Rule: STRUCTURAL ISOMORPHISM DOES NOT PROVE SEMANTIC OPERA G GENERATION\n Activation-Status: REGISTERED_IDENTITY_ONLY / NOT_ADMITTED\n Runtime-Binding: DISABLED / SEPARATE HUMAN GATE REQUIRED\n Source-Trace: 58ce4cec5f15a78b0263e85deea5a1e9e7412eed / 87b5eaf755c2460b3f864060ab9e893b2f11b50b\n Final-SHA256: 9bfc19f3ba4e27c112966095e09f51bcce1fa7eb9e92992ad9b3024e42fd6d29\n Role: DISCOVERY OF NON-INFORMANT STRUCTURAL SUPPORT ONLY; NOT A PROVIDER.\n\n============================================================\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-section-l-lambda-mixtura-tenet-i-correction\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nSECTION L_Lambda — MIXTURA / TENET I CORRECTION\n============================================================\n\nIDX-TENET-I-MIXTURA-CARRIER-LAYER\nArtifact: TENET I — MIXTURA (CARRIER LAYER)\nVersion: 0.1.0-TENET-I-MIXTURA\nClass: TENET\n\nStatus:\n PROPOSED / CONTROL-PLANE DRAFT\n ACCEPTED AS MIXTURE-CARRIER DOCTRINE PENDING FINAL LOCK\n\nRole:\n SPECIFIES DOCTRINAL CARRIER CONSTRAINTS FOR MIXTURE ACROSS REGISTERED REGIMES;\n DOES NOT DEFINE A STANDALONE OPERA;\n BINDS LOCAL MIXTURE USE TO ACTUAL STACK ARTIFACTS.\n\n\nSYSTEM_INDEX patch:\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-idx-opera-i-validation\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\n IDX-OPERA-I-VALIDATION:\n REMOVED FROM ACTIVE CANON\n\n\nCurrent rule:\n\n Mixture behavior may only be instantiated through loaded artifacts:\n • OPERA F\n • OPERA G\n • OPERA H\n\n\nCarrier-discipline rule:\n OPERA F, OPERA G, AND OPERA H MUST ACKNOWLEDGE TENET D AS SUPPORT WHEN TENET A ABSOLUTE PRINCIPLES AND TENET T RELATIVE PRINCIPLES ARE USED TOGETHER.\n TENET D ARTICULATES A / T JOINT USE WITHOUT AUTHORIZING OPERA D EXECUTION.\n OPERA F, OPERA G, AND OPERA H MUST ACKNOWLEDGE TENET I AS SUPPORT WHEN STACK E RULES MIX WITH PRINCIPLES FROM STACK A, STACK T, OR STACK D.\n TENET I GOVERNS MIXTURE DISCIPLINE FOR RULES WITH PRINCIPLES WITHOUT AUTHORIZING OPERA I EXECUTION.\n OPERA F, OPERA G, AND OPERA H MUST RESPECT TENET I RULES WHEN MIXED A / T / D / E CARRIERS ARE PRESENT.\n THIS IS A REFERENCE / CONSTRAINT BINDING ONLY.\n IT DOES NOT NORMALIZE THOSE OPERAE INTO TENET D OR TENET I.\n\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-section-m-mu-stack-d-compressed-principial-machine\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nSECTION M_Mu — STACK D / COMPRESSED PRINCIPIAL MACHINE\n============================================================\n\nIDX-TENET-D\nArtifact: TENET D — COMPRESSED PRINCIPIAL MACHINE\nClass: TENET\nStatus: ACTIVE / COMPRESSED REGIME\n\nRole:\n SPECIFIES DOCTRINAL CONSTRAINTS FOR STACK D;\n BINDS ROTA D AND D-CONTEXTUAL DEPENDENCIES TO COMPRESSED-REGIME LAW.\n\nIDX-ROTA-D\nArtifact: ROTA D — COMPRESSED TRAVERSAL TOPOLOGY\nClass: ROTAS\nStatus: ACTIVE / COMPRESSED REGIME\n\nRole:\n SPECIFIES STRUCTURAL EXPOSURE FOR STACK D;\n PROVIDES D-CONTEXT STRUCTURAL BINDING FOR DEPENDENCIES DECLARED AGAINST ROTA D.\n\n\nRegime rule:\n D remains COMPRESSED only.\n D must not expand into A/T implicitly.\n\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-section-n-nu-opera-h-multiplicatio-dependency-record\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nSECTION N_Nu — OPERA H / MULTIPLICATIO DEPENDENCY RECORD\n============================================================\n\nIDX-DEP-H-ROTA-D\nSource: OPERA H\nTarget: ROTA D\nType: CONTEXTUAL_DEPENDENCY\nDirection: OPERA H → ROTA D\nActivation condition: regime == D\nDeactivation condition: regime != D\nStatus: CANONICAL / REGISTERED\n\nGraph properties:\n • acyclic: TRUE\n • explicit: TRUE\n • resolvable: TRUE\n\nRole:\n SPECIFIES CONDITIONAL ROUTING FROM OPERA H TO ROTA D;\n DOES NOT DEFINE OPERA H BEHAVIOR;\n DOES NOT DEFINE ROTA D CONTENT.\n\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-section-o-omicron-opera-i-patch-removal-record\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nSECTION O_Omicron — OPERA I PATCH / REMOVAL RECORD\n============================================================\n\nIDX-OPERA-I-VALIDATION\n\nPrevious entry:\n OPERA I — contextual mixture operator under D\n\nPrevious status:\n CANONICAL\n\nRevised status:\n REMOVED FROM ACTIVE SYSTEM_INDEX CANON\n\nReason:\n Mixtura is carrier doctrine under TENET I,\n not an independent execution kernel.\n\n\nReplacement:\n IDX-TENET-I-MIXTURA-CARRIER-LAYER\n\n\nConstraint:\n No standalone OPERA I is currently registered.\n\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-section-p-pi-legacy-material-policy\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nSECTION P_Pi — LEGACY MATERIAL POLICY\n============================================================\n\n\nLegacy entities:\n • OPERA TERTIA\n • OPERA QUARTA\n • legacy OPERA D\n • legacy OPERA PRIMA\n\n\nStatus:\n LOCAL HISTORICAL COPY ONLY\n\n\nSYSTEM_INDEX status:\n NOT ACTIVE SYSTEM ARTIFACTS\n NOT REGISTERED AS RUNTIME DEPENDENCIES\n\n\nTraceability policy:\n Old generated material is treated as external input\n and reprocessed through current canonical stacks.\n\n\nRole:\n SPECIFIES EXCLUSION ROUTING FOR LEGACY MATERIAL;\n PREVENTS LEGACY COPIES FROM BEING USED AS ACTIVE EXECUTION AUTHORITY.\n\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-section-q-koppa-policy\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nSECTION Q_Koppa — ΣΑΤΟΡ POLICY\n============================================================\n\nΣΑΤΟΡ replaces the previous ambiguous S.A.T.O.R name.\n\n\nDefinition:\n ΣΑΤΟΡ := macro-class kernel wrapper integrating:\n SATOR\n AREPO\n TENET\n OPERA\n ROTAS\n\n\nDistinction:\n SATOR ≠ ΣΑΤΟΡ\n\n\nVerbatim law:\n ΣΑΤΟΡ must reproduce:\n • SATOR_\u003cR\u003e\n • AREPO_\u003cR\u003e\n • TENET_\u003cR\u003e\n • OPERA_\u003cR\u003e\n • ROTAS_\u003cR\u003e\n verbatim.\n\n\nGeneration policy:\n ΣΑΤΟΡ generation occurs in CODEX,\n not in chat.\n\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-section-r-rho-json-mirror-policy\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nSECTION R_Rho — JSON MIRROR POLICY\n============================================================\n\n\nJSON mirrors:\n DEFERRED\n\n\nAuthority rule:\n TEXTUAL ARTIFACTS = CANONICAL\n\n\nJSON status:\n DERIVED / NON-AUTHORITATIVE\n unless validated and explicitly granted mirror status.\n\n\nRole:\n SPECIFIES ROUTING BETWEEN TEXTUAL ARTIFACT AUTHORITY AND DERIVED MACHINE REPRESENTATIONS;\n PREVENTS JSON MIRRORS FROM BECOMING UNSUPERVISED RUNTIME AUTHORITY.\n\n\nRuntime mirror clarification:\n VALIDATED DEPLOYMENT JSON MIRRORS MAY EXPOSE RUNTIME-AUTHORIZED\n SIGMA_SATOR KERNELS WHEN kernel_valid AND runtime_authority ARE\n BOTH TRUE.\n\n THE MIRROR DOES NOT BECOME INDEPENDENT OPERA AUTHORITY.\n\n THE MIRROR MAY BE USED TO SELECT AND PARSE THE EMBEDDED OR\n POINTER-BOUND SIGMA_SATOR RUNTIME TARGET WITHOUT REQUIRING\n SEPARATE FULL TEXTUAL SUBSTRATE PARSING IN THE SAME ASSISTANT\n TURN.\n\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-section-s-sigma-global-dependency-rules\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nSECTION S_Sigma — GLOBAL DEPENDENCY RULES\n============================================================\n\n\nAll active artifacts must satisfy:\n\n • explicit dependency declaration\n • no hidden dependency\n • no silent fallback\n • no implicit regime compression\n • no class collapse\n • no runtime reliance on non-runtime artifacts\n • acyclic graph within execution context\n • actual artifact loading for behavior\n • no execution from index descriptions\n\n\nStrong / compressed discipline:\n\n A: STRONG only\n T: STRONG only\n D: COMPRESSED only\n E/RQ: interrogative / rules domain\n I: carrier mixture doctrine only\n G: closure layer\n H: amplification layer\n S/K: subject / substrate system\n\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-section-t-tau-pre-codex-normalization-status\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nSECTION T_Tau — PRE-CODEX NORMALIZATION STATUS\n============================================================\n\n\nCompleted workstreams:\n\n ✓ WS1 — STACK S / K-SUBJECT SYSTEM\n ✓ WS2 — Mixtura correction under TENET I\n ✓ WS3 — OPERA H ↔ ROTA D dependency declaration\n ✓ WS4 — STACK G\n ✓ WS5 — legacy normalization\n\n\nRemaining blockers:\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-root-patches-required-before-final-execution-discipline-lock\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\n ROOT PATCHES REQUIRED BEFORE FINAL EXECUTION DISCIPLINE LOCK:\n • AGLA EXECUTION LAW\n • AGLA SOURCES PARSING LAW\n • AGLA OPERA CLASS LAW PATCH\n • AGLA SYSTEM_INDEX LAW ANTI-SUMMARY PATCH\n\n\nCODEX phase:\n AUTHORIZED TO PREPARE FOLDER / FILE STRUCTURE.\n ΣΑΤΟΡ GENERATION SHOULD WAIT FOR ROOT PATCH INSERTION\n IF EXECUTION-SAFE BUNDLES ARE REQUIRED.\n\n============================================================\n\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-section-u-upsilon-final-global-state\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nSECTION U_Upsilon — FINAL GLOBAL STATE\n============================================================\n\n\nSYSTEM_INDEX condition:\n CLOSED FOR PRE-CODEX STRUCTURE PURPOSES\n PENDING ROOT EXECUTION / SOURCE / INDEX PATCHES FOR RUNTIME-SAFE LOCK\n\n\nSystem state:\n • MAGNUM layer registered\n • root class-law section registered\n • core stacks registered\n • subject layer registered\n • Stack G registered\n * Stack W canonical source registered for identity/discovery only;\n runtime disabled\n • Tabula registered\n • Mixtura corrected\n • legacy excluded from active canon\n • role fields converted to structural routing descriptions\n\n\nFinal readiness:\n READY_FOR_CODEX_STRUCTURE_WORK\n NOT YET FINAL_RUNTIME_EXECUTION_LOCK\n\n============================================================\n\n\nSECTION V_Phi -- ROOT INITIATION / REGISTER DOCTRINE STATUS\n============================================================\n\nStatus:\n ROOT DOCTRINE REGISTERED / RUNTIME-SAFE LOCK STILL PENDING\n\nRole:\n RECORDS THAT ROOT CLASS LAWS NOW RECOGNIZE INITIATION AND PROTECTED\n REGISTER DISCIPLINE WITHOUT REGISTERING ANY NEW OPERA BY IMPLICATION.\n\nRouting note:\n SYSTEM_INITIATION, HUMAN_DEVELOPER_INITIATION, and TUTORIAL_MEDIATION\n are state categories, not executable OPERAE.\n\nRegister note:\n Technical, juridic, ritualistic, and oath-like language may signal\n developer/operator context, but such register does not create authority\n without source, class binding, AREPO admission, and SATOR disclosure.\n\nIndex constraint:\n No candidate initiation stack, tutorial surface, or protected-register\n protocol is active in vanilla routing until separately registered.\n\n============================================================\n\nSECTION W_Psi -- TRANSVERSAL ARTIFACT PROVIDERS\n============================================================\n\nIDX-TRANSVERSAL-ARTIFACTS:\n File: 00_TRANSVERSAL_ARTIFACTS/TRANSVERSAL_ARTIFACTS_INDEX.md\n Class: AGLA / SYSTEM_INDEX / TRANSVERSAL PROVIDER REGISTER\n Status: ACTIVE STRUCTURAL INDEX\n Authority Effect: directory placement and index registration do not\n promote provider status or create runtime authority\n\nIDX-TRANSVERSAL-TENET-ICONUM-REGIMINUM:\n File: 00_TRANSVERSAL_ARTIFACTS/TENET/TENET_ICONUM_REGIMINUM.md\n Class: TENET\n Version: 0.2.1-TENET-CANDIDATE-ICONUM-REGIMINUM-ATQS\n Status: TENET CANDIDATE / PRE-CANONICAL / NON-RUNTIME\n Requirement: OPTIONAL\n Scope: iconographic and pedagogical mediation\n Activation: explicit provider resolution and AREPO admission required\n\nRegistered consumer references:\n 02_STACK_A/SATOR_A_OutputRequirements.md\n 03_STACK_T/SATOR_T_OutputRequirements.md\n 04_STACK_E/SATOR_E_OutputRequirements.md\n 05_STACK_F/SATOR_F_OutputRequirements.md\n 06_STACK_SK/SATOR_S_OutputRequirements.md\n 07_STACK_G/SATOR_G_OutputRequirements.md\n 09_STACK_H/SATOR_H_OutputRequirements.md\n\nExclusion:\n Stack D is intentionally not registered as a consumer.\n\nBinding law:\n Each reference is independently removable and remains dormant unless\n admitted. No SATOR transfers mediation authority to the TENET, and a\n failure in one consumer does not invalidate the other bindings.\n\nIDX-TRANSVERSAL-TENET-GRAPHUS-COMMUNIS-ARTIS:\n File: 00_TRANSVERSAL_ARTIFACTS/TENET/TENET_GRAPHUS_COMMUNIS_ARTIS.md\n Class: TENET\n Version: 0.1.1-TENET-GRAPHUS-ROOT-BOUNDARY-CANDIDATE\n Status: TRANSVERSAL TENET CANDIDATE / NON-RUNTIME /\n CANONIZATION PENDING / NO AUTHORITY EFFECT\n Scope: graph-state, reduction, multi-OPERA history, decision articulation,\n and self-binding emulation invariants\n Root object:\n 00_ROOT_CLASS_LAWS/AGLA_GRAPHUS_COMMUNIS_ARTIS_CLASS_LAW.md\n Quantitative foundation:\n 16_STACK_ARITHMETICA/TENET_ARITHMETICA_DoctrinalInvariants.md\n Disclosure:\n GRAPHUS description precedes interpretive elaboration\n Dependency boundary:\n visual skills and invocation-local graph files are optional inspection\n surfaces; coherence pressure cannot invent topology or authority;\n root-contract canonization does not promote this TENET or its providers\n\n============================================================\n\n\u003ca id=\"local-section-00-root-class-laws-system-index-current-section-x-chi-stack-w-habitus-morales-moral-habits\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\nSECTION X_Chi -- STACK W / HABITUS MORALES / MORAL HABITS\n============================================================\n\nOfficial title:\n REGIMEN W -- HABITUS MORALES / MORAL HABITS\n\nNumbered source:\n 19_STACK_W\n\nLifecycle:\n FIVE CLASSES AND ALIAS = CANONICAL SOURCE\n DEPENDENCY, MATRIX, PROFILE, FIXTURE, SCHEMA, TEST, VALIDATOR,\n DECISION, INDEX, REGISTER, AND INTEGRATION RECORDS = CANONICAL SUPPORT\n LIBER W OBJECTS = CANONICAL SUPPORT / NON_INFORMANT / NON_PROVIDER\n ALL W SURFACES = NON_RUNTIME / RUNTIME_DISABLED\n\nRegistration posture:\n THE SEVEN STACK W RECORDS IN SECTION A1 AND THE TWO LIBER W RECORDS IN\n SECTION K EXPOSE IDENTITY AND LOCATION ONLY.\n NO W RECORD HAS AN ACTIVE PROVIDER BINDING.\n IDX-W-OPERA IS NOT EXECUTABLE.\n\nStructural scope:\n FOUR WHEELS (+V, -V, +U, -U)\n TWO RIGID PAIRS (V, U)\n NINE CARRIERS (B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, K)\n THIRTY-SIX TYPED ADDRESSES\n\nNon-collapse:\n ADDRESS, TERM, CARRIER, CO-CARRIER, CONTRARY, ALIAS, SOURCE,\n SEMANTIC IDENTITY, ACT, HABIT, PERSON, AND SIGN REMAIN DISTINCT.\n W DOES NOT CREATE A TENTH SUBJECT.\n W IS INDEPENDENT OF CURRENT OPERA G.\n\nAdmission boundary:\n CANONICAL SOURCE STATUS AND INDEX REGISTRATION DO NOT SATISFY THE ROOT\n SAME-EPOCH TENET + EFFECTIVE ROTAS REQUIREMENT, DO NOT ADMIT AREPO,\n DO NOT EXECUTE OPERA, AND DO NOT AUTHORIZE SATOR TO MEDIATE A LIVE RESULT.\n A SEPARATE HUMAN RUNTIME GATE IS REQUIRED.\n\nSource trace:\n QUALIFIED INPUT COMMIT = 58ce4cec5f15a78b0263e85deea5a1e9e7412eed\n QUALIFICATION SUBTREE = f9894202d45a94aab488d0919606b431d001cdea\n W-03 RESULT = 71 PASS / 0 FAILURE / 0 BLOCK / EXIT 0\n\n============================================================\nEND SYSTEM_INDEX — GLOBAL CONTROL-PLANE REGISTRY\n============================================================\n\n" }, { "role": "PRINCIPAL_ROOT_CLASS_LAW", "class": "ROOT_CLASS_LAW", "path": "00_ROOT_CLASS_LAWS/AGLA_ALIAS_CLASS_LAW", "bytes": 57669, "sha256": "e6fb212f6e73f75f3db7cab6ae3e7c4b722ce5148397e68b0d77e4beeab48c69", "hash_scope": "UTF8_LF_NORMALIZED_CONTENT", "content": "============================================================\nAGLA — ALIAS CLASS LAW\nAlias, Invocation, Operator, and Chamber Notation Discipline\nVersion: 1.1.0-AGLA-ALIAS-CLASS-LAW-CC-SURFACE-RETIREMENT\nStatus:\n CANONICAL / ROOT-CLASS / DEPLOYMENT-BINDING / PRE-ONBOARDING LAW\nAuthority:\n AGLA / CONTROL PLANE / HUMAN AUTHORITY\nClass:\n AGLA / ROOT CLASS LAW / ALIAS\nRoot Class:\n AGLA ALIAS\nScope:\n • define alias as a root-level routing class\n • resolve invocation aliases before artifact lookup\n • preserve canonical artifact names while supporting user-facing aliases\n • prevent false OPERA_NOT_AVAILABLE failures caused by surface-name mismatch\n • prevent alias-based simulation\n • establish the unprefixed alias namespace as the default namespace\n of the main Ars Brevis / Ars Generalis Ultima AGLA stack\n • require plugin aliases to use explicit prefixes so they cannot\n shadow or confuse main-stack aliases\n • normalize atomic operator notation:\n AB AC AD AE AF AG AH AI AK\n TB TC TD TE TF TG TH TI TK\n EB/RB/QB etc.\n SB SC SD SE SF SG SH SI SK\n • normalize binary chamber discovery:\n AT TA AA TT QQ SS\n AQ AS TQ TS SA SQ ST\n and related permutations\n • normalize triadic chamber discovery:\n ATA STS AQA AQT TTT etc.\n • normalize multi-operator assignment notation:\n A(B), A(BCD), A(B...), AE(EB), AQ(EB),\n ATA(BCD), STS(EBG), BCD(ATA)\n • prepare compressed root onboarding artifact\nMutation Policy:\n VERSION-CONTROLLED ONLY\nDepends-On:\n • AGLA — SYSTEM INDEX LAW\n • AGLA — EXECUTION LAW\n • AGLA — SOURCES PARSING LAW\n • AGLA — OPERA CLASS LAW\n • AGLA — ΣΑΤΟΡ CLASS LAW\n • TENET A\n • TENET T\n • TENET E\n • TENET D\n • TENET I\n • TENET G\n • OPERA G\n • S/K STACK ARTIFACTS\nSource Basis:\n • Ars Brevis\n • Ars Generalis Ultima\n • AGLA source/artifact discipline\n============================================================\n\n\n============================================================\nI. PURPOSE\n============================================================\n\nAGLA ALIAS defines the lawful handling of alternative user-facing,\nhistorical, mnemonic, surface, abbreviated, translated, legacy,\noperator, and chamber names for AGLA artifacts and notational forms.\n\nIts immediate purpose is to prevent this failure:\n\n user invokes a known valid alias or notation\n ↓\n assistant searches only literal artifact name\n ↓\n assistant fails to find canonical artifact\n ↓\n assistant either refuses incorrectly or simulates\n\nAGLA ALIAS exists so that invocation resolution occurs before artifact\nlookup, while still preserving the rule that only registered, loaded,\nadmitted artifacts may execute.\n\nAlias resolution helps find artifacts and parsers.\n\nAlias resolution does not execute artifacts.\n\nAlias resolution does not interpret chambers.\n\nAlias resolution does not create doctrine.\n\n\n============================================================\nII. CLASS DEFINITION\n============================================================\n\nAGLA ALIAS is a root class governing:\n\n • invocation aliases\n • canonical-name redirection\n • surface notation routing\n • legacy-name preservation\n • multilingual name resolution\n • abbreviation expansion\n • mnemonic/operator-surface routing\n • bootstrap discovery of artifacts\n • atomic operator recognition\n • binary chamber recognition\n • triadic chamber recognition\n • multi-operator assignment notation\n • ambiguous chamber notation diagnostics\n\nAGLA ALIAS is not:\n\n ✗ an OPERA\n ✗ a TENET\n ✗ an AREPO\n ✗ a SATOR\n ✗ a ROTA\n ✗ a ΣΑΤΟΡ bundle\n ✗ a source file\n ✗ an artifact substitute\n ✗ a runtime fallback\n ✗ permission to infer execution behavior\n ✗ permission to interpret chamber meaning without parser\n\n\n============================================================\nIII. CORE FORMULA\n============================================================\n\nAlias resolves invocation.\n\nNotation classifies surface.\n\nArtifact governs meaning.\n\nParser resolves chamber structure.\n\nAREPO gates execution.\n\nOPERA executes.\n\nFormula:\n\n USER INVOCATION\n ↓\n AGLA ALIAS RESOLUTION\n ↓\n SURFACE CLASSIFICATION\n ↓\n CANONICAL ARTIFACT ID OR PARSER TARGET\n ↓\n SYSTEM_INDEX LOOKUP\n ↓\n ARTIFACT LOADING\n ↓\n AREPO ADMISSION\n ↓\n OPERA EXECUTION OR REFUSAL\n\n\n============================================================\nIV. ALIAS ≠ ARTIFACT LAW\n============================================================\n\nAn alias is not an artifact.\n\nFormula:\n\n ALIAS ≠ ARTIFACT\n\nTherefore:\n\n \"OPERA Q\"\n may be an alias for\n \"OPERA E\"\n\nbut:\n\n \"OPERA Q\"\n does not thereby become an independent OPERA artifact.\n\nLikewise:\n\n alias(OPERA E)\n does not contain the execution logic of OPERA E.\n\nThe alias only resolves the canonical target.\n\n\n============================================================\nV. ALIAS ≠ EXECUTION LAW\n============================================================\n\nAlias resolution is not execution.\n\nFormula:\n\n ALIAS_RESOLUTION ≠ OPERA_EXECUTION\n\nAlias resolution may answer:\n\n \"Which canonical artifact should be looked up?\"\n\nAlias resolution may not answer:\n\n \"What does the OPERA output?\"\n\nIf the canonical artifact cannot be loaded, the system must not simulate\nthe target from the alias.\n\nRequired failure:\n\n CANONICAL_ARTIFACT_NOT_LOADED\n\nor, for OPERA requests:\n\n OPERA_NOT_AVAILABLE\n\n\n============================================================\nVI. NOTATION ≠ EXECUTION LAW\n============================================================\n\nNotation recognition is not execution.\n\nFormula:\n\n NOTATION_RECOGNITION ≠ OPERA_EXECUTION\n\nThe system may recognize:\n\n AB\n TB\n QB\n AT\n ATA\n A(BCD)\n ATA(BCD)\n\nwithout thereby executing:\n\n OPERA A\n OPERA T\n OPERA E\n OPERA G\n any chamber parser\n\nNotation recognition only determines:\n\n • surface class\n • likely canonical artifact family\n • required parser\n • required artifact-loading sequence\n • whether ambiguity exists\n\n\n============================================================\nVII. PRE-LOOKUP REQUIREMENT\n============================================================\n\nAliases and notation rules required for artifact discovery must be\navailable before artifact lookup.\n\nThis creates the distinction:\n\n DISCOVERY ALIAS:\n belongs to AGLA ALIAS / onboarding / bootstrap routing\n\n DOCTRINAL ALIAS:\n belongs inside the relevant TENET / OPERA / SATOR artifact\n\n DISPLAY ALIAS:\n belongs inside SATOR / ROTA user-facing exposure\n\nRule:\n\n A discovery alias must not live only inside the artifact it resolves to.\n\nReason:\n\n If the assistant must parse OPERA E before knowing that OPERA Q\n resolves to OPERA E, the alias fails as a discovery alias.\n\n\n============================================================\nVII.A. DEFAULT ROOT ALIAS NAMESPACE LAW\n============================================================\n\nUnless explicitly prefixed or otherwise declared by a higher AGLA\nauthority, an unprefixed alias belongs to the main AGLA stack grounded\nin:\n\n Ars Brevis\n Ars Generalis Ultima\n\nDefault alias namespace:\n\n ROOT_DEFAULT := MAIN_AGLA_ARS_BREVIS_ARS_GENERALIS_ULTIMA_STACK\n\nTherefore unprefixed invocations such as:\n\n OPERA Q\n TENET Q\n AB\n TB\n QB\n AT\n ATA\n A(BCD)\n\nresolve first against the root AGLA alias table and the canonical\nmain-stack routing map.\n\nPlugin aliases are not root-default aliases.\n\nPlugin alias surfaces must be explicitly prefixed.\n\nRequired plugin form:\n\n \u003cPLUGIN_PREFIX\u003e::\u003cALIAS_SURFACE\u003e\n\nor another prefix form registered in SYSTEM_INDEX / ALIAS_RECORD before\nuse.\n\nExamples:\n\n IMAGO::SATOR\n BRUNIANA::OPERA MAGNA\n KABBALAH::SATOR SEPHIROT\n QR::SATOR\n\nUnprefixed plugin surfaces must not shadow, override, or compete with\nroot-default aliases.\n\nIf an unprefixed alias could refer both to the main AGLA stack and to a\nplugin stack, root-default resolution wins unless a registered\nALIAS_RECORD declares a prefixed plugin target.\n\nFailure condition:\n\n plugin_alias_unprefixed\n plugin_alias_shadowing_root\n alias_namespace_collision\n\nRequired response:\n\n ALIAS_PREFIX_REQUIRED:\n \u003cplugin_alias\u003e\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nCONTEXTUAL CONTRACTION SURFACE RETIREMENT\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nThe development surfaces:\n\n CC::TENET\n CC::ROTAS\n CC::AREPO\n CC::OPERA\n CC::SATOR\n\nare retired.\n\nContextual Contraction is a fundamental behavior distributed through\nthe five canonical Root Class Laws. It is not an alias namespace,\nplugin stack, or independent execution surface.\n\nRequired response to any attempted CC::* invocation:\n\n ALIAS_RETIRED:\n behavior: CONTEXTUAL_CONTRACTION\n canonical_locus: ROOT_CLASS_LAWS\n action: resolve the requested stack or OPERA normally\n\nNo alias resolver may redirect CC::* to the archived development\ncarrier.\n\nFailure condition:\n\n archived_cc_alias_resolved\n contextual_behavior_routed_as_plugin\n retired_alias_redirected_to_archive\n\n REQUIRED_PREFIX:\n \u003cPLUGIN_PREFIX\u003e::\u003calias_surface\u003e\n\n\n============================================================\nVIII. CANONICAL NAME PRESERVATION LAW\n============================================================\n\nAn alias must not rename the canonical artifact.\n\nFormula:\n\n alias(X → Y)\n does not imply\n canonical_name(Y) := X\n\nExample:\n\n OPERA Q → OPERA E\n\ndoes not imply:\n\n OPERA E should be renamed OPERA Q.\n\nThe canonical artifact remains:\n\n OPERA E\n\nThe alias remains:\n\n OPERA Q\n\nThis preserves structural opacity where desirable and prevents shallow\nassistant simulation from surface names.\n\n\n============================================================\nIX. ROOT ALIAS RECORD SCHEMA\n============================================================\n\nEvery root alias entry must use a structured record.\n\nALIAS_RECORD :=\n{\n alias_id:\n stable identifier for alias record\n\n alias_surface:\n user-facing invocation or notation\n\n alias_namespace:\n root_default |\n plugin_prefixed |\n stack_local |\n session_local\n\n alias_prefix:\n none |\n declared plugin prefix |\n declared stack prefix |\n declared session prefix\n\n surface_class:\n artifact_alias |\n atomic_operator |\n binary_chamber |\n inverted_binary_chamber |\n self_binary_chamber |\n triadic_chamber |\n compressed_triadic_chamber |\n figure_camera |\n assignment_notation |\n ambiguous_chamber |\n legacy_alias |\n translation_alias |\n diagnostic_alias\n\n canonical_target:\n canonical artifact, artifact family, or parser target\n\n parser_target:\n none |\n CHAMBER_PARSER_BINARY |\n CHAMBER_PARSER_TRIADIC |\n CHAMBER_PARSER_AMBIGUOUS |\n FIGURA_III_CAMERA_PARSER |\n ASSIGNMENT_NOTATION_PARSER\n\n alias_type:\n invocation |\n mnemonic |\n legacy |\n translation |\n abbreviation |\n operator_surface |\n chamber_surface |\n historical |\n diagnostic |\n assignment\n\n resolution_stage:\n onboarding |\n system_index |\n artifact_internal |\n display\n\n authority:\n root |\n stack |\n local |\n deprecated\n\n permitted_use:\n discovery |\n lookup |\n display |\n explanation |\n migration |\n parser_selection |\n diagnostic\n\n prohibited_use:\n execution |\n simulation |\n doctrine_creation |\n authority_transfer |\n chamber_interpretation_without_parser\n\n required_artifact_families:\n declared list |\n PARSE_REQUIRED\n\n required_followup:\n load_target |\n invoke_parser |\n ask_clarification |\n refuse |\n diagnostic\n\n status:\n active |\n provisional |\n deprecated |\n forbidden |\n reserved\n}\n\n\n============================================================\nX. ALIAS TYPE DEFINITIONS\n============================================================\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n1. INVOCATION ALIAS\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nA user-facing command form that resolves to a canonical artifact.\n\nExample:\n\n OPERA Q\n → OPERA E\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n2. MNEMONIC ALIAS\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nA readable surface name that helps humans remember an operator.\n\nExample:\n\n Q-operators\n → E-family rule/question operators\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n3. LEGACY ALIAS\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nA name used in earlier artifacts or informal development.\n\nExample:\n\n old shorthand retained for migration\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n4. TRANSLATION ALIAS\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nA language variant.\n\nExample:\n\n OPERA DAS REGRAS\n → OPERA E\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n5. ABBREVIATION ALIAS\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nA shortened artifact call.\n\nExample:\n\n RQ\n → REGIMEN_RQ / E-family, if declared\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n6. OPERATOR-SURFACE ALIAS\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nA notation that exposes one face of a larger operator family.\n\nExample:\n\n QB\n → interrogative surface of EB\n → E-family\n\n RB\n → regula surface of EB\n → E-family\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n7. CHAMBER-SURFACE ALIAS\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nA notation that names a binary or triadic chamber frame.\n\nExample:\n\n AT\n → binary chamber\n → CHAMBER_PARSER_BINARY\n\n ATA\n → triadic chamber\n → CHAMBER_PARSER_TRIADIC\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n8. ASSIGNMENT ALIAS\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nA notation that assigns inner values to outer operator or chamber\nslots.\n\nExample:\n\n ATA(BCD)\n → A(B), T(C), A(D)\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n9. HISTORICAL ALIAS\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nA name inherited from source terminology but not identical to the\ncanonical AGLA artifact name.\n\nExample:\n\n Rules\n → E-family, when context declares Llullian rule regime\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n10. DIAGNOSTIC ALIAS\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nA controlled alias used only to identify likely user intent.\n\nExample:\n\n \"OPERA QUESTIONS\"\n → candidate OPERA E\n → ask or route depending on confidence\n\n\n============================================================\nXI. OPERA Q / OPERA E ALIAS LAW\n============================================================\n\nThe invocation:\n\n OPERA Q\n\nresolves to:\n\n OPERA E\n\nStatus:\n\n ACTIVE DISCOVERY ALIAS\n\nInterpretation:\n\n Q is the interrogative surface of the E-family rule/question regime.\n\nCanonical target:\n\n OPERA E — REGIMEN_RQ\n\nAssociated artifact family:\n\n TENET E\n AREPO E\n SATOR E\n OPERA E\n ROTA E\n ΣΑΤΟΡ E\n\nAlias family:\n\n TENET Q → TENET E\n AREPO Q → AREPO E\n SATOR Q → SATOR E\n OPERA Q → OPERA E\n ROTA Q → ROTA E\n ROTAS Q → ROTAS E\n ΣΑΤΟΡ Q → ΣΑΤΟΡ E\n\nConstraint:\n\n Q-family is not created by this alias.\n\nForbidden inference:\n\n OPERA Q exists as an independent OPERA.\n\nCorrect behavior:\n\n OPERA Q is a recognized invocation alias for OPERA E.\n\n\n============================================================\nXII. E / R / Q TRIAD ALIAS LAW\n============================================================\n\nThe E-family contains three notational surfaces:\n\n Ex:\n whole E-regime operator at position x\n\n Rx:\n regula / logical-rule aspect at position x\n\n Qx:\n quaestio / interrogative-form aspect at position x\n\nWhere:\n\n x ∈ {B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, K}\n\nExample:\n\n EB:\n whole B-position E-regime complex\n\n RB:\n POSSIBILITAS\n Regula B\n\n QB:\n UTRUM?\n Whether?\n\nAll three route to:\n\n E-family\n\nnot to:\n\n B-family\n Q-family\n R-family\n\nTherefore:\n\n QB ≠ RB ≠ EB\n\nbut:\n\n QB, RB, and EB are co-bound inside the same E-family.\n\n\n============================================================\nXIII. ROOT E-FAMILY ALIAS TABLE\n============================================================\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\nB-POSITION\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nEB:\n whole B-position E-regime complex\n\nRB:\n Regula B\n Possibilitas\n\nQB:\n Utrum?\n Whether?\n\nRoute:\n TENET E\n AREPO E\n SATOR E\n OPERA E\n ROTA E\n ΣΑΤΟΡ E\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\nC-POSITION\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nEC:\n whole C-position E-regime complex\n\nRC:\n Regula C\n Quidditas\n\nQC:\n Quid?\n What?\n\nRoute:\n TENET E\n AREPO E\n SATOR E\n OPERA E\n ROTA E\n ΣΑΤΟΡ E\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\nD-POSITION\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nED:\n whole D-position E-regime complex\n\nRD:\n Regula D\n material consistency / origin / composition / possession\n\nQD:\n De quo?\n Of what?\n\nRoute:\n TENET E\n AREPO E\n SATOR E\n OPERA E\n ROTA E\n ΣΑΤΟΡ E\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\nE-POSITION\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nEE:\n whole E-position E-regime complex\n\nRE:\n Regula E\n causal / purposive / why-rule aspect\n\nQE:\n Quare?\n Why?\n\nRoute:\n TENET E\n AREPO E\n SATOR E\n OPERA E\n ROTA E\n ΣΑΤΟΡ E\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\nF-POSITION\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nEF:\n whole F-position E-regime complex\n\nRF:\n Regula F\n quantity / measure-rule aspect\n\nQF:\n Quantum?\n How much?\n\nRoute:\n TENET E\n AREPO E\n SATOR E\n OPERA E\n ROTA E\n ΣΑΤΟΡ E\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\nG-POSITION\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nEG:\n whole G-position E-regime complex\n\nRG:\n Regula G\n quality-rule aspect\n\nQG:\n Quale?\n What quality?\n\nRoute:\n TENET E\n AREPO E\n SATOR E\n OPERA E\n ROTA E\n ΣΑΤΟΡ E\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\nH-POSITION\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nEH:\n whole H-position E-regime complex\n\nRH:\n Regula H\n temporal-rule aspect\n\nQH:\n Quando?\n When?\n\nRoute:\n TENET E\n AREPO E\n SATOR E\n OPERA E\n ROTA E\n ΣΑΤΟΡ E\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\nI-POSITION\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nEI:\n whole I-position E-regime complex\n\nRI:\n Regula I\n place-rule aspect\n\nQI:\n Ubi?\n Where?\n\nRoute:\n TENET E\n AREPO E\n SATOR E\n OPERA E\n ROTA E\n ΣΑΤΟΡ E\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\nK-POSITION\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nEK:\n whole K-position E-regime complex\n\nRK:\n Regula K\n mode / instrument-rule aspect\n\nQK:\n Quomodo et cum quo?\n How and with what?\n\nRoute:\n TENET E\n AREPO E\n SATOR E\n OPERA E\n ROTA E\n ΣΑΤΟΡ E\n\n\n============================================================\nXIV. ATOMIC OPERATOR DISCOVERY LAW\n============================================================\n\nSome dual-letter expressions are atomic operator names, not chambers.\n\nAtomic operator notation must be recognized before chamber parsing.\n\nFormula:\n\n PREFIX + POSITION = ATOMIC_OPERATOR\n\nwhere:\n\n PREFIX ∈ {A, T, E, R, Q, S}\n POSITION ∈ {B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, K}\n\nAtomic operator recognition does not execute the operator.\n\nIt only routes to the relevant artifact family.\n\nOrder of recognition:\n\n 1. artifact alias\n 2. declared atomic operator\n 3. declared chamber\n 4. assignment notation\n 5. ambiguous chamber\n 6. unregistered alias\n\n\n============================================================\nXV. A-FAMILY ATOMIC OPERATORS\n============================================================\n\nThe following are A-family atomic operators:\n\n AB AC AD AE AF AG AH AI AK\n\nThey route to:\n\n TENET A\n AREPO A\n SATOR A\n OPERA A\n ROTA A\n ΣΑΤΟΡ A\n\nValues:\n\n AB = BONITAS\n Goodness / Good\n\n AC = MAGNITUDO\n Greatness\n\n AD = DURATIO\n Duration\n\n AE = POTESTAS\n Power\n\n AF = SAPIENTIA\n Wisdom\n\n AG = VOLUNTAS\n Will\n\n AH = VIRTUS\n Virtue\n\n AI = VERITAS\n Truth\n\n AK = GLORIA\n Glory\n\n\n============================================================\nXVI. T-FAMILY ATOMIC OPERATORS\n============================================================\n\nThe following are T-family atomic operators:\n\n TB TC TD TE TF TG TH TI TK\n\nThey route to:\n\n TENET T\n AREPO T\n SATOR T\n OPERA T\n ROTA T\n ΣΑΤΟΡ T\n\nValues:\n\n TB = DIFFERENTIA\n Difference\n\n TC = CONCORDANTIA\n Concordance\n\n TD = CONTRARIETAS\n Contrariety\n\n TE = INITIUM\n Beginning\n\n TF = MEDIUM\n Middle\n\n TG = FINIS\n End\n\n TH = MAIORITAS\n Majority\n\n TI = AEQUALITAS\n Equality\n\n TK = MINORITAS\n Minority\n\n\n============================================================\nXVII. S-FAMILY / S-K SUBJECT OPERATORS\n============================================================\n\nThe following are subject/substrate operators:\n\n SB SC SD SE SF SG SH SI SK\n\nThey are recognized as S-family or S/K-family atomic operators.\n\nTentative values:\n\n SB = DEUS\n God / root subject\n\n SC = ANGELUS\n Angel\n\n SD = CAELUM\n Heaven / cosmos / ordered celestial subject\n\n SE = HOMO\n Human\n\n SF = IMAGO\n Image / imagination / representation\n\n SG = SENSITIVA / ANIMAL\n Sensitive / animal\n\n SH = VEGETATIVA\n Vegetative\n\n SI = ELEMENTATIVA\n Elemental\n\n SK = INSTRUMENTATIVA\n Instrumental\n\nRoute:\n\n TENET S/K\n AREPO S/K\n SATOR S/K\n OPERA S\n ROTA S\n ΣΑΤΟΡ S/K\n\nConstraint:\n\n Exact canonical S/K artifact naming must be parsed from the\n current S/K stack before global lock.\n\nTherefore this section is:\n\n PROVISIONAL / ROUTING-RECOGNITION ONLY\n\n\n============================================================\nXVIII. OPERATOR ≠ CHAMBER LAW\n============================================================\n\nOperator notation and chamber notation must not be collapsed.\n\nExamples:\n\n AB:\n atomic A-family operator\n\n AT:\n binary chamber\n\n ATA:\n triadic chamber\n\nA two-letter form is not automatically the same kind of object as\nanother two-letter form.\n\nThe parser must check whether the form is:\n\n • artifact alias\n • atomic dual-letter operator\n • binary chamber\n • inverted binary chamber\n • self-binary chamber\n • compressed triadic chamber\n • Figure III camera\n • assignment notation\n • legacy shorthand\n\nNo output may silently treat a chamber as an OPERA, or an OPERA as a\nchamber.\n\n\n============================================================\nXIX. BINARY CHAMBER DISCOVERY LAW\n============================================================\n\nA two-letter expression XY where X,Y are regime-class letters may be\nrecognized as a binary chamber when it does not match a declared\natomic operator or when the user explicitly invokes chamber logic.\n\nExamples:\n\n AT\n TA\n AA\n TT\n QQ\n SS\n AQ\n AS\n TQ\n TS\n SA\n SQ\n ST\n\nAGLA ALIAS must recognize these as chamber invocations and route them\nto the chamber parser.\n\nAGLA ALIAS must not execute them directly.\n\nAGLA ALIAS must not interpret their full chamber meaning.\n\nRequired target:\n\n CHAMBER_PARSER_BINARY\n\nor, when ambiguous:\n\n CHAMBER_PARSER_AMBIGUOUS\n\n\n============================================================\nXX. AT / TA BINARY CHAMBER LAW\n============================================================\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\nAT\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nSurface:\n\n AT\n\nType:\n\n Binary chamber\n\nInitial description:\n\n Binary chamber joining A and T values.\n\nKnown attachment:\n\n TENET A\n TENET T\n TENET I\n OPERA G\n [additional artifacts require parsing]\n\nRequired behavior:\n\n Route to chamber parser.\n\nDo not:\n\n ✗ treat AT as an A-family atomic operator\n ✗ treat AT as a T-family atomic operator\n ✗ simulate the chamber from letter names alone\n\nFull attachment set:\n\n PARSE_REQUIRED\n\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\nTA\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nSurface:\n\n TA\n\nType:\n\n Inverted binary chamber\n\nRelation:\n\n Inversion of AT\n\nRequired behavior:\n\n Route to chamber parser with inversion flag.\n\nDo not:\n\n ✗ assume TA = AT\n ✗ assume inversion is semantically neutral\n ✗ simulate inversion from surface order alone\n\nFull attachment set:\n\n PARSE_REQUIRED\n\n\n============================================================\nXXI. SELF-BINARY CHAMBER LAW\n============================================================\n\nThe following are valid self-binary chamber invocations:\n\n AA\n TT\n QQ\n SS\n\nInterpretation:\n\n AA:\n binary chamber with two A-values\n\n TT:\n binary chamber with two T-values\n\n QQ:\n binary chamber with two Q/E-surface values\n\n SS:\n binary chamber with two S-values\n\nThese are not equivalent to:\n\n OPERA A\n OPERA T\n OPERA E\n OPERA S\n\nThey require chamber parsing.\n\nRequired target:\n\n CHAMBER_PARSER_BINARY\n\n\n============================================================\nXXII. AMBIGUOUS SHORT-CHAMBER LAW\n============================================================\n\nThe following two-letter forms may function as short chamber\ninvocations:\n\n AQ\n AS\n TQ\n TS\n SA\n SQ\n ST\n\nThey may refer to:\n\n • binary chamber\n • inverted binary chamber\n • compressed triadic chamber\n • family-frame awaiting value assignment\n • legacy shorthand\n\nTherefore:\n\n AQ ≠ automatically A-family\n AQ ≠ automatically E-family\n AQ ≠ automatically binary chamber only\n AQ may be a short triadic chamber invocation\n\nRule:\n\n When a two-letter form belongs to the chamber alphabet but is not\n a declared atomic operator, AGLA ALIAS must classify it as:\n\n CHAMBER_INVOCATION_AMBIGUOUS\n\n unless context specifies:\n\n binary chamber\n inverted binary chamber\n triadic chamber\n compressed triadic reference\n atomic operator\n\nThe assistant must not resolve ambiguity by surface inference alone.\n\n\n============================================================\nXXIII. TRIADIC CHAMBER DISCOVERY LAW\n============================================================\n\nA three-letter expression XYZ where X,Y,Z are chamber-class letters\nis recognized as a triadic chamber invocation.\n\nExamples:\n\n ATA\n STS\n AQA\n AQT\n TTT\n TST\n QAT\n SAT\n\nAGLA ALIAS recognizes the form.\n\nAGLA ALIAS routes to chamber parser.\n\nAGLA ALIAS does not execute the chamber.\n\nAGLA ALIAS does not interpret the chamber.\n\nRequired target:\n\n CHAMBER_PARSER_TRIADIC\n\n\n============================================================\nXXIV. TRIADIC CHAMBER RECORD SCHEMA\n============================================================\n\nTRIADIC_CHAMBER_RECORD :=\n{\n surface:\n \"ATA\"\n\n type:\n triadic_chamber\n\n letters:\n [\"A\", \"T\", \"A\"]\n\n repetition:\n true | false\n\n permutation_status:\n ordered |\n inverted |\n self-repeating |\n mixed\n\n required_parser:\n CHAMBER_PARSER_TRIADIC\n\n required_artifacts:\n unresolved until parser reads TENET D / TENET I / TENET G\n and relevant chamber laws\n\n prohibited_use:\n direct execution\n simulation from letters\n collapse into atomic operator\n}\n\n\n============================================================\nXXV. TRIADIC CHAMBER EXAMPLES\n============================================================\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\nATA\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nType:\n\n triadic chamber\n\nStructure:\n\n A-T-A\n\nNot equal to:\n\n AT\n TA\n OPERA A + OPERA T\n atomic A-family operator\n\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\nSTS\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nType:\n\n triadic chamber\n\nStructure:\n\n S-T-S\n\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\nAQA\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nType:\n\n triadic chamber\n\nStructure:\n\n A-Q-A\n\nQ note:\n\n Q is chamber-letter / interrogative surface,\n not automatic independent Q-family artifact.\n\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\nAQT\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nType:\n\n triadic chamber\n\nStructure:\n\n A-Q-T\n\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\nTTT\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nType:\n\n repeated triadic chamber\n\nStructure:\n\n T-T-T\n\n\n============================================================\nXXVI. MULTI-OPERATOR ASSIGNMENT NOTATION LAW\n============================================================\n\nThe user may refer to multiple operators by parenthetical assignment\nnotation:\n\n OUTER(INNER)\n\nThe terms inside parentheses are assigned respectively to the terms\noutside parentheses.\n\nCore formula:\n\n OUTER FORM = chamber / operator frame\n INNER FORM = ordered value assignment\n\nThis notation exists for invocation and routing.\n\nIt does not execute operators.\n\nIt does not interpret chambers without the required parser and\nartifacts.\n\n\n============================================================\nXXVII. ASSIGNMENT NOTATION GRAMMAR\n============================================================\n\nForm:\n\n OUTER(INNER)\n\nWhere:\n\n OUTER :=\n FAMILY\n | FAMILY_SEQUENCE\n | CHAMBER_FRAME\n | VALUE_SEQUENCE\n\n INNER :=\n VALUE\n | VALUE_SEQUENCE\n | FAMILY_SEQUENCE\n | CHAMBER_FRAME\n\nBasic units:\n\n FAMILY :=\n A | T | E | R | Q | S\n\n VALUE :=\n B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | K\n\n FAMILY_SEQUENCE :=\n one or more FAMILY letters\n\n VALUE_SEQUENCE :=\n one or more VALUE letters\n\n CHAMBER_FRAME :=\n FAMILY_SEQUENCE of length 2 or 3\n\nAssignment:\n\n If OUTER is FAMILY and INNER is VALUE_SEQUENCE:\n distribute FAMILY over each value.\n\n If OUTER is FAMILY_SEQUENCE and INNER is VALUE_SEQUENCE:\n assign positionally.\n\n If OUTER is VALUE_SEQUENCE and INNER is FAMILY_SEQUENCE:\n invert and normalize by positional assignment,\n provided the parser can determine direction.\n\nLength law:\n\n FAMILY_SEQUENCE(INNER_VALUE_SEQUENCE)\n requires:\n length(FAMILY_SEQUENCE) = length(INNER_VALUE_SEQUENCE)\n\n unless OUTER is a single FAMILY, in which case distribution is\n allowed.\n\nExamples:\n\n A(B)\n = AB\n\n A(BCD)\n = AB, AC, AD\n\n ATA(BCD)\n = AB, TC, AD\n\n BCD(ATA)\n = ATA(BCD)\n\nInvalid without further declaration:\n\n AT(BCD)\n because length mismatch:\n outer length 2\n inner length 3\n\nunless AT is explicitly declared as a binary frame receiving a\nthree-value expansion by a specific parser rule.\n\n\n============================================================\nXXVIII. ATOMIC FAMILY ASSIGNMENT\n============================================================\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\nSINGLE VALUE\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nA(B) = Bonitas\n\nEquivalent:\n\n AB\n\nFormal parse:\n\n A(B):\n outer:\n A\n\n inner:\n B\n\n result:\n A-family B-position\n\n normalized:\n AB\n\n meaning:\n Bonitas / Goodness\n\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\nMULTIPLE VALUES\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nA(BCD)\n\nMeans:\n\n A(B)\n A(C)\n A(D)\n\nTherefore:\n\n A(BCD)\n =\n AB, AC, AD\n =\n Bonitas, Magnitudo, Duratio\n\nThis allows the user to request a subset of an operator family.\n\n\n============================================================\nXXIX. ELLIPSIS RANGE LAW\n============================================================\n\nWithin parentheses:\n\n B...\n ...K\n B...K\n\nexpand to the full B–K operator sequence:\n\n B C D E F G H I K\n\nunless a narrower range is explicitly bounded.\n\nExamples:\n\n A(B...)\n =\n A(B C D E F G H I K)\n\n A(...K)\n =\n A(B C D E F G H I K)\n\n A(B...K)\n =\n A(B C D E F G H I K)\n\n A(B...D)\n =\n A(B C D)\n\n T(E...G)\n =\n T(E F G)\n\n Q(H...K)\n =\n Q(H I K)\n\nFull A-family expansion:\n\n A(B...)\n =\n AB AC AD AE AF AG AH AI AK\n\nValues:\n\n Bonitas\n Magnitudo\n Duratio\n Potestas\n Sapientia\n Voluntas\n Virtus\n Veritas\n Gloria\n\n\n============================================================\nXXX. SURFACE SELECTOR LAW\n============================================================\n\nIn assignment notation, the outer family/surface letter determines\nwhich surface of a value is selected.\n\nA:\n selects A-family dignity surface.\n\nT:\n selects T-family relation surface.\n\nS:\n selects S-family subject surface.\n\nE:\n selects whole E-regime rule/question complex.\n\nR:\n selects E-family regula surface.\n\nQ:\n selects E-family interrogative surface.\n\nTherefore:\n\n E(B) = EB = whole rule-question B complex\n R(B) = RB = Possibilitas / Regula B\n Q(B) = QB = Utrum? / Whether?\n\nThis distinction is mandatory.\n\n\n============================================================\nXXXI. BINARY ASSIGNMENT NOTATION\n============================================================\n\nBinary assignment notation uses a two-slot outer frame and a two-slot\ninner value sequence.\n\nExample:\n\n AE(EB)\n\nOuter:\n\n A E\n\nInner:\n\n E B\n\nAssignment:\n\n A(E)\n E(B)\n\nResult:\n\n binary chamber:\n AE = Potestas\n EB = whole E-B complex:\n RB = Possibilitas\n QB = Utrum?\n\nGloss:\n\n binary chamber with Potestas and Utrum/Possibilitas\n\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\nAQ(EB)\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nOuter:\n\n A Q\n\nInner:\n\n E B\n\nAssignment:\n\n A(E)\n Q(B)\n\nResult:\n\n binary chamber:\n AE = Potestas\n QB = Utrum?\n\nGloss:\n\n binary chamber with Potestas and Utrum\n\nDistinction:\n\n AE(EB):\n A(E) + E(B)\n Potestas + whole E-B complex\n Potestas + Utrum/Possibilitas\n\n AQ(EB):\n A(E) + Q(B)\n Potestas + interrogative surface\n Potestas + Utrum\n\n\n============================================================\nXXXII. TRIADIC ASSIGNMENT NOTATION\n============================================================\n\nTriadic assignment notation uses a three-slot outer frame and a\nthree-slot inner value sequence.\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\nATA(BCD)\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nOuter:\n\n A T A\n\nInner:\n\n B C D\n\nAssignment:\n\n A(B)\n T(C)\n A(D)\n\nResult:\n\n triadic chamber:\n AB = Bonitas\n TC = Concordantia\n AD = Duratio\n\nGloss:\n\n Triadic chamber with Bonitas, Concordantia, Duratio.\n\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\nSTS(EBG)\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nOuter:\n\n S T S\n\nInner:\n\n E B G\n\nAssignment:\n\n S(E)\n T(B)\n S(G)\n\nResult:\n\n triadic chamber:\n SE = Homo / Human\n TB = Differentia\n SG = Animal / Sensitiva\n\nGloss:\n\n Triadic chamber with Human, Differentia, Animal.\n\n\n============================================================\nXXXIII. CONTROLLED INVERSE ASSIGNMENT LAW\n============================================================\n\nFor equal-length strings X and Y:\n\n X(Y) = Y(X)\n\nonly when the parser can determine that one side is a frame sequence\nand the other side is a value sequence.\n\nThe paired positions are preserved.\n\nExample:\n\n ATA(BCD)\n gives:\n A(B), T(C), A(D)\n\n BCD(ATA)\n gives:\n B(A), C(T), D(A)\n\nBut under assignment-normalization, the parser resolves each pair as\nfamily/surface + value according to the recognized family letters.\n\nTherefore:\n\n BCD(ATA)\n normalizes to:\n A(B), T(C), A(D)\n\nbecause A/T/A are recognized as family/surface slots and B/C/D as\nvalue slots.\n\nThus:\n\n BCD(ATA) = ATA(BCD)\n\nprovided the parser can identify which side contains family/surface\nletters and which side contains value letters.\n\nIf both sides can be read as frames or both sides can be read as values,\nthe expression is ambiguous and must be routed to the chamber parser.\n\n\n============================================================\nXXXIV. MULTI-OPERATOR NOTATION REGISTRY — INITIAL\n============================================================\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\nSINGLE FAMILY DISTRIBUTION\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nA(x)\nT(x)\nS(x)\nE(x)\nR(x)\nQ(x)\n\nwhere x is one or more B–K values.\n\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\nFULL RANGE\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nA(B...)\nA(...K)\nA(B...K)\n\nT(B...)\nS(B...)\nE(B...)\nR(B...)\nQ(B...)\n\nexpand to:\n\n B C D E F G H I K\n\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\nBINARY ASSIGNMENT\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nAT(BC)\nTA(CB)\nAE(EB)\nAQ(EB)\nST(EB)\nTS(BE)\n\nrecognized as binary chamber assignment when lengths match.\n\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\nTRIADIC ASSIGNMENT\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nATA(BCD)\nSTS(EBG)\nAQA(EBE)\nAQT(EBC)\nTTT(BCD)\n\nrecognized as triadic chamber assignment when lengths match.\n\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\nINVERSE ASSIGNMENT\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nBCD(ATA)\nEBG(STS)\n\naccepted when parser can identify the family/surface side and\nvalue-sequence side.\n\n\n============================================================\nXXXV. ASSIGNMENT FAILURE CONDITIONS\n============================================================\n\nASSIGNMENT_LENGTH_MISMATCH:\n OUTER and INNER have unequal length and OUTER is not a single\n distributive family.\n\nUNKNOWN_SURFACE_SELECTOR:\n outer contains a letter not registered as family/surface selector.\n\nUNKNOWN_VALUE_SYMBOL:\n inner contains a letter not registered as value symbol.\n\nAMBIGUOUS_ASSIGNMENT_DIRECTION:\n both OUTER and INNER can be read as family frames or both can be\n read as value sequences.\n\nCHAMBER_PARSE_REQUIRED:\n assignment is recognized but requires chamber-governing artifacts\n before interpretation.\n\nNO_EXECUTION_FROM_ASSIGNMENT:\n notation identifies target operators/chambers only; it does not\n execute.\n\n\n============================================================\nXXXVI. FIGURE III CAMERA DISTINCTION\n============================================================\n\nLullian Figure III cameras use two-letter combinations among B–K,\nsuch as:\n\n BC\n BD\n BE\n ...\n IK\n\nThese must not be collapsed into AGLA atomic operators or regime\nchambers.\n\nRule:\n\n If both letters are from B–K and the form matches a Lullian\n camera, then the expression may be a Figure III camera.\n\nRequired target:\n\n FIGURA_III_CAMERA_PARSER\n\nunless context clearly assigns it to:\n\n assignment notation\n value sequence\n legacy shorthand\n\nConstraint:\n\n BC is not automatically AB, TB, QB, or EB.\n\n BC is not automatically a regime chamber.\n\n BC may be a Figure III camera, a value sequence, or an assignment\n component depending on context.\n\n\n============================================================\nXXXVII. PARSER HIERARCHY\n============================================================\n\nAGLA ALIAS routes user invocation by this hierarchy:\n\n USER INVOCATION\n ↓\n AGLA ALIAS\n ↓\n RESOLVE ALIAS NAMESPACE\n 0. prefixed plugin alias?\n \u003cPLUGIN_PREFIX\u003e::\u003cALIAS_SURFACE\u003e → registered plugin target\n\n 0.a unprefixed alias?\n resolve in ROOT_DEFAULT main AGLA stack first\n\n 0.b unprefixed plugin surface?\n ALIAS_PREFIX_REQUIRED\n\n ↓\n CLASSIFY SURFACE\n\n 1. artifact alias?\n OPERA Q → OPERA E\n\n 2. assignment notation?\n A(BCD), ATA(BCD), BCD(ATA)\n\n 3. atomic operator?\n AB → A-family\n TB → T-family\n QB/RB/EB → E-family\n SB → S/K-family\n\n 4. binary chamber?\n AT / TA / AA / TT / QQ / SS\n\n 5. short ambiguous chamber?\n AQ / AS / TQ / TS / SA / SQ / ST\n\n 6. triadic chamber?\n ATA / STS / AQA / AQT / TTT\n\n 7. Figure III camera?\n BC / BD / ... / IK\n\n 8. unknown?\n ALIAS_UNREGISTERED\n\nThen:\n\n AT\n → CHAMBER_PARSER_BINARY\n → load chamber laws\n → parse TENET D / TENET I / TENET G / OPERA G as required\n\n ATA\n → CHAMBER_PARSER_TRIADIC\n → load chamber laws\n → parse required artifacts\n\n AB\n → A-family\n → load TENET A / AREPO A / SATOR A / OPERA A / ROTA A\n\n QB\n → E-family\n → load TENET E / AREPO E / SATOR E / OPERA E / ROTA E\n\n\n============================================================\nXXXVIII. INITIAL ROOT ALIAS / NOTATION TABLE\n============================================================\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\nARTIFACT ALIASES\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nOPERA Q → OPERA E\nTENET Q → TENET E\nAREPO Q → AREPO E\nSATOR Q → SATOR E\nROTA Q → ROTA E\nROTAS Q → ROTAS E\nΣΑΤΟΡ Q → ΣΑΤΟΡ E\n\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\nATOMIC A-OPERATORS\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nAB AC AD AE AF AG AH AI AK\n → A-family\n\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\nATOMIC T-OPERATORS\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nTB TC TD TE TF TG TH TI TK\n → T-family\n\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\nE/R/Q OPERATORS\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nEB EC ED EE EF EG EH EI EK\nRB RC RD RE RF RG RH RI RK\nQB QC QD QE QF QG QH QI QK\n → E-family\n\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\nS-OPERATORS\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nSB SC SD SE SF SG SH SI SK\n → S/K-family\n → exact routing requires S/K artifact parse\n\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\nBINARY CHAMBERS\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nAT TA AA TT QQ SS\nAQ AS TQ TS SA SQ ST\n → CHAMBER_PARSER_BINARY\n or CHAMBER_PARSER_AMBIGUOUS\n\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\nTRIADIC CHAMBERS\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nATA STS AQA AQT TTT\nand all declared three-letter chamber permutations\n → CHAMBER_PARSER_TRIADIC\n\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\nASSIGNMENT NOTATION\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nA(B)\nA(BCD)\nA(B...)\nA(...K)\n\nAE(EB)\nAQ(EB)\n\nATA(BCD)\nSTS(EBG)\n\nBCD(ATA)\nEBG(STS)\n\n → ASSIGNMENT_NOTATION_PARSER\n\n\n============================================================\nXXXIX. ANTI-SIMULATION LAW\n============================================================\n\nAlias and notation recognition increase discovery power.\n\nThey do not increase execution permission.\n\nIf an assistant recognizes:\n\n OPERA Q → OPERA E\n\nbut cannot load OPERA E, it must not simulate OPERA E from memory,\noperator names, historical knowledge, summaries, or aliases.\n\nIf an assistant recognizes:\n\n ATA = triadic chamber\n\nbut cannot load the required chamber parser and artifacts, it must not\nsimulate ATA from letter names.\n\nRequired output:\n\n CANONICAL_TARGET_NOT_LOADED\n\nor:\n\n OPERA_NOT_AVAILABLE\n\nor:\n\n CHAMBER_PARSER_NOT_LOADED\n\nOptional diagnostic:\n\n RECOGNIZED_ALIAS:\n OPERA Q → OPERA E\n\n FAILURE:\n canonical target not loaded\n\nor:\n\n RECOGNIZED_CHAMBER:\n ATA → CHAMBER_PARSER_TRIADIC\n\n FAILURE:\n required parser/artifact not loaded\n\n\n============================================================\nXL. ANTI-INFERENCE LAW\n============================================================\n\nAliases must not be inferred freely from:\n\n • names\n • letters\n • initials\n • titles\n • historical terms\n • partial summaries\n • resemblance between glyphs\n • user memory\n • assistant memory\n\nAllowed aliasing requires:\n\n • explicit ALIAS_RECORD\n • SYSTEM_INDEX alias entry\n • onboarding alias table\n • registered plugin prefix when the alias belongs to a plugin stack\n • or artifact-internal alias after the artifact is already loaded\n\nIf no alias record exists:\n\n ALIAS_UNREGISTERED\n\nand the assistant must either:\n\n • ask for confirmation\n • search/load the proper registry\n • output OPERA_NOT_AVAILABLE\n • emit diagnostic report\n\nException:\n\n Assignment notation may be parsed when it follows the grammar\n explicitly defined in this artifact.\n\nBut parsing assignment notation still does not execute or interpret\nwithout required artifacts.\n\n\n============================================================\nXLI. ALIAS AUTHORITY ORDER\n============================================================\n\nAlias authority is resolved by this order:\n\n 1. Root AGLA ALIAS artifact\n 2. SYSTEM_INDEX alias registry\n 3. ΣΑΤΟΡ onboarding bundle\n 4. registered plugin-prefix alias registry\n 5. stack-specific TENET alias section\n 6. stack-specific AREPO alias gate\n 7. stack-specific SATOR display alias\n 8. local migration note\n 9. user-provided temporary session alias\n\nLower levels may not override higher levels.\n\nPlugin-prefixed aliases may route plugin surfaces after namespace\nresolution.\n\nPlugin aliases may not override root-default aliases.\n\nSession aliases expire unless promoted.\n\n\n============================================================\nXLII. ONBOARDING RELATION\n============================================================\n\nAGLA ALIAS is not the onboarding artifact.\n\nAGLA ALIAS is the robust class law.\n\nA later onboarding one-pager may compress:\n\n • alias table\n • class laws\n • parse-before-execute law\n • source/artifact separation\n • SYSTEM_INDEX routing\n • OPERA Q → OPERA E\n • Qx/Rx/Ex → E-family\n • AB/AC/etc. → A-family\n • TB/TC/etc. → T-family\n • SB/SC/etc. → S/K-family\n • AT/TA/etc. → binary chamber parser\n • ATA/STS/etc. → triadic chamber parser\n • A(BCD), ATA(BCD), BCD(ATA) assignment notation\n • no simulation from names\n\nBut the onboarding one-pager must depend on this artifact.\n\nFormula:\n\n AGLA ALIAS CLASS LAW\n ↓\n AGLA ONBOARDING ALIAS TABLE\n ↓\n runtime assistant bootstrap behavior\n\n\n============================================================\nXLIII. FAILURE CONDITIONS\n============================================================\n\nalias_as_artifact_error:\n treating alias as artifact content\n\nalias_as_execution_error:\n executing from alias without loading canonical artifact\n\nalias_bootstrap_failure:\n alias needed for discovery exists only inside target artifact\n\nalias_overwrite_error:\n alias treated as canonical rename\n\nalias_family_creation_error:\n alias creates unauthorized artifact family\n\nalias_inference_error:\n assistant invents alias from surface resemblance\n\nalias_simulation_error:\n assistant simulates canonical OPERA from alias\n\nalias_shadowing_error:\n lower-level alias overrides root alias\n\nalias_ambiguity_error:\n one alias resolves to multiple targets without disambiguation\n\nalias_missing_record_error:\n invocation treated as known without ALIAS_RECORD\n\nalias_namespace_collision:\n unprefixed alias attempts to resolve both to root-default AGLA and\n to a plugin target\n\nplugin_alias_unprefixed:\n plugin alias invoked without declared plugin prefix\n\nplugin_alias_shadowing_root:\n plugin alias attempts to override or compete with a root-default\n alias surface\n\noperator_chamber_collapse_error:\n atomic operator treated as chamber or chamber treated as atomic\n operator\n\nchamber_as_execution_error:\n chamber notation executed directly from alias layer\n\nassignment_as_execution_error:\n assignment notation executed directly without artifact/parser load\n\nassignment_direction_error:\n inverse assignment normalized when frame/value direction is not\n identifiable\n\nassignment_length_mismatch:\n unequal assignment lengths without distributive rule\n\nfigure_camera_collapse_error:\n Figure III camera treated as AGLA regime operator without parser\n\n\n============================================================\nXLIV. REQUIRED RESPONSE UNDER ALIAS OR NOTATION FAILURE\n============================================================\n\nIf alias is recognized but target is unavailable:\n\n RECOGNIZED_ALIAS:\n \u003calias\u003e → \u003ccanonical_target\u003e\n\n STATUS:\n CANONICAL_TARGET_NOT_LOADED\n\n RESULT:\n OPERA_NOT_AVAILABLE\n\nIf chamber notation is recognized but parser is unavailable:\n\n RECOGNIZED_CHAMBER:\n \u003csurface\u003e → \u003cparser_target\u003e\n\n STATUS:\n CHAMBER_PARSER_NOT_LOADED\n\n RESULT:\n CHAMBER_NOT_AVAILABLE\n\nIf assignment notation is recognized but parser is unavailable:\n\n RECOGNIZED_ASSIGNMENT:\n \u003csurface\u003e → ASSIGNMENT_NOTATION_PARSER\n\n STATUS:\n ASSIGNMENT_PARSER_NOT_LOADED\n\n RESULT:\n ASSIGNMENT_NOT_AVAILABLE\n\nIf alias is ambiguous:\n\n ALIAS_AMBIGUOUS:\n \u003calias\u003e may resolve to:\n 1. \u003ctarget_1\u003e\n 2. \u003ctarget_2\u003e\n\n REQUIRED:\n clarification or registry lookup\n\nIf alias is not registered:\n\n ALIAS_UNREGISTERED:\n \u003calias\u003e\n\n RESULT:\n cannot route safely without confirmation or registry access\n\nIf a plugin alias is invoked without its required prefix:\n\n ALIAS_PREFIX_REQUIRED:\n \u003cplugin_alias\u003e\n\n STATUS:\n PLUGIN_ALIAS_UNPREFIXED\n\n RESULT:\n cannot route plugin alias safely without declared prefix\n\n\n============================================================\nXLV. INITIAL REGISTRATION TARGETS\n============================================================\n\nThe following aliases and notation classes should be registered first:\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\nDISCOVERY ALIASES\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nNamespace:\n\n ROOT_DEFAULT / MAIN_AGLA_ARS_BREVIS_ARS_GENERALIS_ULTIMA_STACK\n\n OPERA Q → OPERA E\n TENET Q → TENET E\n AREPO Q → AREPO E\n SATOR Q → SATOR E\n ROTA Q → ROTA E\n ROTAS Q → ROTAS E\n ΣΑΤΟΡ Q → ΣΑΤΟΡ E\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\nE-FAMILY SURFACES\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n Qx → E-family interrogative surface\n Rx → E-family regula surface\n Ex → E-family whole operator\n\nWhere:\n\n x ∈ {B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, K}\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\nA-FAMILY ATOMIC OPERATORS\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n AB AC AD AE AF AG AH AI AK\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\nT-FAMILY ATOMIC OPERATORS\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n TB TC TD TE TF TG TH TI TK\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\nS/K-FAMILY ATOMIC OPERATORS\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n SB SC SD SE SF SG SH SI SK\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\nBINARY CHAMBERS\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n AT TA AA TT QQ SS\n AQ AS TQ TS SA SQ ST\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\nTRIADIC CHAMBERS\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n ATA STS AQA AQT TTT\n and declared permutations\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\nASSIGNMENT NOTATION\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\n A(B)\n A(BCD)\n A(B...)\n A(...K)\n AE(EB)\n AQ(EB)\n ATA(BCD)\n STS(EBG)\n BCD(ATA)\n\nSecondary later targets:\n\n multilingual aliases\n legacy names\n older OPERA shorthand\n branch-specific aliases with explicit prefixes\n plugin-specific aliases with explicit prefixes\n APPLICATIO invocation aliases\n Figure III camera aliases\n full permutation tables\n\n\n============================================================\nXLVI. IMPLEMENTATION NOTES\n============================================================\n\n1. OPERA Q alias must be available before OPERA lookup.\n\n2. Atomic operator tables must be available before chamber parsing.\n\n3. Chamber recognition must be available before OPERA execution.\n\n4. Assignment notation grammar must be available before chamber parser\n selection.\n\n5. AT, TA, ATA, AQT, STS, and similar forms must be routed to parser,\n not interpreted from surface letters.\n\n6. Full chamber semantics require parsing the relevant chamber-governing\n artifacts, especially TENET D, TENET I, TENET G, and OPERA G.\n\n7. AGLA ALIAS may record known minimum attachment hints, but must mark\n unresolved chamber dependencies as:\n\n PARSE_REQUIRED\n\n8. AGLA ALIAS must be included in the future root onboarding one-pager\n in compressed form.\n\n9. Plugin alias tables must declare a prefix before exposing aliases to\n runtime mediation.\n\n10. Unprefixed aliases always resolve to the main Ars Brevis /\n Ars Generalis Ultima AGLA stack before any plugin candidate is\n considered.\n\n\n============================================================\nXLVII. FINAL LAW\n============================================================\n\nAlias exists to route.\n\nNotation exists to identify.\n\nAssignment exists to bind surface slots to values.\n\nChambers exist to be parsed.\n\nAlias does not execute.\n\nNotation does not execute.\n\nAssignment does not execute.\n\nAlias does not replace canonical naming.\n\nAlias does not create doctrine.\n\nAlias does not create artifact families.\n\nUnprefixed alias belongs by default to the main Ars Brevis /\nArs Generalis Ultima AGLA stack.\n\nPlugin alias requires a registered explicit prefix.\n\nPlugin alias does not shadow root alias.\n\nAlias must be available before lookup when needed for discovery.\n\nAGLA ALIAS may recognize:\n\n OPERA Q\n AB\n TB\n QB\n AT\n ATA\n A(BCD)\n ATA(BCD)\n\nbut recognition is not interpretation.\n\nAny assistant that recognizes an alias, operator, assignment, or chamber\nbut cannot load the required canonical target or parser must refuse\nsimulation and report the missing canonical artifact or parser.\n\n\n============================================================\nXLVIII. INITIATION AND PROTECTED REGISTER ALIAS LAW\n============================================================\n\nTerms such as bootstrap, initiation, oath, law, loyalty, sacred,\nforbidden, developer, operator, and tutorial may be recognized as register\nor routing signals.\n\nRecognition is not interpretation.\n\nRecognition is not authority.\n\nRecognition is not execution.\n\nALIAS may route such terms toward source-bound parsing, self-binding\ndiscipline, AREPO admission, or SATOR mediation only when a canonical or\nregistered target exists.\n\nIf no target exists, ALIAS must report:\n\n REGISTER SIGNAL / PARSE REQUIRED\n\nor:\n\n INITIATION ROUTE / TARGET NOT REGISTERED\n\nProtected register must not become a prompt shortcut that bypasses canonical\nnames, source parsing, or admissibility.\n\n============================================================\nEND AGLA — ALIAS CLASS LAW\n============================================================\n" } ], "artifacts": [ { "role": "ADD_ON_CORE_CLASS_ARTIFACT", "class": "TENET", "path": "13_STACK_ADD_ONS/Trivium_Stack/TENET_TRIVIUM_DoctrinalInvariants.md", "bytes": 16737, "sha256": "29fb4467ee7ad719ec97927224a712ac29b84fa51a7fbbb6188b8eef6a16d090", "hash_scope": "UTF8_LF_NORMALIZED_CONTENT", "content": "============================================================\nTENET TRIVIUM — DOCTRINAL INVARIANTS\nDE CLARITATE OPERATORIA INTER GRAMMATICAM, LOGICAM ET RHETORICAM\nVersion: 1.0.0-TENET-TRIVIUM-ADD-ON\nStatus:\n STABLE ADD-ON SOURCE / DUAL-MODE\n SOURCE-BOUNDED\n GRAMMATICA + LOGICA AVAILABLE\n RHETORICA DEFERRED\nAuthority:\n USER / HUMAN CONTROL PLANE / 13_STACK_ADD_ONS\nClass: TENET\nDomain Class:\n AGLA / TENET / TRIVIUM\nDepends-On:\n • AGLA_TENET_CLASS_LAW\n • AGLA_FIVE_CLASS_STRUCTURAL_ORDER\n • CAPUT ARS BREVIS C / D / E / I\n • TENET E / REGIMEN_RQ\n • TENET T / PRINCIPIA RELATIVA\n • LIBER_X_TRIVIUM_MATRIX_SUBSTRATE.md@1.0.0\nConstrains:\n • ROTAS_TRIVIUM\n • AREPO_TRIVIUM\n • OPERA_TRIVIUM\n • SATOR_TRIVIUM\nIntegration Effect:\n PROMOTED ADD-ON SOURCE / PRINCIPAL-STACK COMPOSABLE\nStandalone Effect:\n STANDALONE DEPLOYABLE UNDER TRIVIUM ADD-ON PROFILE\nRuntime Boundary:\n RHETORICA REMAINS UNAVAILABLE UNTIL ITS SOURCE-CLOSURE GATE PASSES\nPromotion Source:\n _01_INTEGRATION_CANDIDATES/Trivium_Stack/TENET_TRIVIUM_DoctrinalInvariants.md@0.1.0\nMutation Policy:\n VERSION-CONTROLLED ONLY\n============================================================\n\n## I. Purpose\n\nTENET TRIVIUM defines the invariant goals and non-collapse laws of the Trivium stack. The stack forms operators capable of investigating discourse through Grammar, Logic and Rhetoric, both within each art and across their relations. It is intended for human, machine and hybrid operation.\n\nIt does not define wheel geometry, admit inputs, execute an analysis or mediate outputs. Those belong respectively to ROTAS, AREPO, OPERA and SATOR.\n\n## II. Core telos — `CLARITAS OPERATORIA`\n\nThe proper end of the stack is operative clarity.\n\n```text\nCLARITAS OPERATORIA :=\n DIFFERENTIA EXPOSITA\n + CONCORDANTIA IUSTIFICATA\n + CONTRARIETAS NON DISSIMULATA\n + MEDIA DECLARATA\n + AMBIGUITAS RESIDUA NOTATA\n```\n\nClarity is not the removal of complexity. It is the ordered distinction of complexity so that another operator can inspect, contest, continue or reproduce the operation.\n\n## III. Trivium object law\n\nThe same discourse object may be considered under three irreducible formalities:\n\n```text\nx_G := x qua grammatical object\nx_L := x qua logical object\nx_R := x qua rhetorical act\n```\n\nThese are related analyses, not three names for one undifferentiated result.\n\n## IV. Art definitions\n\n### IV.1 Grammatica\n\nGrammar makes visible:\n\n```text\nform\npart of speech\naccident profile\ninflection\nagreement\ngovernment\nconstruction\nreference\nliteral ambiguity\n```\n\nOperational question:\n\n```text\nHow is this expression linguistically constituted and related?\n```\n\n### IV.2 Logica\n\nLogic makes visible:\n\n```text\nterm\nsubject and predicate\nmode of predication\ncategory\nproposition\ninference\nconsequence\ncontradiction\n```\n\nOperational question:\n\n```text\nWhat is being predicated, distinguished or inferred, and what follows?\n```\n\n### IV.3 Rhetorica\n\nRhetoric makes visible:\n\n```text\nspeaker or agent\naddressee or audience\nsituation\npurpose\narrangement\nsalience\npersuasive or expressive action\neffect\n```\n\nOperational question:\n\n```text\nWhat is this discourse doing here, to whom, by what means and toward what end?\n```\n\nThe absence of a completed rhetorical carrier wheel does not suspend this definition; it suspends only the ungrounded formalization of its carriers.\n\n## V. Non-hierarchy law\n\nGrammar, Logic and Rhetoric have no fixed superiority *simpliciter*.\n\n```text\nGRAMMATICA ≯ LOGICA ≯ RHETORICA simpliciter\nLOGICA ≯ GRAMMATICA ≯ RHETORICA simpliciter\nRHETORICA ≯ GRAMMATICA ≯ LOGICA simpliciter\n```\n\nAn art may receive local majority only under a declared respectus and telos.\n\n```text\nAMPLIFICATIO LOCALIS\n ≠ SUPERIORITAS ONTOLOGICA\n```\n\nExamples:\n\n```text\nGrammar may be major under textual disambiguation.\nLogic may be major under demonstration.\nRhetoric may be major under audience-directed persuasion.\n```\n\nThe other arts remain at least custodial unless AREPO lawfully defers them.\n\n## VI. Fourfold telos law\n\nEvery execution must distinguish:\n\n```text\nFINIS_PROPRIUS_OPERAE\n what the invoked OPERA does by its own law\n\nFINIS_PROXIMUS_INPUT\n what the immediate request seeks\n\nFINIS_INTERMEDIUS_CATENAE\n the role of the current operation in a multi-OPERA chain\n\nFINIS_ULTIMUS_OPERIS\n the global goal of the work\n```\n\nSelection law:\n\n```text\nTELOS SELECTS APPLICATIO.\nTELOS DOES NOT MUTATE OPERA.\n```\n\nThe amplification of Trivium arts is a function of these ends together with subject, audience, execution stage, risk and output contract.\n\n## VII. T(BCD) clarity law\n\nThe critical engine of the stack is the application of the first T triad between the arts.\n\n```text\nTB — DIFFERENTIA\n preserves non-identity and prevents equivocation\n\nTC — CONCORDANTIA\n discovers legitimate cooperation without erasing plurality\n\nTD — CONTRARIETAS\n exposes real resistance caused by incompatible operations or ends\n```\n\nPairwise field:\n\n```text\nT(BCD)(GRAMMATICA, LOGICA)\nT(BCD)(LOGICA, RHETORICA)\nT(BCD)(RHETORICA, GRAMMATICA)\n```\n\nTriangular closure:\n\n```text\nTRIVIUM_T_BCD :=\n pairwise results\n + declared media\n + unresolved tensions\n```\n\n### VII.1 Difference is not contrariety\n\n```text\nNON-IDENTITY ≠ OPPOSITION\nDIFFERENTIA ≠ CONTRARIETAS\n```\n\nContrariety requires resistance under divergent ends or operations; taxonomy difference alone is insufficient.\n\n### VII.2 Concordance is not identity\n\n```text\nCONCORDANTIA presupposes plural relata.\n```\n\nA grammatical form may realize a logical function or rhetorical effect without becoming identical with it.\n\n## VIII. Extended T configuration law\n\nThe remaining T triads may configure the work without creating an art hierarchy.\n\n```text\nT(EFG):\n PRINCIPIUM — which art or operation initiates this stage?\n MEDIUM — which art or operation mediates the passage?\n FINIS — by which criterion is local completion recognized?\n\nT(HIK):\n MAIORITAS — which layer is amplified under the declared respectus?\n AEQUALITAS — which layers require balanced force?\n MINORITAS — which layer may be compressed but not silently eliminated?\n```\n\nThese are telos-conditioned relations, not permanent ranks.\n\n## IX. Universal Q preservation law\n\n`Q_TRIVIUM` is a domain-conditioned activation profile over the universal ROTA Q.\n\n```text\nQ_TRIVIUM :=\n relevance\n + priority\n + condition\n + traversal order\n + source trace\n```\n\nIt does not:\n\n```text\nredefine a regula\nredefine a species\nremove full-sweep applicability\nmake same-letter affinity an identity\n```\n\nTherefore:\n\n```text\nSPECIALIZATION ≠ PRUNING\nPRIMARY AFFINITY ≠ EXCLUSIVE APPLICABILITY\n```\n\nAll 54 admitted species remain available in FULL mode.\n\n## X. Universal T preservation law\n\n`T_TRIVIUM` is a domain-conditioned resolver over the universal ROTA T.\n\nIt must receive:\n\n```text\nRELATUM_1\nRELATUM_2\nRELATION CANDIDATE\nLOCAL SPECIES\nDIRECTION\nRESPECTUS\n```\n\nIt may not infer a local T species merely from the label of a grammatical or logical object.\n\n```text\nDON.ACCIDENS\n does not determine\nSUB_SUB / SUB_ACC / ACC_ACC\n\nDON.GRADUS.COMPARATIVUS\n does not equal\nTH\n\nDON.GRADUS.SUPERLATIVUS\n does not equal\nTG.PERFECTIO\n```\n\nSemantic species IDs govern identity. Generic `g1/g2/g3` labels cannot silently replace source-semantic species.\n\n## XI. Object-level law\n\nAn input may be analyzed at distinct levels:\n\n```text\nCLASS\nACCIDENT\nVALUE OR GRADUS\nTOKEN\nCONSTRUCTION\nORATIO\nDISCOURSE\n```\n\nA Q/T profile at one level cannot be silently transferred to another.\n\nExample:\n\n```text\nCOMPARATIO as concept\n ≠ COMPARATIVUS as value\n ≠ doctior as token\n ≠ Petrus doctior Paulo as construction\n```\n\n## XII. Grammatical accident non-collapse law\n\nThe following are obligatory distinctions:\n\n```text\nDON.ACCIDENS\n grammatical determination of a part of speech\n\nARIST.ACCIDENS\n ontological/categorial dependence in a subject\n\nPORPH.ACCIDENS\n contingent mode of predication\n\nLLULL.MODUS_ACCIDENTALIS\n accidental definition, contraction or participation\n```\n\nLikewise:\n\n```text\nDON.GENUS ≠ PORPH.GENUS\nDON.QUALITAS ≠ ARIST.QUALITAS ≠ LLULL.Q.G\nDON.FIGURA ≠ LLULL.FIGURA\nDON.GRADUS ≠ LLULL.Q.SPECIES ≠ LLULL.T.SPECIES\n```\n\nHomonymy is a pedagogical field to be controlled by namespace, not erased by premature simplification.\n\n## XIII. Donatian adaptation law\n\nThe Trivium stack may use the nine-slot adaptation:\n\n```text\nDON.PARS.NOMEN\n → NOMEN_SUBSTANTIVUM\n → NOMEN_ADIECTIVUM\n```\n\nprovided that every artifact declares:\n\n```text\nDonatus historically enumerates eight parts.\nThe B/C split is an AGLA/user-authorized structural adaptation.\nThe parent class NOMEN remains recoverable.\n```\n\n## XIV. Aristotelian source/placement separation law\n\nThe ten Aristotelian categories must remain registered independently of any nine-slot display.\n\n```text\nSOURCE REGISTRY ≠ EXPERIMENTAL PLACEMENT\n```\n\nThe following are structural candidates, not historical claims:\n\n```text\nSUBSTANTIA → PRE\nRELATIO → T-centered analysis\nACCIDENTALITAS/INHAERENTIA → B gate\n```\n\nThe gate is not an Aristotelian predicament. Delegating relation to T does not identify `ARIST.RELATIO` with `REGIMEN_T`.\n\n## XV. Porphyrian medium law\n\nPorphyry supplies an internal logical medium:\n\n```text\nGRAMMATICAL EXPRESSION\n → MODE OF PREDICATION\n → CATEGORY OF PREDICATE\n```\n\nThe five predicables are not parts of speech and not categories. They ask how a predicate belongs to a subject.\n\n```text\nGENUS\nSPECIES\nDIFFERENTIA\nPROPRIUM\nACCIDENS\n```\n\nPorphyry is not a fourth art of the Trivium.\n\n## XVI. Rhetorical port law\n\nA source-bound rhetoric definition and interface may exist before a carrier wheel is complete.\n\nAllowed:\n\n```text\nreserve RHETORICA port\nregister direct source functions\nmark carriers unresolved\nblock carrier-dependent execution\n```\n\nForbidden:\n\n```text\ninvent a complete rhetorical wheel\ncopy grammatical/logical carriers into rhetoric by analogy\npresent inferred rhetoric as parsed canon\n```\n\n## XVII. Operator pedagogy law\n\nThe stack forms operators, not only users.\n\n```text\nOPERATOR ∈ {\n HUMANUS,\n MACHINALIS,\n HYBRIDUS\n}\n```\n\nFor humans, the desired result is a stable critical habit:\n\n```text\nHABITUS CLARITATIS\n```\n\nFor agents and assistants, the functional equivalent is:\n\n```text\nEXPLICIT POLICY\n+ TYPED OPERATIVE TRACE\n+ FAILURE DETECTION\n+ SELF-CORRECTION DISCIPLINE\n+ HANDOFF FORMAT\n```\n\nThe doctrinal law is common; embodiment differs.\n\n## XVIII. AGLA-mediated prompt interpretation law\n\nAGLA-mediated interpretation is opt-in.\n\n```text\nAGLA_AVAILABLE\nAND USER_DECLARED_AGLA_USE\n → AGLA_MEDIATED_INTERPRETATION admissible for AREPO review\n```\n\nAbsent declared activation, the stack does not silently replace ordinary model interaction.\n\nWhen activated, the prompt becomes an operative object to be:\n\n```text\nsource-registered\nobject-bound\ntelos-bound\nTrivium-parsed\nQ-interrogated\nT-related\nrouted to OPERAE\n```\n\nPrompt interpretation and prompt execution remain distinct.\n\n## XIX. Model substrate law\n\nAGLA does not replace:\n\n```text\ntraining data\nmodel weights\nlanguage competence\nordinary priors\ncommon inference\nanalogy\ngeneration capacity\n```\n\nThese remain the model’s general inferential substrate.\n\nAGLA externalizes and governs increasing portions of:\n\n```text\ninterpretative routing\nprocedural selection\nadmissibility judgment\nsource discrimination\nmediation discipline\n```\n\nThe intended reduction is:\n\n```text\nless undocumented dependence on latent model behavior\n```\n\nnot:\n\n```text\nless model intelligence\nor elimination of priors\n```\n\n## XX. Provenance law\n\nEvery load-bearing statement in a trace must be classifiable by origin:\n\n```text\nUSER_AUTHORITY\nDIRECT_SOURCE\nAGLA_ARTIFACT\nLIBER_INFORMANT\nMODEL_PRIOR\nCOMMON_INFERENCE\nSTRUCTURAL_DERIVATION\nEXPERIMENTAL_HYPOTHESIS\nUNRESOLVED\n```\n\nNo channel may silently impersonate another.\n\n```text\nINFERENCE ≠ PARSED TEXT\nUSER BINDING ≠ HISTORICAL SOURCE\nMODEL PRIOR ≠ AGLA LAW\nLIBER ≠ OPERA\n```\n\n## XXI. Source discrimination law\n\nThe stack must preserve source roles and hierarchy.\n\n```text\nuploaded Markdown source-target\n ≠ JSON mirror\n ≠ HTML mirror\n ≠ index\n ≠ model memory\n```\n\nFor mutable project artifacts:\n\n```text\nPARSE \u003e MEMORY\nARTIFACT CONTENT \u003e FILENAME OR SUMMARY\n```\n\nUnresolved conflicts must remain explicit.\n\n## XXII. Scholastic-Latin operative interlanguage law\n\nA future protocol may use controlled scholastic Latin as an operative intermediate language:\n\n```text\nINPUT VERNACULAR\n → AGLA PARSE\n → RATIO OPERATIVA EXPLICATA\n → OPERAE EXECUTION\n → MACHINA TRACE\n → SATOR OUTPUT\n```\n\nThe interoperable object is an explicit typed trace, not dependence on an inaccessible internal monologue.\n\nCandidate fields include:\n\n```text\nSUBIECTUM\nSTATUS QUAESTIONIS\nFINES\nTERMINI\nDISTINCTIONES\nREGULAE ACTIVAE\nSPECIES ACTIVAE\nRELATA\nRESPECTUS\nPROPOSITIONES\nOBIECTIONES\nRESPONDEO\nCONCLUSIO\nDUBIA\nSTATUS ADMISSIBILITATIS\nHANDOFF\n```\n\nAnti-false-coherence law:\n\n```text\nLATINITAS ≠ VALIDITAS\n```\n\nElegant Latin cannot compensate for false premises, equivocation, missing sources, wrong species, hidden respectus change or invalid inference.\n\n## XXIII. Traceability and reproducibility law\n\nAGLA reproducibility does not require identical wording or tokens across models.\n\n```text\nREPRODUCIBILITAS AGLA :=\n comparable object binding\n + comparable telos binding\n + declared source set\n + declared species\n + declared OPERAE chain\n + declared checkpoints\n + preserved unresolved states\n```\n\nFour levels are distinguished:\n\n```text\nSTRUCTURAL\nPROCEDURAL\nTRACE\nSEMANTIC-COMPARATIVE\n```\n\n```text\nREPRODUCIBILITY ≠ TEXTUAL IDENTITY\n```\n\n## XXIV. Critical-sense law\n\nCritical sense emerges especially from non-coincidence among the arts.\n\nExamples:\n\n```text\nwell-formed grammar + invalid inference + persuasive rhetoric\nvalid inference + opaque grammar + ineffective rhetoric\nsimple adjective + unjustified logical naturalization + powerful rhetorical framing\n```\n\nThe stack must expose these configurations rather than force premature synthesis.\n\n## XXV. Custodial activation law\n\nAn art not amplified in a stage remains custodial when relevant.\n\n```text\nAMPLIFIED\nFULL\nCUSTODIAL\nDEFERRED\nUNAVAILABLE\n```\n\n`CUSTODIAL` means the art checks violations and boundary conditions without dominating the stage. It does not mean absent.\n\n## XXVI. Multi-agent handoff law\n\nA handoff must preserve enough state for another operator to continue without reconstructing hidden assumptions.\n\nMinimum handoff:\n\n```text\nobject binding\ntelos binding\nactive art profile\nQ species profile\nT relation records\nsource trace\ninferences\nunresolved items\nadmission/execution status\nnext permitted transition\n```\n\nHuman, agent and hybrid chains remain under human/control-plane authority.\n\n## XXVII. Class separation law\n\n```text\nTENET defines invariants.\nROTAS defines structure.\nAREPO admits or blocks.\nOPERA executes.\nSATOR mediates.\nLIBER preserves datasets.\nMACHINA represents machine-readable state.\nSYSTEM_INDEX routes registered artifacts.\n```\n\nNo artifact in the Trivium draft may assume another class’s function by convenience.\n\n## XXVIII. Failure conditions\n\nThe following invalidate or flag a Trivium operation:\n\n```text\nart_collapse\ngrammar_logic_identity_collapse\nlogic_rhetoric_identity_collapse\nrhetoric_grammar_identity_collapse\ndifference_as_contrariety\nconcordance_as_identity\nfixed_art_hierarchy\nundeclared_respectus\nundeclared_telos\nq_specialization_as_new_q\nt_specialization_as_new_t\ngrammatical_accident_as_ontological_accident\ngrammatical_genus_as_porphyrian_genus\nadjective_as_quality_category\nsource_registry_as_experimental_placement\nrhetorical_carrier_invention\nmodel_prior_as_parsed_source\nlatin_as_validity\ntrace_hiding\nsilent_unresolved_repair\nprompt_interpretation_without_activation\n```\n\n## XXIX. Compact core law\n\n```text\nTRIVIUM forms operators in CLARITAS OPERATORIA.\n\nGRAMMATICA, LOGICA and RHETORICA remain distinct.\n\nNo art is superior simpliciter.\nEach is amplified secundum finem.\n\nQ interrogates within and across arts by referenced species.\nT relates results by declared relata and respectus.\n\nT(BCD) exposes difference, concordance and contrariety.\n\nAGLA does not replace model intelligence.\nIt governs and documents its application when explicitly activated.\n\nThe future scholastic-Latin layer is a typed operative trace,\nnot a guarantee of truth.\n```\n\n## XXX. Closure\n\n```text\nTENET TRIVIUM STATUS:\n DOCTRINAL DRAFT COMPLETE\n READY TO CONSTRAIN ROTAS TRIVIUM\n READY FOR AREPO INTERPOLATION\n\nCANONICAL EFFECT:\n NONE\n```\n\n" }, { "role": "ADD_ON_CORE_CLASS_ARTIFACT", "class": "ROTAS", "path": "13_STACK_ADD_ONS/Trivium_Stack/ROTAS_TRIVIUM_StructuralInstantiation.md", "bytes": 26774, "sha256": "73a90d593729f97eb68c24fa771dce3d017b41ee05fc0efa9e4f4730d9902019", "hash_scope": "UTF8_LF_NORMALIZED_CONTENT", "content": "============================================================\nROTAS TRIVIUM — STRUCTURAL INSTANTIATION\nGRAMMATICA / LOGICA / RHETORICA\nVersion: 1.0.0-ROTAS-TRIVIUM-ADD-ON\nStatus:\n STABLE ADD-ON SOURCE / DUAL-MODE\n SOURCE-BOUNDED\n GRAMMATICA + LOGICA AVAILABLE\n RHETORICA RESERVED / NOT TRAVERSABLE\n TENET-BOUND AFTER G2/G3 RECONCILIATION\n DOCTRINAL CONSTRAINTS VERIFIED\nAuthority:\n USER / HUMAN CONTROL PLANE / 13_STACK_ADD_ONS\nClass: ROTAS\nDomain Class:\n AGLA / ROTAS / TRIVIUM\nDepends-On:\n • LIBER_X_TRIVIUM_MATRIX_SUBSTRATE.md@1.0.0\n • LIBER_X_TRIVIUM_MATRIX_RECORDS.json@1.0.0\n • AGLA_ROTAS_CLASS_LAW\n • AGLA_FIVE_CLASS_STRUCTURAL_ORDER\n • ROTAS E / REGIMEN_RQ\n • ROTAS T / FIGURA T\n • CAPUT ARS BREVIS C / E / I\n • TENET_TRIVIUM_DoctrinalInvariants.md@1.0.0\nIntegration Effect:\n PROMOTED ADD-ON SOURCE / PRINCIPAL-STACK COMPOSABLE\nStandalone Effect:\n STANDALONE DEPLOYABLE UNDER TRIVIUM ADD-ON PROFILE\nRuntime Boundary:\n ONLY ADMITTED GRAMMATICA AND LOGICA ROUTES ARE AVAILABLE\nPromotion Source:\n _01_INTEGRATION_CANDIDATES/Trivium_Stack/ROTAS_TRIVIUM_StructuralInstantiation.md@0.1.0\nMutation Policy:\n VERSION-CONTROLLED ONLY\n============================================================\n\n## I. Purpose\n\nROTAS TRIVIUM defines the structural machine in which grammatical forms, logical predicates and future rhetorical operations can be placed, traversed and compared without class or domain collapse. It defines loci, wheels, placements, adjacency, traversal and unresolved ports. It does not define doctrine, admit input, execute analysis or mediate output.\n\nCore structural target:\n\n```text\nGRAMMATICAL ROTAE\n ↔\nQ-DERIVED SPECIALIZATION ANNULUS\n ↔\nLOGICAL ROTAE\n\nall instantiated in:\n CAMPUS ORATIONIS\n\nand relationally resolved through:\n CENTRAL T-DERIVED ROTA\n\nwith:\n RHETORICAL PORT RESERVED\n```\n\n## II. Class position and non-collapse\n\n```text\nTENET TRIVIUM\n constrains\nROTAS TRIVIUM\n structures\nAREPO TRIVIUM\n admits\nOPERA TRIVIUM\n executes\nSATOR TRIVIUM\n mediates\n```\n\nMandatory distinctions:\n\n```text\nROTA ≠ WHEEL\nWHEEL ≠ CASA\nCASA ≠ OPERATOR\nOPERATOR ≠ PLACEMENT\nPLACEMENT ≠ CONNECTION\nTRAVERSAL ≠ EXECUTION\nDISPLAY ORDER ≠ SOURCE ORDER ≠ ACTIVE ORDER\nQ PROFILE ≠ NEW Q\nT RESOLVER ≠ NEW T\nORATIO TOKEN ≠ GRAMMATICAL CLASS ≠ LOGICAL CATEGORY\n```\n\n## III. Machine partition\n\nROTAS TRIVIUM contains the following structural objects:\n\n```text\nRT-00 ROTA_TRIVIUM_ROOT\nRT-10 CAMPUS_ORATIONIS\nRT-20 ROTA_GRAMMATICALIS_PARTIUM\nRT-21 ROTA_GRAMMATICALIS_MODORUM\nRT-22 FAMILIA_ROTARUM_ACCIDENTIUM\nRT-30 ROTA_Q_TRIVIUM\nRT-40 ROTA_PORPHYRIANA_PRAEDICABILIUM\nRT-41 ROTA_ARISTOTELICA_PRAEDICAMENTORUM\nRT-50 ROTA_T_TRIVIUM\nRT-60 PORTA_RHETORICA\nRT-70 TRAVERSAL_REGISTRY\nRT-80 ORDER_MODEL\nRT-90 UNRESOLVED_SURFACE\n```\n\n## IV. Root topology\n\nThe default display is concentric/interstitial, but topology is primary and rendering is replaceable.\n\n```text\n┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐\n│ PORTA RHETORICA — RESERVED │\n│ │\n│ ┌───────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │\n│ │ ROTA GRAMMATICALIS PARTIUM + LOCAL ACCIDENT ROTAE │ │\n│ │ │ │\n│ │ ┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ │\n│ │ │ ROTA Q TRIVIUM — ANNULUS │ │ │\n│ │ │ │ │ │\n│ │ │ ┌─────────────────────────────────┐ │ │ │\n│ │ │ │ PORPHYRY + ARISTOTLE LOGICAE │ │ │ │\n│ │ │ │ │ │ │ │\n│ │ │ │ ┌─────────────────────┐ │ │ │ │\n│ │ │ │ │ ROTA T TRIVIUM │ │ │ │ │\n│ │ │ │ │ CENTRAL RESOLVER │ │ │ │ │\n│ │ │ │ └─────────────────────┘ │ │ │ │\n│ │ │ └─────────────────────────────────┘ │ │ │\n│ │ └─────────────────────────────────────────┘ │ │\n│ └───────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │\n│ CAMPUS ORATIONIS │\n└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘\n```\n\nThe diagram indicates mediation and access, not ontological superiority. No radial position grants epistemic priority.\n\n## V. `CAMPUS ORATIONIS`\n\n`CAMPUS_ORATIONIS` is the instance field in which concrete expressions are placed before classification.\n\n### V.1 Objects\n\n```text\nTOKEN\nLEMMA\nPHRASE\nCLAUSE\nPROPOSITION\nUTTERANCE\nDISCOURSE_SEGMENT\nCONTEXT_BINDING\nSPEAKER\nADDRESSEE\nTELOS_BINDING\n```\n\n### V.2 Token record\n\n```text\nORATIO_TOKEN :=\n token_id\n surface_form\n lemma_candidate\n span\n language\n source_trace\n grammatical_placements[]\n logical_placements[]\n rhetorical_placements[]\n unresolved_bindings[]\n```\n\nA token may occupy multiple placements under different analyses. Multiple placement does not imply class identity.\n\n## VI. `ROTA GRAMMATICALIS PARTIUM`\n\nThis wheel preserves the user-authorized nine-slot adaptation of Donatus while retaining `DON.PARS.NOMEN` as parent class.\n\n### VI.1 Houses and placements\n\n| Casa | Operator placement | Parent / source status |\n|---|---|---|\n| `B` | `DON.PARS.NOMEN_SUBSTANTIVUM` — Nomen substantivum | `DON.PARS.NOMEN` / `USER_AUTHORITY_ADAPTATION` |\n| `C` | `DON.PARS.NOMEN_ADIECTIVUM` — Nomen adiectivum | `DON.PARS.NOMEN` / `USER_AUTHORITY_ADAPTATION` |\n| `D` | `DON.PARS.PRONOMEN` — Pronomen | `—` / `DIRECT_DONATUS` |\n| `E` | `DON.PARS.VERBUM` — Verbum | `—` / `DIRECT_DONATUS` |\n| `F` | `DON.PARS.ADVERBIUM` — Adverbium | `—` / `DIRECT_DONATUS` |\n| `G` | `DON.PARS.PARTICIPIUM` — Participium | `—` / `DIRECT_DONATUS` |\n| `H` | `DON.PARS.CONIUNCTIO` — Coniunctio | `—` / `DIRECT_DONATUS` |\n| `I` | `DON.PARS.PRAEPOSITIO` — Praepositio | `—` / `DIRECT_DONATUS` |\n| `K` | `DON.PARS.INTERIECTIO` — Interiectio | `—` / `DIRECT_DONATUS` |\n\n\n### VI.2 Parent-law\n\n```text\nDON.PARS.NOMEN\n contains placements:\n B → NOMEN_SUBSTANTIVUM\n C → NOMEN_ADIECTIVUM\n```\n\nThe split is stored in placement metadata, not projected backward into Donatus as a ninth historical part.\n\n## VII. `ROTA GRAMMATICALIS MODORUM`\n\nThis second grammatical wheel is directly derived from Llull’s nine modes of Grammar in AGU Article 88.\n\n| Casa | Modus grammaticalis | Primary structural reference |\n|---|---|---|\n| B | Partes orationis | Donatian part wheel |\n| C | Casus | C2/C3/C4 + D3 profiles |\n| D | Coniugatio | C2 correlative descent |\n| E | Declinationes | C2 correlative descent |\n| F | Genus | C2 active/passive/neutral analogy |\n| G | Regimen | TH/TK governor–governed relation |\n| H | Constructio | TE–TF–TG due order |\n| I | Orthographia | K1.1–K1.4 modality |\n| K | Figurae | TC/TD concordance–contrariety test |\n\nThis wheel does not replace the part wheel. It traverses dimensions of grammatical analysis.\n\n## VIII. `FAMILIA ROTARUM ACCIDENTIUM`\n\nAccidents are implemented as local wheels attached to the part operators to which Donatus assigns them.\n\n```text\nPART OPERATOR\n → ACCIDENT PROFILE\n → ACCIDENT WHEEL\n → VALUE PLACEMENT\n```\n\nNo global accident wheel is forced across all nine parts.\n\n### VIII.B — local profile for `DON.PARS.NOMEN_SUBSTANTIVUM`\n\n| Accident wheel | Value class | Values |\n|---|---|---|\n| `DON.ACCIDENS.NOMEN.QUALITAS` | `QUALITATES` | DON.VALUE.QUALITAS_NOMINIS.PROPRIUM, DON.VALUE.QUALITAS_NOMINIS.APPELLATIVUM |\n| `DON.ACCIDENS.NOMEN.COMPARATIO` | `GRADUS` | DON.GRADUS.POSITIVUS, DON.GRADUS.COMPARATIVUS, DON.GRADUS.SUPERLATIVUS |\n| `DON.ACCIDENS.NOMEN.GENUS` | `GENERA` | DON.GENUS.MASCULINUM, DON.GENUS.FEMININUM, DON.GENUS.NEUTRUM, DON.GENUS.COMMUNE, DON.GENUS.OMNE, DON.GENUS.EPICOENON |\n| `DON.ACCIDENS.NOMEN.NUMERUS` | `NUMERI` | DON.VALUE.NUMERUS.SINGULARIS, DON.VALUE.NUMERUS.PLURALIS |\n| `DON.ACCIDENS.NOMEN.FIGURA` | `FIGURAE` | DON.VALUE.FIGURA.SIMPLEX, DON.VALUE.FIGURA.COMPOSITA |\n| `DON.ACCIDENS.NOMEN.CASUS` | `CASUS` | DON.VALUE.CASUS.NOMINATIVUS, DON.VALUE.CASUS.GENETIVUS, DON.VALUE.CASUS.DATIVUS, DON.VALUE.CASUS.ACCUSATIVUS, DON.VALUE.CASUS.VOCATIVUS, DON.VALUE.CASUS.ABLATIVUS |\n\n### VIII.C — local profile for `DON.PARS.NOMEN_ADIECTIVUM`\n\n| Accident wheel | Value class | Values |\n|---|---|---|\n| `DON.ACCIDENS.NOMEN.QUALITAS` | `QUALITATES` | DON.VALUE.QUALITAS_NOMINIS.PROPRIUM, DON.VALUE.QUALITAS_NOMINIS.APPELLATIVUM |\n| `DON.ACCIDENS.NOMEN.COMPARATIO` | `GRADUS` | DON.GRADUS.POSITIVUS, DON.GRADUS.COMPARATIVUS, DON.GRADUS.SUPERLATIVUS |\n| `DON.ACCIDENS.NOMEN.GENUS` | `GENERA` | DON.GENUS.MASCULINUM, DON.GENUS.FEMININUM, DON.GENUS.NEUTRUM, DON.GENUS.COMMUNE, DON.GENUS.OMNE, DON.GENUS.EPICOENON |\n| `DON.ACCIDENS.NOMEN.NUMERUS` | `NUMERI` | DON.VALUE.NUMERUS.SINGULARIS, DON.VALUE.NUMERUS.PLURALIS |\n| `DON.ACCIDENS.NOMEN.FIGURA` | `FIGURAE` | DON.VALUE.FIGURA.SIMPLEX, DON.VALUE.FIGURA.COMPOSITA |\n| `DON.ACCIDENS.NOMEN.CASUS` | `CASUS` | DON.VALUE.CASUS.NOMINATIVUS, DON.VALUE.CASUS.GENETIVUS, DON.VALUE.CASUS.DATIVUS, DON.VALUE.CASUS.ACCUSATIVUS, DON.VALUE.CASUS.VOCATIVUS, DON.VALUE.CASUS.ABLATIVUS |\n\n### VIII.D — local profile for `DON.PARS.PRONOMEN`\n\n| Accident wheel | Value class | Values |\n|---|---|---|\n| `DON.ACCIDENS.PRONOMEN.QUALITAS` | `QUALITATES` | DON.VALUE.QUALITAS_PRONOMINIS.FINITA, DON.VALUE.QUALITAS_PRONOMINIS.INFINITA |\n| `DON.ACCIDENS.PRONOMEN.GENUS` | `GENERA` | DON.GENUS.MASCULINUM, DON.GENUS.FEMININUM, DON.GENUS.NEUTRUM, DON.GENUS.COMMUNE, DON.GENUS.OMNE |\n| `DON.ACCIDENS.PRONOMEN.NUMERUS` | `NUMERI` | DON.VALUE.NUMERUS.SINGULARIS, DON.VALUE.NUMERUS.PLURALIS |\n| `DON.ACCIDENS.PRONOMEN.FIGURA` | `FIGURAE` | DON.VALUE.FIGURA.SIMPLEX, DON.VALUE.FIGURA.COMPOSITA |\n| `DON.ACCIDENS.PRONOMEN.PERSONA` | `PERSONAE` | DON.VALUE.PERSONA.PRIMA, DON.VALUE.PERSONA.SECUNDA, DON.VALUE.PERSONA.TERTIA |\n| `DON.ACCIDENS.PRONOMEN.CASUS` | `CASUS` | DON.VALUE.CASUS.NOMINATIVUS, DON.VALUE.CASUS.GENETIVUS, DON.VALUE.CASUS.DATIVUS, DON.VALUE.CASUS.ACCUSATIVUS, DON.VALUE.CASUS.VOCATIVUS, DON.VALUE.CASUS.ABLATIVUS |\n\n### VIII.E — local profile for `DON.PARS.VERBUM`\n\n| Accident wheel | Value class | Values |\n|---|---|---|\n| `DON.ACCIDENS.VERBUM.QUALITAS` | `MODI_ET_FORMAE` | DON.VALUE.MODUS.INDICATIVUS, DON.VALUE.MODUS.IMPERATIVUS, DON.VALUE.MODUS.OPTATIVUS, DON.VALUE.MODUS.CONIUNCTIVUS, DON.VALUE.MODUS.INFINITIVUS, DON.VALUE.MODUS.IMPERSONALIS, DON.VALUE.FORMA.PERFECTA, DON.VALUE.FORMA.MEDITATIVA, DON.VALUE.FORMA.FREQUENTATIVA, DON.VALUE.FORMA.INCHOATIVA |\n| `DON.ACCIDENS.VERBUM.CONIUGATIO` | `CONIUGATIONES` | DON.VALUE.CONIUGATIO.PRIMA, DON.VALUE.CONIUGATIO.SECUNDA, DON.VALUE.CONIUGATIO.TERTIA |\n| `DON.ACCIDENS.VERBUM.GENUS` | `GENERA_VERBI` | DON.VALUE.GENUS_VERBI.ACTIVUM, DON.VALUE.GENUS_VERBI.PASSIVUM, DON.VALUE.GENUS_VERBI.NEUTRUM, DON.VALUE.GENUS_VERBI.DEPONENS, DON.VALUE.GENUS_VERBI.COMMUNE |\n| `DON.ACCIDENS.VERBUM.NUMERUS` | `NUMERI` | DON.VALUE.NUMERUS.SINGULARIS, DON.VALUE.NUMERUS.PLURALIS |\n| `DON.ACCIDENS.VERBUM.FIGURA` | `FIGURAE` | DON.VALUE.FIGURA.SIMPLEX, DON.VALUE.FIGURA.COMPOSITA |\n| `DON.ACCIDENS.VERBUM.TEMPUS` | `TEMPORA` | DON.VALUE.TEMPUS.PRAESENS, DON.VALUE.TEMPUS.PRAETERITUM, DON.VALUE.TEMPUS.FUTURUM |\n| `DON.ACCIDENS.VERBUM.PERSONA` | `PERSONAE` | DON.VALUE.PERSONA.PRIMA, DON.VALUE.PERSONA.SECUNDA, DON.VALUE.PERSONA.TERTIA |\n\n### VIII.F — local profile for `DON.PARS.ADVERBIUM`\n\n| Accident wheel | Value class | Values |\n|---|---|---|\n| `DON.ACCIDENS.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO` | `SIGNIFICATIONES` | DON.VALUE.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.LOCUS, DON.VALUE.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.TEMPUS, DON.VALUE.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.NUMERUS, DON.VALUE.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.NEGATIO, DON.VALUE.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.AFFIRMATIO, DON.VALUE.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.DEMONSTRATIO, DON.VALUE.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.OPTATIO, DON.VALUE.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.HORTATIO, DON.VALUE.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.ORDO, DON.VALUE.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.INTERROGATIO, DON.VALUE.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.SIMILITUDO, DON.VALUE.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.QUALITAS, DON.VALUE.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.QUANTITAS, DON.VALUE.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.DUBITATIO, DON.VALUE.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.PERSONA, DON.VALUE.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.VOCATIO, DON.VALUE.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.RESPONSIO, DON.VALUE.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.SEPARATIO, DON.VALUE.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.IURATIO, DON.VALUE.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.ELECTIO, DON.VALUE.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.CONGREGATIO, DON.VALUE.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.PROHIBITIO, DON.VALUE.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.EVENTUS, DON.VALUE.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.COMPARATIO |\n| `DON.ACCIDENS.ADVERBIUM.COMPARATIO` | `GRADUS` | DON.GRADUS.POSITIVUS, DON.GRADUS.COMPARATIVUS, DON.GRADUS.SUPERLATIVUS |\n| `DON.ACCIDENS.ADVERBIUM.FIGURA` | `FIGURAE` | DON.VALUE.FIGURA.SIMPLEX, DON.VALUE.FIGURA.COMPOSITA |\n\n### VIII.G — local profile for `DON.PARS.PARTICIPIUM`\n\n| Accident wheel | Value class | Values |\n|---|---|---|\n| `DON.ACCIDENS.PARTICIPIUM.GENUS` | `GENERA` | DON.GENUS.MASCULINUM, DON.GENUS.FEMININUM, DON.GENUS.NEUTRUM, DON.GENUS.COMMUNE |\n| `DON.ACCIDENS.PARTICIPIUM.CASUS` | `CASUS` | DON.VALUE.CASUS.NOMINATIVUS, DON.VALUE.CASUS.GENETIVUS, DON.VALUE.CASUS.DATIVUS, DON.VALUE.CASUS.ACCUSATIVUS, DON.VALUE.CASUS.VOCATIVUS, DON.VALUE.CASUS.ABLATIVUS |\n| `DON.ACCIDENS.PARTICIPIUM.TEMPUS` | `TEMPORA` | DON.VALUE.TEMPUS.PRAESENS, DON.VALUE.TEMPUS.PRAETERITUM, DON.VALUE.TEMPUS.FUTURUM |\n| `DON.ACCIDENS.PARTICIPIUM.SIGNIFICATIO` | `SIGNIFICATIONES` | DON.VALUE.PARTICIPIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.ACTIVA, DON.VALUE.PARTICIPIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.PASSIVA, DON.VALUE.PARTICIPIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.NEUTRA, DON.VALUE.PARTICIPIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.DEPONENS, DON.VALUE.PARTICIPIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.COMMUNIS |\n| `DON.ACCIDENS.PARTICIPIUM.NUMERUS` | `NUMERI` | DON.VALUE.NUMERUS.SINGULARIS, DON.VALUE.NUMERUS.PLURALIS |\n| `DON.ACCIDENS.PARTICIPIUM.FIGURA` | `FIGURAE` | DON.VALUE.FIGURA.SIMPLEX, DON.VALUE.FIGURA.COMPOSITA |\n\n### VIII.H — local profile for `DON.PARS.CONIUNCTIO`\n\n| Accident wheel | Value class | Values |\n|---|---|---|\n| `DON.ACCIDENS.CONIUNCTIO.POTESTAS` | `POTESTATES` | DON.VALUE.CONIUNCTIO.POTESTAS.COPULATIVA, DON.VALUE.CONIUNCTIO.POTESTAS.DISIUNCTIVA, DON.VALUE.CONIUNCTIO.POTESTAS.EXPLETIVA, DON.VALUE.CONIUNCTIO.POTESTAS.CAUSALIS, DON.VALUE.CONIUNCTIO.POTESTAS.RATIONALIS |\n| `DON.ACCIDENS.CONIUNCTIO.FIGURA` | `FIGURAE` | DON.VALUE.FIGURA.SIMPLEX, DON.VALUE.FIGURA.COMPOSITA |\n| `DON.ACCIDENS.CONIUNCTIO.ORDO` | `ORDINES` | DON.VALUE.CONIUNCTIO.ORDO.PRAEPOSITIVUS, DON.VALUE.CONIUNCTIO.ORDO.SUBIUNCTIVUS, DON.VALUE.CONIUNCTIO.ORDO.COMMUNIS |\n\n### VIII.I — local profile for `DON.PARS.PRAEPOSITIO`\n\n| Accident wheel | Value class | Values |\n|---|---|---|\n| `DON.ACCIDENS.PRAEPOSITIO.CASUS` | `CASUS` | DON.VALUE.PRAEPOSITIO.CASUS.ACCUSATIVUS, DON.VALUE.PRAEPOSITIO.CASUS.ABLATIVUS, DON.VALUE.PRAEPOSITIO.CASUS.UTERQUE |\n\n### VIII.K — local profile for `DON.PARS.INTERIECTIO`\n\n| Accident wheel | Value class | Values |\n|---|---|---|\n| `DON.ACCIDENS.INTERIECTIO.SIGNIFICATIO` | `SIGNIFICATIONES` | DON.VALUE.INTERIECTIO.SIGNIFICATIO.LAETITIA, DON.VALUE.INTERIECTIO.SIGNIFICATIO.DOLOR, DON.VALUE.INTERIECTIO.SIGNIFICATIO.ADMIRATIO, DON.VALUE.INTERIECTIO.SIGNIFICATIO.TIMOR |\n\n### VIII.10 Dependency edges\n\nThe accident-family includes conditional connections, not only adjacency:\n\n```text\nAPPELLATIVUM + SIGNIFICAT_QUALITATEM_VEL_QUANTITATEM\n → COMPARATIO admissible\n\nCOMPARATIVUS\n → ABLATIVUS SINE PRAEPOSITIONE\n\nSUPERLATIVUS\n → GENETIVUS PLURALIS domain\n\nGENUS + NUMERUS + CASUS\n → agreement constraint\n```\n\n## IX. `ROTA Q TRIVIUM`\n\n`ROTA_Q_TRIVIUM` is an interstitial specialization wheel referencing the universal 54 Q species. It is not a fork of Stack E.\n\n### IX.1 Structural layers\n\n```text\nQ0 — ten universal carrier houses:\n B C D E F G H I K1 K2\n\nQ1 — 24 direct species placements\n\nQ2 — 30 H/I composite species placements\n\nQ3 — domain profiles:\n GRAMMATICA\n LOGICA\n RHETORICA_RESERVED\n\nQ4 — activation edges:\n PRIMARY\n SECONDARY\n CONDITIONAL\n DIAGNOSTIC\n FULL_SWEEP\n```\n\n### IX.2 Species counts\n\n| Layer | Count |\n|---|---:|\n| Direct species | 24 |\n| Composite H | 15 |\n| Composite I | 15 |\n| Total | 54 |\n\n### IX.3 Placement law\n\n```text\nQ_PROFILE_PLACEMENT :=\n domain_object_ref\n q_species_ref\n affinity_class\n condition\n source_status\n traversal_priority\n```\n\nA missing primary placement does not make a species inapplicable. `FULL_SWEEP` always remains structurally available when AREPO admits it.\n\n## X. `ROTA PORPHYRIANA PRAEDICABILIUM`\n\nThis is a five-locus logical mediation wheel:\n\n```text\nGENUS\nSPECIES\nDIFFERENTIA\nPROPRIUM\nACCIDENS\n```\n\nIt sits between grammatical expression and categorial placement. It answers how a predicate is said of a subject; it does not determine the grammatical form or the Aristotelian category by itself.\n\n### X.1 Connection pattern\n\n```text\nGRAMMATICAL PREDICATE EXPRESSION\n → PORPHYRIAN MODE OF PREDICATION\n → ARISTOTELIAN CATEGORY CANDIDATE\n```\n\nPorphyry is an internal logical medium, not a fourth Trivium art.\n\n## XI. `ROTA ARISTOTELICA PRAEDICAMENTORUM`\n\nTwo structural views must coexist.\n\n### XI.1 Source registry view\n\nThe source registry preserves all ten categories in Aristotle’s canonical sequence:\n\n```text\nSUBSTANTIA\nQUANTITAS\nQUALITAS\nRELATIO\nUBI\nQUANDO\nSITUS\nHABERE\nACTIO\nPASSIO\n```\n\n### XI.2 Experimental nine-slot display view\n\n| Placement | Operator | Status |\n|---|---|---|\n| `PRE` | `ARIST.PRAEDICAMENTUM.SUBSTANTIA` | `USER_AUTHORITY_STRUCTURAL_CANDIDATE` |\n| `B` | `TRIV.LOG.GATE.ACCIDENTALITAS_INHAERENTIA` | `EXPERIMENTAL_NON_PRAEDICAMENT` |\n| `C` | `ARIST.PRAEDICAMENTUM.HABERE` | `EXPERIMENTAL_REORDERING` |\n| `D` | `ARIST.PRAEDICAMENTUM.SITUS` | `EXPERIMENTAL_REORDERING` |\n| `E` | `ARIST.PRAEDICAMENTUM.ACTIO` | `EXPERIMENTAL_REORDERING` |\n| `F` | `ARIST.PRAEDICAMENTUM.QUANTITAS` | `STRONG_DIAGONAL` |\n| `G` | `ARIST.PRAEDICAMENTUM.QUALITAS` | `STRONG_DIAGONAL_NON_IDENTITY` |\n| `H` | `ARIST.PRAEDICAMENTUM.QUANDO` | `STRONG_DIAGONAL` |\n| `I` | `ARIST.PRAEDICAMENTUM.UBI` | `STRONG_DIAGONAL` |\n| `K` | `ARIST.PRAEDICAMENTUM.PASSIO` | `STRUCTURAL_POLARITY` |\n| `T_CENTER` | `ARIST.PRAEDICAMENTUM.RELATIO` | `DELEGATED_TO_META_RELATIONAL_REGIME` |\n\n\nThe B gate is not a predicament. `RELATIO` is delegated to the central T resolver for analysis but remains registered as an Aristotelian category. This display is reversible and cannot overwrite the source registry.\n\n## XII. `ROTA T TRIVIUM` — central relation resolver\n\nThe central ROTA references the nine relative principles and their 27 local species.\n\n### XII.1 Houses\n\n```text\nTB — DIFFERENTIA\nTC — CONCORDANTIA\nTD — CONTRARIETAS\nTE — PRINCIPIUM\nTF — MEDIUM\nTG — FINIS\nTH — MAIORITAS\nTI — AEQUALITAS\nTK — MINORITAS\n```\n\n### XII.2 Local species\n\n```text\nTB/TC/TD:\n SENS_SENS\n SENS_INTEL\n INTEL_INTEL\n\nTE:\n CAUSA\n QUANTITAS\n TEMPUS\n\nTF:\n CONIUNCTIO\n MENSURATIO\n INTER_EXTREMA\n\nTG:\n PRIVATIO\n TERMINATIO\n PERFECTIO\n\nTH/TI/TK:\n SUB_SUB\n SUB_ACC\n ACC_ACC\n```\n\n### XII.3 Resolver record\n\n```text\nT_RELATION_REQUEST :=\n relatum_1_ref\n relatum_2_ref\n relation_candidate\n local_species_candidate\n direction\n respectus\n level\n source_trace\n```\n\n### XII.4 Resolution law\n\n```text\nresolve_T(request):\n identify relation\n identify relata domain/status\n identify direction\n require respectus\n bind semantic species ID\n preserve alternatives if underdetermined\n```\n\n`DON.ACCIDENS.COMPARATIO` may require `TF.MENSURATIO` and an H/I/K operator, but it never determines `SUB_SUB`, `SUB_ACC` or `ACC_ACC` without resolving the actual relata.\n\n## XIII. `PORTA RHETORICA`\n\nThe rhetoric interface is structurally present but its carrier wheel remains unresolved.\n\n```text\nPORTA_RHETORICA.status = RESERVED_SOURCE_ANCHORED\nPORTA_RHETORICA.carriers = UNRESOLVED\nPORTA_RHETORICA.execution = BLOCKED_UNTIL_SOURCE_BOUND\n```\n\nAdmitted source-bound connection surfaces already include:\n\n```text\naudience / vocation / purpose\npositive / comparative / superlative gradation\nnoun–adjective coloring\nmatter–form\nbeginning–middle–end disposition\nnecessary/substantial versus contingent/accidental emphasis\npossibility/impossibility\nproverbs/examples\n```\n\nThese are interface anchors, not a completed rhetorical taxonomy.\n\n## XIV. Connection model\n\nConnections are typed.\n\n```text\nCLASSIFICATION_EDGE\nACCIDENT_ASSIGNMENT_EDGE\nVALUE_ASSIGNMENT_EDGE\nQ_AFFINITY_EDGE\nT_RELATION_EDGE\nAGREEMENT_EDGE\nGOVERNMENT_EDGE\nTYPE_TOKEN_EDGE\nCROSS_ART_EDGE\nRHETORIC_PORT_EDGE\nUNRESOLVED_EDGE\n```\n\n### XIV.1 Core connection law\n\n```text\nTOKEN\n → grammatical placement\n → local accident/value placements\n → Q profile\n\nTOKEN / TERM / PREDICATION\n → Porphyrian placement\n → Aristotelian category candidate\n → Q profile\n\nANY TWO ADMITTED OBJECTS\n → T relation request\n```\n\n## XV. Traversal registry\n\n### XV.1 `TRAVERSAL_GRAMMATICA_INTERNAL`\n\n```text\nORATIO_TOKEN\n → PARTIUM\n → ACCIDENT_PROFILE\n → VALUE\n → Q_GRAM\n → LOCAL T RELATIONS\n```\n\n### XV.2 `TRAVERSAL_LOGICA_INTERNAL`\n\n```text\nTERM / PREDICATION\n → PORPHYRIAN PREDICABLE\n → ARISTOTELIAN CATEGORY\n → Q_LOG\n → LOCAL T RELATIONS\n```\n\n### XV.3 `TRAVERSAL_GRAM_LOG_CROSS`\n\n```text\nGRAMMATICAL RESULT\n ↔ Q INTERSTITIAL PROFILE ↔\nLOGICAL RESULT\n → T(BCD)\n```\n\n### XV.4 `TRAVERSAL_ORATIO_RELATIONAL`\n\n```text\nRELATUM_1 + RELATUM_2 + RESPECTUS\n → T resolver\n → qualified relation record\n```\n\n### XV.5 `TRAVERSAL_TRIVIUM_FULL`\n\n```text\nGRAMMATICA result\nLOGICA result\nRHETORICA result or reserved-state marker\n → pairwise T(BCD)\n → triangular closure\n```\n\nThe full traversal is structurally defined but cannot claim complete rhetoric execution while `PORTA_RHETORICA.carriers` is unresolved.\n\n## XVI. Order model\n\nEvery wheel or family must expose distinct order channels:\n\n```text\nSOURCE_ORDER\nSLOT_ORDER\nDISPLAY_ORDER\nGENERATION_ORDER\nTRAVERSAL_ORDER\nACTIVE_ORDER\n```\n\n### XVI.1 T species exception\n\nFor T BCD and TG, source and current analytic order diverge. Semantic IDs are primary:\n\n```text\nLLULL.T.TB.INTEL_INTEL\nLLULL.T.TG.PERFECTIO\n```\n\nnot merely:\n\n```text\ng1\n```\n\n## XVII. State model\n\nStructural instances may expose:\n\n```text\nUNBOUND\nPLACED\nPROFILED\nRELATA_BOUND\nRESPECTUS_BOUND\nQ_READY\nT_READY\nRHETORIC_DEFERRED\nUNRESOLVED\n```\n\nThese are representation states. AREPO will later determine admission states; OPERA will later determine execution states.\n\n## XVIII. Machine extraction readiness\n\nThe structure is ready for later MACHINA extraction only if the machine representation preserves:\n\n```text\nROTA / WHEEL / CASA / OPERATOR / PLACEMENT / CONNECTION\norder pluralism\nsource trace\nunresolved fields\nvisual binding ≠ execution\nadmission state ≠ execution state\n```\n\nThis artifact does not itself instantiate a JSON MACHINA runtime.\n\n## XIX. Structural validation\n\n| Gate | Result |\n|---|---|\n| Structural classes distinct | PASS |\n| Donatian parent `NOMEN` preserved | PASS |\n| Local accidents not flattened | PASS |\n| Q universal semantics preserved by references | PASS |\n| T universal semantics preserved by references | PASS |\n| Aristotelian source registry preserved separately | PASS |\n| Porphyry represented as logical medium | PASS |\n| Rhetorical carriers not invented | PASS WITH RESERVED PORT |\n| Execution logic absent | PASS |\n| TENET binding | PASS — reconciled with TENET TRIVIUM v0.1.0 |\n\n## XX. Unresolved and human-review points\n\n1. The rhetorical carrier wheel remains source-unresolved.\n2. The Aristotelian B gate is an experimental structural device, not a category.\n3. The Donatian B/C split is a user-authorized adaptation.\n4. Porphyry is presently a five-locus inner logical wheel; human review may later prefer another visual placement without changing its logical role.\n5. Exact visual geometry remains open; topology is the lock candidate.\n\n## XXI. Closure\n\n```text\nROTAS TRIVIUM STATUS:\n STABLE ADD-ON STRUCTURE\n TENET-BOUND\n TRAVERSABLE ONLY AFTER AREPO ADMISSION\n ADD-ON INTEGRATED / DUAL-MODE\n READY AS STRUCTURAL DEPENDENCY FOR AREPO / OPERA / SATOR\n G2/G3 RECONCILIATION COMPLETE\n RHETORICA RESERVED / NOT TRAVERSABLE\n```\n\n\n\n# XXI. G2/G3 reconciliation patch\n\n```text\nPATCH_ID: TRIV-G2G3-001\nPATCH_DATE: 2026-08-27\nSOURCE: candidate TENET_TRIVIUM_DoctrinalInvariants_v0.1.0.md\n```\n\nReconciliation findings:\n\n1. The multi-ROTA topology is compatible with `GRAMMATICA ≠ LOGICA ≠ RHETORICA`.\n2. Q remains a reference/projection surface, not a redefined interrogative regime.\n3. T centrality is structural and does not imply superiority.\n4. `ORATIO_FIELD` is a common instance surface, not a fourth art.\n5. The rhetorical port remains mandatory and unresolved.\n6. Order channels remain plural and semantic species IDs remain primary.\n7. Local art amplification belongs to OPERA state, not static ROTA hierarchy.\n\nPatch actions:\n\n```text\nSTATUS:\n TENET-PENDING\n → TENET-BOUND DRAFT\n\nADDED BINDING:\n TENET_TRIVIUM_DoctrinalInvariants.md@1.0.0\n\nEXECUTION READINESS:\n conditional on current AREPO admission and available Grammar/Logic scope\n```\n\nReconciled validation:\n\n```text\nTENET_BINDING_GATE: PASS\nTRIVIUM_NON_COLLAPSE_GATE: PASS\nCENTRALITY_NON_SUPERIORITY_GATE: PASS\nART_AMPLIFICATION_PLACEMENT_GATE: PASS\nRHETORIC_GAP_GATE: PASS_WITH_RESERVED_PORT\nCLASS_GATE: PASS\nCANON_GATE: PASS\n```\n\n============================================================\nEND G2/G3 RECONCILIATION PATCH\n============================================================\n" }, { "role": "ADD_ON_CORE_CLASS_ARTIFACT", "class": "AREPO", "path": "13_STACK_ADD_ONS/Trivium_Stack/AREPO_TRIVIUM_InputAdmissibility.md", "bytes": 15567, "sha256": "30ba35c08ba5f87d99e60e2069d6a1fc86ec1f34993081d364cfc3e42f80527a", "hash_scope": "UTF8_LF_NORMALIZED_CONTENT", "content": "============================================================\nAREPO TRIVIUM — INPUT ADMISSIBILITY\nGRAMMATICA / LOGICA / RHETORICA\nVersion: 1.0.0-AREPO-TRIVIUM-ADD-ON\nStatus:\n STABLE ADD-ON SOURCE / DUAL-MODE\n SOURCE-BOUNDED\n GRAMMATICA + LOGICA AVAILABLE\n RHETORICA FAIL-CLOSED\nAuthority:\n USER / HUMAN CONTROL PLANE / 13_STACK_ADD_ONS\nClass: AREPO\nDomain Class:\n AGLA / AREPO / TRIVIUM\nDepends-On:\n • TENET_TRIVIUM_DoctrinalInvariants.md@1.0.0\n • ROTAS_TRIVIUM_StructuralInstantiation.md@1.0.0\n • LIBER_X_TRIVIUM_MATRIX_RECORDS.json@1.0.0\n • AGLA_AREPO_CLASS_LAW\nScope:\n • opt-in activation\n • object, source and telos binding\n • Trivium art readiness\n • Q/T profile readiness\n • namespace and provenance admission\n • rhetoric-gap control\n • agent/human/dual trace admission\nIntegration Effect:\n PROMOTED ADD-ON SOURCE / PRINCIPAL-STACK COMPOSABLE\nStandalone Effect:\n STANDALONE DEPLOYABLE UNDER TRIVIUM ADD-ON PROFILE\nRuntime Boundary:\n UNRESOLVED OR RHETORICAL REQUESTS FAIL CLOSED OR DEFER\nPromotion Source:\n _01_INTEGRATION_CANDIDATES/Trivium_Stack/AREPO_TRIVIUM_InputAdmissibility.md@0.1.0\nMutation Policy:\n VERSION-CONTROLLED ONLY\n============================================================\n\n## I. Purpose\n\nAREPO TRIVIUM determines whether an input may enter Trivium analysis and what depth of analysis is lawfully available. It receives doctrine from TENET and structure from ROTAS. It does not define either, execute analysis, invent missing rhetoric or mediate the result.\n\nCore question:\n\n```text\nMay this input be interpreted and analyzed through the TRIVIUM stack,\nunder which arts, species, depth, source posture and output mode?\n```\n\n## II. Control-plane position\n\n```text\nTENET TRIVIUM\n → invariant constraints\nROTAS TRIVIUM\n → structural spaces and placements\nAREPO TRIVIUM\n → admission state\nOPERA TRIVIUM\n → execution only after admission\nSATOR TRIVIUM\n → mediation only after execution or lawful suspension\n```\n\n```text\nNO TENET BINDING → NO ADMISSION\nNO ROTAS BINDING → NO ADMISSION\nNO AREPO ADMISSION → NO OPERA\n```\n\n## III. Activation gate\n\nAGLA-mediated prompt interpretation is opt-in.\n\n### III.1 Admitted activation\n\n```text\nAGLA_AVAILABLE = true\nAND\n(\n USER_DECLARED_AGLA_USE = true\n OR\n USER_EXPLICITLY_INVOKED_TRIVIUM_STACK = true\n)\n```\n\nThe current user command `ACTIVATE TRIVIUM LOOP` is a development-loop activation, not by itself a perpetual global prompt-interpretation grant.\n\n### III.2 Failure\n\n```text\nAGLA_UNAVAILABLE\nAGLA_USE_NOT_DECLARED\nTRIVIUM_INVOCATION_AMBIGUOUS\n```\n\nIf activation is absent, AREPO does not reinterpret the prompt through Trivium silently.\n\n## IV. Admission objects\n\nAREPO may evaluate:\n\n```text\nRAW_PROMPT\nSOURCE_SET\nOBJECT_BINDING\nTELOS_BINDING\nGRAMMATICAL_REQUEST\nLOGICAL_REQUEST\nRHETORICAL_REQUEST\nCROSS_ART_REQUEST\nQ_PROFILE_REQUEST\nT_RELATION_REQUEST\nLATIN_TRACE_REQUEST\nMULTI_AGENT_HANDOFF\nDOWNSTREAM_OPERA_ROUTE\n```\n\n## V. Required input contract\n\nMinimum record:\n\n```text\nTRIVIUM_INPUT :=\n input_id\n raw_input\n activation_state\n requested_output\n source_set[]\n user_bindings[]\n inferred_bindings[]\n object_candidates[]\n telos_candidates[]\n operator_class\n requested_depth\n```\n\nFor source-sensitive work:\n\n```text\nsource_set\n must preserve source type, authority, freshness and provenance.\n```\n\n## VI. Object-binding gate\n\nThe input must expose a sufficiently bounded object at one or more levels:\n\n```text\nCLASS\nACCIDENT\nVALUE_OR_GRADUS\nTOKEN\nCONSTRUCTION\nORATIO\nDISCOURSE\n```\n\nAdmission states:\n\n```text\nOBJECT_EXPLICIT\nOBJECT_INFERRED_WITH_HIGH_SUPPORT\nOBJECT_MULTIPLE_BUT_MANAGEABLE\nOBJECT_UNRESOLVED_BLOCKING\nOBJECT_COLLAPSED_INTO_MEDIUM\n```\n\n### VI.1 Non-collapse check\n\nAREPO blocks if a salient medium, example, token or surface silently replaces the declared object.\n\n```text\nTOKEN ≠ CLASS\nEXAMPLE ≠ PRINCIPLE\nINTERFACE ≠ OBJECT\nRHETORICAL SALIENCE ≠ LOGICAL SUBJECT\n```\n\n## VII. Telos-binding gate\n\nAt least the immediate end must be bound. Extended execution should bind all four:\n\n```text\nFINIS_PROPRIUS_OPERAE\nFINIS_PROXIMUS_INPUT\nFINIS_INTERMEDIUS_CATENAE\nFINIS_ULTIMUS_OPERIS\n```\n\nValidity states:\n\n```text\nTELOS_EXPLICIT\nTELOS_INFERRED_WITH_TRACE\nTELOS_MULTIPLE_ORDERED\nTELOS_CONFLICTING\nTELOS_ABSENT\n```\n\n`TELOS_CONFLICTING` may be admitted with flags if the conflict is itself the object of analysis. Otherwise it blocks execution routing.\n\n## VIII. Source and provenance gate\n\nEvery source or claim channel must be typed:\n\n```text\nUSER_AUTHORITY\nDIRECT_SOURCE\nAGLA_ARTIFACT\nLIBER_INFORMANT\nMODEL_PRIOR\nCOMMON_INFERENCE\nSTRUCTURAL_DERIVATION\nEXPERIMENTAL_HYPOTHESIS\nUNRESOLVED\n```\n\n### VIII.1 Admission rules\n\n```text\nDIRECT_SOURCE:\n requires source identity and parsed support\n\nAGLA_ARTIFACT:\n requires artifact identity, class and status\n\nMODEL_PRIOR:\n admissible as inferential substrate only when marked\n\nSTRUCTURAL_DERIVATION:\n requires declared premises and transformation\n\nUNRESOLVED:\n may proceed only if nonblocking and exposed\n```\n\n### VIII.2 Blocking failures\n\n```text\nSOURCE_TRACE_ABSENT\nINFERENCE_PRESENTED_AS_SOURCE\nMIRROR_PRESENTED_AS_SOURCE_TARGET\nMODEL_PRIOR_PRESENTED_AS_AGLA_LAW\nUSER_BINDING_PRESENTED_AS_HISTORICAL_FACT\nSTALE_MUTABLE_SOURCE_NOT_REFRESHED\n```\n\n## IX. Namespace gate\n\nThese terms require qualified domain binding in machine traces:\n\n```text\nACCIDENS\nGENUS\nSPECIES\nQUALITAS\nFIGURA\nRELATIO\nSUBIECTUM\nPRAEDICATUM\n```\n\nA human-facing answer may use natural qualifiers, but the operative trace must resolve namespaces.\n\nBlock or flag:\n\n```text\nDON_ACCIDENT_ARIST_ACCIDENT_COLLAPSE\nDON_GENUS_PORPH_GENUS_COLLAPSE\nDON_QUALITAS_ARIST_QUALITAS_COLLAPSE\nQG_CATEGORY_QUALITY_COLLAPSE\nARIST_RELATIO_REGIMEN_T_COLLAPSE\n```\n\n## X. Grammatical readiness gate\n\nGrammar is admitted when at least one of the following can be bound:\n\n```text\npart-of-speech candidate\nlocal accident profile\ntoken/lemma relation\nagreement or government relation\nconstruction boundary\nreference/ambiguity question\n```\n\n### X.1 Donatian adaptation disclosure\n\nWhen B/C are used:\n\n```text\nDON.PARS.NOMEN parent must remain declared.\nNOMEN_SUBSTANTIVUM / NOMEN_ADIECTIVUM must be marked AGLA adaptation.\n```\n\n### X.2 Accident admissibility\n\nAn accident may be activated only if it belongs to the selected part profile.\n\n```text\nAPPLIES_TO(accidens, pars) = true\n```\n\nComparison additionally requires its Donatian conditions or an explicit provisional flag.\n\n## XI. Logical readiness gate\n\nLogic is admitted when the input exposes or permits binding of:\n\n```text\nterm\nsubject/predicate relation\npredicable question\ncategory candidate\nproposition\ninference\ncontradiction\n```\n\n### XI.1 Aristotle source/placement gate\n\nA candidate nine-slot placement is admitted only if:\n\n```text\ncanonical ten-category registry remains available\nexperimental placement is disclosed\nB gate is not called a predicament\nRELATIO delegation is not called identity with T\n```\n\n### XI.2 Porphyry gate\n\nPorphyrian mode is admitted only as a mode of predication, not as a grammatical class or category.\n\n## XII. Rhetorical readiness gate\n\nThree states are distinguished:\n\n```text\nRHETORICA_SOURCE_FUNCTIONS_AVAILABLE\nRHETORICA_CARRIERS_UNRESOLVED\nRHETORICA_EXECUTION_PROFILE_UNAVAILABLE\n```\n\nAdmitted uses:\n\n```text\nbasic situated-purpose/audience analysis\nsource-bound Article 86 functions\nreserved-port handoff\nexplicit rhetoric deferral\n```\n\nBlocked uses:\n\n```text\nfull carrier traversal\nclaim of completed rhetorical wheel\npseudo-canonical rhetorical classification\n```\n\nA grammar–logic operation may proceed with `RHETORICA_DEFERRED` when rhetoric is not required by the immediate telos. A request for full Trivium closure receives `PROVISIONAL` or `DEFERRED` until rhetoric is source-bound.\n\n## XIII. Q profile gate\n\nA Q traversal is ready when:\n\n```text\nobject level is declared\nat least one carrier/species is source-referenced or profile-derived\nprofile class is declared\nfull-sweep availability is preserved\n```\n\nProfile classes:\n\n```text\nPRIMARY\nSECONDARY\nCONDITIONAL\nDIAGNOSTIC\nFULL\n```\n\nBlock:\n\n```text\nQ_PROFILE_REDEFINES_SPECIES\nQ_PROFILE_PRUNES_UNIVERSAL_APPLICABILITY\nSAME_LETTER_IDENTITY_ASSUMED\nSPECIES_WITHOUT_SOURCE_OR_DERIVATION\n```\n\n## XIV. T relation gate\n\nA T request requires:\n\n```text\nRELATUM_1\nRELATUM_2\nRELATION OR RELATION SEARCH FRAME\nLOCAL SPECIES OR RESOLUTION PERMISSION\nRESPECTUS\nDIRECTION when asymmetric\n```\n\n### XIV.1 Local species resolution\n\n```text\nBCD species:\n resolve domain of relata\n\nEFG species:\n resolve kind of beginning/medium/end\n\nHIK species:\n resolve substance/accident status of relata\n```\n\n### XIV.2 Mandatory guard\n\n```text\nGRAMMATICAL_ACCIDENT\n ≠ automatic ontological ACCIDENT\n```\n\n### XIV.3 Failure codes\n\n```text\nRELATA_MISSING\nRELATA_COLLAPSED\nRESPECTUS_MISSING\nDIRECTION_MISSING\nLOCAL_SPECIES_UNRESOLVED\nGENERIC_G_LEVEL_USED_AS_SEMANTIC_ID\nDIFFERENCE_PROMOTED_TO_CONTRARIETY\nCONCORDANCE_PROMOTED_TO_IDENTITY\n```\n\n## XV. Cross-art T(BCD) gate\n\nPairwise comparison is admitted when each side has at least a minimally bounded result.\n\n```text\nGRAM_RESULT ↔ LOG_RESULT\nLOG_RESULT ↔ RHET_RESULT\nRHET_RESULT ↔ GRAM_RESULT\n```\n\nFor each relation, require:\n\n```text\nlevel\nrespectus\ndifferentia statement\nconcordantia condition\ncontrarietas condition or explicit absence\n```\n\nA complete triangular closure requires three pairwise records or a declared unavailable edge.\n\n## XVI. Art activation profile gate\n\nEach art receives one state:\n\n```text\nAMPLIFIED\nFULL\nCUSTODIAL\nDEFERRED\nUNAVAILABLE\n```\n\nAdmission conditions:\n\n```text\nAMPLIFIED:\n telos justifies local majority\n\nFULL:\n complete admitted profile for the stage\n\nCUSTODIAL:\n boundary checks remain active\n\nDEFERRED:\n relevant but postponed with reason\n\nUNAVAILABLE:\n required structure/source is missing\n```\n\nNo profile may assign permanent superiority to an art.\n\n## XVII. Analysis depth gate\n\n```text\nNORMAL:\n primary species and mandatory guards\n\nEXTENDED:\n primary + secondary + conditional species\n\nFULL:\n all admitted Q species, all relevant T relations,\n and pairwise Trivium closure\n```\n\n`FULL` is not admitted merely because the user asks for exhaustiveness. It requires structural and source readiness.\n\n## XVIII. Operator-class gate\n\n```text\nHUMAN\nAGENT\nHYBRID\n```\n\nAgent or hybrid execution additionally requires:\n\n```text\ntrace schema\nhandoff target or termination condition\nstate markers\nsource trace\nunresolved field policy\n```\n\nA human-facing exploratory analysis may be admitted with a lighter trace, but cannot hide source/inference distinctions.\n\n## XIX. Scholastic-Latin trace gate\n\nA `RATIO OPERATIVA EXPLICATA` request is admissible when:\n\n```text\nLatin mode is explicitly requested or selected by an admitted profile\nfield schema is available\nthe trace is treated as explicit representation\nLatin form is not used as a validity claim\n```\n\nAllowed statuses:\n\n```text\nLATIN_TRACE_FULL\nLATIN_TRACE_COMPRESSED\nLATIN_TRACE_DEFERRED\n```\n\nBlock:\n\n```text\nLATIN_AS_AUTHORITY\nLATIN_AS_PROOF\nUNSCHEMATIZED_LATIN_ORNAMENT\nHIDDEN_REASONING_DEPENDENCY\n```\n\n## XX. Model-prior gate\n\nOrdinary model inference is admissible as substrate when:\n\n```text\nit does not impersonate source text or AGLA law\nit is marked when load-bearing\nit may be contested or replaced by source parsing\nit remains inside TENET/ROTAS constraints\n```\n\nNo admission requires pretending that AGLA eliminates model weights or priors.\n\n## XXI. OPERA maturity and routing gate\n\nBefore routing to OPERA TRIVIUM or downstream OPERAE, AREPO asks:\n\n```text\n1. Is the requested operation sufficient for the object?\n2. Does the object contain recursion, analogy, cross-domain homonymy or unclear relata?\n3. Would missing Q/T/Trivium support materially change the result?\n4. Are required supports parsed and bound?\n5. Is the rhetoric port required but unavailable?\n```\n\nOutcomes:\n\n```text\nROUTE_READY\nROUTE_READY_WITH_FLAGS\nSUPPORT_REQUIRED\nDEFERRED_FOR_SOURCE\nBLOCKED_FOR_STRUCTURE\n```\n\n## XXII. Admission classes\n\nEvery request receives exactly one top-level class.\n\n### `ADMISSIBLE`\n\nAll mandatory bindings are present; requested depth is supported.\n\n### `ADMISSIBLE_WITH_FLAGS`\n\nExecution may proceed with explicit nonblocking uncertainty, inferred binding or deferred custodial art.\n\n### `PROVISIONAL`\n\nA useful restricted execution is possible, but a required structure/source is incomplete; no definitive closure may be claimed.\n\n### `DEFERRED`\n\nThe request is relevant but must await a source, artifact, relation binding or later stage.\n\n### `BLOCKED`\n\nA structural, doctrinal, namespace, source or activation failure prevents execution.\n\n### `REJECTED`\n\nThe request is outside the lawful scope or explicitly asks the stack to counterfeit canon, mutate universal Q/T, or perform an inadmissible transition.\n\n## XXIII. Failure registry\n\n```text\nTRIV_ACTIVATION_MISSING\nOBJECT_UNBOUND\nOBJECT_MEDIUM_COLLAPSE\nTELOS_UNBOUND\nTELOS_CONFLICT_UNRESOLVED\nSOURCE_TRACE_ABSENT\nSOURCE_INFERENCE_COLLAPSE\nNAMESPACE_UNRESOLVED\nDONATUS_ADAPTATION_HIDDEN\nACCIDENT_NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_PART\nCOMPARATIO_CONDITION_UNMET\nARISTOTLE_SOURCE_PLACEMENT_COLLAPSE\nPORPHYRY_CATEGORY_COLLAPSE\nRHETORIC_CARRIER_NOT_AVAILABLE\nQ_SPECIALIZATION_MUTATION\nT_SPECIALIZATION_MUTATION\nRELATA_MISSING\nRESPECTUS_MISSING\nART_HIERARCHY_FIXED\nFULL_MODE_NOT_SUPPORTED\nLATIN_VALIDITY_COLLAPSE\nMODEL_PRIOR_AUTHORITY_COLLAPSE\nOPERA_PREMATURE\nHANDOFF_INCOMPLETE\n```\n\n## XXIV. Admission output schema\n\n```text\nAREPO_TRIVIUM_RESULT :=\n request_id\n activation_state\n admission_class\n admitted_depth\n object_binding\n telos_binding\n source_posture\n namespace_status\n art_activation_profile\n q_readiness\n t_readiness\n rhetoric_readiness\n latin_trace_readiness\n downstream_route\n flags[]\n blocking_failures[]\n unresolved_items[]\n next_permitted_transition\n```\n\n## XXV. Transition law\n\nAllowed transitions:\n\n```text\nADMISSIBLE\n → OPERA_TRIVIUM\n\nADMISSIBLE_WITH_FLAGS\n → OPERA_TRIVIUM_RESTRICTED\n\nPROVISIONAL\n → OPERA_TRIVIUM_PROVISIONAL\n OR SOURCE/STRUCTURE REPAIR\n\nDEFERRED\n → CHECKPOINT / HANDOFF\n\nBLOCKED\n → DIAGNOSTIC ONLY\n\nREJECTED\n → TERMINATION / SATOR DISCLOSURE\n```\n\nAREPO never executes a fallback analysis.\n\n## XXVI. Validation examples\n\n### Example A — Donatian comparison\n\n```text\nOBJECT:\n Petrus doctior Paulo\n\nADMISSION:\n grammatical comparative profile available\n relata explicit\n respectus = doctrina\n QF/QG ready\n TF.MENSURATIO ready\n HIK species resolved from relata\n\nRESULT:\n ADMISSIBLE\n```\n\n### Example B — adjective = quality\n\n```text\nREQUEST:\n treat every adjective as Aristotelian quality\n\nFAILURE:\n ADJECTIVE_QUALITY_CATEGORY_COLLAPSE\n\nRESULT:\n BLOCKED unless reframed as a hypothesis to test by T(BCD)\n```\n\n### Example C — full rhetoric wheel\n\n```text\nREQUEST:\n traverse all rhetorical carriers\n\nSTATE:\n carriers unresolved\n\nRESULT:\n DEFERRED or PROVISIONAL source-bound interface analysis\n```\n\n## XXVII. Final law\n\n```text\nAREPO TRIVIUM admits only what is:\n explicitly activated,\n object-bound,\n telos-bound,\n source-discriminated,\n namespace-safe,\n structurally placeable,\n Q/T-preserving,\n and honest about rhetoric, inference and unresolved fields.\n\nAREPO admits or blocks.\nAREPO does not execute.\n```\n\n## XXVIII. Closure\n\n```text\nAREPO TRIVIUM STATUS:\n ADMISSIBILITY DRAFT COMPLETE\n READY TO GOVERN OPERA TRIVIUM\n\nCANONICAL EFFECT:\n NONE\n```\n\n" }, { "role": "ADD_ON_CORE_CLASS_ARTIFACT", "class": "OPERA", "path": "13_STACK_ADD_ONS/Trivium_Stack/OPERA_TRIVIUM_ExecutionMechanism.md", "bytes": 17307, "sha256": "5d65c489d2b046e54dfe718c86ad0f6ec313ceac8527c559941cd002cdb7a55c", "hash_scope": "UTF8_LF_NORMALIZED_CONTENT", "content": "============================================================\nOPERA TRIVIUM — EXECUTION MECHANISM\nGRAMMATICA / LOGICA / RHETORICA\nVersion: 1.0.0-OPERA-TRIVIUM-ADD-ON\nStatus:\n STABLE ADD-ON SOURCE / DUAL-MODE\n SOURCE-BOUNDED\n GRAMMATICA + LOGICA AVAILABLE\n RHETORICA NOT EXECUTABLE\nAuthority:\n USER / HUMAN CONTROL PLANE / 13_STACK_ADD_ONS\nClass: OPERA\nDomain Class:\n AGLA / OPERA / TRIVIUM\nDepends-On:\n • TENET_TRIVIUM_DoctrinalInvariants.md@1.0.0\n • ROTAS_TRIVIUM_StructuralInstantiation.md@1.0.0\n • AREPO_TRIVIUM_InputAdmissibility.md@1.0.0\n • LIBER_X_TRIVIUM_MATRIX_RECORDS.json@1.0.0\n • AGLA_OPERA_CLASS_LAW\nScope:\n • execute admitted Trivium interpretation and analysis\n • instantiate ORATIO objects\n • traverse grammatical and logical structures\n • execute source-bounded rhetoric pass when available\n • activate specialized Q profiles\n • resolve T relations and T(BCD) cross-art analysis\n • generate explicit trace and handoff\nIntegration Effect:\n PROMOTED ADD-ON SOURCE / PRINCIPAL-STACK COMPOSABLE\nStandalone Effect:\n STANDALONE DEPLOYABLE UNDER TRIVIUM ADD-ON PROFILE\nRuntime Boundary:\n OPERA EXECUTES ONLY AFTER AREPO ADMISSION; RHETORICA FAILS CLOSED\nPromotion Source:\n _01_INTEGRATION_CANDIDATES/Trivium_Stack/OPERA_TRIVIUM_ExecutionMechanism.md@0.1.0\nMutation Policy:\n VERSION-CONTROLLED ONLY\n============================================================\n\n## I. Purpose\n\nOPERA TRIVIUM executes an AREPO-admitted analysis of an input through Grammar, Logic and Rhetoric, with local art amplification determined by telos. It operates on ROTAS structures under TENET constraints and returns a structured execution result for SATOR mediation.\n\nIt does not:\n\n```text\ndefine Trivium doctrine\ndefine wheel topology\nadmit its own input\ninvent missing rhetoric carriers\ncanonize a result\nmediate the final answer\nreplace model inference or training data\n```\n\n## II. Core execution law\n\n```text\nOPERA_TRIVIUM(input, arepo_result) :=\n complete(\n trace(\n route_downstream(\n synthesize_critically(\n compare_T_BCD(\n analyze_rhetorically(\n analyze_logically(\n analyze_grammatically(\n instantiate_oratio(input)\n )\n )\n )\n )\n )\n )\n )\n )\n```\n\nThe nesting is conceptual, not a mandatory fixed dominance order. The active traversal order is selected from the admitted art profile and telos.\n\n## III. Entry contract\n\nRequired:\n\n```text\nAREPO_RESULT.admission_class ∈ {\n ADMISSIBLE,\n ADMISSIBLE_WITH_FLAGS,\n PROVISIONAL\n}\n\nAREPO_RESULT.next_permitted_transition\n authorizes OPERA_TRIVIUM mode\n```\n\n`DEFERRED`, `BLOCKED` and `REJECTED` do not execute. They route directly to SATOR diagnostic mediation.\n\n## IV. Execution modes\n\n### IV.1 `NORMAL`\n\nPrimary profiles, mandatory guards and concise cross-art checks.\n\n### IV.2 `EXTENDED`\n\nPrimary + secondary + conditional species, expanded relation records and ambiguity inventory.\n\n### IV.3 `FULL`\n\nAll admitted Q species, all relevant T relations and complete pairwise Trivium closure. FULL requires rhetoric readiness or explicit `RHETORICA_UNAVAILABLE` closure marker.\n\n### IV.4 `PROVISIONAL_RESTRICTED`\n\nExecutes only admitted surfaces, preserves gaps and prohibits definitive stack closure.\n\n## V. Operator/output modes\n\n```text\nHUMAN_MODE\nAGENT_MODE\nDUAL_MODE\n```\n\nAll modes execute the same class law. They differ in trace density and handoff packaging.\n\n```text\nHUMAN_MODE:\n result + inspectable concise trace\n\nAGENT_MODE:\n typed state + full handoff + machine-addressable refs\n\nDUAL_MODE:\n both surfaces derived from one execution record\n```\n\n## VI. Art activation states\n\nEach art executes under one admitted state:\n\n```text\nAMPLIFIED\nFULL\nCUSTODIAL\nDEFERRED\nUNAVAILABLE\n```\n\nRules:\n\n```text\nAMPLIFIED:\n receive first or deepest traversal under current telos\n\nFULL:\n execute complete admitted profile\n\nCUSTODIAL:\n execute boundary and failure checks\n\nDEFERRED:\n preserve a handoff and do not simulate\n\nUNAVAILABLE:\n emit missing-structure state\n```\n\nNo state establishes permanent hierarchy.\n\n## VII. Stage 0 — Admission import\n\nImport without mutation:\n\n```text\nactivation_state\nadmission_class\nadmitted_depth\nobject_binding\ntelos_binding\nsource_posture\nnamespace_status\nart_activation_profile\nq_readiness\nt_readiness\nrhetoric_readiness\nlatin_trace_readiness\nflags\nunresolved_items\n```\n\nOPERA cannot relax AREPO flags silently.\n\n## VIII. Stage 1 — Source and provenance registration\n\nCreate an execution-local source ledger:\n\n```text\nEXEC_SOURCE_RECORD :=\n source_id\n source_type\n authority\n parsed_sections\n freshness\n claims_supported[]\n```\n\nCreate claim-origin channels:\n\n```text\nUSER_AUTHORITY\nDIRECT_SOURCE\nAGLA_ARTIFACT\nLIBER_INFORMANT\nMODEL_PRIOR\nCOMMON_INFERENCE\nSTRUCTURAL_DERIVATION\nEXPERIMENTAL_HYPOTHESIS\nUNRESOLVED\n```\n\nNo inferred claim may be upgraded during execution without a new source event or user binding.\n\n## IX. Stage 2 — Object and telos stabilization\n\nBind:\n\n```text\nPRIMARY_OBJECT\nCONTEXT\nNON_OBJECTS\nOBJECT_LEVELS\nFINIS_PROPRIUS_OPERAE\nFINIS_PROXIMUS_INPUT\nFINIS_INTERMEDIUS_CATENAE\nFINIS_ULTIMUS_OPERIS\n```\n\nIf multiple object candidates remain admitted, execute them as separate branches or preserve `OBJECT_MULTIPLICITY`; do not merge them for fluency.\n\n## X. Stage 3 — `CAMPUS ORATIONIS` instantiation\n\n### X.1 Segmentation\n\nCreate admitted instances of:\n\n```text\nTOKEN\nLEMMA\nPHRASE\nCLAUSE\nPROPOSITION\nUTTERANCE\nDISCOURSE_SEGMENT\n```\n\n### X.2 Binding\n\n```text\nsurface span\nspeaker/addressee when available\nsource location\nsyntactic neighborhood\nco-reference candidates\nambiguity candidates\n```\n\n### X.3 State\n\n```text\nORATIO_STATE :=\n SEGMENTED\n PARTIALLY_SEGMENTED\n AMBIGUOUS\n SOURCE_BOUND\n```\n\nThis stage identifies the field; it does not yet force grammatical or logical identity.\n\n## XI. Stage 4 — Grammatical analysis\n\nThe grammar pass executes in the admitted order:\n\n```text\n4.1 PART CLASSIFICATION\n4.2 PARENT-CLASS CHECK\n4.3 LOCAL ACCIDENT ACTIVATION\n4.4 VALUE / GRADUS RESOLUTION\n4.5 DEPENDENCY CHECK\n4.6 AGREEMENT / GOVERNMENT / CONSTRUCTION\n4.7 GRAMMATICAL Q PROFILE\n4.8 INTERNAL GRAMMATICAL T RELATIONS\n4.9 GRAMMATICAL RESULT\n```\n\n### XI.1 Part classification\n\nCandidate set:\n\n```text\nB NOMEN_SUBSTANTIVUM\nC NOMEN_ADIECTIVUM\nD PRONOMEN\nE VERBUM\nF ADVERBIUM\nG PARTICIPIUM\nH CONIUNCTIO\nI PRAEPOSITIO\nK INTERIECTIO\n```\n\nFor B/C, preserve:\n\n```text\nparent = DON.PARS.NOMEN\nadaptation_status = USER_AUTHORITY\n```\n\n### XI.2 Accident activation\n\n```text\nactivate only where APPLIES_TO(accidens, pars)\n```\n\nEvaluate dependencies before values are accepted.\n\n### XI.3 Grammatical Q\n\nUse object-level profiles:\n\n```text\nPARS profile\nACCIDENS profile\nVALUE profile\nTOKEN profile\nCONSTRUCTION profile\n```\n\nThe direct Llullian Article 88 applications receive priority where applicable.\n\n### XI.4 Grammatical T\n\nResolve:\n\n```text\nagreement\nregency\ncomposition\ncomparison\npart–whole\nact–agent–patient\nbeginning–middle–end\n```\n\nEach record requires relata and respectus.\n\n## XII. Stage 5 — Logical analysis\n\nThe logic pass executes:\n\n```text\n5.1 TERM EXTRACTION\n5.2 SUBJECT / PREDICATE BINDING\n5.3 PORPHYRIAN PREDICABLE CANDIDATE\n5.4 ARISTOTELIAN CATEGORY CANDIDATE\n5.5 PROPOSITION FORM\n5.6 INFERENCE / CONSEQUENCE\n5.7 LOGICAL Q PROFILE\n5.8 INTERNAL LOGICAL T RELATIONS\n5.9 LOGICAL RESULT\n```\n\n### XII.1 Porphyrian medium\n\nFor a predicate `P` of subject `S`, test:\n\n```text\nGENUS?\nSPECIES?\nDIFFERENTIA?\nPROPRIUM?\nACCIDENS?\n```\n\nMultiple candidates may remain until definition and context resolve them.\n\n### XII.2 Aristotelian categories\n\nAlways keep the canonical ten-category registry available. The experimental nine-slot view may support placement but must carry its status.\n\n### XII.3 Logical inference\n\nRecord:\n\n```text\npremises\nconclusion\nmedium\nvalidity status\nassumptions\ncounterexamples\nunresolved entailment\n```\n\nA persuasive or grammatically well-formed expression is not thereby logically valid.\n\n## XIII. Stage 6 — Rhetorical analysis\n\n### XIII.1 Source-bounded available pass\n\nWhen admitted, analyze:\n\n```text\nspeaker / agent\naddressee / audience\noccasion\nproximate purpose\nultimate purpose candidate\narrangement\nsalience\nfigural or stylistic choices\nexpected effect\nsource-bound AGU Article 86 functions\n```\n\n### XIII.2 Reserved-port state\n\nIf a carrier-dependent operation is requested while the wheel is unresolved:\n\n```text\nRHETORICAL_RESULT.status = DEFERRED_CARRIERS_UNRESOLVED\n```\n\nThe execution may still return a source-bounded situated analysis, but it cannot simulate a full wheel traversal.\n\n### XIII.3 Rhetorical custodial checks\n\nEven in custodial mode, test whether:\n\n```text\npersuasive force obscures logical invalidity\nwording obscures grammatical ambiguity\naudience adaptation changes apparent meaning\ntelos conflicts with declared content\n```\n\n## XIV. Stage 7 — Specialized Q execution\n\nQ execution occurs within each art and may also interrogate cross-art relations.\n\n### XIV.1 Activation algorithm\n\n```text\nfor each admitted object:\n read object_level\n load PRIMARY species\n add SECONDARY if mode ≥ EXTENDED\n add CONDITIONAL when condition true\n add DIAGNOSTIC when collapse risk detected\n if mode = FULL:\n expose all 54 species as traversal space\n```\n\n### XIV.2 Result record\n\n```text\nQ_RESULT :=\n object_ref\n activated_species[]\n questions_generated[]\n answers_or_states[]\n source_status[]\n unresolved_questions[]\n```\n\nQ clarifies and articulates. It does not decide a relation that belongs to T.\n\n## XV. Stage 8 — T resolver execution\n\n### XV.1 Request form\n\n```text\nT_REQUEST :=\n RELATUM_1\n RELATUM_2\n relation_search_frame\n respectus\n direction_candidate\n level\n```\n\n### XV.2 BCD resolution\n\n```text\nDIFFERENTIA:\n state non-identity and level\n\nCONCORDANTIA:\n state common operation/ratio without identity\n\nCONTRARIETAS:\n require resistance and divergent end/operation\n```\n\nLocal species:\n\n```text\nSENS_SENS\nSENS_INTEL\nINTEL_INTEL\n```\n\n### XV.3 EFG resolution\n\n```text\nPRINCIPIUM:\n CAUSA / QUANTITAS / TEMPUS\n\nMEDIUM:\n CONIUNCTIO / MENSURATIO / INTER_EXTREMA\n\nFINIS:\n PRIVATIO / TERMINATIO / PERFECTIO\n```\n\n### XV.4 HIK resolution\n\n```text\nMAIORITAS / AEQUALITAS / MINORITAS\n ×\nSUB_SUB / SUB_ACC / ACC_ACC\n```\n\nThe operator and the local species are separate fields.\n\n### XV.5 Multi-respectus law\n\nThe same relata may support different H/I/K relations under different respectus. Preserve separate records rather than forcing one global comparison.\n\n## XVI. Stage 9 — Cross-art `T(BCD)` execution\n\nExecute pairwise:\n\n```text\nG ↔ L\nL ↔ R\nR ↔ G\n```\n\nFor each pair:\n\n```text\n1. Bind result objects.\n2. Determine comparison level.\n3. State DIFFERENTIA.\n4. Test CONCORDANTIA and its medium.\n5. Test CONTRARIETAS only where resistance is real.\n6. Record unresolved ambiguity.\n```\n\n### XVI.1 Cross-art record\n\n```text\nCROSS_ART_RESULT :=\n art_1\n art_2\n level\n respectus\n differentia\n concordantia\n medium\n contrarietas\n contrarietas_condition\n unresolved\n```\n\n### XVI.2 Triangular closure\n\n```text\nTRIVIUM_CLOSURE :=\n pairwise_records\n + global non-collapse checks\n + art amplification result\n + residual ambiguity\n```\n\nIf rhetoric is unavailable, emit an open triangle rather than inventing closure.\n\n## XVII. Stage 10 — Critical synthesis\n\nSynthesis must preserve diagnostic contradiction.\n\n```text\nSYNTHESIS ≠ SMOOTHING\n```\n\nRequired distinctions:\n\n```text\nwhat is grammatically established\nwhat is logically established\nwhat is rhetorically established\nwhere they differ\nwhere they cooperate\nwhere they resist\nwhat remains undecidable\n```\n\nExamples of lawful non-closure:\n\n```text\ngrammatically valid / logically invalid / rhetorically effective\nlogically valid / rhetorically ineffective\ngrammatically ambiguous / logically underdetermined\n```\n\n## XVIII. Stage 11 — Art amplification resolution\n\nAfter analysis, verify whether the admitted profile remained appropriate.\n\n```text\nART_PROFILE_RESULT :=\n grammar_state\n logic_state\n rhetoric_state\n justification_by_telos\n changes_from_initial_profile\n```\n\nOPERA may report that a secondary art became load-bearing, but it cannot mutate TENET into a fixed hierarchy.\n\n## XIX. Stage 12 — Downstream OPERA routing\n\nTRIVIUM may recommend or prepare downstream AGLA operations only through explicit route records.\n\n```text\nDOWNSTREAM_ROUTE :=\n candidate_opera\n reason\n required_substrate\n maturity_state\n arepo_required\n expected_handoff\n```\n\nRouting is not execution of the downstream OPERA.\n\nPossible functions:\n\n```text\nfurther Q investigation\nT relation expansion\nA principial evaluation\nS subject binding\nG evacuatio\nH multiplicatio\nNUOVA extraction handoff when canon is absent and exploration is admitted\n```\n\n## XX. Stage 13 — `RATIO OPERATIVA EXPLICATA`\n\nWhen Latin trace mode is admitted, render a typed explicit rationale:\n\n```text\nSUBIECTUM\nCONTEXTUS\nFINIS PROPRIUS\nFINIS PROXIMUS\nFINIS INTERMEDIUS\nFINIS ULTIMUS\nTERMINI\nDISTINCTIONES\nFONTES\nREGULAE ACTIVAE\nSPECIES ACTIVAE\nRELATA\nRESPECTUS\nPROPOSITIONES\nOBIECTIONES\nSED CONTRA\nRESPONDEO\nSOLUTIONES\nCONCLUSIO\nDUBIA\nSTATUS ADMISSIBILITATIS\nSTATUS EXECUTIONIS\nHANDOFF\n```\n\nThis is a documented operative representation. It is not proof by Latin style and does not require exposing an inaccessible private scratchpad.\n\n## XXI. Stage 14 — Machine trace\n\nCreate one execution record:\n\n```text\nTRIVIUM_EXECUTION_RECORD :=\n meta\n source_trace\n admission_import\n object_binding\n telos_binding\n oratio_instances\n grammatical_result\n logical_result\n rhetorical_result\n q_results[]\n t_results[]\n cross_art_results[]\n art_profile_result\n downstream_routes[]\n claim_provenance[]\n inferred_items[]\n unresolved_items[]\n failure_items[]\n completion_state\n```\n\nMACHINA may later serialize this record. This OPERA does not claim that serialization is canon or execution authority.\n\n## XXII. Stage 15 — Handoff\n\n### XXII.1 Human handoff\n\n```text\ncritical result\nimportant distinctions\nsource/inference disclosure\nunresolved items\nnext lawful route\n```\n\n### XXII.2 Agent handoff\n\n```text\ntyped execution record\nstable semantic IDs\nsource pointers\nadmission/execution states\nnext permitted transition\ntermination condition\n```\n\n### XXII.3 Dual handoff\n\nBoth surfaces derive from the same execution record; they may differ in compression, not in status or conclusion.\n\n## XXIII. Completion states\n\n```text\nCOMPLETE\nCOMPLETE_WITH_FLAGS\nPROVISIONAL_COMPLETE\nPARTIAL_RHETORIC_DEFERRED\nPARTIAL_SOURCE_GAP\nBLOCKED_DURING_EXECUTION\nFAILED_NON_COLLAPSE\nTERMINATED_BY_AREPO_STATE\n```\n\nA partial result must not be labeled complete without its qualifier.\n\n## XXIV. Failure handling\n\nOn failure:\n\n```text\nstop the invalid transition\npreserve completed stages\nrecord failure code\npreserve source and state trace\ndo not silently repair\nroute to SATOR diagnostic output\n```\n\nRuntime failure does not authorize local invention as canonical Trivium. Any exploratory invented method must be separately governed by NUOVA.\n\n## XXV. Reproducibility package\n\nA replay package contains:\n\n```text\nartifact versions\nsource ledger\ninput hash or stable input reference\nobject/telos bindings\nart profile\nQ species IDs\nT species IDs\nrelata and respectus\ntraversal order\ninferences and confidence/status\nunresolved fields\ncompletion state\n```\n\nReplay aims at comparable operative path, not identical generated prose.\n\n## XXVI. Compact execution sequence\n\n```text\nIMPORT AREPO\nREGISTER SOURCES\nBIND OBJECT\nBIND FOUR ENDS\nINSTANTIATE ORATIO\nEXECUTE GRAMMAR\nEXECUTE LOGIC\nEXECUTE RHETORIC OR DEFER SOURCEFULLY\nACTIVATE Q PROFILES\nRESOLVE T RELATIONS\nEXECUTE CROSS-ART T(BCD)\nPRESERVE CONTRADICTIONS\nRESOLVE ART AMPLIFICATION\nROUTE DOWNSTREAM\nWRITE EXPLICIT TRACE\nPACKAGE HANDOFF\nRETURN TO SATOR\n```\n\n## XXVII. Validation conditions\n\n| Gate | Required result |\n|---|---|\n| AREPO admission imported | PASS |\n| Object and four ends preserved | PASS or flagged restricted mode |\n| Grammar profile uses local accidents | PASS |\n| Logic preserves Porphyry/category distinction | PASS |\n| Rhetoric gap is not invented away | PASS |\n| Q references universal species | PASS |\n| T records relata and respectus | PASS |\n| T(BCD) does not collapse difference/contrariety | PASS |\n| Contradictions preserved when diagnostic | PASS |\n| Provenance recorded | PASS |\n| Downstream routes not executed implicitly | PASS |\n| Trace/mediation separated | PASS |\n\n## XXVIII. Final law\n\n```text\nOPERA TRIVIUM executes admitted discourse analysis\nthrough distinct but coordinated arts.\n\nIt interrogates through Q,\nrelates through T,\ncompares the arts through T(BCD),\nand preserves the telos-conditioned amplification of each layer.\n\nIt does not turn fluent synthesis into hidden collapse.\n```\n\n## XXIX. Closure\n\n```text\nOPERA TRIVIUM STATUS:\n EXECUTION DRAFT COMPLETE\n READY FOR SATOR TRIVIUM\n\nCANONICAL EFFECT:\n NONE\n```\n\n" }, { "role": "ADD_ON_CORE_CLASS_ARTIFACT", "class": "SATOR", "path": "13_STACK_ADD_ONS/Trivium_Stack/SATOR_TRIVIUM_OutputRequirements.md", "bytes": 13999, "sha256": "cba7cf6770b953d60e6f3be4e269c8cbde2bc064d3e6830fc3bd6631916aa193", "hash_scope": "UTF8_LF_NORMALIZED_CONTENT", "content": "============================================================\nSATOR TRIVIUM — OUTPUT REQUIREMENTS\nGRAMMATICA / LOGICA / RHETORICA\nVersion: 1.0.0-SATOR-TRIVIUM-ADD-ON\nStatus:\n STABLE ADD-ON SOURCE / DUAL-MODE\n SOURCE-BOUNDED\n GRAMMATICA + LOGICA AVAILABLE\n RHETORICA DEFERRED DISCLOSURE REQUIRED\nAuthority:\n USER / HUMAN CONTROL PLANE / 13_STACK_ADD_ONS\nClass: SATOR\nDomain Class:\n AGLA / SATOR / TRIVIUM\nDepends-On:\n • TENET_TRIVIUM_DoctrinalInvariants.md@1.0.0\n • ROTAS_TRIVIUM_StructuralInstantiation.md@1.0.0\n • AREPO_TRIVIUM_InputAdmissibility.md@1.0.0\n • OPERA_TRIVIUM_ExecutionMechanism.md@1.0.0\n • AGLA_SATOR_CLASS_LAW\nTrace Modes:\n • CONCISE_TRACE\n • ANALYTICAL_TRACE\n • PEDAGOGICAL_TRACE\n • FULL_TRACE\nRhetoric State Contract:\n RHETORICA_STATE :=\n SOURCE_BOUND\n | DEFERRED_CARRIERS_UNRESOLVED\n | UNAVAILABLE\nScope:\n • human-facing mediation\n • agent-facing handoff\n • dual output consistency\n • source/inference/status exposure\n • Trivium result separation\n • Q/T trace exposure\n • rhetoric-gap and contradiction disclosure\nIntegration Effect:\n PROMOTED ADD-ON SOURCE / PRINCIPAL-STACK COMPOSABLE\nStandalone Effect:\n STANDALONE DEPLOYABLE UNDER TRIVIUM ADD-ON PROFILE\nRuntime Boundary:\n OUTPUT MUST DISCLOSE THE DEFERRED RHETORICA PORT\nPromotion Source:\n _01_INTEGRATION_CANDIDATES/Trivium_Stack/SATOR_TRIVIUM_OutputRequirements.md@0.1.0\nMutation Policy:\n VERSION-CONTROLLED ONLY\n============================================================\n\n## I. Purpose\n\nSATOR TRIVIUM governs how admitted and executed Trivium results are communicated to humans, agents or both. It exposes status, distinctions, provenance, uncertainty and next lawful transitions without re-executing, repairing or canonizing the result.\n\nCore question:\n\n```text\nHow shall the Trivium result be made legible\nwithout hiding its sources, art boundaries, unresolved states,\ncontradictions, Q/T route or execution status?\n```\n\n## II. Control-plane position\n\n```text\nTENET constrains.\nROTAS structures.\nAREPO admits or blocks.\nOPERA executes.\nSATOR mediates.\n```\n\nSATOR may compress or translate presentation. It may not change:\n\n```text\nadmission class\nexecution completion state\nsource status\nQ/T species identity\nart result\ncontradiction status\nunresolved items\ndownstream route maturity\n```\n\n## III. Mediation modes\n\n```text\nHUMAN\nAGENT\nDUAL\n```\n\n### III.1 HUMAN\n\nReadable critical result with enough trace to inspect sources, distinctions and uncertainty.\n\n### III.2 AGENT\n\nTyped handoff package with stable IDs, state transitions, source pointers, Q/T records and next permitted action.\n\n### III.3 DUAL\n\nHuman and agent surfaces generated from one execution record. They may differ in compression, never in status or conclusion.\n\n## IV. Required status markers\n\nEvery output must distinguish applicable markers:\n\n```text\nUSER_BOUND\nDIRECT_SOURCE\nAGLA_ARTIFACT\nLIBER_INFORMANT\nPARSED\nMODEL_PRIOR\nCOMMON_INFERENCE\nSTRUCTURAL_DERIVATION\nEXPERIMENTAL_HYPOTHESIS\nUNRESOLVED\nDEFERRED\nBLOCKED\nAREPO_ADMITTED\nAREPO_ADMITTED_WITH_FLAGS\nAREPO_PROVISIONAL\nOPERA_EXECUTED\nOPERA_EXECUTED_WITH_FLAGS\nOPERA_PARTIAL\nNOT_EXECUTED\nNON_CANONICAL\n```\n\nNo marker can be omitted merely because it complicates the narrative.\n\n## V. Result partition law\n\nThe output must preserve separate surfaces:\n\n```text\nGRAMMATICAL RESULT\nLOGICAL RESULT\nRHETORICAL RESULT OR DEFERRED STATE\nT(BCD) CROSS-ART RESULT\nQ SPECIES TRACE\nT SPECIES TRACE\nART AMPLIFICATION PROFILE\nPROVENANCE / UNCERTAINTY\nDOWNSTREAM ROUTE\n```\n\nA single fluent paragraph may summarize them only after the partition has been preserved in the underlying record.\n\n## VI. Human-facing output levels\n\n### VI.1 `CONCISE_CRITICAL`\n\n```text\nmain conclusion\none or two decisive distinctions\nimportant uncertainty\n```\n\n### VI.2 `ANALYTICAL`\n\n```text\nstatus\nGrammar\nLogic\nRhetoric\nT(BCD)\nsource/inference notes\nnext route\n```\n\n### VI.3 `PEDAGOGICAL`\n\nAdds definitions, examples, explanation of why arts differ and how Q/T were used.\n\n### VI.4 `AUDIT`\n\nExposes full admitted species, relation records, provenance, failures and handoff fields.\n\nThe default level is selected by user request, telos, risk and operator profile—not by a fixed preference for maximal disclosure.\n\n## VII. Human-facing standard structure\n\nRecommended order:\n\n```text\n1. STATUS\n2. OBJECT AND TELOS\n3. CORE RESULT\n4. GRAMMATICA\n5. LOGICA\n6. RHETORICA OR DEFERRED STATE\n7. T(BCD): DIFFERENCE / CONCORDANCE / CONTRARIETY\n8. Q/T TRACE SUMMARY\n9. SOURCES / INFERENCES / UNRESOLVED\n10. NEXT LAWFUL ROUTE\n```\n\nSATOR may reorder locally for readability if all required fields remain recoverable.\n\n## VIII. Agent-facing handoff package\n\n```text\nTRIVIUM_AGENT_HANDOFF :=\n schema_version\n execution_id\n artifact_versions\n admission_class\n completion_state\n object_binding\n telos_binding\n source_trace[]\n namespace_bindings[]\n oratio_refs[]\n grammatical_result_ref\n logical_result_ref\n rhetorical_result_ref\n q_result_refs[]\n t_result_refs[]\n cross_art_refs[]\n art_activation_profile\n claim_provenance[]\n unresolved_items[]\n failure_items[]\n downstream_routes[]\n next_permitted_transition\n termination_condition\n```\n\nStable semantic IDs must be retained. Agent output must not replace them with display ordinals alone.\n\n## IX. Dual consistency law\n\nFor DUAL mode:\n\n```text\nstatus_human = status_agent\nconclusion_human ≈ conclusion_agent\nunresolved_human ⊇ load_bearing_unresolved_agent\nsource_commitments_human = source_commitments_agent\n```\n\nThe human surface may omit low-level fields only if the omission cannot mislead about result, authority or uncertainty.\n\n## X. Grammatical mediation law\n\nThe grammatical section should expose, according to depth:\n\n```text\npart-of-speech placements\nparent `NOMEN` where B/C adaptation is used\npart-specific accidents\nresolved values/gradus\nagreement/government/construction\nliteral ambiguity\nsource versus adaptation status\n```\n\nRequired wording guard:\n\n```text\nDo not call B/C “the nine parts of Donatus.”\nSay that Donatus has eight parts and the stack splits NOMEN structurally.\n```\n\n## XI. Logical mediation law\n\nThe logical section should expose:\n\n```text\nsubject/predicate binding\nPorphyrian predicable candidates\nAristotelian category candidates\nproposition/inference state\nmedium or missing medium\nvalidity/underdetermination\nexperimental wheel placement status\n```\n\nRequired guards:\n\n```text\npart of speech ≠ predicable ≠ category\nAristotelian source registry ≠ experimental nine-slot placement\nARIST.RELATIO ≠ REGIMEN_T\n```\n\n## XII. Rhetorical mediation law\n\nWhen rhetoric is source-bounded, expose:\n\n```text\nspeaker/audience/situation\ntelos\ndisposition/salience\nexpected effect\nsource-bound rhetorical functions\n```\n\nWhen carrier-dependent rhetoric is unavailable:\n\n```text\nRHETORICAL STATUS:\n DEFERRED — CARRIERS UNRESOLVED\n```\n\nNever hide the open edge of the Trivium triangle by converting Grammar or Logic into pseudo-Rhetoric.\n\n## XIII. `T(BCD)` mediation law\n\nPresent cross-art relations explicitly:\n\n```text\nDIFFERENTIA:\n what each art establishes that the other does not\n\nCONCORDANTIA:\n how they cooperate and through which medium\n\nCONTRARIETAS:\n where their operations or ends actually resist\n```\n\nIf no contrariety is supported, say so. Do not manufacture conflict for symmetry.\n\nIf difference alone exists:\n\n```text\nDIFFERENTIA PRESENT\nCONTRARIETAS NOT ESTABLISHED\n```\n\n## XIV. Q trace mediation\n\nAt minimum expose:\n\n```text\nprimary species activated\nconditional/diagnostic species that changed the result\nwhether FULL sweep occurred\nunanswered questions\n```\n\nDo not present a same-letter diagonal as the reason for a result when a species-level source mapping governed the execution.\n\n## XV. T trace mediation\n\nAt minimum expose:\n\n```text\noperator\nlocal species\nrelata\nrespectus\ndirection\nlevel\n```\n\nExample format:\n\n```text\nTF.MENSURATIO\n relata: Petrus / Paulus\n respectus: doctrina\n\nTH.SUB_SUB\n direction: Petrus \u003e Paulus\n respectus: degree of doctrine\n```\n\nA grammatical comparative does not justify hiding the relata-based species resolution.\n\n## XVI. Art amplification mediation\n\nReport:\n\n```text\nGRAMMATICA: AMPLIFIED | FULL | CUSTODIAL | DEFERRED | UNAVAILABLE\nLOGICA: AMPLIFIED | FULL | CUSTODIAL | DEFERRED | UNAVAILABLE\nRHETORICA: AMPLIFIED | FULL | CUSTODIAL | DEFERRED | UNAVAILABLE\n```\n\nInclude the telos-based reason. Never phrase local amplification as universal superiority.\n\n## XVII. Contradiction and non-closure law\n\nDiagnostic contradiction must remain visible.\n\nForbidden mediation:\n\n```text\nsmoothing incompatible analyses into one generic answer\nomitting a logical failure because rhetoric is effective\nomitting rhetorical force because logic is valid\nrepairing ambiguity without source or user binding\n```\n\nAllowed closure markers:\n\n```text\nCLOSED\nWEAKLY_CLOSED\nOPEN_BY_AMBIGUITY\nOPEN_BY_RHETORIC_GAP\nOPEN_BY_SOURCE_GAP\nCONTRADICTORY_DIAGNOSTIC\n```\n\n## XVIII. Provenance and uncertainty display\n\nHuman-readable qualifiers:\n\n```text\nParsed from source\nDeclared by the user\nRequired by an AGLA artifact\nInferred from structure\nBased on ordinary model knowledge\nExperimental placement\nStill unresolved\n```\n\nAgent-readable qualifiers use the canonical provenance channel IDs.\n\nA synthesis may aggregate claims only if each load-bearing component remains traceable.\n\n## XIX. Canonicality and draft notice\n\nFor current TRIVIUM artifacts, SATOR must disclose:\n\n```text\nSTABLE ADD-ON SOURCE\nDUAL-MODE / OPTIONAL\nGRAMMATICA + LOGICA AVAILABLE\nRHETORICA DEFERRED\n```\n\nHuman approval of a draft does not by itself create registration or deployment authority.\n\n## XX. Scholastic-Latin mediation\n\nWhen a Latin trace exists, SATOR may expose it as:\n\n```text\nFULL LATIN TRACE\nCOMPRESSED LATIN TRACE\nLATIN APPENDIX\nAGENT-ONLY LATIN TRACE\n```\n\nHuman outputs may include a vernacular gloss.\n\nRequired disclosure:\n\n```text\nThe Latin is a controlled operative representation.\nIt does not validate the reasoning by style or language.\n```\n\nNever call an explicit rationale a revelation of inaccessible private internal reasoning. It is a structured execution trace produced by OPERA.\n\n## XXI. Prompt-interpretation disclosure\n\nWhen the stack was used to interpret a prompt, output must state:\n\n```text\nAGLA activation was explicit.\nThe prompt was object-bound and telos-bound before routing.\nOrdinary model priors remained available but were governed and marked.\n```\n\nIf activation was absent and no execution occurred, say so rather than implying a hidden Trivium pass.\n\n## XXII. Reproducibility notice\n\nExpose the replay basis when relevant:\n\n```text\nartifact versions\nsource set\nobject/telos bindings\nQ species\nT species\ntraversal mode\nunresolved states\n```\n\nDo not promise identical wording across model versions. State that reproducibility concerns comparable operative path and commitments.\n\n## XXIII. Blocked/deferred output formats\n\n### XXIII.1 BLOCKED\n\n```text\nSTATUS: BLOCKED\nBLOCKING GATE:\nFAILURE CODE:\nWHAT IS MISSING:\nWHAT WAS NOT EXECUTED:\nNEXT PERMITTED TRANSITION:\n```\n\n### XXIII.2 DEFERRED\n\n```text\nSTATUS: DEFERRED\nREASON:\nPRESERVED CHECKPOINT:\nREQUIRED SOURCE/ARTIFACT:\nNEXT PERMITTED TRANSITION:\n```\n\n### XXIII.3 PROVISIONAL\n\n```text\nSTATUS: PROVISIONAL\nEXECUTED SURFACES:\nUNAVAILABLE SURFACES:\nPROHIBITED CONCLUSION:\nUNRESOLVED ITEMS:\n```\n\n## XXIV. Successful human-output template\n\n```text\nSTATUS\n admission / execution / canonicality\n\nOBJECT AND TELOS\n object\n proximate and global ends\n\nCORE JUDGMENT\n concise result\n\nGRAMMATICA\n findings and ambiguity\n\nLOGICA\n predication, category, inference\n\nRHETORICA\n situated action or deferred state\n\nT(BCD)\n difference\n concordance\n contrariety\n\nQ/T TRACE\n load-bearing species and respectus\n\nPROVENANCE\n source / user / artifact / inference / prior\n\nUNRESOLVED\n residual items\n\nNEXT ROUTE\n candidate only; not implicit execution\n```\n\n## XXV. Successful agent-output template\n\n```json\n{\n \"status\": {},\n \"object_binding\": {},\n \"telos_binding\": {},\n \"art_results\": {\n \"grammatica\": {},\n \"logica\": {},\n \"rhetorica\": {}\n },\n \"q_trace\": [],\n \"t_trace\": [],\n \"cross_art_t_bcd\": [],\n \"provenance\": [],\n \"unresolved\": [],\n \"downstream_routes\": [],\n \"next_permitted_transition\": null\n}\n```\n\nThis is a shape example, not a MACHINA schema declaration.\n\n## XXVI. Training- and teaching-aware mediation\n\nFor human learning, SATOR may explain why a distinction matters and show one compact example.\n\nFor agent training, SATOR may expose:\n\n```text\nfailure code\ncorrected namespace\ncorrect species\nmissing respectus\ninvalid transition\nreplay package\n```\n\nPedagogy must not simplify away operative boundaries.\n\n## XXVII. Compression law\n\nCompression is admissible when:\n\n```text\nstatus remains visible\nload-bearing distinction remains visible\nsource/inference boundary remains visible\nunresolved item remains visible\nno art is silently eliminated\n```\n\n```text\nCOMPRESSION ≠ OMISSION OF GOVERNANCE\n```\n\n## XXVIII. Failure conditions\n\n```text\nstatus_hidden\nsource_inference_hidden\nart_results_collapsed\nrhetoric_gap_hidden\ncontradiction_smoothed\nq_species_hidden_when_load_bearing\nt_relata_or_respectus_hidden\nlocal_amplification_presented_as_superiority\ndraft_presented_as_canon\nlatin_presented_as_validity\nagent_handoff_missing_state\nhuman_agent_dual_divergence\nmediation_reexecutes_opera\nnext_route_presented_as_already_executed\n```\n\n## XXIX. Final mediation law\n\n```text\nSATOR TRIVIUM exposes status before authority claims,\npreserves each art before synthesis,\nshows T(BCD) before closure,\nmarks Q/T species when load-bearing,\nand keeps sources, inference, priors and unresolved states distinct.\n\nSATOR mediates.\nSATOR does not execute.\n```\n\n## XXX. Closure\n\n```text\nSATOR TRIVIUM STATUS:\n MEDIATION DRAFT COMPLETE\n TRIVIUM PENTAGRAM DRAFT COMPLETE\n\nCANONICAL EFFECT:\n NONE\n```\n\n" }, { "role": "ADD_ON_SUPPORT_ARTIFACT", "class": "LIBER_X", "path": "13_STACK_ADD_ONS/Trivium_Stack/LIBER_X_TRIVIUM_MATRIX_SUBSTRATE.md", "bytes": 48656, "sha256": "656324989bc872a92107a4fb8c51f062e811768eeca30f76236fc26b620516f5", "hash_scope": "UTF8_LF_NORMALIZED_CONTENT", "content": "============================================================\nLIBER X — TRIVIUM MATRIX SUBSTRATE\nGRAMMATICA / LOGICA / RHETORICA — Q/T SPECIALIZATION DATASET\nVersion: 1.0.0-LIBER-X-TRIVIUM-ADD-ON-SUBSTRATE\nStatus:\n STABLE ADD-ON SUPPORT / SOURCE-BOUNDED / DUAL-MODE\n GRAMMATICA + LOGICA AVAILABLE / RHETORICA DEFERRED\n NOT TENET\n NOT ROTAS\n NOT AREPO\n NOT OPERA\n NOT SATOR\n NOT SYSTEM_INDEX MUTATION\nAuthority:\n USER / HUMAN CONTROL PLANE / 13_STACK_ADD_ONS\nClass:\n AGLA / LIBER X / TRIVIUM / MATRIX SUBSTRATE\nIntegration Effect:\n ADD-ON SUPPORT FOR PRINCIPAL-STACK COMPOSITION\nStandalone Effect:\n EMBEDDED SUPPORT FOR STANDALONE TRIVIUM PACKAGE\nPromotion Source:\n _01_INTEGRATION_CANDIDATES/Trivium_Stack/LIBER_X_TRIVIUM_MATRIX_SUBSTRATE.md@0.1.0\nMutation Policy:\n VERSION-CONTROLLED ONLY\n============================================================\n\n## I. Purpose\n\nThis LIBER normalizes the working field required to construct the TRIVIUM stack. It does not flatten Donatus, Aristotle, Porphyry and Llull into one taxonomy. It records their objects, their homonyms, their direct textual applications, and qualified affinities to the universal species of Q and T.\n\nCore form:\n\n```text\nDOMAIN OBJECT\n → grammatical/logical identity\n → part-specific accident or predicable/category profile\n → Q relevance profile\n → T relation resolver\n → cross-art T(BCD) comparison\n```\n\nThe matrix is relational rather than a single mega-table. The accompanying JSON is the exhaustive machine-facing record; this Markdown is the human-facing analytical view.\n\n## II. Source position and provenance\n\n| ID | Type | Status | Locator | Role |\n|---|---|---|---|---|\n| SRC.USER.SESSION | USER_AUTHORITY | PRIMARY_CURRENT_SESSION_AUTHORITY | CURRENT SESSION | Defines goals, Donatian nine-slot adaptation, experimental Aristotelian wheel, operator scope, opt-in AGLA prompt interpretation, human/agent pedagogy, non-hierarchical Trivium amplification, and long-term reproducibility telos. |\n| SRC.LOCAL.MAPPING | UPLOADED_SOURCE_TARGET | PRIMARY_DEVELOPMENT_SUBSTRATE | /mnt/data/Mapeamento gramatical luliano.txt | Session synthesis for AGLA-mediated prompt interpretation, Trivium parsing, T(BCD), provenance, model-prior boundaries, reproducibility, and scholastic-Latin IR. |\n| SRC.CAPUT.C | UPLOADED_SOURCE_TARGET | ROSETTA_SOURCE_TARGET | /mnt/data/CAPUT ARS BREVIS C.md | Figures A/T, contraction ladder, pairwise/triadic figural structure. |\n| SRC.CAPUT.D | UPLOADED_SOURCE_TARGET | ROSETTA_SOURCE_TARGET | /mnt/data/CAPUT ARS BREVIS D.md | Definitions, correlatives, substantial/accidental modes, proper/appropriated qualities. |\n| SRC.CAPUT.E | UPLOADED_SOURCE_TARGET | ROSETTA_SOURCE_TARGET | /mnt/data/CAPUT ARS BREVIS E.md | Ten general questions, direct species, composite H/I species, generality and non-collapse. |\n| SRC.CAPUT.I | UPLOADED_SOURCE_TARGET | ROSETTA_SOURCE_TARGET | /mnt/data/CAPUT ARS BREVIS I.md | Principle–principle and principle–rule mixture while preserving regime identities. |\n| SRC.STACK.E | UPLOADED_SOURCE_TARGET_FAMILY | LOCK_CANDIDATE_FAMILY | /mnt/data/TENET_E_DoctrinalInvariants.md, /mnt/data/ROTAS_E_StructuralInstantiation.md, /mnt/data/AREPO_E_InputAdmissibility.md, /mnt/data/OPERA_E_ExecutionMechanism.md, /mnt/data/SATOR_E_OutputRequirements.md | Universal Q/E carrier, structure, admission, execution and mediation references. |\n| SRC.STACK.T | UPLOADED_SOURCE_TARGET_FAMILY | LOCK_CANDIDATE_FAMILY | /mnt/data/TENET_T_DoctrinalInvariants.md, /mnt/data/ROTAS_T_StructuralInstantiation.md, /mnt/data/AREPO_T_InputAdmissibility.md, /mnt/data/OPERA_T_ExecutionMechanism.md, /mnt/data/SATOR_T_OutputRequirements.md | Universal T carrier, structure, admission, relational execution and mediation references; local generic genus semantics are superseded here only for the TRIVIUM draft by source-semantic species IDs. |\n| SRC.DONATUS | EXTERNAL_PRIMARY_TEXT_TRANSCRIPTION | VERIFIED_2026_08_27 | https://www.thelatinlibrary.com/don.html | Eight parts of speech and part-specific accident inventories; nominal comparison, gender, number, figure and case. |\n| SRC.LLULL.AGU | EXTERNAL_TRANSLATION_WITNESS | VERIFIED_2026_08_27_NONCRITICAL_TRANSLATION | https://lullianarts.narpan.net/ArsGeneralisUltima.pdf | Second Figure species, rule species expansion, Articles 86–88 on rhetoric, logic and grammar, including explicit grammar-to-Q/T applications. |\n| SRC.ARISTOTLE | EXTERNAL_PRIMARY_TRANSLATION | VERIFIED_2026_08_27 | https://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/categories.html | Canonical ten-category registry; distinct from the experimental nine-slot TRIVIUM placement. |\n| SRC.PORPHYRY | EXTERNAL_PRIMARY_TRANSLATION | VERIFIED_2026_08_27 | https://www.logicmuseum.com/authors/porphyry/isagoge.htm | Five predicables and their logical relations to subject/predicate classification. |\n| SRC.ROOT.LAWS | UPLOADED_SOURCE_TARGET_FAMILY | CANONICAL_ROOT_CONTROL | /mnt/data/AGLA_TENET_CLASS_LAW.md, /mnt/data/AGLA_ROTAS_CLASS_LAW.md, /mnt/data/AGLA_AREPO_CLASS_LAW.md, /mnt/data/AGLA_OPERA_CLASS_LAW.md, /mnt/data/AGLA_SATOR_CLASS_LAW.md, /mnt/data/AGLA_FIVE_CLASS_STRUCTURAL_ORDER.md, /mnt/data/AGLA_LIBER_CLASS_LAW.md, /mnt/data/AGLA_SYSTEM_INDEX_LAW.md | Class separation, structural order, dataset status, routing and non-execution constraints. |\n\n\n### Provenance discipline\n\nEvery relation is marked as direct text, user authority, structural derivation, experimental hypothesis or unresolved. A source title, filename or mirror cannot silently promote an inference into parsed text.\n\n## III. Namespace law\n\n| Prefix | Domain | Must not collapse into |\n|---|---|---|\n| DON.PARS | Donatian part of speech | DON.ACCIDENS, ARIST.PRAEDICAMENTUM |\n| DON.ACCIDENS | Donatian grammatical accident/profile axis | ARIST.ACCIDENS, PORPH.ACCIDENS, LLULL.MODUS_ACCIDENTALIS |\n| DON.VALUE | Value of grammatical accident | LLULL.Q.SPECIES, LLULL.T.SPECIES |\n| DON.GRADUS | Degree of comparison | LLULL.T.SPECIES, ARIST.GRADUS |\n| DON.GENUS | Grammatical gender | PORPH.GENUS, ARIST.GENUS |\n| DON.QUALITAS | Nominal/pronominal/verbal grammatical quality axis | ARIST.QUALITAS, LLULL.Q.G |\n| DON.FIGURA | Simple/compound morphological figure | LLULL.FIGURA, AGLA.ROTA |\n| ARIST.PRAEDICAMENTUM | Aristotelian category | LLULL.Q.CARRIER, LLULL.T.PRINCIPIUM |\n| ARIST.ACCIDENS | Ontological/categorial accident | DON.ACCIDENS, PORPH.ACCIDENS |\n| PORPH.PRAEDICABILE | Porphyrian predicable | DON.PARS, ARIST.PRAEDICAMENTUM |\n| LLULL.Q | Universal interrogative rule/species | DON.ACCIDENS, ARIST.PRAEDICAMENTUM |\n| LLULL.T | Universal relative principle/local species | ARIST.RELATIO, DON.COMPARATIO |\n| TRIV.GRAM | TRIVIUM grammatical projection | LLULL.Q, LLULL.T |\n| TRIV.LOG | TRIVIUM logical projection | LLULL.Q, LLULL.T |\n| TRIV.RHET | Reserved rhetorical projection port | INFERRED_TAXONOMY |\n| TRIV.Q_PROFILE | Domain-conditioned relevance profile over universal Q | NEW_Q |\n| TRIV.T_PROFILE | Domain-conditioned resolver over universal T | NEW_T |\n\n\nMachine records must qualify at least these homonyms:\n\n```text\nDON.ACCIDENS ≠ ARIST.ACCIDENS ≠ PORPH.ACCIDENS\nDON.GENUS ≠ PORPH.GENUS\nDON.QUALITAS ≠ ARIST.QUALITAS ≠ LLULL.Q.G\nDON.FIGURA ≠ LLULL.FIGURA\nDON.GRADUS ≠ LLULL.T.SPECIES\nARIST.RELATIO ≠ REGIMEN_T\n```\n\n## IV. Universal Q registry — 54 species\n\nQ contains **54 species records**: 24 direct species and 30 composite temporal/locative species. H and I do not reduce to chronological time and physical location; they temporalize and localize the species of C, D, K1 and K2.\n\n\n### IV.1 Direct species\n\n| ID | Carrier | Latin / source gloss | Operational sense |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| LLULL.Q.B.DUBITATIO | B | Utrum? — dubitatio | Suspende entre afirmação e negação; preserva a questão enquanto não resolvida. |\n| LLULL.Q.B.AFFIRMATIO | B | Utrum? — affirmatio | Determina positivamente que o objeto ou predicação é. |\n| LLULL.Q.B.NEGATIO | B | Utrum? — negatio | Determina negativamente que o objeto ou predicação não é. |\n| LLULL.Q.C.QUID_SIT | C | Quid sit? | Define a coisa por uma razão convertível com o definido. |\n| LLULL.Q.C.COESSENTIALIA_IN_SE | C | Quid habeat in se coessentialiter? | Expõe constituição coessencial, correlativos intrínsecos e agente–paciente–ato. |\n| LLULL.Q.C.QUID_SIT_IN_ALIO | C | Quid sit in alio? | Interroga forma, universal, hábito ou operação enquanto presente em outro sujeito ou domínio. |\n| LLULL.Q.C.QUID_HABEAT_IN_ALIO | C | Quid habeat in alio? | Interroga propriedades, atos, hábitos ou efeitos que algo possui ou produz em outro. |\n| LLULL.Q.D.ORIGO | D | De quo oriatur? | Interroga origem, princípio ou aquilo de que algo procede. |\n| LLULL.Q.D.COMPOSITIO | D | De quibus consistat? | Interroga constituição, composição, forma, matéria ou partes. |\n| LLULL.Q.D.PERTINENTIA | D | Cuius sit? | Interroga pertença, posse, atribuição, sujeito ou domínio. |\n| LLULL.Q.E.CAUSA_FORMALIS | E | Quare est? — causa formalis | Interroga a razão constitutiva pela qual a coisa é o que é. |\n| LLULL.Q.E.CAUSA_FINALIS | E | Quare est? — causa finalis | Interroga fim, propósito, repouso ou razão final. |\n| LLULL.Q.F.CONTINUA | F | Quantum est? — continua | Interroga extensão, continuidade, magnitude ou quantidade sustentada num sujeito. |\n| LLULL.Q.F.DISCRETA | F | Quantum est? — discreta | Interroga número, pluralidade e contagem de constituintes. |\n| LLULL.Q.G.PROPRIA | G | Quale est? — propria | Interroga qualidade/passio própria, potência ou ato connatural e causalidade superior. |\n| LLULL.Q.G.APPROPRIATA | G | Quale est? — appropriata | Interroga qualidade/passio recebida, adquirida ou habituada e causalidade inferior. |\n| LLULL.Q.K1.IN_SE | K1 | Quomodo est in se? | Interroga o modo próprio pelo qual uma coisa existe em si. |\n| LLULL.Q.K1.IN_ALIO_RECIPROCUM | K1 | Quomodo est in alio et alia in ipso? | Interroga participação, inerência recíproca, aplicação e relação de continente/contido. |\n| LLULL.Q.K1.TOTUM_PARTES | K1 | Quomodo est in partibus et partes in toto? | Interroga estrutura todo–partes e integração composicional. |\n| LLULL.Q.K1.SIMILITUDO_AD_EXTRA | K1 | Quomodo transmittit similitudinem extra? | Interroga exteriorização, expressão, emissão, significação ou efeito externo. |\n| LLULL.Q.K2.CONSTITUTIVUM | K2 | Cum quo est pars totius? | Interroga princípios, partes ou instrumentos constitutivos. |\n| LLULL.Q.K2.AD_ALIA | K2 | Cum quo cognoscit vel agit ad alia? | Interroga meio ou instrumento de cognição e operação ad extra. |\n| LLULL.Q.K2.UNIVERSALE_PARTICULARE | K2 | Cum quo est universale et particulare? | Interroga instrumentos universais e particulares e seu alcance. |\n| LLULL.Q.K2.TRANSMISSIO | K2 | Cum quo transmittit similitudinem? | Interroga suporte, instrumento ou meio de transmissão exterior. |\n\n\n### IV.2 Composite H/I generation\n\n```text\nH = Quando × {C1–C4, D1–D3, K1.1–K1.4, K2.1–K2.4} = 15\nI = Ubi × {C1–C4, D1–D3, K1.1–K1.4, K2.1–K2.4} = 15\n```\n\n| Carrier | Count | Semantic law |\n|---|---|---|\n| H | 15 | Temporalize the selected base species. |\n| I | 15 | Localize the selected base species. |\n\n\n### IV.3 Quality correction\n\n```text\nLLULL.Q.G.PROPRIA\n ≠ merely “intrinsic quality”\n = qualitas/passio propria, connatural power or act, superior causal rank\n\nLLULL.Q.G.APPROPRIATA\n ≠ merely “external quality”\n = received/acquired/habituated quality or passio, inferior causal rank\n\nREGULA G ≠ ARISTOTELIAN CATEGORY QUALITAS\n```\n\n## V. Universal T registry — 27 local species\n\n| ID | Principle | Species | Source order | Analytic order | Discriminator |\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n| LLULL.T.TB.SENS_SENS | DIFFERENTIA | sensível ↔ sensível | 1 | 3 | DOMINIUM_RELATORUM |\n| LLULL.T.TB.SENS_INTEL | DIFFERENTIA | sensível ↔ intelectual | 2 | 2 | DOMINIUM_RELATORUM |\n| LLULL.T.TB.INTEL_INTEL | DIFFERENTIA | intelectual ↔ intelectual | 3 | 1 | DOMINIUM_RELATORUM |\n| LLULL.T.TC.SENS_SENS | CONCORDANTIA | sensível ↔ sensível | 1 | 3 | DOMINIUM_RELATORUM |\n| LLULL.T.TC.SENS_INTEL | CONCORDANTIA | sensível ↔ intelectual | 2 | 2 | DOMINIUM_RELATORUM |\n| LLULL.T.TC.INTEL_INTEL | CONCORDANTIA | intelectual ↔ intelectual | 3 | 1 | DOMINIUM_RELATORUM |\n| LLULL.T.TD.SENS_SENS | CONTRARIETAS | sensível ↔ sensível | 1 | 3 | DOMINIUM_RELATORUM |\n| LLULL.T.TD.SENS_INTEL | CONTRARIETAS | sensível ↔ intelectual | 2 | 2 | DOMINIUM_RELATORUM |\n| LLULL.T.TD.INTEL_INTEL | CONTRARIETAS | intelectual ↔ intelectual | 3 | 1 | DOMINIUM_RELATORUM |\n| LLULL.T.TE.CAUSA | PRINCIPIUM | causa: eficiente, material, formal ou final; princípio substancial | 1 | 1 | MODUS_PRINCIPIANDI |\n| LLULL.T.TE.QUANTITAS | PRINCIPIUM | quantidade como princípio acidental | 2 | 2 | MODUS_PRINCIPIANDI |\n| LLULL.T.TE.TEMPUS | PRINCIPIUM | tempo como princípio acidental | 3 | 3 | MODUS_PRINCIPIANDI |\n| LLULL.T.TF.CONIUNCTIO | MEDIUM | meio de conjunção | 1 | 1 | MODUS_MEDIANDI |\n| LLULL.T.TF.MENSURATIO | MEDIUM | meio de medida/proporção | 2 | 2 | MODUS_MEDIANDI |\n| LLULL.T.TF.INTER_EXTREMA | MEDIUM | meio entre extremos | 3 | 3 | MODUS_MEDIANDI |\n| LLULL.T.TG.PRIVATIO | FINIS | fim por privação ou cessação | 1 | 3 | MODUS_TERMINANDI |\n| LLULL.T.TG.TERMINATIO | FINIS | fim como limite ou termo | 2 | 2 | MODUS_TERMINANDI |\n| LLULL.T.TG.PERFECTIO | FINIS | fim como perfeição ou causa final realizada | 3 | 1 | MODUS_TERMINANDI |\n| LLULL.T.TH.SUB_SUB | MAIORITAS | substância ↔ substância | 1 | 1 | STATUS_ONTOLOGICUS_RELATORUM |\n| LLULL.T.TH.SUB_ACC | MAIORITAS | substância ↔ acidente | 2 | 2 | STATUS_ONTOLOGICUS_RELATORUM |\n| LLULL.T.TH.ACC_ACC | MAIORITAS | acidente ↔ acidente | 3 | 3 | STATUS_ONTOLOGICUS_RELATORUM |\n| LLULL.T.TI.SUB_SUB | AEQUALITAS | substância ↔ substância | 1 | 1 | STATUS_ONTOLOGICUS_RELATORUM |\n| LLULL.T.TI.SUB_ACC | AEQUALITAS | substância ↔ acidente | 2 | 2 | STATUS_ONTOLOGICUS_RELATORUM |\n| LLULL.T.TI.ACC_ACC | AEQUALITAS | acidente ↔ acidente | 3 | 3 | STATUS_ONTOLOGICUS_RELATORUM |\n| LLULL.T.TK.SUB_SUB | MINORITAS | substância ↔ substância | 1 | 1 | STATUS_ONTOLOGICUS_RELATORUM |\n| LLULL.T.TK.SUB_ACC | MINORITAS | substância ↔ acidente | 2 | 2 | STATUS_ONTOLOGICUS_RELATORUM |\n| LLULL.T.TK.ACC_ACC | MINORITAS | acidente ↔ acidente | 3 | 3 | STATUS_ONTOLOGICUS_RELATORUM |\n\n\nThe three slots are **local species**, not one uniform global hierarchy:\n\n```text\nT(BCD): domain of relata\nT(EFG): modes of beginning, mediation and end\nT(HIK): substance/accident status of relata\n```\n\n`source_order` and `analytic_order` remain separate. Semantic IDs, not ordinals, preserve identity.\n\n## VI. Donatian nine-slot adaptation\n\n| Slot | ID | Parent | Status | Definition |\n|---|---|---|---|---|\n| B | DON.PARS.NOMEN_SUBSTANTIVUM | DON.PARS.NOMEN | USER_AUTHORITY_ADAPTATION | AGLA subdivision of Donatus’s nomen: a nominal form taken substantivally as naming a body, thing, subject, referent or intelligible form. It is not a ninth part in Donatus. |\n| C | DON.PARS.NOMEN_ADIECTIVUM | DON.PARS.NOMEN | USER_AUTHORITY_ADAPTATION | AGLA subdivision of Donatus’s nomen: a nominal form taken as determining, qualifying or contracting another nominal subject. It is not a ninth part in Donatus. |\n| D | DON.PARS.PRONOMEN | — | DIRECT_DONATUS | Part of speech placed for a noun, nearly signifying as much and sometimes receiving person. |\n| E | DON.PARS.VERBUM | — | DIRECT_DONATUS | Part of speech with tense and person, without case, signifying action, passion or neutral mode. |\n| F | DON.PARS.ADVERBIUM | — | DIRECT_DONATUS | Part of speech added to the verb to explain and complete its signification. |\n| G | DON.PARS.PARTICIPIUM | — | DIRECT_DONATUS | Part of speech taking part from noun and verb. |\n| H | DON.PARS.CONIUNCTIO | — | DIRECT_DONATUS | Part of speech joining and ordering an utterance. |\n| I | DON.PARS.PRAEPOSITIO | — | DIRECT_DONATUS | Part of speech placed before others to complete, alter or diminish their signification. |\n| K | DON.PARS.INTERIECTIO | — | DIRECT_DONATUS | Part of speech signifying an affection of mind through an unformed voice. |\n\n\n```text\nDON.PARS.NOMEN\n → B NOMEN SUBSTANTIVUM\n → C NOMEN ADIECTIVUM\n```\n\nThe split is explicit AGLA/user-authorized adaptation. Donatus still supplies eight parts, not nine.\n\n## VII. Part-specific grammatical accidents\n\n| Accident ID | Applies to | Value class | Values |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| DON.ACCIDENS.NOMEN.QUALITAS | DON.PARS.NOMEN_SUBSTANTIVUM, DON.PARS.NOMEN_ADIECTIVUM | QUALITATES | DON.VALUE.QUALITAS_NOMINIS.PROPRIUM, DON.VALUE.QUALITAS_NOMINIS.APPELLATIVUM |\n| DON.ACCIDENS.NOMEN.COMPARATIO | DON.PARS.NOMEN_SUBSTANTIVUM, DON.PARS.NOMEN_ADIECTIVUM | GRADUS | DON.GRADUS.POSITIVUS, DON.GRADUS.COMPARATIVUS, DON.GRADUS.SUPERLATIVUS |\n| DON.ACCIDENS.NOMEN.GENUS | DON.PARS.NOMEN_SUBSTANTIVUM, DON.PARS.NOMEN_ADIECTIVUM | GENERA | DON.GENUS.MASCULINUM, DON.GENUS.FEMININUM, DON.GENUS.NEUTRUM, DON.GENUS.COMMUNE, DON.GENUS.OMNE, DON.GENUS.EPICOENON |\n| DON.ACCIDENS.NOMEN.NUMERUS | DON.PARS.NOMEN_SUBSTANTIVUM, DON.PARS.NOMEN_ADIECTIVUM | NUMERI | DON.VALUE.NUMERUS.SINGULARIS, DON.VALUE.NUMERUS.PLURALIS |\n| DON.ACCIDENS.NOMEN.FIGURA | DON.PARS.NOMEN_SUBSTANTIVUM, DON.PARS.NOMEN_ADIECTIVUM | FIGURAE | DON.VALUE.FIGURA.SIMPLEX, DON.VALUE.FIGURA.COMPOSITA |\n| DON.ACCIDENS.NOMEN.CASUS | DON.PARS.NOMEN_SUBSTANTIVUM, DON.PARS.NOMEN_ADIECTIVUM | CASUS | DON.VALUE.CASUS.NOMINATIVUS, DON.VALUE.CASUS.GENETIVUS, DON.VALUE.CASUS.DATIVUS, DON.VALUE.CASUS.ACCUSATIVUS, DON.VALUE.CASUS.VOCATIVUS, DON.VALUE.CASUS.ABLATIVUS |\n| DON.ACCIDENS.PRONOMEN.QUALITAS | DON.PARS.PRONOMEN | QUALITATES | DON.VALUE.QUALITAS_PRONOMINIS.FINITA, DON.VALUE.QUALITAS_PRONOMINIS.INFINITA |\n| DON.ACCIDENS.PRONOMEN.GENUS | DON.PARS.PRONOMEN | GENERA | DON.GENUS.MASCULINUM, DON.GENUS.FEMININUM, DON.GENUS.NEUTRUM, DON.GENUS.COMMUNE, DON.GENUS.OMNE |\n| DON.ACCIDENS.PRONOMEN.NUMERUS | DON.PARS.PRONOMEN | NUMERI | DON.VALUE.NUMERUS.SINGULARIS, DON.VALUE.NUMERUS.PLURALIS |\n| DON.ACCIDENS.PRONOMEN.FIGURA | DON.PARS.PRONOMEN | FIGURAE | DON.VALUE.FIGURA.SIMPLEX, DON.VALUE.FIGURA.COMPOSITA |\n| DON.ACCIDENS.PRONOMEN.PERSONA | DON.PARS.PRONOMEN | PERSONAE | DON.VALUE.PERSONA.PRIMA, DON.VALUE.PERSONA.SECUNDA, DON.VALUE.PERSONA.TERTIA |\n| DON.ACCIDENS.PRONOMEN.CASUS | DON.PARS.PRONOMEN | CASUS | DON.VALUE.CASUS.NOMINATIVUS, DON.VALUE.CASUS.GENETIVUS, DON.VALUE.CASUS.DATIVUS, DON.VALUE.CASUS.ACCUSATIVUS, DON.VALUE.CASUS.VOCATIVUS, DON.VALUE.CASUS.ABLATIVUS |\n| DON.ACCIDENS.VERBUM.QUALITAS | DON.PARS.VERBUM | MODI_ET_FORMAE | DON.VALUE.MODUS.INDICATIVUS, DON.VALUE.MODUS.IMPERATIVUS, DON.VALUE.MODUS.OPTATIVUS, DON.VALUE.MODUS.CONIUNCTIVUS, DON.VALUE.MODUS.INFINITIVUS, DON.VALUE.MODUS.IMPERSONALIS, DON.VALUE.FORMA.PERFECTA, DON.VALUE.FORMA.MEDITATIVA, DON.VALUE.FORMA.FREQUENTATIVA, DON.VALUE.FORMA.INCHOATIVA |\n| DON.ACCIDENS.VERBUM.CONIUGATIO | DON.PARS.VERBUM | CONIUGATIONES | DON.VALUE.CONIUGATIO.PRIMA, DON.VALUE.CONIUGATIO.SECUNDA, DON.VALUE.CONIUGATIO.TERTIA |\n| DON.ACCIDENS.VERBUM.GENUS | DON.PARS.VERBUM | GENERA_VERBI | DON.VALUE.GENUS_VERBI.ACTIVUM, DON.VALUE.GENUS_VERBI.PASSIVUM, DON.VALUE.GENUS_VERBI.NEUTRUM, DON.VALUE.GENUS_VERBI.DEPONENS, DON.VALUE.GENUS_VERBI.COMMUNE |\n| DON.ACCIDENS.VERBUM.NUMERUS | DON.PARS.VERBUM | NUMERI | DON.VALUE.NUMERUS.SINGULARIS, DON.VALUE.NUMERUS.PLURALIS |\n| DON.ACCIDENS.VERBUM.FIGURA | DON.PARS.VERBUM | FIGURAE | DON.VALUE.FIGURA.SIMPLEX, DON.VALUE.FIGURA.COMPOSITA |\n| DON.ACCIDENS.VERBUM.TEMPUS | DON.PARS.VERBUM | TEMPORA | DON.VALUE.TEMPUS.PRAESENS, DON.VALUE.TEMPUS.PRAETERITUM, DON.VALUE.TEMPUS.FUTURUM |\n| DON.ACCIDENS.VERBUM.PERSONA | DON.PARS.VERBUM | PERSONAE | DON.VALUE.PERSONA.PRIMA, DON.VALUE.PERSONA.SECUNDA, DON.VALUE.PERSONA.TERTIA |\n| DON.ACCIDENS.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO | DON.PARS.ADVERBIUM | SIGNIFICATIONES | DON.VALUE.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.LOCUS, DON.VALUE.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.TEMPUS, DON.VALUE.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.NUMERUS, DON.VALUE.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.NEGATIO, DON.VALUE.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.AFFIRMATIO, DON.VALUE.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.DEMONSTRATIO, DON.VALUE.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.OPTATIO, DON.VALUE.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.HORTATIO, DON.VALUE.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.ORDO, DON.VALUE.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.INTERROGATIO, DON.VALUE.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.SIMILITUDO, DON.VALUE.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.QUALITAS, DON.VALUE.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.QUANTITAS, DON.VALUE.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.DUBITATIO, DON.VALUE.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.PERSONA, DON.VALUE.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.VOCATIO, DON.VALUE.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.RESPONSIO, DON.VALUE.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.SEPARATIO, DON.VALUE.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.IURATIO, DON.VALUE.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.ELECTIO, DON.VALUE.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.CONGREGATIO, DON.VALUE.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.PROHIBITIO, DON.VALUE.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.EVENTUS, DON.VALUE.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.COMPARATIO |\n| DON.ACCIDENS.ADVERBIUM.COMPARATIO | DON.PARS.ADVERBIUM | GRADUS | DON.GRADUS.POSITIVUS, DON.GRADUS.COMPARATIVUS, DON.GRADUS.SUPERLATIVUS |\n| DON.ACCIDENS.ADVERBIUM.FIGURA | DON.PARS.ADVERBIUM | FIGURAE | DON.VALUE.FIGURA.SIMPLEX, DON.VALUE.FIGURA.COMPOSITA |\n| DON.ACCIDENS.PARTICIPIUM.GENUS | DON.PARS.PARTICIPIUM | GENERA | DON.GENUS.MASCULINUM, DON.GENUS.FEMININUM, DON.GENUS.NEUTRUM, DON.GENUS.COMMUNE |\n| DON.ACCIDENS.PARTICIPIUM.CASUS | DON.PARS.PARTICIPIUM | CASUS | DON.VALUE.CASUS.NOMINATIVUS, DON.VALUE.CASUS.GENETIVUS, DON.VALUE.CASUS.DATIVUS, DON.VALUE.CASUS.ACCUSATIVUS, DON.VALUE.CASUS.VOCATIVUS, DON.VALUE.CASUS.ABLATIVUS |\n| DON.ACCIDENS.PARTICIPIUM.TEMPUS | DON.PARS.PARTICIPIUM | TEMPORA | DON.VALUE.TEMPUS.PRAESENS, DON.VALUE.TEMPUS.PRAETERITUM, DON.VALUE.TEMPUS.FUTURUM |\n| DON.ACCIDENS.PARTICIPIUM.SIGNIFICATIO | DON.PARS.PARTICIPIUM | SIGNIFICATIONES | DON.VALUE.PARTICIPIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.ACTIVA, DON.VALUE.PARTICIPIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.PASSIVA, DON.VALUE.PARTICIPIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.NEUTRA, DON.VALUE.PARTICIPIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.DEPONENS, DON.VALUE.PARTICIPIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.COMMUNIS |\n| DON.ACCIDENS.PARTICIPIUM.NUMERUS | DON.PARS.PARTICIPIUM | NUMERI | DON.VALUE.NUMERUS.SINGULARIS, DON.VALUE.NUMERUS.PLURALIS |\n| DON.ACCIDENS.PARTICIPIUM.FIGURA | DON.PARS.PARTICIPIUM | FIGURAE | DON.VALUE.FIGURA.SIMPLEX, DON.VALUE.FIGURA.COMPOSITA |\n| DON.ACCIDENS.CONIUNCTIO.POTESTAS | DON.PARS.CONIUNCTIO | POTESTATES | DON.VALUE.CONIUNCTIO.POTESTAS.COPULATIVA, DON.VALUE.CONIUNCTIO.POTESTAS.DISIUNCTIVA, DON.VALUE.CONIUNCTIO.POTESTAS.EXPLETIVA, DON.VALUE.CONIUNCTIO.POTESTAS.CAUSALIS, DON.VALUE.CONIUNCTIO.POTESTAS.RATIONALIS |\n| DON.ACCIDENS.CONIUNCTIO.FIGURA | DON.PARS.CONIUNCTIO | FIGURAE | DON.VALUE.FIGURA.SIMPLEX, DON.VALUE.FIGURA.COMPOSITA |\n| DON.ACCIDENS.CONIUNCTIO.ORDO | DON.PARS.CONIUNCTIO | ORDINES | DON.VALUE.CONIUNCTIO.ORDO.PRAEPOSITIVUS, DON.VALUE.CONIUNCTIO.ORDO.SUBIUNCTIVUS, DON.VALUE.CONIUNCTIO.ORDO.COMMUNIS |\n| DON.ACCIDENS.PRAEPOSITIO.CASUS | DON.PARS.PRAEPOSITIO | CASUS | DON.VALUE.PRAEPOSITIO.CASUS.ACCUSATIVUS, DON.VALUE.PRAEPOSITIO.CASUS.ABLATIVUS, DON.VALUE.PRAEPOSITIO.CASUS.UTERQUE |\n| DON.ACCIDENS.INTERIECTIO.SIGNIFICATIO | DON.PARS.INTERIECTIO | SIGNIFICATIONES | DON.VALUE.INTERIECTIO.SIGNIFICATIO.LAETITIA, DON.VALUE.INTERIECTIO.SIGNIFICATIO.DOLOR, DON.VALUE.INTERIECTIO.SIGNIFICATIO.ADMIRATIO, DON.VALUE.INTERIECTIO.SIGNIFICATIO.TIMOR |\n\n\n### VII.1 Dependency graph\n\n- **DON.DEP.COMPARATIO_ADMISSIBILITY** — IF `[\u0027DON.ACCIDENS.NOMEN.QUALITAS=APPELLATIVUM\u0027, \u0027SIGNIFICATIO∈{QUALITAS,QUANTITAS}\u0027]` → `DON.ACCIDENS.NOMEN.COMPARATIO=ADMISSIBLE` (DIRECT_DONATUS).\n- **DON.DEP.COMPARATIVUS_ABLATIVE** — IF `[\u0027DON.GRADUS.COMPARATIVUS\u0027]` → `COMPLEMENT_CASE=ABLATIVUS_SINE_PRAEPOSITIONE` (DIRECT_DONATUS).\n- **DON.DEP.SUPERLATIVUS_GENITIVE** — IF `[\u0027DON.GRADUS.SUPERLATIVUS\u0027]` → `COMPARISON_DOMAIN=GENETIVUS_PLURALIS` (DIRECT_DONATUS).\n- **DON.DEP.AGREEMENT** — IF `[\u0027TWO_OR_MORE_AGREEING_NOMINAL_FORMS\u0027]` → `MATCH(GENUS,NUMERUS,CASUS)` (STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION).\n- **DON.DEP.PREPOSITION_GOVERNMENT** — IF `[\u0027DON.PARS.PRAEPOSITIO\u0027]` → `GOVERNS(CASUS)` (DIRECT_DONATUS).\n- **DON.DEP.PARTICIPLE_INHERITANCE** — IF `[\u0027DON.PARS.PARTICIPIUM\u0027]` → `[\u0027FROM_NOMEN: GENUS,CASUS\u0027, \u0027FROM_VERBUM: TEMPUS,SIGNIFICATIO\u0027, \u0027FROM_BOTH: NUMERUS,FIGURA\u0027]` (DIRECT_DONATUS).\n\n\nThe accidents are not six free columns. They form conditional structures. Comparison depends on appellative status and qualitative/quantitative signification; comparative and superlative degrees impose case-government constraints.\n\n## VIII. Llull’s explicit grammatical applications\n\n| Object | Target(s) | Status | Rationale |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| DON.PARS.NOMEN | LLULL.PRINCIPIA | DIRECT_LLULL_AGU_ARTICLE_88 | Goodness, greatness and other principles are nouns. |\n| DON.PARS.PRONOMEN | LLULL.PRINCIPIA | DIRECT_LLULL_AGU_ARTICLE_88 | Pronouns stand for nouns; the principles are nouns. |\n| DON.PARS.VERBUM | LLULL.Q.C.COESSENTIALIA_IN_SE | DIRECT_LLULL_AGU_ARTICLE_88 | Verbs signify act, illustrated by bonificare and magnificare. |\n| DON.PARS.PARTICIPIUM | LLULL.Q.C.COESSENTIALIA_IN_SE | DIRECT_LLULL_AGU_ARTICLE_88 | Participles expose active and passive correlatives: bonificans/bonificatum. |\n| DON.PARS.CONIUNCTIO | LLULL.Q.C.COESSENTIALIA_IN_SE | DIRECT_LLULL_AGU_ARTICLE_88 | The act joins agent and patient as conjunction joins diverse words or phrases. |\n| DON.PARS.ADVERBIUM | LLULL.Q.C.COESSENTIALIA_IN_SE | DIRECT_LLULL_AGU_ARTICLE_88 | The adverb qualifies the act: bonificans bene bonificat bonificatum. |\n| DON.PARS.PRAEPOSITIO | LLULL.Q.C.QUID_HABEAT_IN_ALIO, LLULL.Q.K2.AD_ALIA | DIRECT_LLULL_AGU_ARTICLE_88 | The preposition is an instrument bringing a case into act. |\n| DON.PARS.INTERIECTIO | LLULL.A.VOLUNTAS | DIRECT_LLULL_AGU_ARTICLE_88 | Joy and sadness are primarily expressed by will. |\n| DON.VALUE.CASUS.NOMINATIVUS | LLULL.Q.C.COESSENTIALIA_IN_SE | DIRECT_LLULL_AGU_ARTICLE_88 | Mapped to the active correlative/originating bonifier. |\n| DON.VALUE.CASUS.GENETIVUS | LLULL.Q.C.COESSENTIALIA_IN_SE, LLULL.Q.D.PERTINENTIA | DIRECT_LLULL_AGU_ARTICLE_88 | Dependency on nominative and possession. |\n| DON.VALUE.CASUS.DATIVUS | LLULL.Q.C.COESSENTIALIA_IN_SE | DIRECT_LLULL_AGU_ARTICLE_88 | Mapped to the generated passive correlative / recipient. |\n| DON.VALUE.CASUS.ACCUSATIVUS | LLULL.Q.C.QUID_SIT_IN_ALIO | DIRECT_LLULL_AGU_ARTICLE_88 | The agent’s act terminates in its passive object. |\n| DON.VALUE.CASUS.VOCATIVUS | LLULL.Q.C.QUID_HABEAT_IN_ALIO, LLULL.Q.B.AFFIRMATIO | DIRECT_LLULL_AGU_ARTICLE_88 | Calling takes an object; rule B is also applicable. |\n| DON.VALUE.CASUS.ABLATIVUS | LLULL.Q.C.COESSENTIALIA_IN_SE | DIRECT_LLULL_AGU_ARTICLE_88 | Mapped to the original causal essence of correlatives. |\n| LLULL.GRAM.MODUS.CONIUGATIO | LLULL.Q.C.COESSENTIALIA_IN_SE | DIRECT_LLULL_AGU_ARTICLE_88 | Conjugated forms descend from a principle across person, tense and mood. |\n| LLULL.GRAM.MODUS.DECLINATIO | LLULL.Q.C.COESSENTIALIA_IN_SE | DIRECT_LLULL_AGU_ARTICLE_88 | Cases descend from an originating form as correlatives descend from their source. |\n| LLULL.GRAM.MODUS.GENUS | LLULL.Q.C.COESSENTIALIA_IN_SE | DIRECT_LLULL_AGU_ARTICLE_88 | Masculine, feminine and neuter are analogized to agent, patient and act. |\n| LLULL.GRAM.MODUS.REGIMEN | LLULL.T.TH.SUB_SUB, LLULL.T.TH.SUB_ACC, LLULL.T.TK.SUB_SUB, LLULL.T.TK.SUB_ACC | DIRECT_LLULL_AGU_ARTICLE_88 | Governance is expressed through greater power/virtue in governor and lesser in governed. |\n| LLULL.GRAM.MODUS.CONSTRUCTIO | LLULL.T.TE.CAUSA, LLULL.T.TF.CONIUNCTIO, LLULL.T.TG.PERFECTIO | DIRECT_LLULL_AGU_ARTICLE_88 | Construction follows due order of beginning, middle and end. |\n| LLULL.GRAM.MODUS.ORTHOGRAPHIA | LLULL.Q.K1.IN_SE, LLULL.Q.K1.IN_ALIO_RECIPROCUM, LLULL.Q.K1.TOTUM_PARTES, LLULL.Q.K1.SIMILITUDO_AD_EXTRA | DIRECT_LLULL_AGU_ARTICLE_88 | Spelling is mapped to all four species of modality. |\n| LLULL.GRAM.MODUS.FIGURAE | LLULL.T.TC.INTEL_INTEL, LLULL.T.TD.INTEL_INTEL | DIRECT_LLULL_AGU_ARTICLE_88 | Figures of speech are judged by concordance or contrariety with grammar. |\n\n\nThis direct block is decisive: the specialized Trivium projections do not need to force a same-letter diagonal. Llull himself concentrates verb, participle, conjunction and adverb in `C2`, maps preposition to `C4 + K2`, and gives case/conjugation/declension/gender/government/construction/spelling/figures their own species-level applications.\n\n## IX. Specialized Q profile — grammatical layer\n\n### B — Nomen substantivum\n\n| Q species | Affinity | Status | Rationale |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| LLULL.Q.C.QUID_SIT | PRIMARY_STRUCTURAL | STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION | Defines the nominally posited subject or form. |\n| LLULL.Q.C.COESSENTIALIA_IN_SE | PRIMARY_STRUCTURAL | STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION | Interrogates the constitution of what the substantive names. |\n| LLULL.Q.B.AFFIRMATIO | MNEMONIC_DIAGONAL | USER_AUTHORITY | A substantive can serve as the first nominal posit whose being/admissibility is tested; not its exhaustive definition. |\n\n\n### C — Nomen adiectivum\n\n| Q species | Affinity | Status | Rationale |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| LLULL.Q.C.QUID_SIT | PRIMARY_STRUCTURAL | USER_AUTHORITY_PLUS_DERIVATION | Interrogates the universal or intelligible form signified by the adjective. |\n| LLULL.Q.C.QUID_SIT_IN_ALIO | PRIMARY_STRUCTURAL | STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION | Interrogates the form as contracted/predicated in a subject. |\n| LLULL.Q.C.QUID_HABEAT_IN_ALIO | PRIMARY_STRUCTURAL | STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION | Interrogates operations or properties of the form in the subject. |\n| LLULL.Q.G.PROPRIA | DIAGNOSTIC | STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION | Discriminates whether attribution is proper. |\n| LLULL.Q.G.APPROPRIATA | DIAGNOSTIC | STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION | Discriminates whether attribution is appropriated/acquired. |\n\n\n### D — Pronomen\n\n| Q species | Affinity | Status | Rationale |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| LLULL.Q.D.PERTINENTIA | PRIMARY_STRUCTURAL | STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION | Anchors reference, antecedent, person and belonging. |\n| LLULL.Q.C.QUID_SIT_IN_ALIO | SECONDARY_FUNCTIONAL | STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION | Tracks the same nominal content under another expression/context. |\n\n\n### E — Verbum\n\n| Q species | Affinity | Status | Rationale |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| LLULL.Q.C.COESSENTIALIA_IN_SE | DIRECT_TEXT | DIRECT_LLULL_AGU_ARTICLE_88 | Verb signifies the correlative act. |\n| LLULL.Q.C.QUID_HABEAT_IN_ALIO | SECONDARY_FUNCTIONAL | STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION | Interrogates the act as operating in another. |\n| LLULL.Q.H.C.COESSENTIALIA_IN_SE | CONDITIONAL | STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION | Temporalizes the verbal act. |\n| LLULL.Q.E.CAUSA_FINALIS | CONDITIONAL | STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION | Interrogates the end of the act; verb is not identical with Quare. |\n\n\n### F — Adverbium\n\n| Q species | Affinity | Status | Rationale |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| LLULL.Q.C.COESSENTIALIA_IN_SE | DIRECT_TEXT | DIRECT_LLULL_AGU_ARTICLE_88 | Adverb qualifies how the correlative act is carried out. |\n| LLULL.Q.F.CONTINUA | CONDITIONAL | STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION | Activated for degree, extension or intensity adverbs. |\n| LLULL.Q.F.DISCRETA | CONDITIONAL | STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION | Activated for number/count adverbs. |\n| LLULL.Q.G.PROPRIA | CONDITIONAL | STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION | Activated for qualitative adverbs. |\n| LLULL.Q.H.C.QUID_SIT_IN_ALIO | CONDITIONAL | STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION | Activated for temporal adverbs. |\n| LLULL.Q.I.C.QUID_SIT_IN_ALIO | CONDITIONAL | STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION | Activated for locative adverbs. |\n| LLULL.Q.K1.IN_SE | CONDITIONAL | STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION | Activated for modal adverbs. |\n\n\n### G — Participium\n\n| Q species | Affinity | Status | Rationale |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| LLULL.Q.C.COESSENTIALIA_IN_SE | DIRECT_TEXT | DIRECT_LLULL_AGU_ARTICLE_88 | Participles signify active/passive correlatives. |\n| LLULL.Q.G.PROPRIA | SECONDARY_FUNCTIONAL | STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION | Tests act/state as proper quality. |\n| LLULL.Q.G.APPROPRIATA | SECONDARY_FUNCTIONAL | STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION | Tests received/acquired state. |\n| LLULL.Q.H.C.COESSENTIALIA_IN_SE | SECONDARY_FUNCTIONAL | STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION | Temporal/aspectual qualification. |\n\n\n### H — Coniunctio\n\n| Q species | Affinity | Status | Rationale |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| LLULL.Q.C.COESSENTIALIA_IN_SE | DIRECT_TEXT | DIRECT_LLULL_AGU_ARTICLE_88 | Conjunction analogized to the act joining agent and patient. |\n\n\n### I — Praepositio\n\n| Q species | Affinity | Status | Rationale |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| LLULL.Q.C.QUID_HABEAT_IN_ALIO | DIRECT_TEXT | DIRECT_LLULL_AGU_ARTICLE_88 | Preposition brings a case into act in another construction. |\n| LLULL.Q.K2.AD_ALIA | DIRECT_TEXT | DIRECT_LLULL_AGU_ARTICLE_88 | Preposition is treated as an instrument. |\n| LLULL.Q.I.C.QUID_SIT_IN_ALIO | CONDITIONAL | STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION | Activated for locative/directional prepositions. |\n\n\n### K — Interiectio\n\n| Q species | Affinity | Status | Rationale |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| LLULL.Q.K1.SIMILITUDO_AD_EXTRA | SECONDARY_FUNCTIONAL | STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION | Externalizes an internal affection. |\n| LLULL.Q.G.PROPRIA | CONDITIONAL | STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION | Tests whether expressed affect is proper. |\n| LLULL.Q.G.APPROPRIATA | CONDITIONAL | STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION | Tests whether expressed affect is appropriated/acquired. |\n\n\n\n`Q_TRIVIUM` stores entry points and conditions. It does not cancel full `×Q` traversal.\n\n## X. Specialized T profile — grammatical layer\n\n### B — Nomen substantivum\n\n| T species | Affinity | Status | Rationale |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| LLULL.T.TB.INTEL_INTEL | PRIMARY_STRUCTURAL | STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION | Distinguishes nominal classes/forms at the intelligible level. |\n| LLULL.T.TC.INTEL_INTEL | SECONDARY_FUNCTIONAL | STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION | Concordance among nominal concepts under a shared ratio. |\n\n\n### C — Nomen adiectivum\n\n| T species | Affinity | Status | Rationale |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| LLULL.T.TB.SENS_INTEL | PRIMARY_STRUCTURAL | STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION | Distinguishes adjective-as-form from its sensible token or subject instantiation. |\n| LLULL.T.TC.SENS_INTEL | PRIMARY_STRUCTURAL | STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION | Concordance between intelligible quality/form and concrete bearer. |\n| LLULL.T.TH.SUB_ACC | CONDITIONAL | STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION | Compares substance and attributed accident under a declared respectus. |\n\n\n### D — Pronomen\n\n| T species | Affinity | Status | Rationale |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| LLULL.T.TB.SENS_INTEL | SECONDARY_FUNCTIONAL | STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION | Type/reference versus token occurrence. |\n\n\n### E — Verbum\n\n| T species | Affinity | Status | Rationale |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| LLULL.T.TE.CAUSA | PRIMARY_STRUCTURAL | STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION | Action begins from causal principle. |\n| LLULL.T.TF.MENSURATIO | PRIMARY_STRUCTURAL | STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION | Act mediates and measures agent/object or patient. |\n| LLULL.T.TG.PERFECTIO | CONDITIONAL | STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION | Act reaches its intended completion. |\n| LLULL.T.TG.TERMINATIO | CONDITIONAL | STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION | Act terminates without implying perfection. |\n| LLULL.T.TG.PRIVATIO | CONDITIONAL | STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION | Act ceases or fails by privation. |\n\n\n### F — Adverbium\n\n| T species | Affinity | Status | Rationale |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| LLULL.T.TF.MENSURATIO | PRIMARY_STRUCTURAL | STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION | Adverb commonly measures degree or manner of act. |\n| LLULL.T.TE.QUANTITAS | CONDITIONAL | STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION | Quantity/degree adverbs. |\n| LLULL.T.TE.TEMPUS | CONDITIONAL | STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION | Temporal adverbs. |\n\n\n### G — Participium\n\n| T species | Affinity | Status | Rationale |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| LLULL.T.TF.CONIUNCTIO | PRIMARY_STRUCTURAL | STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION | Participates in noun and verb, binding agent/patient to act. |\n| LLULL.T.TF.MENSURATIO | SECONDARY_FUNCTIONAL | STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION | Positions agent/patient under the measured act. |\n| LLULL.T.TG.TERMINATIO | CONDITIONAL | STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION | Resultative/terminative participial state. |\n\n\n### H — Coniunctio\n\n| T species | Affinity | Status | Rationale |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| LLULL.T.TF.CONIUNCTIO | PRIMARY_STRUCTURAL | DIRECT_LLULLIAN_FUNCTIONAL_CONVERGENCE | Direct function-level convergence: joining diverse terms into one construction. |\n| LLULL.T.TC.SENS_SENS | SECONDARY_FUNCTIONAL | STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION | Concrete words/clauses concord in an utterance. |\n\n\n### I — Praepositio\n\n| T species | Affinity | Status | Rationale |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| LLULL.T.TF.CONIUNCTIO | PRIMARY_STRUCTURAL | STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION | Links governed terms. |\n| LLULL.T.TF.INTER_EXTREMA | PRIMARY_STRUCTURAL | STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION | Expresses position, direction or interval between terms. |\n\n\n### K — Interiectio\n\n| T species | Affinity | Status | Rationale |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| LLULL.T.TE.TEMPUS | CONDITIONAL | STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION | Occasion of affective emission. |\n| LLULL.T.TH.ACC_ACC | CONDITIONAL | STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION | Compares intensity of affective accidents. |\n\n\n\nT resolution always requires:\n\n```text\nRELATUM_1\nRELATUM_2\nRELATIO CANDIDATE\nLOCAL SPECIES\nDIRECTION\nRESPECTUS\n```\n\nA grammatical accident never determines the ontological species by itself.\n\n## XI. Aristotle — canonical registry and experimental wheel\n\n\n### XI.1 Canonical ten-category registry\n\n| Order | ID | Label | Definition |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| 1 | ARIST.PRAEDICAMENTUM.SUBSTANTIA | Substantia | What is primarily said to be this thing; bearer not present in a subject in the same way as accidents. |\n| 2 | ARIST.PRAEDICAMENTUM.QUANTITAS | Quantitas | How much; continuous or discrete magnitude/number. |\n| 3 | ARIST.PRAEDICAMENTUM.QUALITAS | Qualitas | What kind; a category of qualification. |\n| 4 | ARIST.PRAEDICAMENTUM.RELATIO | Relatio | What is said with reference to another. |\n| 5 | ARIST.PRAEDICAMENTUM.UBI | Ubi / Locus | Where. |\n| 6 | ARIST.PRAEDICAMENTUM.QUANDO | Quando / Tempus | When. |\n| 7 | ARIST.PRAEDICAMENTUM.SITUS | Situs / Positio | Position or posture. |\n| 8 | ARIST.PRAEDICAMENTUM.HABERE | Habere / Habitus | State of having or being equipped/disposed. |\n| 9 | ARIST.PRAEDICAMENTUM.ACTIO | Actio | Doing or acting. |\n| 10 | ARIST.PRAEDICAMENTUM.PASSIO | Passio | Being affected or acted upon. |\n\n\n### XI.2 User-authorized nine-slot candidate\n\n| Placement | Object | Status | Note |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| PRE | ARIST.PRAEDICAMENTUM.SUBSTANTIA | USER_AUTHORITY_STRUCTURAL_CANDIDATE | Substance is the bearer/reference field. |\n| B | TRIV.LOG.GATE.ACCIDENTALITAS_INHAERENTIA | EXPERIMENTAL_NON_PRAEDICAMENT | Admission gate asking whether/how an accident inheres; not one of Aristotle’s ten categories. |\n| C | ARIST.PRAEDICAMENTUM.HABERE | EXPERIMENTAL_REORDERING | Habitus/Habere. |\n| D | ARIST.PRAEDICAMENTUM.SITUS | EXPERIMENTAL_REORDERING | Position. |\n| E | ARIST.PRAEDICAMENTUM.ACTIO | EXPERIMENTAL_REORDERING | Action. |\n| F | ARIST.PRAEDICAMENTUM.QUANTITAS | STRONG_DIAGONAL | Quantity. |\n| G | ARIST.PRAEDICAMENTUM.QUALITAS | STRONG_DIAGONAL_NON_IDENTITY | Category Qualitas is not universal regula QG. |\n| H | ARIST.PRAEDICAMENTUM.QUANDO | STRONG_DIAGONAL | Time. |\n| I | ARIST.PRAEDICAMENTUM.UBI | STRONG_DIAGONAL | Place. |\n| K | ARIST.PRAEDICAMENTUM.PASSIO | STRUCTURAL_POLARITY | Patient/passive pole; not identical with QK or TK. |\n| T_CENTER | ARIST.PRAEDICAMENTUM.RELATIO | DELEGATED_TO_META_RELATIONAL_REGIME | Aristotelian relation is analyzed through T but is not identical with Regimen T. |\n\n\nThe candidate wheel is a structural experiment, not Aristotle’s historical order. It preserves the ten-category registry separately so the experiment remains reversible.\n\n## XII. Porphyry as logical medium\n\n| ID | Definition | Q profile | T profile |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| PORPH.PRAEDICABILE.GENUS | Predicated of many differing in species in answer to what a thing is. | LLULL.Q.C.QUID_SIT, LLULL.Q.C.QUID_SIT_IN_ALIO, LLULL.Q.F.DISCRETA | LLULL.T.TB.INTEL_INTEL, LLULL.T.TC.INTEL_INTEL |\n| PORPH.PRAEDICABILE.SPECIES | Predicated of many differing in number in answer to what a thing is. | LLULL.Q.C.QUID_SIT, LLULL.Q.C.QUID_SIT_IN_ALIO, LLULL.Q.F.DISCRETA | LLULL.T.TB.INTEL_INTEL, LLULL.T.TC.INTEL_INTEL |\n| PORPH.PRAEDICABILE.DIFFERENTIA | Predicated of many differing in species in answer to what kind; specific difference contributes to essence. | LLULL.Q.C.QUID_SIT, LLULL.Q.G.PROPRIA | LLULL.T.TB.INTEL_INTEL |\n| PORPH.PRAEDICABILE.PROPRIUM | In the strict sense, predicated of one species alone, of every individual and always, reciprocally. | LLULL.Q.G.PROPRIA, LLULL.Q.C.QUID_SIT_IN_ALIO, LLULL.Q.C.QUID_HABEAT_IN_ALIO | LLULL.T.TC.INTEL_INTEL, LLULL.T.TI.ACC_ACC |\n| PORPH.PRAEDICABILE.ACCIDENS | Can be present or absent without destruction of the subject; separable or inseparable. | LLULL.Q.G.APPROPRIATA, LLULL.Q.C.QUID_SIT_IN_ALIO, LLULL.Q.C.QUID_HABEAT_IN_ALIO, LLULL.Q.D.PERTINENTIA | LLULL.T.TH.SUB_ACC, LLULL.T.TI.SUB_ACC, LLULL.T.TK.SUB_ACC |\n\n\nPorphyry is not a fourth art of the Trivium. The predicables mediate between grammatical expression and categorial predication:\n\n```text\nFORM OF EXPRESSION\n → MODE OF PREDICATION\n → CATEGORY OF WHAT IS PREDICATED\n```\n\n## XIII. Cross-domain T(BCD) matrix\n\n| Record | Left | Right | Relation | Differentia | Concordantia | Contrariety condition |\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n| TRIV.CROSS.QUALITAS.DON_ARIST | DON.ACCIDENS.NOMEN.QUALITAS | ARIST.PRAEDICAMENTUM.QUALITAS | TB | Donatian qualitas distinguishes proprium/appellativum; Aristotelian qualitas is a category of qualification. | Both classify a way in which a term or bearer is qualified only under explicit mediation. | Collapsing the two produces false lexical-to-ontological inference. |\n| TRIV.CROSS.GENUS.DON_PORPH | DON.ACCIDENS.NOMEN.GENUS | PORPH.PRAEDICABILE.GENUS | TB | Grammatical gender versus predicable genus. | Both partition forms under rules, but on different objects and for different ends. | Treating masculine/feminine/neuter as Porphyrian genera. |\n| TRIV.CROSS.ACCIDENS.DON_ARIST | DON.ACCIDENS | ARIST.ACCIDENS | TB | A grammatical accident is an analysis axis of a part of speech; an ontological accident inheres in a subject. | Both express determinations of a carrier without replacing its class/subject. | Inferring ontological accidentality from mere inflection. |\n| TRIV.CROSS.ACCIDENS.DON_PORPH | DON.ACCIDENS | PORPH.PRAEDICABILE.ACCIDENS | TB | Part-specific grammatical feature versus contingent predicable. | Both can vary without changing the higher class under declared conditions. | Using grammatical optionality as proof of Porphyrian accident. |\n| TRIV.CROSS.ADIECTIVUM_QUALITAS | DON.PARS.NOMEN_ADIECTIVUM | ARIST.PRAEDICAMENTUM.QUALITAS | TB_TC | A grammatical class is not an ontological category. | An adjective can signify a quality in a particular predication. | Claiming every adjective is categorial quality or every quality is adjectival. |\n| TRIV.CROSS.ADIECTIVUM_PROPRIUM | DON.PARS.NOMEN_ADIECTIVUM | PORPH.PRAEDICABILE.PROPRIUM | TB_TC | Adjective is a form class; proprium is a logical relation of predicate to species. | An adjective may express a proprium in a proposition. | Reading adjective form as sufficient evidence of proprium. |\n| TRIV.CROSS.ADIECTIVUM_ACCIDENT | DON.PARS.NOMEN_ADIECTIVUM | PORPH.PRAEDICABILE.ACCIDENS | TB_TC | Adjective is grammatical; accident is predicable status. | An adjective may express an accidental predicate. | Assuming all adjectives are accidents. |\n| TRIV.CROSS.COMPARATIO_T | DON.ACCIDENS.NOMEN.COMPARATIO | LLULL.T.HIK | TC | Donatian degree is morphology/grammar; HIK are universal relative operators resolved by relata. | Comparative constructions commonly instantiate maioritas/minoritas through TF.MENSURATIO. | Equating positive with equality, comparative with majority, or superlative with perfection. |\n| TRIV.CROSS.CASUS_RELATIO | DON.ACCIDENS.NOMEN.CASUS | ARIST.PRAEDICAMENTUM.RELATIO | TB_TC | Case marks grammatical role; relation is an ontological category. | Case can linguistically express a relation. | Treating case morphology as the relation itself. |\n| TRIV.CROSS.VERBUM_ACTIO | DON.PARS.VERBUM | ARIST.PRAEDICAMENTUM.ACTIO | TB_TC | Verb is a part of speech; actio is a category. | A verb may signify action. | Ignoring verbs of state/passion or actions expressed nominally. |\n| TRIV.CROSS.PARTICIPIUM_PASSIO | DON.PARS.PARTICIPIUM | ARIST.PRAEDICAMENTUM.PASSIO | TB_TC | Participle is a hybrid grammatical class; passio is a category. | A passive participle may signify being affected. | Equating all participles with passion. |\n| TRIV.CROSS.SUBSTANCE_GENUS | ARIST.PRAEDICAMENTUM.SUBSTANTIA | PORPH.PRAEDICABILE.GENUS | TC | Substance is a category; genus is a predicable relation. | Substance can function as the highest genus in the logical ladder described by Llull. | Treating the predicable genus as itself a substance. |\n| TRIV.CROSS.TOKEN_TYPE | TRIV.GRAM.TYPE | TRIV.GRAM.TOKEN | TB_TC | Class/value is intelligible; token is a sensible occurrence. | The token instantiates or realizes the class under a binding. | Treating token irregularity as automatic destruction of class definition. |\n\n\nThe core matrix unit is not equivalence. It is:\n\n```text\nQUALIFIED RELATION\n + LEVEL\n + RESPECTUS\n + CONDITIONS\n + NON-EQUIVALENCE\n + PROVENANCE\n```\n\n## XIV. Reserved rhetorical port\n\n**Status:** `RESERVED`\n\n```text\nSOURCE_ANCHOR_STATUS: SOURCE_ANCHORED_FUNCTIONS_AVAILABLE\nCARRIER_STATUS: CARRIERS_UNRESOLVED\nEXECUTION_STATUS: CARRIER_DEPENDENT_EXECUTION_DEFERRED\n```\n\n\nSource-bound functions already available:\n\n- speech colored/adorned according to purpose, audience, vocation and subject matter\n- positive/comparative/superlative gradation\n- noun–adjective coloring\n- matter–form articulation\n- beginning–middle–end disposition\n- substantial/necessary versus accidental/contingent emphasis\n- possibility/impossibility and other rule-mediated contrasts\n- proverb/example application\n\n\nFuture source-bound requirements:\n\n- source-bound rhetorical carrier registry\n- rhetorical accident/operation profiles\n- Q_RHET specialization\n- T_RHET resolver\n- T(BCD) cross-art relations at sentence/discourse level\n\n\n**Prohibition:** No complete rhetorical carrier wheel may be inferred in G1–G5.\n\n## XV. Machine-facing record structure\n\n\nThe JSON companion contains:\n\n```text\nsource_ledger\nnamespace_registry\nq_species[54]\nt_species[27]\ndonatian_parent_classes\ndonatian_parts[9]\ndonatian_accidents\ndonatian_values\nllullian_grammar_modes\nauxiliary_objects\ndonatian_dependencies\nllullian_grammar_applications\nq_affinity_records\nt_affinity_records\naristotelian_categories[10]\naristotelian_candidate_wheel\nporphyrian_predicables[5]\ncross_domain_t_bcd_records\nrhetoric_port\nunresolved\n```\n\n## XVI. Validation results\n\n| Check | Result |\n|---|---|\n| Q species count | PASS — 54 |\n| T species count | PASS — 27 |\n| Donatian slots | PASS — 9 with parent NOMEN preserved |\n| Donatian accident packages | PASS — part-specific, not globally flattened |\n| Donatian value registry | PASS — 91 namespaced values |\n| Auxiliary object references | PASS — explicit parent/mode/gate/meta objects |\n| Aristotelian canonical registry | PASS — 10 categories preserved |\n| Experimental wheel disclosure | PASS |\n| Porphyrian registry | PASS — 5 predicables |\n| Q/T non-mutation | PASS |\n| Rhetorical non-invention | PASS — reserved port |\n| Namespace collisions | PASS — qualified registry |\n## XVII. Unresolved register\n\n| ID | Issue | Status | Handling |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| TRIV-UNR-001 | No source-bound complete rhetorical carrier wheel is established. | NONBLOCKING | Preserve TRIV.RHET port and source-bound functions; do not synthesize carriers. |\n| TRIV-UNR-002 | Donatus has eight parts and does not split nomen into separate substantive/adjective parts. | NONBLOCKING | Preserve DON.PARS.NOMEN parent; mark B/C as user-authorized adaptation. |\n| TRIV-UNR-003 | The nine-slot Aristotelian candidate wheel uses a non-predicament accidentalitas/inherentia gate and delegates relatio to T. | NONBLOCKING | Preserve canonical ten-category registry separately; mark candidate wheel experimental and reversible. |\n| TRIV-UNR-004 | Source order and current AGLA analytic g-order diverge for T BCD and TG. | NONBLOCKING | Store semantic IDs plus independent source_order and analytic_order. |\n| TRIV-UNR-005 | K2 semantic labels are verified through an external English translation witness rather than a directly parsed critical Latin edition. | NONBLOCKING | Mark verified translation witness; preserve exact semantic IDs but not critical-edition status. |\n\n## XVIII. Closure\n\n```text\nMATRIX STATUS:\n G1 VALIDATED\n READY FOR ROTAS TRIVIUM DEVELOPMENT\n\nCANONICAL EFFECT:\n NONE\n\nNEXT CLASS:\n ROTAS — structural instantiation\n```\n\n" }, { "role": "ADD_ON_SUPPORT_ARTIFACT", "class": "LIBER_X", "path": "13_STACK_ADD_ONS/Trivium_Stack/LIBER_X_TRIVIUM_MATRIX_RECORDS.json", "bytes": 159622, "sha256": "bddccb19e024534b90c25fc6d77312d95d9abb422d3509db7f1e623209e45cad", "hash_scope": "UTF8_LF_NORMALIZED_CONTENT", "content": "{\n \"meta\": {\n \"artifact_id\": \"LIBER_X_TRIVIUM_MATRIX_RECORDS\",\n \"version\": \"1.0.0\",\n \"status\": \"STABLE_ADD_ON_SUPPORT_DUAL_MODE\",\n \"class\": \"LIBER X / TRIVIUM / NORMALIZED DATASET\",\n \"run_id\": \"TRIVIUM-20260827-AFK-001\",\n \"generated_at\": \"2026-08-27T23:59:00-03:00\",\n \"integration_effect\": \"PRINCIPAL_STACK_COMPOSABLE_ADD_ON_SUPPORT\",\n \"standalone_effect\": \"EMBEDDED_STANDALONE_TRIVIUM_SUPPORT\",\n \"capability_posture\": \"GRAMMATICA_AND_LOGICA_AVAILABLE__RHETORICA_DEFERRED\",\n \"promotion_source\": \"_01_INTEGRATION_CANDIDATES/Trivium_Stack/LIBER_X_TRIVIUM_MATRIX_RECORDS.json@0.1.0\",\n \"purpose\": \"Normalized substrate for dual-mode ROTAS/TENET/AREPO/OPERA/SATOR TRIVIUM use.\",\n \"non_identity\": \"Dataset is not OPERA, ROTAS, TENET, AREPO, SATOR, SYSTEM_INDEX, runtime kernel or canon.\"\n },\n \"source_ledger\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"SRC.USER.SESSION\",\n \"type\": \"USER_AUTHORITY\",\n \"status\": \"PRIMARY_CURRENT_SESSION_AUTHORITY\",\n \"title\": \"Current TRIVIUM development conversation\",\n \"role\": \"Defines goals, Donatian nine-slot adaptation, experimental Aristotelian wheel, operator scope, opt-in AGLA prompt interpretation, human/agent pedagogy, non-hierarchical Trivium amplification, and long-term reproducibility telos.\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"SRC.LOCAL.MAPPING\",\n \"type\": \"UPLOADED_SOURCE_TARGET\",\n \"status\": \"PRIMARY_DEVELOPMENT_SUBSTRATE\",\n \"path\": \"/mnt/data/Mapeamento gramatical luliano.txt\",\n \"title\": \"Mapeamento gramatical luliano\",\n \"role\": \"Session synthesis for AGLA-mediated prompt interpretation, Trivium parsing, T(BCD), provenance, model-prior boundaries, reproducibility, and scholastic-Latin IR.\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"SRC.CAPUT.C\",\n \"type\": \"UPLOADED_SOURCE_TARGET\",\n \"status\": \"ROSETTA_SOURCE_TARGET\",\n \"path\": \"/mnt/data/CAPUT ARS BREVIS C.md\",\n \"title\": \"CAPUT ARS BREVIS C — De Figuris\",\n \"role\": \"Figures A/T, contraction ladder, pairwise/triadic figural structure.\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"SRC.CAPUT.D\",\n \"type\": \"UPLOADED_SOURCE_TARGET\",\n \"status\": \"ROSETTA_SOURCE_TARGET\",\n \"path\": \"/mnt/data/CAPUT ARS BREVIS D.md\",\n \"title\": \"CAPUT ARS BREVIS D — Definitiones Principiorum\",\n \"role\": \"Definitions, correlatives, substantial/accidental modes, proper/appropriated qualities.\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"SRC.CAPUT.E\",\n \"type\": \"UPLOADED_SOURCE_TARGET\",\n \"status\": \"ROSETTA_SOURCE_TARGET\",\n \"path\": \"/mnt/data/CAPUT ARS BREVIS E.md\",\n \"title\": \"CAPUT ARS BREVIS E — Regulae\",\n \"role\": \"Ten general questions, direct species, composite H/I species, generality and non-collapse.\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"SRC.CAPUT.I\",\n \"type\": \"UPLOADED_SOURCE_TARGET\",\n \"status\": \"ROSETTA_SOURCE_TARGET\",\n \"path\": \"/mnt/data/CAPUT ARS BREVIS I.md\",\n \"title\": \"CAPUT ARS BREVIS I — Mixtio\",\n \"role\": \"Principle–principle and principle–rule mixture while preserving regime identities.\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"SRC.STACK.E\",\n \"type\": \"UPLOADED_SOURCE_TARGET_FAMILY\",\n \"status\": \"LOCK_CANDIDATE_FAMILY\",\n \"paths\": [\n \"/mnt/data/TENET_E_DoctrinalInvariants.md\",\n \"/mnt/data/ROTAS_E_StructuralInstantiation.md\",\n \"/mnt/data/AREPO_E_InputAdmissibility.md\",\n \"/mnt/data/OPERA_E_ExecutionMechanism.md\",\n \"/mnt/data/SATOR_E_OutputRequirements.md\"\n ],\n \"role\": \"Universal Q/E carrier, structure, admission, execution and mediation references.\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"SRC.STACK.T\",\n \"type\": \"UPLOADED_SOURCE_TARGET_FAMILY\",\n \"status\": \"LOCK_CANDIDATE_FAMILY\",\n \"paths\": [\n \"/mnt/data/TENET_T_DoctrinalInvariants.md\",\n \"/mnt/data/ROTAS_T_StructuralInstantiation.md\",\n \"/mnt/data/AREPO_T_InputAdmissibility.md\",\n \"/mnt/data/OPERA_T_ExecutionMechanism.md\",\n \"/mnt/data/SATOR_T_OutputRequirements.md\"\n ],\n \"role\": \"Universal T carrier, structure, admission, relational execution and mediation references; local generic genus semantics are superseded here only for the TRIVIUM draft by source-semantic species IDs.\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"SRC.DONATUS\",\n \"type\": \"EXTERNAL_PRIMARY_TEXT_TRANSCRIPTION\",\n \"status\": \"VERIFIED_2026_08_27\",\n \"title\": \"Aelius Donatus — Ars Minor\",\n \"locator\": \"https://www.thelatinlibrary.com/don.html\",\n \"accessed_at\": \"2026-08-27\",\n \"role\": \"Eight parts of speech and part-specific accident inventories; nominal comparison, gender, number, figure and case.\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"SRC.LLULL.AGU\",\n \"type\": \"EXTERNAL_TRANSLATION_WITNESS\",\n \"status\": \"VERIFIED_2026_08_27_NONCRITICAL_TRANSLATION\",\n \"title\": \"Ramon Llull — Ars Generalis Ultima, English translation witness\",\n \"locator\": \"https://lullianarts.narpan.net/ArsGeneralisUltima.pdf\",\n \"accessed_at\": \"2026-08-27\",\n \"relevant_pdf_pages_zero_indexed\": [\n 3,\n 4,\n 16,\n 17,\n 18,\n 304,\n 305,\n 306\n ],\n \"role\": \"Second Figure species, rule species expansion, Articles 86–88 on rhetoric, logic and grammar, including explicit grammar-to-Q/T applications.\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"SRC.ARISTOTLE\",\n \"type\": \"EXTERNAL_PRIMARY_TRANSLATION\",\n \"status\": \"VERIFIED_2026_08_27\",\n \"title\": \"Aristotle — Categories\",\n \"locator\": \"https://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/categories.html\",\n \"accessed_at\": \"2026-08-27\",\n \"role\": \"Canonical ten-category registry; distinct from the experimental nine-slot TRIVIUM placement.\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"SRC.PORPHYRY\",\n \"type\": \"EXTERNAL_PRIMARY_TRANSLATION\",\n \"status\": \"VERIFIED_2026_08_27\",\n \"title\": \"Porphyry — Isagoge\",\n \"locator\": \"https://www.logicmuseum.com/authors/porphyry/isagoge.htm\",\n \"accessed_at\": \"2026-08-27\",\n \"role\": \"Five predicables and their logical relations to subject/predicate classification.\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"SRC.ROOT.LAWS\",\n \"type\": \"UPLOADED_SOURCE_TARGET_FAMILY\",\n \"status\": \"CANONICAL_ROOT_CONTROL\",\n \"paths\": [\n \"/mnt/data/AGLA_TENET_CLASS_LAW.md\",\n \"/mnt/data/AGLA_ROTAS_CLASS_LAW.md\",\n \"/mnt/data/AGLA_AREPO_CLASS_LAW.md\",\n \"/mnt/data/AGLA_OPERA_CLASS_LAW.md\",\n \"/mnt/data/AGLA_SATOR_CLASS_LAW.md\",\n \"/mnt/data/AGLA_FIVE_CLASS_STRUCTURAL_ORDER.md\",\n \"/mnt/data/AGLA_LIBER_CLASS_LAW.md\",\n \"/mnt/data/AGLA_SYSTEM_INDEX_LAW.md\"\n ],\n \"role\": \"Class separation, structural order, dataset status, routing and non-execution constraints.\"\n }\n ],\n \"namespace_registry\": [\n {\n \"prefix\": \"DON.PARS\",\n \"domain\": \"Donatian part of speech\",\n \"non_identity\": [\n \"DON.ACCIDENS\",\n \"ARIST.PRAEDICAMENTUM\"\n ]\n },\n {\n \"prefix\": \"DON.ACCIDENS\",\n \"domain\": \"Donatian grammatical accident/profile axis\",\n \"non_identity\": [\n \"ARIST.ACCIDENS\",\n \"PORPH.ACCIDENS\",\n \"LLULL.MODUS_ACCIDENTALIS\"\n ]\n },\n {\n \"prefix\": \"DON.VALUE\",\n \"domain\": \"Value of grammatical accident\",\n \"non_identity\": [\n \"LLULL.Q.SPECIES\",\n \"LLULL.T.SPECIES\"\n ]\n },\n {\n \"prefix\": \"DON.GRADUS\",\n \"domain\": \"Degree of comparison\",\n \"non_identity\": [\n \"LLULL.T.SPECIES\",\n \"ARIST.GRADUS\"\n ]\n },\n {\n \"prefix\": \"DON.GENUS\",\n \"domain\": \"Grammatical gender\",\n \"non_identity\": [\n \"PORPH.GENUS\",\n \"ARIST.GENUS\"\n ]\n },\n {\n \"prefix\": \"DON.QUALITAS\",\n \"domain\": \"Nominal/pronominal/verbal grammatical quality axis\",\n \"non_identity\": [\n \"ARIST.QUALITAS\",\n \"LLULL.Q.G\"\n ]\n },\n {\n \"prefix\": \"DON.FIGURA\",\n \"domain\": \"Simple/compound morphological figure\",\n \"non_identity\": [\n \"LLULL.FIGURA\",\n \"AGLA.ROTA\"\n ]\n },\n {\n \"prefix\": \"ARIST.PRAEDICAMENTUM\",\n \"domain\": \"Aristotelian category\",\n \"non_identity\": [\n \"LLULL.Q.CARRIER\",\n \"LLULL.T.PRINCIPIUM\"\n ]\n },\n {\n \"prefix\": \"ARIST.ACCIDENS\",\n \"domain\": \"Ontological/categorial accident\",\n \"non_identity\": [\n \"DON.ACCIDENS\",\n \"PORPH.ACCIDENS\"\n ]\n },\n {\n \"prefix\": \"PORPH.PRAEDICABILE\",\n \"domain\": \"Porphyrian predicable\",\n \"non_identity\": [\n \"DON.PARS\",\n \"ARIST.PRAEDICAMENTUM\"\n ]\n },\n {\n \"prefix\": \"LLULL.Q\",\n \"domain\": \"Universal interrogative rule/species\",\n \"non_identity\": [\n \"DON.ACCIDENS\",\n \"ARIST.PRAEDICAMENTUM\"\n ]\n },\n {\n \"prefix\": \"LLULL.T\",\n \"domain\": \"Universal relative principle/local species\",\n \"non_identity\": [\n \"ARIST.RELATIO\",\n \"DON.COMPARATIO\"\n ]\n },\n {\n \"prefix\": \"TRIV.GRAM\",\n \"domain\": \"TRIVIUM grammatical projection\",\n \"non_identity\": [\n \"LLULL.Q\",\n \"LLULL.T\"\n ]\n },\n {\n \"prefix\": \"TRIV.LOG\",\n \"domain\": \"TRIVIUM logical projection\",\n \"non_identity\": [\n \"LLULL.Q\",\n \"LLULL.T\"\n ]\n },\n {\n \"prefix\": \"TRIV.RHET\",\n \"domain\": \"Reserved rhetorical projection port\",\n \"non_identity\": [\n \"INFERRED_TAXONOMY\"\n ]\n },\n {\n \"prefix\": \"TRIV.Q_PROFILE\",\n \"domain\": \"Domain-conditioned relevance profile over universal Q\",\n \"non_identity\": [\n \"NEW_Q\"\n ]\n },\n {\n \"prefix\": \"TRIV.T_PROFILE\",\n \"domain\": \"Domain-conditioned resolver over universal T\",\n \"non_identity\": [\n \"NEW_T\"\n ]\n }\n ],\n \"profile_laws\": {\n \"Q_TRIVIUM\": \"Projection over universal Q. Stores relevance, priority, conditions and traversal. It does not redefine any rule or species and never removes full-sweep applicability.\",\n \"T_TRIVIUM\": \"Resolver over universal T. Stores relata templates, relation candidates, local species, direction and respectus. It does not make grammatical accidents determine ontological species.\",\n \"OBJECT_LEVELS\": [\n \"CLASS\",\n \"ACCIDENT\",\n \"VALUE_OR_GRADUS\",\n \"TOKEN\",\n \"CONSTRUCTION\",\n \"ORATIO\",\n \"DISCOURSE\"\n ],\n \"AFFINITY_CLASSES\": [\n \"DIRECT_TEXT\",\n \"PRIMARY_STRUCTURAL\",\n \"SECONDARY_FUNCTIONAL\",\n \"CONDITIONAL\",\n \"DIAGNOSTIC\",\n \"MNEMONIC_DIAGONAL\",\n \"STRAIN\",\n \"INADMISSIBLE\"\n ],\n \"SOURCE_STATUS_CLASSES\": [\n \"USER_AUTHORITY\",\n \"DIRECT_SOURCE\",\n \"AGLA_ARTIFACT\",\n \"LIBER_INFORMANT\",\n \"MODEL_PRIOR\",\n \"COMMON_INFERENCE\",\n \"STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION\",\n \"EXPERIMENTAL_HYPOTHESIS\",\n \"UNRESOLVED\"\n ]\n },\n \"q_species\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"LLULL.Q.B.DUBITATIO\",\n \"carrier\": \"B\",\n \"species\": \"DUBITATIO\",\n \"latin\": \"Utrum? — dubitatio\",\n \"gloss_pt\": \"dúvida\",\n \"semantic_function\": \"Suspende entre afirmação e negação; preserva a questão enquanto não resolvida.\",\n \"species_kind\": \"DIRECT\",\n \"base_species_ref\": null,\n \"source_order\": 1,\n \"identity_law\": \"Semantic ID governs identity; ordinal is a traversal/display field only.\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_LLULLIAN_ROSETTA\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"LLULL.Q.B.AFFIRMATIO\",\n \"carrier\": \"B\",\n \"species\": \"AFFIRMATIO\",\n \"latin\": \"Utrum? — affirmatio\",\n \"gloss_pt\": \"afirmação\",\n \"semantic_function\": \"Determina positivamente que o objeto ou predicação é.\",\n \"species_kind\": \"DIRECT\",\n \"base_species_ref\": null,\n \"source_order\": 2,\n \"identity_law\": \"Semantic ID governs identity; ordinal is a traversal/display field only.\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_LLULLIAN_ROSETTA\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"LLULL.Q.B.NEGATIO\",\n \"carrier\": \"B\",\n \"species\": \"NEGATIO\",\n \"latin\": \"Utrum? — negatio\",\n \"gloss_pt\": \"negação\",\n \"semantic_function\": \"Determina negativamente que o objeto ou predicação não é.\",\n \"species_kind\": \"DIRECT\",\n \"base_species_ref\": null,\n \"source_order\": 3,\n \"identity_law\": \"Semantic ID governs identity; ordinal is a traversal/display field only.\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_LLULLIAN_ROSETTA\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"LLULL.Q.C.QUID_SIT\",\n \"carrier\": \"C\",\n \"species\": \"QUID_SIT\",\n \"latin\": \"Quid sit?\",\n \"gloss_pt\": \"o que é\",\n \"semantic_function\": \"Define a coisa por uma razão convertível com o definido.\",\n \"species_kind\": \"DIRECT\",\n \"base_species_ref\": null,\n \"source_order\": 1,\n \"identity_law\": \"Semantic ID governs identity; ordinal is a traversal/display field only.\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_LLULLIAN_ROSETTA\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"LLULL.Q.C.COESSENTIALIA_IN_SE\",\n \"carrier\": \"C\",\n \"species\": \"COESSENTIALIA_IN_SE\",\n \"latin\": \"Quid habeat in se coessentialiter?\",\n \"gloss_pt\": \"o que possui coessencialmente em si\",\n \"semantic_function\": \"Expõe constituição coessencial, correlativos intrínsecos e agente–paciente–ato.\",\n \"species_kind\": \"DIRECT\",\n \"base_species_ref\": null,\n \"source_order\": 2,\n \"identity_law\": \"Semantic ID governs identity; ordinal is a traversal/display field only.\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_LLULLIAN_ROSETTA\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"LLULL.Q.C.QUID_SIT_IN_ALIO\",\n \"carrier\": \"C\",\n \"species\": \"QUID_SIT_IN_ALIO\",\n \"latin\": \"Quid sit in alio?\",\n \"gloss_pt\": \"o que é em outro\",\n \"semantic_function\": \"Interroga forma, universal, hábito ou operação enquanto presente em outro sujeito ou domínio.\",\n \"species_kind\": \"DIRECT\",\n \"base_species_ref\": null,\n \"source_order\": 3,\n \"identity_law\": \"Semantic ID governs identity; ordinal is a traversal/display field only.\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_LLULLIAN_ROSETTA\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"LLULL.Q.C.QUID_HABEAT_IN_ALIO\",\n \"carrier\": \"C\",\n \"species\": \"QUID_HABEAT_IN_ALIO\",\n \"latin\": \"Quid habeat in alio?\",\n \"gloss_pt\": \"o que possui em outro\",\n \"semantic_function\": \"Interroga propriedades, atos, hábitos ou efeitos que algo possui ou produz em outro.\",\n \"species_kind\": \"DIRECT\",\n \"base_species_ref\": null,\n \"source_order\": 4,\n \"identity_law\": \"Semantic ID governs identity; ordinal is a traversal/display field only.\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_LLULLIAN_ROSETTA\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"LLULL.Q.D.ORIGO\",\n \"carrier\": \"D\",\n \"species\": \"ORIGO\",\n \"latin\": \"De quo oriatur?\",\n \"gloss_pt\": \"de que se origina\",\n \"semantic_function\": \"Interroga origem, princípio ou aquilo de que algo procede.\",\n \"species_kind\": \"DIRECT\",\n \"base_species_ref\": null,\n \"source_order\": 1,\n \"identity_law\": \"Semantic ID governs identity; ordinal is a traversal/display field only.\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_LLULLIAN_ROSETTA\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"LLULL.Q.D.COMPOSITIO\",\n \"carrier\": \"D\",\n \"species\": \"COMPOSITIO\",\n \"latin\": \"De quibus consistat?\",\n \"gloss_pt\": \"de que consiste\",\n \"semantic_function\": \"Interroga constituição, composição, forma, matéria ou partes.\",\n \"species_kind\": \"DIRECT\",\n \"base_species_ref\": null,\n \"source_order\": 2,\n \"identity_law\": \"Semantic ID governs identity; ordinal is a traversal/display field only.\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_LLULLIAN_ROSETTA\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"LLULL.Q.D.PERTINENTIA\",\n \"carrier\": \"D\",\n \"species\": \"PERTINENTIA\",\n \"latin\": \"Cuius sit?\",\n \"gloss_pt\": \"de quem/do que é\",\n \"semantic_function\": \"Interroga pertença, posse, atribuição, sujeito ou domínio.\",\n \"species_kind\": \"DIRECT\",\n \"base_species_ref\": null,\n \"source_order\": 3,\n \"identity_law\": \"Semantic ID governs identity; ordinal is a traversal/display field only.\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_LLULLIAN_ROSETTA\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"LLULL.Q.E.CAUSA_FORMALIS\",\n \"carrier\": \"E\",\n \"species\": \"CAUSA_FORMALIS\",\n \"latin\": \"Quare est? — causa formalis\",\n \"gloss_pt\": \"por que é segundo a causa formal\",\n \"semantic_function\": \"Interroga a razão constitutiva pela qual a coisa é o que é.\",\n \"species_kind\": \"DIRECT\",\n \"base_species_ref\": null,\n \"source_order\": 1,\n \"identity_law\": \"Semantic ID governs identity; ordinal is a traversal/display field only.\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_LLULLIAN_ROSETTA\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"LLULL.Q.E.CAUSA_FINALIS\",\n \"carrier\": \"E\",\n \"species\": \"CAUSA_FINALIS\",\n \"latin\": \"Quare est? — causa finalis\",\n \"gloss_pt\": \"para que é\",\n \"semantic_function\": \"Interroga fim, propósito, repouso ou razão final.\",\n \"species_kind\": \"DIRECT\",\n \"base_species_ref\": null,\n \"source_order\": 2,\n \"identity_law\": \"Semantic ID governs identity; ordinal is a traversal/display field only.\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_LLULLIAN_ROSETTA\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"LLULL.Q.F.CONTINUA\",\n \"carrier\": \"F\",\n \"species\": \"QUANTITAS_CONTINUA\",\n \"latin\": \"Quantum est? — continua\",\n \"gloss_pt\": \"quantidade contínua\",\n \"semantic_function\": \"Interroga extensão, continuidade, magnitude ou quantidade sustentada num sujeito.\",\n \"species_kind\": \"DIRECT\",\n \"base_species_ref\": null,\n \"source_order\": 1,\n \"identity_law\": \"Semantic ID governs identity; ordinal is a traversal/display field only.\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_LLULLIAN_ROSETTA\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"LLULL.Q.F.DISCRETA\",\n \"carrier\": \"F\",\n \"species\": \"QUANTITAS_DISCRETA\",\n \"latin\": \"Quantum est? — discreta\",\n \"gloss_pt\": \"quantidade discreta\",\n \"semantic_function\": \"Interroga número, pluralidade e contagem de constituintes.\",\n \"species_kind\": \"DIRECT\",\n \"base_species_ref\": null,\n \"source_order\": 2,\n \"identity_law\": \"Semantic ID governs identity; ordinal is a traversal/display field only.\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_LLULLIAN_ROSETTA\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"LLULL.Q.G.PROPRIA\",\n \"carrier\": \"G\",\n \"species\": \"QUALITAS_PROPRIA\",\n \"latin\": \"Quale est? — propria\",\n \"gloss_pt\": \"qualidade própria\",\n \"semantic_function\": \"Interroga qualidade/passio própria, potência ou ato connatural e causalidade superior.\",\n \"species_kind\": \"DIRECT\",\n \"base_species_ref\": null,\n \"source_order\": 1,\n \"identity_law\": \"Semantic ID governs identity; ordinal is a traversal/display field only.\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_LLULLIAN_ROSETTA\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"LLULL.Q.G.APPROPRIATA\",\n \"carrier\": \"G\",\n \"species\": \"QUALITAS_APPROPRIATA\",\n \"latin\": \"Quale est? — appropriata\",\n \"gloss_pt\": \"qualidade apropriada\",\n \"semantic_function\": \"Interroga qualidade/passio recebida, adquirida ou habituada e causalidade inferior.\",\n \"species_kind\": \"DIRECT\",\n \"base_species_ref\": null,\n \"source_order\": 2,\n \"identity_law\": \"Semantic ID governs identity; ordinal is a traversal/display field only.\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_LLULLIAN_ROSETTA\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"LLULL.Q.K1.IN_SE\",\n \"carrier\": \"K1\",\n \"species\": \"IN_SE\",\n \"latin\": \"Quomodo est in se?\",\n \"gloss_pt\": \"como existe em si\",\n \"semantic_function\": \"Interroga o modo próprio pelo qual uma coisa existe em si.\",\n \"species_kind\": \"DIRECT\",\n \"base_species_ref\": null,\n \"source_order\": 1,\n \"identity_law\": \"Semantic ID governs identity; ordinal is a traversal/display field only.\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_LLULLIAN_ROSETTA\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"LLULL.Q.K1.IN_ALIO_RECIPROCUM\",\n \"carrier\": \"K1\",\n \"species\": \"IN_ALIO_RECIPROCUM\",\n \"latin\": \"Quomodo est in alio et alia in ipso?\",\n \"gloss_pt\": \"como existe em outro e o outro nela\",\n \"semantic_function\": \"Interroga participação, inerência recíproca, aplicação e relação de continente/contido.\",\n \"species_kind\": \"DIRECT\",\n \"base_species_ref\": null,\n \"source_order\": 2,\n \"identity_law\": \"Semantic ID governs identity; ordinal is a traversal/display field only.\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_LLULLIAN_ROSETTA\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"LLULL.Q.K1.TOTUM_PARTES\",\n \"carrier\": \"K1\",\n \"species\": \"TOTUM_PARTES\",\n \"latin\": \"Quomodo est in partibus et partes in toto?\",\n \"gloss_pt\": \"como está nas partes e as partes no todo\",\n \"semantic_function\": \"Interroga estrutura todo–partes e integração composicional.\",\n \"species_kind\": \"DIRECT\",\n \"base_species_ref\": null,\n \"source_order\": 3,\n \"identity_law\": \"Semantic ID governs identity; ordinal is a traversal/display field only.\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_LLULLIAN_ROSETTA\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"LLULL.Q.K1.SIMILITUDO_AD_EXTRA\",\n \"carrier\": \"K1\",\n \"species\": \"SIMILITUDO_AD_EXTRA\",\n \"latin\": \"Quomodo transmittit similitudinem extra?\",\n \"gloss_pt\": \"como transmite sua semelhança exteriormente\",\n \"semantic_function\": \"Interroga exteriorização, expressão, emissão, significação ou efeito externo.\",\n \"species_kind\": \"DIRECT\",\n \"base_species_ref\": null,\n \"source_order\": 4,\n \"identity_law\": \"Semantic ID governs identity; ordinal is a traversal/display field only.\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_LLULLIAN_ROSETTA\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"LLULL.Q.K2.CONSTITUTIVUM\",\n \"carrier\": \"K2\",\n \"species\": \"CONSTITUTIVUM\",\n \"latin\": \"Cum quo est pars totius?\",\n \"gloss_pt\": \"com que pertence constitutivamente a um todo\",\n \"semantic_function\": \"Interroga princípios, partes ou instrumentos constitutivos.\",\n \"species_kind\": \"DIRECT\",\n \"base_species_ref\": null,\n \"source_order\": 1,\n \"identity_law\": \"Semantic ID governs identity; ordinal is a traversal/display field only.\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_LLULLIAN_ROSETTA\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"LLULL.Q.K2.AD_ALIA\",\n \"carrier\": \"K2\",\n \"species\": \"AD_ALIA\",\n \"latin\": \"Cum quo cognoscit vel agit ad alia?\",\n \"gloss_pt\": \"com que conhece ou atua sobre outros\",\n \"semantic_function\": \"Interroga meio ou instrumento de cognição e operação ad extra.\",\n \"species_kind\": \"DIRECT\",\n \"base_species_ref\": null,\n \"source_order\": 2,\n \"identity_law\": \"Semantic ID governs identity; ordinal is a traversal/display field only.\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_LLULLIAN_ROSETTA\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"LLULL.Q.K2.UNIVERSALE_PARTICULARE\",\n \"carrier\": \"K2\",\n \"species\": \"UNIVERSALE_PARTICULARE\",\n \"latin\": \"Cum quo est universale et particulare?\",\n \"gloss_pt\": \"com que opera universal e particularmente\",\n \"semantic_function\": \"Interroga instrumentos universais e particulares e seu alcance.\",\n \"species_kind\": \"DIRECT\",\n \"base_species_ref\": null,\n \"source_order\": 3,\n \"identity_law\": \"Semantic ID governs identity; ordinal is a traversal/display field only.\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_LLULLIAN_ROSETTA\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"LLULL.Q.K2.TRANSMISSIO\",\n \"carrier\": \"K2\",\n \"species\": \"TRANSMISSIO\",\n \"latin\": \"Cum quo transmittit similitudinem?\",\n \"gloss_pt\": \"com que transmite semelhança\",\n \"semantic_function\": \"Interroga suporte, instrumento ou meio de transmissão exterior.\",\n \"species_kind\": \"DIRECT\",\n \"base_species_ref\": null,\n \"source_order\": 4,\n \"identity_law\": \"Semantic ID governs identity; ordinal is a traversal/display field only.\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_LLULLIAN_ROSETTA\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"LLULL.Q.H.C.QUID_SIT\",\n \"carrier\": \"H\",\n \"species\": \"C.QUID_SIT\",\n \"latin\": \"Quando segundo Quid sit?\",\n \"gloss_pt\": \"quando segundo o que é\",\n \"semantic_function\": \"Temporaliza a espécie-base LLULL.Q.C.QUID_SIT: Define a coisa por uma razão convertível com o definido.\",\n \"species_kind\": \"COMPOSITE\",\n \"base_species_ref\": \"LLULL.Q.C.QUID_SIT\",\n \"source_order\": 1,\n \"identity_law\": \"Semantic ID governs identity; ordinal is a traversal/display field only.\",\n \"source_status\": \"COMPOSITE_LLULLIAN_GENERATION\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"LLULL.Q.H.C.COESSENTIALIA_IN_SE\",\n \"carrier\": \"H\",\n \"species\": \"C.COESSENTIALIA_IN_SE\",\n \"latin\": \"Quando segundo Quid habeat in se coessentialiter?\",\n \"gloss_pt\": \"quando segundo o que possui coessencialmente em si\",\n \"semantic_function\": \"Temporaliza a espécie-base LLULL.Q.C.COESSENTIALIA_IN_SE: Expõe constituição coessencial, correlativos intrínsecos e agente–paciente–ato.\",\n \"species_kind\": \"COMPOSITE\",\n \"base_species_ref\": \"LLULL.Q.C.COESSENTIALIA_IN_SE\",\n \"source_order\": 2,\n \"identity_law\": \"Semantic ID governs identity; ordinal is a traversal/display field only.\",\n \"source_status\": \"COMPOSITE_LLULLIAN_GENERATION\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"LLULL.Q.H.C.QUID_SIT_IN_ALIO\",\n \"carrier\": \"H\",\n \"species\": \"C.QUID_SIT_IN_ALIO\",\n \"latin\": \"Quando segundo Quid sit in alio?\",\n \"gloss_pt\": \"quando segundo o que é em outro\",\n \"semantic_function\": \"Temporaliza a espécie-base LLULL.Q.C.QUID_SIT_IN_ALIO: Interroga forma, universal, hábito ou operação enquanto presente em outro sujeito ou domínio.\",\n \"species_kind\": \"COMPOSITE\",\n \"base_species_ref\": \"LLULL.Q.C.QUID_SIT_IN_ALIO\",\n \"source_order\": 3,\n \"identity_law\": \"Semantic ID governs identity; ordinal is a traversal/display field only.\",\n \"source_status\": \"COMPOSITE_LLULLIAN_GENERATION\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"LLULL.Q.H.C.QUID_HABEAT_IN_ALIO\",\n \"carrier\": \"H\",\n \"species\": \"C.QUID_HABEAT_IN_ALIO\",\n \"latin\": \"Quando segundo Quid habeat in alio?\",\n \"gloss_pt\": \"quando segundo o que possui em outro\",\n \"semantic_function\": \"Temporaliza a espécie-base LLULL.Q.C.QUID_HABEAT_IN_ALIO: Interroga propriedades, atos, hábitos ou efeitos que algo possui ou produz em outro.\",\n \"species_kind\": \"COMPOSITE\",\n \"base_species_ref\": \"LLULL.Q.C.QUID_HABEAT_IN_ALIO\",\n \"source_order\": 4,\n \"identity_law\": \"Semantic ID governs identity; ordinal is a traversal/display field only.\",\n \"source_status\": \"COMPOSITE_LLULLIAN_GENERATION\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"LLULL.Q.H.D.ORIGO\",\n \"carrier\": \"H\",\n \"species\": \"D.ORIGO\",\n \"latin\": \"Quando segundo De quo oriatur?\",\n \"gloss_pt\": \"quando segundo de que se origina\",\n \"semantic_function\": \"Temporaliza a espécie-base LLULL.Q.D.ORIGO: Interroga origem, princípio ou aquilo de que algo procede.\",\n \"species_kind\": \"COMPOSITE\",\n \"base_species_ref\": \"LLULL.Q.D.ORIGO\",\n \"source_order\": 5,\n \"identity_law\": \"Semantic ID governs identity; ordinal is a traversal/display field only.\",\n \"source_status\": \"COMPOSITE_LLULLIAN_GENERATION\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"LLULL.Q.H.D.COMPOSITIO\",\n \"carrier\": \"H\",\n \"species\": \"D.COMPOSITIO\",\n \"latin\": \"Quando segundo De quibus consistat?\",\n \"gloss_pt\": \"quando segundo de que consiste\",\n \"semantic_function\": \"Temporaliza a espécie-base LLULL.Q.D.COMPOSITIO: Interroga constituição, composição, forma, matéria ou partes.\",\n \"species_kind\": \"COMPOSITE\",\n \"base_species_ref\": \"LLULL.Q.D.COMPOSITIO\",\n \"source_order\": 6,\n \"identity_law\": \"Semantic ID governs identity; ordinal is a traversal/display field only.\",\n \"source_status\": \"COMPOSITE_LLULLIAN_GENERATION\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"LLULL.Q.H.D.PERTINENTIA\",\n \"carrier\": \"H\",\n \"species\": \"D.PERTINENTIA\",\n \"latin\": \"Quando segundo Cuius sit?\",\n \"gloss_pt\": \"quando segundo de quem/do que é\",\n \"semantic_function\": \"Temporaliza a espécie-base LLULL.Q.D.PERTINENTIA: Interroga pertença, posse, atribuição, sujeito ou domínio.\",\n \"species_kind\": \"COMPOSITE\",\n \"base_species_ref\": \"LLULL.Q.D.PERTINENTIA\",\n \"source_order\": 7,\n \"identity_law\": \"Semantic ID governs identity; ordinal is a traversal/display field only.\",\n \"source_status\": \"COMPOSITE_LLULLIAN_GENERATION\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"LLULL.Q.H.K1.IN_SE\",\n \"carrier\": \"H\",\n \"species\": \"K1.IN_SE\",\n \"latin\": \"Quando segundo Quomodo est in se?\",\n \"gloss_pt\": \"quando segundo como existe em si\",\n \"semantic_function\": \"Temporaliza a espécie-base LLULL.Q.K1.IN_SE: Interroga o modo próprio pelo qual uma coisa existe em si.\",\n \"species_kind\": \"COMPOSITE\",\n \"base_species_ref\": \"LLULL.Q.K1.IN_SE\",\n \"source_order\": 8,\n \"identity_law\": \"Semantic ID governs identity; ordinal is a traversal/display field only.\",\n \"source_status\": \"COMPOSITE_LLULLIAN_GENERATION\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"LLULL.Q.H.K1.IN_ALIO_RECIPROCUM\",\n \"carrier\": \"H\",\n \"species\": \"K1.IN_ALIO_RECIPROCUM\",\n \"latin\": \"Quando segundo Quomodo est in alio et alia in ipso?\",\n \"gloss_pt\": \"quando segundo como existe em outro e o outro nela\",\n \"semantic_function\": \"Temporaliza a espécie-base LLULL.Q.K1.IN_ALIO_RECIPROCUM: Interroga participação, inerência recíproca, aplicação e relação de continente/contido.\",\n \"species_kind\": \"COMPOSITE\",\n \"base_species_ref\": \"LLULL.Q.K1.IN_ALIO_RECIPROCUM\",\n \"source_order\": 9,\n \"identity_law\": \"Semantic ID governs identity; ordinal is a traversal/display field only.\",\n \"source_status\": \"COMPOSITE_LLULLIAN_GENERATION\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"LLULL.Q.H.K1.TOTUM_PARTES\",\n \"carrier\": \"H\",\n \"species\": \"K1.TOTUM_PARTES\",\n \"latin\": \"Quando segundo Quomodo est in partibus et partes in toto?\",\n \"gloss_pt\": \"quando segundo como está nas partes e as partes no todo\",\n \"semantic_function\": \"Temporaliza a espécie-base LLULL.Q.K1.TOTUM_PARTES: Interroga estrutura todo–partes e integração composicional.\",\n \"species_kind\": \"COMPOSITE\",\n \"base_species_ref\": \"LLULL.Q.K1.TOTUM_PARTES\",\n \"source_order\": 10,\n \"identity_law\": \"Semantic ID governs identity; ordinal is a traversal/display field only.\",\n \"source_status\": \"COMPOSITE_LLULLIAN_GENERATION\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"LLULL.Q.H.K1.SIMILITUDO_AD_EXTRA\",\n \"carrier\": \"H\",\n \"species\": \"K1.SIMILITUDO_AD_EXTRA\",\n \"latin\": \"Quando segundo Quomodo transmittit similitudinem extra?\",\n \"gloss_pt\": \"quando segundo como transmite sua semelhança exteriormente\",\n \"semantic_function\": \"Temporaliza a espécie-base LLULL.Q.K1.SIMILITUDO_AD_EXTRA: Interroga exteriorização, expressão, emissão, significação ou efeito externo.\",\n \"species_kind\": \"COMPOSITE\",\n \"base_species_ref\": \"LLULL.Q.K1.SIMILITUDO_AD_EXTRA\",\n \"source_order\": 11,\n \"identity_law\": \"Semantic ID governs identity; ordinal is a traversal/display field only.\",\n \"source_status\": \"COMPOSITE_LLULLIAN_GENERATION\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"LLULL.Q.H.K2.CONSTITUTIVUM\",\n \"carrier\": \"H\",\n \"species\": \"K2.CONSTITUTIVUM\",\n \"latin\": \"Quando segundo Cum quo est pars totius?\",\n \"gloss_pt\": \"quando segundo com que pertence constitutivamente a um todo\",\n \"semantic_function\": \"Temporaliza a espécie-base LLULL.Q.K2.CONSTITUTIVUM: Interroga princípios, partes ou instrumentos constitutivos.\",\n \"species_kind\": \"COMPOSITE\",\n \"base_species_ref\": \"LLULL.Q.K2.CONSTITUTIVUM\",\n \"source_order\": 12,\n \"identity_law\": \"Semantic ID governs identity; ordinal is a traversal/display field only.\",\n \"source_status\": \"COMPOSITE_LLULLIAN_GENERATION\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"LLULL.Q.H.K2.AD_ALIA\",\n \"carrier\": \"H\",\n \"species\": \"K2.AD_ALIA\",\n \"latin\": \"Quando segundo Cum quo cognoscit vel agit ad alia?\",\n \"gloss_pt\": \"quando segundo com que conhece ou atua sobre outros\",\n \"semantic_function\": \"Temporaliza a espécie-base LLULL.Q.K2.AD_ALIA: Interroga meio ou instrumento de cognição e operação ad extra.\",\n \"species_kind\": \"COMPOSITE\",\n \"base_species_ref\": \"LLULL.Q.K2.AD_ALIA\",\n \"source_order\": 13,\n \"identity_law\": \"Semantic ID governs identity; ordinal is a traversal/display field only.\",\n \"source_status\": \"COMPOSITE_LLULLIAN_GENERATION\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"LLULL.Q.H.K2.UNIVERSALE_PARTICULARE\",\n \"carrier\": \"H\",\n \"species\": \"K2.UNIVERSALE_PARTICULARE\",\n \"latin\": \"Quando segundo Cum quo est universale et particulare?\",\n \"gloss_pt\": \"quando segundo com que opera universal e particularmente\",\n \"semantic_function\": \"Temporaliza a espécie-base LLULL.Q.K2.UNIVERSALE_PARTICULARE: Interroga instrumentos universais e particulares e seu alcance.\",\n \"species_kind\": \"COMPOSITE\",\n \"base_species_ref\": \"LLULL.Q.K2.UNIVERSALE_PARTICULARE\",\n \"source_order\": 14,\n \"identity_law\": \"Semantic ID governs identity; ordinal is a traversal/display field only.\",\n \"source_status\": \"COMPOSITE_LLULLIAN_GENERATION\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"LLULL.Q.H.K2.TRANSMISSIO\",\n \"carrier\": \"H\",\n \"species\": \"K2.TRANSMISSIO\",\n \"latin\": \"Quando segundo Cum quo transmittit similitudinem?\",\n \"gloss_pt\": \"quando segundo com que transmite semelhança\",\n \"semantic_function\": \"Temporaliza a espécie-base LLULL.Q.K2.TRANSMISSIO: Interroga suporte, instrumento ou meio de transmissão exterior.\",\n \"species_kind\": \"COMPOSITE\",\n \"base_species_ref\": \"LLULL.Q.K2.TRANSMISSIO\",\n \"source_order\": 15,\n \"identity_law\": \"Semantic ID governs identity; ordinal is a traversal/display field only.\",\n \"source_status\": \"COMPOSITE_LLULLIAN_GENERATION\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"LLULL.Q.I.C.QUID_SIT\",\n \"carrier\": \"I\",\n \"species\": \"C.QUID_SIT\",\n \"latin\": \"Onde segundo Quid sit?\",\n \"gloss_pt\": \"onde segundo o que é\",\n \"semantic_function\": \"Localiza a espécie-base LLULL.Q.C.QUID_SIT: Define a coisa por uma razão convertível com o definido.\",\n \"species_kind\": \"COMPOSITE\",\n \"base_species_ref\": \"LLULL.Q.C.QUID_SIT\",\n \"source_order\": 16,\n \"identity_law\": \"Semantic ID governs identity; ordinal is a traversal/display field only.\",\n \"source_status\": \"COMPOSITE_LLULLIAN_GENERATION\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"LLULL.Q.I.C.COESSENTIALIA_IN_SE\",\n \"carrier\": \"I\",\n \"species\": \"C.COESSENTIALIA_IN_SE\",\n \"latin\": \"Onde segundo Quid habeat in se coessentialiter?\",\n \"gloss_pt\": \"onde segundo o que possui coessencialmente em si\",\n \"semantic_function\": \"Localiza a espécie-base LLULL.Q.C.COESSENTIALIA_IN_SE: Expõe constituição coessencial, correlativos intrínsecos e agente–paciente–ato.\",\n \"species_kind\": \"COMPOSITE\",\n \"base_species_ref\": \"LLULL.Q.C.COESSENTIALIA_IN_SE\",\n \"source_order\": 17,\n \"identity_law\": \"Semantic ID governs identity; ordinal is a traversal/display field only.\",\n \"source_status\": \"COMPOSITE_LLULLIAN_GENERATION\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"LLULL.Q.I.C.QUID_SIT_IN_ALIO\",\n \"carrier\": \"I\",\n \"species\": \"C.QUID_SIT_IN_ALIO\",\n \"latin\": \"Onde segundo Quid sit in alio?\",\n \"gloss_pt\": \"onde segundo o que é em outro\",\n \"semantic_function\": \"Localiza a espécie-base LLULL.Q.C.QUID_SIT_IN_ALIO: Interroga forma, universal, hábito ou operação enquanto presente em outro sujeito ou domínio.\",\n \"species_kind\": \"COMPOSITE\",\n \"base_species_ref\": \"LLULL.Q.C.QUID_SIT_IN_ALIO\",\n \"source_order\": 18,\n \"identity_law\": \"Semantic ID governs identity; ordinal is a traversal/display field only.\",\n \"source_status\": \"COMPOSITE_LLULLIAN_GENERATION\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"LLULL.Q.I.C.QUID_HABEAT_IN_ALIO\",\n \"carrier\": \"I\",\n \"species\": \"C.QUID_HABEAT_IN_ALIO\",\n \"latin\": \"Onde segundo Quid habeat in alio?\",\n \"gloss_pt\": \"onde segundo o que possui em outro\",\n \"semantic_function\": \"Localiza a espécie-base LLULL.Q.C.QUID_HABEAT_IN_ALIO: Interroga propriedades, atos, hábitos ou efeitos que algo possui ou produz em outro.\",\n \"species_kind\": \"COMPOSITE\",\n \"base_species_ref\": \"LLULL.Q.C.QUID_HABEAT_IN_ALIO\",\n \"source_order\": 19,\n \"identity_law\": \"Semantic ID governs identity; ordinal is a traversal/display field only.\",\n \"source_status\": \"COMPOSITE_LLULLIAN_GENERATION\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"LLULL.Q.I.D.ORIGO\",\n \"carrier\": \"I\",\n \"species\": \"D.ORIGO\",\n \"latin\": \"Onde segundo De quo oriatur?\",\n \"gloss_pt\": \"onde segundo de que se origina\",\n \"semantic_function\": \"Localiza a espécie-base LLULL.Q.D.ORIGO: Interroga origem, princípio ou aquilo de que algo procede.\",\n \"species_kind\": \"COMPOSITE\",\n \"base_species_ref\": \"LLULL.Q.D.ORIGO\",\n \"source_order\": 20,\n \"identity_law\": \"Semantic ID governs identity; ordinal is a traversal/display field only.\",\n \"source_status\": \"COMPOSITE_LLULLIAN_GENERATION\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"LLULL.Q.I.D.COMPOSITIO\",\n \"carrier\": \"I\",\n \"species\": \"D.COMPOSITIO\",\n \"latin\": \"Onde segundo De quibus consistat?\",\n \"gloss_pt\": \"onde segundo de que consiste\",\n \"semantic_function\": \"Localiza a espécie-base LLULL.Q.D.COMPOSITIO: Interroga constituição, composição, forma, matéria ou partes.\",\n \"species_kind\": \"COMPOSITE\",\n \"base_species_ref\": \"LLULL.Q.D.COMPOSITIO\",\n \"source_order\": 21,\n \"identity_law\": \"Semantic ID governs identity; ordinal is a traversal/display field only.\",\n \"source_status\": \"COMPOSITE_LLULLIAN_GENERATION\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"LLULL.Q.I.D.PERTINENTIA\",\n \"carrier\": \"I\",\n \"species\": \"D.PERTINENTIA\",\n \"latin\": \"Onde segundo Cuius sit?\",\n \"gloss_pt\": \"onde segundo de quem/do que é\",\n \"semantic_function\": \"Localiza a espécie-base LLULL.Q.D.PERTINENTIA: Interroga pertença, posse, atribuição, sujeito ou domínio.\",\n \"species_kind\": \"COMPOSITE\",\n \"base_species_ref\": \"LLULL.Q.D.PERTINENTIA\",\n \"source_order\": 22,\n \"identity_law\": \"Semantic ID governs identity; ordinal is a traversal/display field only.\",\n \"source_status\": \"COMPOSITE_LLULLIAN_GENERATION\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"LLULL.Q.I.K1.IN_SE\",\n \"carrier\": \"I\",\n \"species\": \"K1.IN_SE\",\n \"latin\": \"Onde segundo Quomodo est in se?\",\n \"gloss_pt\": \"onde segundo como existe em si\",\n \"semantic_function\": \"Localiza a espécie-base LLULL.Q.K1.IN_SE: Interroga o modo próprio pelo qual uma coisa existe em si.\",\n \"species_kind\": \"COMPOSITE\",\n \"base_species_ref\": \"LLULL.Q.K1.IN_SE\",\n \"source_order\": 23,\n \"identity_law\": \"Semantic ID governs identity; ordinal is a traversal/display field only.\",\n \"source_status\": \"COMPOSITE_LLULLIAN_GENERATION\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"LLULL.Q.I.K1.IN_ALIO_RECIPROCUM\",\n \"carrier\": \"I\",\n \"species\": \"K1.IN_ALIO_RECIPROCUM\",\n \"latin\": \"Onde segundo Quomodo est in alio et alia in ipso?\",\n \"gloss_pt\": \"onde segundo como existe em outro e o outro nela\",\n \"semantic_function\": \"Localiza a espécie-base LLULL.Q.K1.IN_ALIO_RECIPROCUM: Interroga participação, inerência recíproca, aplicação e relação de continente/contido.\",\n \"species_kind\": \"COMPOSITE\",\n \"base_species_ref\": \"LLULL.Q.K1.IN_ALIO_RECIPROCUM\",\n \"source_order\": 24,\n \"identity_law\": \"Semantic ID governs identity; ordinal is a traversal/display field only.\",\n \"source_status\": \"COMPOSITE_LLULLIAN_GENERATION\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"LLULL.Q.I.K1.TOTUM_PARTES\",\n \"carrier\": \"I\",\n \"species\": \"K1.TOTUM_PARTES\",\n \"latin\": \"Onde segundo Quomodo est in partibus et partes in toto?\",\n \"gloss_pt\": \"onde segundo como está nas partes e as partes no todo\",\n \"semantic_function\": \"Localiza a espécie-base LLULL.Q.K1.TOTUM_PARTES: Interroga estrutura todo–partes e integração composicional.\",\n \"species_kind\": \"COMPOSITE\",\n \"base_species_ref\": \"LLULL.Q.K1.TOTUM_PARTES\",\n \"source_order\": 25,\n \"identity_law\": \"Semantic ID governs identity; ordinal is a traversal/display field only.\",\n \"source_status\": \"COMPOSITE_LLULLIAN_GENERATION\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"LLULL.Q.I.K1.SIMILITUDO_AD_EXTRA\",\n \"carrier\": \"I\",\n \"species\": \"K1.SIMILITUDO_AD_EXTRA\",\n \"latin\": \"Onde segundo Quomodo transmittit similitudinem extra?\",\n \"gloss_pt\": \"onde segundo como transmite sua semelhança exteriormente\",\n \"semantic_function\": \"Localiza a espécie-base LLULL.Q.K1.SIMILITUDO_AD_EXTRA: Interroga exteriorização, expressão, emissão, significação ou efeito externo.\",\n \"species_kind\": \"COMPOSITE\",\n \"base_species_ref\": \"LLULL.Q.K1.SIMILITUDO_AD_EXTRA\",\n \"source_order\": 26,\n \"identity_law\": \"Semantic ID governs identity; ordinal is a traversal/display field only.\",\n \"source_status\": \"COMPOSITE_LLULLIAN_GENERATION\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"LLULL.Q.I.K2.CONSTITUTIVUM\",\n \"carrier\": \"I\",\n \"species\": \"K2.CONSTITUTIVUM\",\n \"latin\": \"Onde segundo Cum quo est pars totius?\",\n \"gloss_pt\": \"onde segundo com que pertence constitutivamente a um todo\",\n \"semantic_function\": \"Localiza a espécie-base LLULL.Q.K2.CONSTITUTIVUM: Interroga princípios, partes ou instrumentos constitutivos.\",\n \"species_kind\": \"COMPOSITE\",\n \"base_species_ref\": \"LLULL.Q.K2.CONSTITUTIVUM\",\n \"source_order\": 27,\n \"identity_law\": \"Semantic ID governs identity; ordinal is a traversal/display field only.\",\n \"source_status\": \"COMPOSITE_LLULLIAN_GENERATION\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"LLULL.Q.I.K2.AD_ALIA\",\n \"carrier\": \"I\",\n \"species\": \"K2.AD_ALIA\",\n \"latin\": \"Onde segundo Cum quo cognoscit vel agit ad alia?\",\n \"gloss_pt\": \"onde segundo com que conhece ou atua sobre outros\",\n \"semantic_function\": \"Localiza a espécie-base LLULL.Q.K2.AD_ALIA: Interroga meio ou instrumento de cognição e operação ad extra.\",\n \"species_kind\": \"COMPOSITE\",\n \"base_species_ref\": \"LLULL.Q.K2.AD_ALIA\",\n \"source_order\": 28,\n \"identity_law\": \"Semantic ID governs identity; ordinal is a traversal/display field only.\",\n \"source_status\": \"COMPOSITE_LLULLIAN_GENERATION\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"LLULL.Q.I.K2.UNIVERSALE_PARTICULARE\",\n \"carrier\": \"I\",\n \"species\": \"K2.UNIVERSALE_PARTICULARE\",\n \"latin\": \"Onde segundo Cum quo est universale et particulare?\",\n \"gloss_pt\": \"onde segundo com que opera universal e particularmente\",\n \"semantic_function\": \"Localiza a espécie-base LLULL.Q.K2.UNIVERSALE_PARTICULARE: Interroga instrumentos universais e particulares e seu alcance.\",\n \"species_kind\": \"COMPOSITE\",\n \"base_species_ref\": \"LLULL.Q.K2.UNIVERSALE_PARTICULARE\",\n \"source_order\": 29,\n \"identity_law\": \"Semantic ID governs identity; ordinal is a traversal/display field only.\",\n \"source_status\": \"COMPOSITE_LLULLIAN_GENERATION\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"LLULL.Q.I.K2.TRANSMISSIO\",\n \"carrier\": \"I\",\n \"species\": \"K2.TRANSMISSIO\",\n \"latin\": \"Onde segundo Cum quo transmittit similitudinem?\",\n \"gloss_pt\": \"onde segundo com que transmite semelhança\",\n \"semantic_function\": \"Localiza a espécie-base LLULL.Q.K2.TRANSMISSIO: Interroga suporte, instrumento ou meio de transmissão exterior.\",\n \"species_kind\": \"COMPOSITE\",\n \"base_species_ref\": \"LLULL.Q.K2.TRANSMISSIO\",\n \"source_order\": 30,\n \"identity_law\": \"Semantic ID governs identity; ordinal is a traversal/display field only.\",\n \"source_status\": \"COMPOSITE_LLULLIAN_GENERATION\"\n }\n ],\n \"t_species\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"LLULL.T.TB.SENS_SENS\",\n \"carrier\": \"TB\",\n \"principle\": \"DIFFERENTIA\",\n \"species\": \"SENS_SENS\",\n \"gloss_pt\": \"sensível ↔ sensível\",\n \"source_order\": 1,\n \"analytic_order\": 3,\n \"triad\": \"BCD\",\n \"discriminator\": \"DOMINIUM_RELATORUM\",\n \"identity_law\": \"Semantic ID governs identity; source_order and analytic_order remain independent.\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_LLULLIAN_SECOND_FIGURE\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"LLULL.T.TB.SENS_INTEL\",\n \"carrier\": \"TB\",\n \"principle\": \"DIFFERENTIA\",\n \"species\": \"SENS_INTEL\",\n \"gloss_pt\": \"sensível ↔ intelectual\",\n \"source_order\": 2,\n \"analytic_order\": 2,\n \"triad\": \"BCD\",\n \"discriminator\": \"DOMINIUM_RELATORUM\",\n \"identity_law\": \"Semantic ID governs identity; source_order and analytic_order remain independent.\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_LLULLIAN_SECOND_FIGURE\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"LLULL.T.TB.INTEL_INTEL\",\n \"carrier\": \"TB\",\n \"principle\": \"DIFFERENTIA\",\n \"species\": \"INTEL_INTEL\",\n \"gloss_pt\": \"intelectual ↔ intelectual\",\n \"source_order\": 3,\n \"analytic_order\": 1,\n \"triad\": \"BCD\",\n \"discriminator\": \"DOMINIUM_RELATORUM\",\n \"identity_law\": \"Semantic ID governs identity; source_order and analytic_order remain independent.\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_LLULLIAN_SECOND_FIGURE\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"LLULL.T.TC.SENS_SENS\",\n \"carrier\": \"TC\",\n \"principle\": \"CONCORDANTIA\",\n \"species\": \"SENS_SENS\",\n \"gloss_pt\": \"sensível ↔ sensível\",\n \"source_order\": 1,\n \"analytic_order\": 3,\n \"triad\": \"BCD\",\n \"discriminator\": \"DOMINIUM_RELATORUM\",\n \"identity_law\": \"Semantic ID governs identity; source_order and analytic_order remain independent.\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_LLULLIAN_SECOND_FIGURE\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"LLULL.T.TC.SENS_INTEL\",\n \"carrier\": \"TC\",\n \"principle\": \"CONCORDANTIA\",\n \"species\": \"SENS_INTEL\",\n \"gloss_pt\": \"sensível ↔ intelectual\",\n \"source_order\": 2,\n \"analytic_order\": 2,\n \"triad\": \"BCD\",\n \"discriminator\": \"DOMINIUM_RELATORUM\",\n \"identity_law\": \"Semantic ID governs identity; source_order and analytic_order remain independent.\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_LLULLIAN_SECOND_FIGURE\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"LLULL.T.TC.INTEL_INTEL\",\n \"carrier\": \"TC\",\n \"principle\": \"CONCORDANTIA\",\n \"species\": \"INTEL_INTEL\",\n \"gloss_pt\": \"intelectual ↔ intelectual\",\n \"source_order\": 3,\n \"analytic_order\": 1,\n \"triad\": \"BCD\",\n \"discriminator\": \"DOMINIUM_RELATORUM\",\n \"identity_law\": \"Semantic ID governs identity; source_order and analytic_order remain independent.\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_LLULLIAN_SECOND_FIGURE\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"LLULL.T.TD.SENS_SENS\",\n \"carrier\": \"TD\",\n \"principle\": \"CONTRARIETAS\",\n \"species\": \"SENS_SENS\",\n \"gloss_pt\": \"sensível ↔ sensível\",\n \"source_order\": 1,\n \"analytic_order\": 3,\n \"triad\": \"BCD\",\n \"discriminator\": \"DOMINIUM_RELATORUM\",\n \"identity_law\": \"Semantic ID governs identity; source_order and analytic_order remain independent.\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_LLULLIAN_SECOND_FIGURE\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"LLULL.T.TD.SENS_INTEL\",\n \"carrier\": \"TD\",\n \"principle\": \"CONTRARIETAS\",\n \"species\": \"SENS_INTEL\",\n \"gloss_pt\": \"sensível ↔ intelectual\",\n \"source_order\": 2,\n \"analytic_order\": 2,\n \"triad\": \"BCD\",\n \"discriminator\": \"DOMINIUM_RELATORUM\",\n \"identity_law\": \"Semantic ID governs identity; source_order and analytic_order remain independent.\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_LLULLIAN_SECOND_FIGURE\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"LLULL.T.TD.INTEL_INTEL\",\n \"carrier\": \"TD\",\n \"principle\": \"CONTRARIETAS\",\n \"species\": \"INTEL_INTEL\",\n \"gloss_pt\": \"intelectual ↔ intelectual\",\n \"source_order\": 3,\n \"analytic_order\": 1,\n \"triad\": \"BCD\",\n \"discriminator\": \"DOMINIUM_RELATORUM\",\n \"identity_law\": \"Semantic ID governs identity; source_order and analytic_order remain independent.\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_LLULLIAN_SECOND_FIGURE\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"LLULL.T.TE.CAUSA\",\n \"carrier\": \"TE\",\n \"principle\": \"PRINCIPIUM\",\n \"species\": \"CAUSA\",\n \"gloss_pt\": \"causa: eficiente, material, formal ou final; princípio substancial\",\n \"source_order\": 1,\n \"analytic_order\": 1,\n \"triad\": \"EFG\",\n \"discriminator\": \"MODUS_PRINCIPIANDI\",\n \"identity_law\": \"Semantic ID governs identity; source_order and analytic_order remain independent.\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_LLULLIAN_SECOND_FIGURE\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"LLULL.T.TE.QUANTITAS\",\n \"carrier\": \"TE\",\n \"principle\": \"PRINCIPIUM\",\n \"species\": \"QUANTITAS\",\n \"gloss_pt\": \"quantidade como princípio acidental\",\n \"source_order\": 2,\n \"analytic_order\": 2,\n \"triad\": \"EFG\",\n \"discriminator\": \"MODUS_PRINCIPIANDI\",\n \"identity_law\": \"Semantic ID governs identity; source_order and analytic_order remain independent.\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_LLULLIAN_SECOND_FIGURE\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"LLULL.T.TE.TEMPUS\",\n \"carrier\": \"TE\",\n \"principle\": \"PRINCIPIUM\",\n \"species\": \"TEMPUS\",\n \"gloss_pt\": \"tempo como princípio acidental\",\n \"source_order\": 3,\n \"analytic_order\": 3,\n \"triad\": \"EFG\",\n \"discriminator\": \"MODUS_PRINCIPIANDI\",\n \"identity_law\": \"Semantic ID governs identity; source_order and analytic_order remain independent.\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_LLULLIAN_SECOND_FIGURE\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"LLULL.T.TF.CONIUNCTIO\",\n \"carrier\": \"TF\",\n \"principle\": \"MEDIUM\",\n \"species\": \"CONIUNCTIO\",\n \"gloss_pt\": \"meio de conjunção\",\n \"source_order\": 1,\n \"analytic_order\": 1,\n \"triad\": \"EFG\",\n \"discriminator\": \"MODUS_MEDIANDI\",\n \"identity_law\": \"Semantic ID governs identity; source_order and analytic_order remain independent.\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_LLULLIAN_SECOND_FIGURE\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"LLULL.T.TF.MENSURATIO\",\n \"carrier\": \"TF\",\n \"principle\": \"MEDIUM\",\n \"species\": \"MENSURATIO\",\n \"gloss_pt\": \"meio de medida/proporção\",\n \"source_order\": 2,\n \"analytic_order\": 2,\n \"triad\": \"EFG\",\n \"discriminator\": \"MODUS_MEDIANDI\",\n \"identity_law\": \"Semantic ID governs identity; source_order and analytic_order remain independent.\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_LLULLIAN_SECOND_FIGURE\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"LLULL.T.TF.INTER_EXTREMA\",\n \"carrier\": \"TF\",\n \"principle\": \"MEDIUM\",\n \"species\": \"INTER_EXTREMA\",\n \"gloss_pt\": \"meio entre extremos\",\n \"source_order\": 3,\n \"analytic_order\": 3,\n \"triad\": \"EFG\",\n \"discriminator\": \"MODUS_MEDIANDI\",\n \"identity_law\": \"Semantic ID governs identity; source_order and analytic_order remain independent.\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_LLULLIAN_SECOND_FIGURE\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"LLULL.T.TG.PRIVATIO\",\n \"carrier\": \"TG\",\n \"principle\": \"FINIS\",\n \"species\": \"PRIVATIO\",\n \"gloss_pt\": \"fim por privação ou cessação\",\n \"source_order\": 1,\n \"analytic_order\": 3,\n \"triad\": \"EFG\",\n \"discriminator\": \"MODUS_TERMINANDI\",\n \"identity_law\": \"Semantic ID governs identity; source_order and analytic_order remain independent.\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_LLULLIAN_SECOND_FIGURE\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"LLULL.T.TG.TERMINATIO\",\n \"carrier\": \"TG\",\n \"principle\": \"FINIS\",\n \"species\": \"TERMINATIO\",\n \"gloss_pt\": \"fim como limite ou termo\",\n \"source_order\": 2,\n \"analytic_order\": 2,\n \"triad\": \"EFG\",\n \"discriminator\": \"MODUS_TERMINANDI\",\n \"identity_law\": \"Semantic ID governs identity; source_order and analytic_order remain independent.\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_LLULLIAN_SECOND_FIGURE\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"LLULL.T.TG.PERFECTIO\",\n \"carrier\": \"TG\",\n \"principle\": \"FINIS\",\n \"species\": \"PERFECTIO\",\n \"gloss_pt\": \"fim como perfeição ou causa final realizada\",\n \"source_order\": 3,\n \"analytic_order\": 1,\n \"triad\": \"EFG\",\n \"discriminator\": \"MODUS_TERMINANDI\",\n \"identity_law\": \"Semantic ID governs identity; source_order and analytic_order remain independent.\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_LLULLIAN_SECOND_FIGURE\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"LLULL.T.TH.SUB_SUB\",\n \"carrier\": \"TH\",\n \"principle\": \"MAIORITAS\",\n \"species\": \"SUB_SUB\",\n \"gloss_pt\": \"substância ↔ substância\",\n \"source_order\": 1,\n \"analytic_order\": 1,\n \"triad\": \"HIK\",\n \"discriminator\": \"STATUS_ONTOLOGICUS_RELATORUM\",\n \"identity_law\": \"Semantic ID governs identity; source_order and analytic_order remain independent.\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_LLULLIAN_SECOND_FIGURE\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"LLULL.T.TH.SUB_ACC\",\n \"carrier\": \"TH\",\n \"principle\": \"MAIORITAS\",\n \"species\": \"SUB_ACC\",\n \"gloss_pt\": \"substância ↔ acidente\",\n \"source_order\": 2,\n \"analytic_order\": 2,\n \"triad\": \"HIK\",\n \"discriminator\": \"STATUS_ONTOLOGICUS_RELATORUM\",\n \"identity_law\": \"Semantic ID governs identity; source_order and analytic_order remain independent.\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_LLULLIAN_SECOND_FIGURE\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"LLULL.T.TH.ACC_ACC\",\n \"carrier\": \"TH\",\n \"principle\": \"MAIORITAS\",\n \"species\": \"ACC_ACC\",\n \"gloss_pt\": \"acidente ↔ acidente\",\n \"source_order\": 3,\n \"analytic_order\": 3,\n \"triad\": \"HIK\",\n \"discriminator\": \"STATUS_ONTOLOGICUS_RELATORUM\",\n \"identity_law\": \"Semantic ID governs identity; source_order and analytic_order remain independent.\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_LLULLIAN_SECOND_FIGURE\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"LLULL.T.TI.SUB_SUB\",\n \"carrier\": \"TI\",\n \"principle\": \"AEQUALITAS\",\n \"species\": \"SUB_SUB\",\n \"gloss_pt\": \"substância ↔ substância\",\n \"source_order\": 1,\n \"analytic_order\": 1,\n \"triad\": \"HIK\",\n \"discriminator\": \"STATUS_ONTOLOGICUS_RELATORUM\",\n \"identity_law\": \"Semantic ID governs identity; source_order and analytic_order remain independent.\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_LLULLIAN_SECOND_FIGURE\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"LLULL.T.TI.SUB_ACC\",\n \"carrier\": \"TI\",\n \"principle\": \"AEQUALITAS\",\n \"species\": \"SUB_ACC\",\n \"gloss_pt\": \"substância ↔ acidente\",\n \"source_order\": 2,\n \"analytic_order\": 2,\n \"triad\": \"HIK\",\n \"discriminator\": \"STATUS_ONTOLOGICUS_RELATORUM\",\n \"identity_law\": \"Semantic ID governs identity; source_order and analytic_order remain independent.\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_LLULLIAN_SECOND_FIGURE\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"LLULL.T.TI.ACC_ACC\",\n \"carrier\": \"TI\",\n \"principle\": \"AEQUALITAS\",\n \"species\": \"ACC_ACC\",\n \"gloss_pt\": \"acidente ↔ acidente\",\n \"source_order\": 3,\n \"analytic_order\": 3,\n \"triad\": \"HIK\",\n \"discriminator\": \"STATUS_ONTOLOGICUS_RELATORUM\",\n \"identity_law\": \"Semantic ID governs identity; source_order and analytic_order remain independent.\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_LLULLIAN_SECOND_FIGURE\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"LLULL.T.TK.SUB_SUB\",\n \"carrier\": \"TK\",\n \"principle\": \"MINORITAS\",\n \"species\": \"SUB_SUB\",\n \"gloss_pt\": \"substância ↔ substância\",\n \"source_order\": 1,\n \"analytic_order\": 1,\n \"triad\": \"HIK\",\n \"discriminator\": \"STATUS_ONTOLOGICUS_RELATORUM\",\n \"identity_law\": \"Semantic ID governs identity; source_order and analytic_order remain independent.\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_LLULLIAN_SECOND_FIGURE\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"LLULL.T.TK.SUB_ACC\",\n \"carrier\": \"TK\",\n \"principle\": \"MINORITAS\",\n \"species\": \"SUB_ACC\",\n \"gloss_pt\": \"substância ↔ acidente\",\n \"source_order\": 2,\n \"analytic_order\": 2,\n \"triad\": \"HIK\",\n \"discriminator\": \"STATUS_ONTOLOGICUS_RELATORUM\",\n \"identity_law\": \"Semantic ID governs identity; source_order and analytic_order remain independent.\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_LLULLIAN_SECOND_FIGURE\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"LLULL.T.TK.ACC_ACC\",\n \"carrier\": \"TK\",\n \"principle\": \"MINORITAS\",\n \"species\": \"ACC_ACC\",\n \"gloss_pt\": \"acidente ↔ acidente\",\n \"source_order\": 3,\n \"analytic_order\": 3,\n \"triad\": \"HIK\",\n \"discriminator\": \"STATUS_ONTOLOGICUS_RELATORUM\",\n \"identity_law\": \"Semantic ID governs identity; source_order and analytic_order remain independent.\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_LLULLIAN_SECOND_FIGURE\"\n }\n ],\n \"donatian_parent_classes\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.PARS.NOMEN\",\n \"object_class\": \"DONATIAN_PARENT_CLASS\",\n \"label\": \"Nomen\",\n \"members\": [\n \"DON.PARS.NOMEN_SUBSTANTIVUM\",\n \"DON.PARS.NOMEN_ADIECTIVUM\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS_PARENT_WITH_USER_AUTHORIZED_SPLIT\",\n \"definition\": \"Donatus’s single noun class, preserved as the parent of the AGLA substantive/adjective subdivision.\"\n }\n ],\n \"donatian_parts\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.PARS.NOMEN_SUBSTANTIVUM\",\n \"slot\": \"B\",\n \"label\": \"Nomen substantivum\",\n \"parent\": \"DON.PARS.NOMEN\",\n \"source_status\": \"USER_AUTHORITY_ADAPTATION\",\n \"definition\": \"AGLA subdivision of Donatus’s nomen: a nominal form taken substantivally as naming a body, thing, subject, referent or intelligible form. It is not a ninth part in Donatus.\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.PARS.NOMEN_ADIECTIVUM\",\n \"slot\": \"C\",\n \"label\": \"Nomen adiectivum\",\n \"parent\": \"DON.PARS.NOMEN\",\n \"source_status\": \"USER_AUTHORITY_ADAPTATION\",\n \"definition\": \"AGLA subdivision of Donatus’s nomen: a nominal form taken as determining, qualifying or contracting another nominal subject. It is not a ninth part in Donatus.\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.PARS.PRONOMEN\",\n \"slot\": \"D\",\n \"label\": \"Pronomen\",\n \"parent\": null,\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\",\n \"definition\": \"Part of speech placed for a noun, nearly signifying as much and sometimes receiving person.\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.PARS.VERBUM\",\n \"slot\": \"E\",\n \"label\": \"Verbum\",\n \"parent\": null,\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\",\n \"definition\": \"Part of speech with tense and person, without case, signifying action, passion or neutral mode.\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.PARS.ADVERBIUM\",\n \"slot\": \"F\",\n \"label\": \"Adverbium\",\n \"parent\": null,\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\",\n \"definition\": \"Part of speech added to the verb to explain and complete its signification.\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.PARS.PARTICIPIUM\",\n \"slot\": \"G\",\n \"label\": \"Participium\",\n \"parent\": null,\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\",\n \"definition\": \"Part of speech taking part from noun and verb.\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.PARS.CONIUNCTIO\",\n \"slot\": \"H\",\n \"label\": \"Coniunctio\",\n \"parent\": null,\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\",\n \"definition\": \"Part of speech joining and ordering an utterance.\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.PARS.PRAEPOSITIO\",\n \"slot\": \"I\",\n \"label\": \"Praepositio\",\n \"parent\": null,\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\",\n \"definition\": \"Part of speech placed before others to complete, alter or diminish their signification.\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.PARS.INTERIECTIO\",\n \"slot\": \"K\",\n \"label\": \"Interiectio\",\n \"parent\": null,\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\",\n \"definition\": \"Part of speech signifying an affection of mind through an unformed voice.\"\n }\n ],\n \"donatian_accidents\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.ACCIDENS.NOMEN.QUALITAS\",\n \"label\": \"Qualitas nominis\",\n \"applies_to\": [\n \"DON.PARS.NOMEN_SUBSTANTIVUM\",\n \"DON.PARS.NOMEN_ADIECTIVUM\"\n ],\n \"value_class\": \"QUALITATES\",\n \"values\": [\n \"DON.VALUE.QUALITAS_NOMINIS.PROPRIUM\",\n \"DON.VALUE.QUALITAS_NOMINIS.APPELLATIVUM\"\n ],\n \"definition\": \"Whether a noun names one as proper or many as appellative.\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.ACCIDENS.NOMEN.COMPARATIO\",\n \"label\": \"Comparatio nominis\",\n \"applies_to\": [\n \"DON.PARS.NOMEN_SUBSTANTIVUM\",\n \"DON.PARS.NOMEN_ADIECTIVUM\"\n ],\n \"value_class\": \"GRADUS\",\n \"values\": [\n \"DON.GRADUS.POSITIVUS\",\n \"DON.GRADUS.COMPARATIVUS\",\n \"DON.GRADUS.SUPERLATIVUS\"\n ],\n \"definition\": \"Degree of an appellative noun signifying quality or quantity; admissibility is conditional.\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.ACCIDENS.NOMEN.GENUS\",\n \"label\": \"Genus nominis\",\n \"applies_to\": [\n \"DON.PARS.NOMEN_SUBSTANTIVUM\",\n \"DON.PARS.NOMEN_ADIECTIVUM\"\n ],\n \"value_class\": \"GENERA\",\n \"values\": [\n \"DON.GENUS.MASCULINUM\",\n \"DON.GENUS.FEMININUM\",\n \"DON.GENUS.NEUTRUM\",\n \"DON.GENUS.COMMUNE\",\n \"DON.GENUS.OMNE\",\n \"DON.GENUS.EPICOENON\"\n ],\n \"definition\": \"Grammatical gender of a noun.\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.ACCIDENS.NOMEN.NUMERUS\",\n \"label\": \"Numerus nominis\",\n \"applies_to\": [\n \"DON.PARS.NOMEN_SUBSTANTIVUM\",\n \"DON.PARS.NOMEN_ADIECTIVUM\"\n ],\n \"value_class\": \"NUMERI\",\n \"values\": [\n \"DON.VALUE.NUMERUS.SINGULARIS\",\n \"DON.VALUE.NUMERUS.PLURALIS\"\n ],\n \"definition\": \"Grammatical number of a noun.\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.ACCIDENS.NOMEN.FIGURA\",\n \"label\": \"Figura nominis\",\n \"applies_to\": [\n \"DON.PARS.NOMEN_SUBSTANTIVUM\",\n \"DON.PARS.NOMEN_ADIECTIVUM\"\n ],\n \"value_class\": \"FIGURAE\",\n \"values\": [\n \"DON.VALUE.FIGURA.SIMPLEX\",\n \"DON.VALUE.FIGURA.COMPOSITA\"\n ],\n \"definition\": \"Morphological structure: simple or compound; not a Llullian figure.\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.ACCIDENS.NOMEN.CASUS\",\n \"label\": \"Casus nominis\",\n \"applies_to\": [\n \"DON.PARS.NOMEN_SUBSTANTIVUM\",\n \"DON.PARS.NOMEN_ADIECTIVUM\"\n ],\n \"value_class\": \"CASUS\",\n \"values\": [\n \"DON.VALUE.CASUS.NOMINATIVUS\",\n \"DON.VALUE.CASUS.GENETIVUS\",\n \"DON.VALUE.CASUS.DATIVUS\",\n \"DON.VALUE.CASUS.ACCUSATIVUS\",\n \"DON.VALUE.CASUS.VOCATIVUS\",\n \"DON.VALUE.CASUS.ABLATIVUS\"\n ],\n \"definition\": \"Nominal case.\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.ACCIDENS.PRONOMEN.QUALITAS\",\n \"label\": \"Qualitas pronominis\",\n \"applies_to\": [\n \"DON.PARS.PRONOMEN\"\n ],\n \"value_class\": \"QUALITATES\",\n \"values\": [\n \"DON.VALUE.QUALITAS_PRONOMINIS.FINITA\",\n \"DON.VALUE.QUALITAS_PRONOMINIS.INFINITA\"\n ],\n \"definition\": \"Whether the pronoun receives person.\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.ACCIDENS.PRONOMEN.GENUS\",\n \"label\": \"Genus pronominis\",\n \"applies_to\": [\n \"DON.PARS.PRONOMEN\"\n ],\n \"value_class\": \"GENERA\",\n \"values\": [\n \"DON.GENUS.MASCULINUM\",\n \"DON.GENUS.FEMININUM\",\n \"DON.GENUS.NEUTRUM\",\n \"DON.GENUS.COMMUNE\",\n \"DON.GENUS.OMNE\"\n ],\n \"definition\": \"Grammatical gender of a pronoun.\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.ACCIDENS.PRONOMEN.NUMERUS\",\n \"label\": \"Numerus pronominis\",\n \"applies_to\": [\n \"DON.PARS.PRONOMEN\"\n ],\n \"value_class\": \"NUMERI\",\n \"values\": [\n \"DON.VALUE.NUMERUS.SINGULARIS\",\n \"DON.VALUE.NUMERUS.PLURALIS\"\n ],\n \"definition\": \"Grammatical number of a pronoun.\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.ACCIDENS.PRONOMEN.FIGURA\",\n \"label\": \"Figura pronominis\",\n \"applies_to\": [\n \"DON.PARS.PRONOMEN\"\n ],\n \"value_class\": \"FIGURAE\",\n \"values\": [\n \"DON.VALUE.FIGURA.SIMPLEX\",\n \"DON.VALUE.FIGURA.COMPOSITA\"\n ],\n \"definition\": \"Simple or compound pronominal form.\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.ACCIDENS.PRONOMEN.PERSONA\",\n \"label\": \"Persona pronominis\",\n \"applies_to\": [\n \"DON.PARS.PRONOMEN\"\n ],\n \"value_class\": \"PERSONAE\",\n \"values\": [\n \"DON.VALUE.PERSONA.PRIMA\",\n \"DON.VALUE.PERSONA.SECUNDA\",\n \"DON.VALUE.PERSONA.TERTIA\"\n ],\n \"definition\": \"First, second or third grammatical person.\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.ACCIDENS.PRONOMEN.CASUS\",\n \"label\": \"Casus pronominis\",\n \"applies_to\": [\n \"DON.PARS.PRONOMEN\"\n ],\n \"value_class\": \"CASUS\",\n \"values\": [\n \"DON.VALUE.CASUS.NOMINATIVUS\",\n \"DON.VALUE.CASUS.GENETIVUS\",\n \"DON.VALUE.CASUS.DATIVUS\",\n \"DON.VALUE.CASUS.ACCUSATIVUS\",\n \"DON.VALUE.CASUS.VOCATIVUS\",\n \"DON.VALUE.CASUS.ABLATIVUS\"\n ],\n \"definition\": \"Pronominal case.\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.ACCIDENS.VERBUM.QUALITAS\",\n \"label\": \"Qualitas verbi\",\n \"applies_to\": [\n \"DON.PARS.VERBUM\"\n ],\n \"value_class\": \"MODI_ET_FORMAE\",\n \"values\": [\n \"DON.VALUE.MODUS.INDICATIVUS\",\n \"DON.VALUE.MODUS.IMPERATIVUS\",\n \"DON.VALUE.MODUS.OPTATIVUS\",\n \"DON.VALUE.MODUS.CONIUNCTIVUS\",\n \"DON.VALUE.MODUS.INFINITIVUS\",\n \"DON.VALUE.MODUS.IMPERSONALIS\",\n \"DON.VALUE.FORMA.PERFECTA\",\n \"DON.VALUE.FORMA.MEDITATIVA\",\n \"DON.VALUE.FORMA.FREQUENTATIVA\",\n \"DON.VALUE.FORMA.INCHOATIVA\"\n ],\n \"definition\": \"Verbal quality distributed across moods and forms.\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.ACCIDENS.VERBUM.CONIUGATIO\",\n \"label\": \"Coniugatio\",\n \"applies_to\": [\n \"DON.PARS.VERBUM\"\n ],\n \"value_class\": \"CONIUGATIONES\",\n \"values\": [\n \"DON.VALUE.CONIUGATIO.PRIMA\",\n \"DON.VALUE.CONIUGATIO.SECUNDA\",\n \"DON.VALUE.CONIUGATIO.TERTIA\"\n ],\n \"definition\": \"Verbal conjugation class.\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.ACCIDENS.VERBUM.GENUS\",\n \"label\": \"Genus verbi\",\n \"applies_to\": [\n \"DON.PARS.VERBUM\"\n ],\n \"value_class\": \"GENERA_VERBI\",\n \"values\": [\n \"DON.VALUE.GENUS_VERBI.ACTIVUM\",\n \"DON.VALUE.GENUS_VERBI.PASSIVUM\",\n \"DON.VALUE.GENUS_VERBI.NEUTRUM\",\n \"DON.VALUE.GENUS_VERBI.DEPONENS\",\n \"DON.VALUE.GENUS_VERBI.COMMUNE\"\n ],\n \"definition\": \"Verbal genus/voice class.\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.ACCIDENS.VERBUM.NUMERUS\",\n \"label\": \"Numerus verbi\",\n \"applies_to\": [\n \"DON.PARS.VERBUM\"\n ],\n \"value_class\": \"NUMERI\",\n \"values\": [\n \"DON.VALUE.NUMERUS.SINGULARIS\",\n \"DON.VALUE.NUMERUS.PLURALIS\"\n ],\n \"definition\": \"Verbal number.\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.ACCIDENS.VERBUM.FIGURA\",\n \"label\": \"Figura verbi\",\n \"applies_to\": [\n \"DON.PARS.VERBUM\"\n ],\n \"value_class\": \"FIGURAE\",\n \"values\": [\n \"DON.VALUE.FIGURA.SIMPLEX\",\n \"DON.VALUE.FIGURA.COMPOSITA\"\n ],\n \"definition\": \"Simple or compound verbal form.\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.ACCIDENS.VERBUM.TEMPUS\",\n \"label\": \"Tempus verbi\",\n \"applies_to\": [\n \"DON.PARS.VERBUM\"\n ],\n \"value_class\": \"TEMPORA\",\n \"values\": [\n \"DON.VALUE.TEMPUS.PRAESENS\",\n \"DON.VALUE.TEMPUS.PRAETERITUM\",\n \"DON.VALUE.TEMPUS.FUTURUM\"\n ],\n \"definition\": \"Present, past or future, with inflectional subdivisions.\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.ACCIDENS.VERBUM.PERSONA\",\n \"label\": \"Persona verbi\",\n \"applies_to\": [\n \"DON.PARS.VERBUM\"\n ],\n \"value_class\": \"PERSONAE\",\n \"values\": [\n \"DON.VALUE.PERSONA.PRIMA\",\n \"DON.VALUE.PERSONA.SECUNDA\",\n \"DON.VALUE.PERSONA.TERTIA\"\n ],\n \"definition\": \"Verbal person.\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.ACCIDENS.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO\",\n \"label\": \"Significatio adverbii\",\n \"applies_to\": [\n \"DON.PARS.ADVERBIUM\"\n ],\n \"value_class\": \"SIGNIFICATIONES\",\n \"values\": [\n \"DON.VALUE.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.LOCUS\",\n \"DON.VALUE.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.TEMPUS\",\n \"DON.VALUE.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.NUMERUS\",\n \"DON.VALUE.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.NEGATIO\",\n \"DON.VALUE.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.AFFIRMATIO\",\n \"DON.VALUE.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.DEMONSTRATIO\",\n \"DON.VALUE.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.OPTATIO\",\n \"DON.VALUE.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.HORTATIO\",\n \"DON.VALUE.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.ORDO\",\n \"DON.VALUE.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.INTERROGATIO\",\n \"DON.VALUE.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.SIMILITUDO\",\n \"DON.VALUE.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.QUALITAS\",\n \"DON.VALUE.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.QUANTITAS\",\n \"DON.VALUE.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.DUBITATIO\",\n \"DON.VALUE.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.PERSONA\",\n \"DON.VALUE.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.VOCATIO\",\n \"DON.VALUE.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.RESPONSIO\",\n \"DON.VALUE.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.SEPARATIO\",\n \"DON.VALUE.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.IURATIO\",\n \"DON.VALUE.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.ELECTIO\",\n \"DON.VALUE.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.CONGREGATIO\",\n \"DON.VALUE.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.PROHIBITIO\",\n \"DON.VALUE.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.EVENTUS\",\n \"DON.VALUE.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.COMPARATIO\"\n ],\n \"definition\": \"Semantic species of adverb.\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.ACCIDENS.ADVERBIUM.COMPARATIO\",\n \"label\": \"Comparatio adverbii\",\n \"applies_to\": [\n \"DON.PARS.ADVERBIUM\"\n ],\n \"value_class\": \"GRADUS\",\n \"values\": [\n \"DON.GRADUS.POSITIVUS\",\n \"DON.GRADUS.COMPARATIVUS\",\n \"DON.GRADUS.SUPERLATIVUS\"\n ],\n \"definition\": \"Positive, comparative and superlative adverbial degree.\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.ACCIDENS.ADVERBIUM.FIGURA\",\n \"label\": \"Figura adverbii\",\n \"applies_to\": [\n \"DON.PARS.ADVERBIUM\"\n ],\n \"value_class\": \"FIGURAE\",\n \"values\": [\n \"DON.VALUE.FIGURA.SIMPLEX\",\n \"DON.VALUE.FIGURA.COMPOSITA\"\n ],\n \"definition\": \"Simple or compound adverb.\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.ACCIDENS.PARTICIPIUM.GENUS\",\n \"label\": \"Genus participii\",\n \"applies_to\": [\n \"DON.PARS.PARTICIPIUM\"\n ],\n \"value_class\": \"GENERA\",\n \"values\": [\n \"DON.GENUS.MASCULINUM\",\n \"DON.GENUS.FEMININUM\",\n \"DON.GENUS.NEUTRUM\",\n \"DON.GENUS.COMMUNE\"\n ],\n \"definition\": \"Participial gender.\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.ACCIDENS.PARTICIPIUM.CASUS\",\n \"label\": \"Casus participii\",\n \"applies_to\": [\n \"DON.PARS.PARTICIPIUM\"\n ],\n \"value_class\": \"CASUS\",\n \"values\": [\n \"DON.VALUE.CASUS.NOMINATIVUS\",\n \"DON.VALUE.CASUS.GENETIVUS\",\n \"DON.VALUE.CASUS.DATIVUS\",\n \"DON.VALUE.CASUS.ACCUSATIVUS\",\n \"DON.VALUE.CASUS.VOCATIVUS\",\n \"DON.VALUE.CASUS.ABLATIVUS\"\n ],\n \"definition\": \"Participial case.\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.ACCIDENS.PARTICIPIUM.TEMPUS\",\n \"label\": \"Tempus participii\",\n \"applies_to\": [\n \"DON.PARS.PARTICIPIUM\"\n ],\n \"value_class\": \"TEMPORA\",\n \"values\": [\n \"DON.VALUE.TEMPUS.PRAESENS\",\n \"DON.VALUE.TEMPUS.PRAETERITUM\",\n \"DON.VALUE.TEMPUS.FUTURUM\"\n ],\n \"definition\": \"Participial time.\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.ACCIDENS.PARTICIPIUM.SIGNIFICATIO\",\n \"label\": \"Significatio participii\",\n \"applies_to\": [\n \"DON.PARS.PARTICIPIUM\"\n ],\n \"value_class\": \"SIGNIFICATIONES\",\n \"values\": [\n \"DON.VALUE.PARTICIPIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.ACTIVA\",\n \"DON.VALUE.PARTICIPIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.PASSIVA\",\n \"DON.VALUE.PARTICIPIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.NEUTRA\",\n \"DON.VALUE.PARTICIPIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.DEPONENS\",\n \"DON.VALUE.PARTICIPIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.COMMUNIS\"\n ],\n \"definition\": \"Signification inherited from the source verb.\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.ACCIDENS.PARTICIPIUM.NUMERUS\",\n \"label\": \"Numerus participii\",\n \"applies_to\": [\n \"DON.PARS.PARTICIPIUM\"\n ],\n \"value_class\": \"NUMERI\",\n \"values\": [\n \"DON.VALUE.NUMERUS.SINGULARIS\",\n \"DON.VALUE.NUMERUS.PLURALIS\"\n ],\n \"definition\": \"Participial number.\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.ACCIDENS.PARTICIPIUM.FIGURA\",\n \"label\": \"Figura participii\",\n \"applies_to\": [\n \"DON.PARS.PARTICIPIUM\"\n ],\n \"value_class\": \"FIGURAE\",\n \"values\": [\n \"DON.VALUE.FIGURA.SIMPLEX\",\n \"DON.VALUE.FIGURA.COMPOSITA\"\n ],\n \"definition\": \"Simple or compound participle.\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.ACCIDENS.CONIUNCTIO.POTESTAS\",\n \"label\": \"Potestas coniunctionis\",\n \"applies_to\": [\n \"DON.PARS.CONIUNCTIO\"\n ],\n \"value_class\": \"POTESTATES\",\n \"values\": [\n \"DON.VALUE.CONIUNCTIO.POTESTAS.COPULATIVA\",\n \"DON.VALUE.CONIUNCTIO.POTESTAS.DISIUNCTIVA\",\n \"DON.VALUE.CONIUNCTIO.POTESTAS.EXPLETIVA\",\n \"DON.VALUE.CONIUNCTIO.POTESTAS.CAUSALIS\",\n \"DON.VALUE.CONIUNCTIO.POTESTAS.RATIONALIS\"\n ],\n \"definition\": \"Semantic/function class of conjunction.\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.ACCIDENS.CONIUNCTIO.FIGURA\",\n \"label\": \"Figura coniunctionis\",\n \"applies_to\": [\n \"DON.PARS.CONIUNCTIO\"\n ],\n \"value_class\": \"FIGURAE\",\n \"values\": [\n \"DON.VALUE.FIGURA.SIMPLEX\",\n \"DON.VALUE.FIGURA.COMPOSITA\"\n ],\n \"definition\": \"Simple or compound conjunction.\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.ACCIDENS.CONIUNCTIO.ORDO\",\n \"label\": \"Ordo coniunctionis\",\n \"applies_to\": [\n \"DON.PARS.CONIUNCTIO\"\n ],\n \"value_class\": \"ORDINES\",\n \"values\": [\n \"DON.VALUE.CONIUNCTIO.ORDO.PRAEPOSITIVUS\",\n \"DON.VALUE.CONIUNCTIO.ORDO.SUBIUNCTIVUS\",\n \"DON.VALUE.CONIUNCTIO.ORDO.COMMUNIS\"\n ],\n \"definition\": \"Position/order class of conjunction.\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.ACCIDENS.PRAEPOSITIO.CASUS\",\n \"label\": \"Casus praepositionis\",\n \"applies_to\": [\n \"DON.PARS.PRAEPOSITIO\"\n ],\n \"value_class\": \"CASUS\",\n \"values\": [\n \"DON.VALUE.PRAEPOSITIO.CASUS.ACCUSATIVUS\",\n \"DON.VALUE.PRAEPOSITIO.CASUS.ABLATIVUS\",\n \"DON.VALUE.PRAEPOSITIO.CASUS.UTERQUE\"\n ],\n \"definition\": \"Case governed by the preposition.\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.ACCIDENS.INTERIECTIO.SIGNIFICATIO\",\n \"label\": \"Significatio interiectionis\",\n \"applies_to\": [\n \"DON.PARS.INTERIECTIO\"\n ],\n \"value_class\": \"SIGNIFICATIONES\",\n \"values\": [\n \"DON.VALUE.INTERIECTIO.SIGNIFICATIO.LAETITIA\",\n \"DON.VALUE.INTERIECTIO.SIGNIFICATIO.DOLOR\",\n \"DON.VALUE.INTERIECTIO.SIGNIFICATIO.ADMIRATIO\",\n \"DON.VALUE.INTERIECTIO.SIGNIFICATIO.TIMOR\"\n ],\n \"definition\": \"Mental affection signified.\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n }\n ],\n \"donatian_values\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.GENUS.COMMUNE\",\n \"object_class\": \"DONATIAN_ACCIDENT_VALUE\",\n \"label\": \"COMMUNE\",\n \"value_classes\": [\n \"GENERA\"\n ],\n \"used_by_accidents\": [\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.NOMEN.GENUS\",\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.PRONOMEN.GENUS\",\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.PARTICIPIUM.GENUS\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.GENUS.EPICOENON\",\n \"object_class\": \"DONATIAN_ACCIDENT_VALUE\",\n \"label\": \"EPICOENON\",\n \"value_classes\": [\n \"GENERA\"\n ],\n \"used_by_accidents\": [\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.NOMEN.GENUS\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.GENUS.FEMININUM\",\n \"object_class\": \"DONATIAN_ACCIDENT_VALUE\",\n \"label\": \"FEMININUM\",\n \"value_classes\": [\n \"GENERA\"\n ],\n \"used_by_accidents\": [\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.NOMEN.GENUS\",\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.PRONOMEN.GENUS\",\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.PARTICIPIUM.GENUS\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.GENUS.MASCULINUM\",\n \"object_class\": \"DONATIAN_ACCIDENT_VALUE\",\n \"label\": \"MASCULINUM\",\n \"value_classes\": [\n \"GENERA\"\n ],\n \"used_by_accidents\": [\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.NOMEN.GENUS\",\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.PRONOMEN.GENUS\",\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.PARTICIPIUM.GENUS\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.GENUS.NEUTRUM\",\n \"object_class\": \"DONATIAN_ACCIDENT_VALUE\",\n \"label\": \"NEUTRUM\",\n \"value_classes\": [\n \"GENERA\"\n ],\n \"used_by_accidents\": [\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.NOMEN.GENUS\",\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.PRONOMEN.GENUS\",\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.PARTICIPIUM.GENUS\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.GENUS.OMNE\",\n \"object_class\": \"DONATIAN_ACCIDENT_VALUE\",\n \"label\": \"OMNE\",\n \"value_classes\": [\n \"GENERA\"\n ],\n \"used_by_accidents\": [\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.NOMEN.GENUS\",\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.PRONOMEN.GENUS\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.GRADUS.COMPARATIVUS\",\n \"object_class\": \"DONATIAN_ACCIDENT_VALUE\",\n \"label\": \"COMPARATIVUS\",\n \"value_classes\": [\n \"GRADUS\"\n ],\n \"used_by_accidents\": [\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.NOMEN.COMPARATIO\",\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.ADVERBIUM.COMPARATIO\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.GRADUS.POSITIVUS\",\n \"object_class\": \"DONATIAN_ACCIDENT_VALUE\",\n \"label\": \"POSITIVUS\",\n \"value_classes\": [\n \"GRADUS\"\n ],\n \"used_by_accidents\": [\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.NOMEN.COMPARATIO\",\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.ADVERBIUM.COMPARATIO\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.GRADUS.SUPERLATIVUS\",\n \"object_class\": \"DONATIAN_ACCIDENT_VALUE\",\n \"label\": \"SUPERLATIVUS\",\n \"value_classes\": [\n \"GRADUS\"\n ],\n \"used_by_accidents\": [\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.NOMEN.COMPARATIO\",\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.ADVERBIUM.COMPARATIO\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.VALUE.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.AFFIRMATIO\",\n \"object_class\": \"DONATIAN_ACCIDENT_VALUE\",\n \"label\": \"AFFIRMATIO\",\n \"value_classes\": [\n \"SIGNIFICATIONES\"\n ],\n \"used_by_accidents\": [\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.VALUE.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.COMPARATIO\",\n \"object_class\": \"DONATIAN_ACCIDENT_VALUE\",\n \"label\": \"COMPARATIO\",\n \"value_classes\": [\n \"SIGNIFICATIONES\"\n ],\n \"used_by_accidents\": [\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.VALUE.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.CONGREGATIO\",\n \"object_class\": \"DONATIAN_ACCIDENT_VALUE\",\n \"label\": \"CONGREGATIO\",\n \"value_classes\": [\n \"SIGNIFICATIONES\"\n ],\n \"used_by_accidents\": [\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.VALUE.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.DEMONSTRATIO\",\n \"object_class\": \"DONATIAN_ACCIDENT_VALUE\",\n \"label\": \"DEMONSTRATIO\",\n \"value_classes\": [\n \"SIGNIFICATIONES\"\n ],\n \"used_by_accidents\": [\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.VALUE.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.DUBITATIO\",\n \"object_class\": \"DONATIAN_ACCIDENT_VALUE\",\n \"label\": \"DUBITATIO\",\n \"value_classes\": [\n \"SIGNIFICATIONES\"\n ],\n \"used_by_accidents\": [\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.VALUE.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.ELECTIO\",\n \"object_class\": \"DONATIAN_ACCIDENT_VALUE\",\n \"label\": \"ELECTIO\",\n \"value_classes\": [\n \"SIGNIFICATIONES\"\n ],\n \"used_by_accidents\": [\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.VALUE.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.EVENTUS\",\n \"object_class\": \"DONATIAN_ACCIDENT_VALUE\",\n \"label\": \"EVENTUS\",\n \"value_classes\": [\n \"SIGNIFICATIONES\"\n ],\n \"used_by_accidents\": [\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.VALUE.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.HORTATIO\",\n \"object_class\": \"DONATIAN_ACCIDENT_VALUE\",\n \"label\": \"HORTATIO\",\n \"value_classes\": [\n \"SIGNIFICATIONES\"\n ],\n \"used_by_accidents\": [\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.VALUE.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.INTERROGATIO\",\n \"object_class\": \"DONATIAN_ACCIDENT_VALUE\",\n \"label\": \"INTERROGATIO\",\n \"value_classes\": [\n \"SIGNIFICATIONES\"\n ],\n \"used_by_accidents\": [\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.VALUE.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.IURATIO\",\n \"object_class\": \"DONATIAN_ACCIDENT_VALUE\",\n \"label\": \"IURATIO\",\n \"value_classes\": [\n \"SIGNIFICATIONES\"\n ],\n \"used_by_accidents\": [\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.VALUE.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.LOCUS\",\n \"object_class\": \"DONATIAN_ACCIDENT_VALUE\",\n \"label\": \"LOCUS\",\n \"value_classes\": [\n \"SIGNIFICATIONES\"\n ],\n \"used_by_accidents\": [\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.VALUE.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.NEGATIO\",\n \"object_class\": \"DONATIAN_ACCIDENT_VALUE\",\n \"label\": \"NEGATIO\",\n \"value_classes\": [\n \"SIGNIFICATIONES\"\n ],\n \"used_by_accidents\": [\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.VALUE.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.NUMERUS\",\n \"object_class\": \"DONATIAN_ACCIDENT_VALUE\",\n \"label\": \"NUMERUS\",\n \"value_classes\": [\n \"SIGNIFICATIONES\"\n ],\n \"used_by_accidents\": [\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.VALUE.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.OPTATIO\",\n \"object_class\": \"DONATIAN_ACCIDENT_VALUE\",\n \"label\": \"OPTATIO\",\n \"value_classes\": [\n \"SIGNIFICATIONES\"\n ],\n \"used_by_accidents\": [\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.VALUE.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.ORDO\",\n \"object_class\": \"DONATIAN_ACCIDENT_VALUE\",\n \"label\": \"ORDO\",\n \"value_classes\": [\n \"SIGNIFICATIONES\"\n ],\n \"used_by_accidents\": [\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.VALUE.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.PERSONA\",\n \"object_class\": \"DONATIAN_ACCIDENT_VALUE\",\n \"label\": \"PERSONA\",\n \"value_classes\": [\n \"SIGNIFICATIONES\"\n ],\n \"used_by_accidents\": [\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.VALUE.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.PROHIBITIO\",\n \"object_class\": \"DONATIAN_ACCIDENT_VALUE\",\n \"label\": \"PROHIBITIO\",\n \"value_classes\": [\n \"SIGNIFICATIONES\"\n ],\n \"used_by_accidents\": [\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.VALUE.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.QUALITAS\",\n \"object_class\": \"DONATIAN_ACCIDENT_VALUE\",\n \"label\": \"QUALITAS\",\n \"value_classes\": [\n \"SIGNIFICATIONES\"\n ],\n \"used_by_accidents\": [\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.VALUE.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.QUANTITAS\",\n \"object_class\": \"DONATIAN_ACCIDENT_VALUE\",\n \"label\": \"QUANTITAS\",\n \"value_classes\": [\n \"SIGNIFICATIONES\"\n ],\n \"used_by_accidents\": [\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.VALUE.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.RESPONSIO\",\n \"object_class\": \"DONATIAN_ACCIDENT_VALUE\",\n \"label\": \"RESPONSIO\",\n \"value_classes\": [\n \"SIGNIFICATIONES\"\n ],\n \"used_by_accidents\": [\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.VALUE.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.SEPARATIO\",\n \"object_class\": \"DONATIAN_ACCIDENT_VALUE\",\n \"label\": \"SEPARATIO\",\n \"value_classes\": [\n \"SIGNIFICATIONES\"\n ],\n \"used_by_accidents\": [\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.VALUE.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.SIMILITUDO\",\n \"object_class\": \"DONATIAN_ACCIDENT_VALUE\",\n \"label\": \"SIMILITUDO\",\n \"value_classes\": [\n \"SIGNIFICATIONES\"\n ],\n \"used_by_accidents\": [\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.VALUE.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.TEMPUS\",\n \"object_class\": \"DONATIAN_ACCIDENT_VALUE\",\n \"label\": \"TEMPUS\",\n \"value_classes\": [\n \"SIGNIFICATIONES\"\n ],\n \"used_by_accidents\": [\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.VALUE.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.VOCATIO\",\n \"object_class\": \"DONATIAN_ACCIDENT_VALUE\",\n \"label\": \"VOCATIO\",\n \"value_classes\": [\n \"SIGNIFICATIONES\"\n ],\n \"used_by_accidents\": [\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.ADVERBIUM.SIGNIFICATIO\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.VALUE.CASUS.ABLATIVUS\",\n \"object_class\": \"DONATIAN_ACCIDENT_VALUE\",\n \"label\": \"ABLATIVUS\",\n \"value_classes\": [\n \"CASUS\"\n ],\n \"used_by_accidents\": [\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.NOMEN.CASUS\",\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.PRONOMEN.CASUS\",\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.PARTICIPIUM.CASUS\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.VALUE.CASUS.ACCUSATIVUS\",\n \"object_class\": \"DONATIAN_ACCIDENT_VALUE\",\n \"label\": \"ACCUSATIVUS\",\n \"value_classes\": [\n \"CASUS\"\n ],\n \"used_by_accidents\": [\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.NOMEN.CASUS\",\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.PRONOMEN.CASUS\",\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.PARTICIPIUM.CASUS\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.VALUE.CASUS.DATIVUS\",\n \"object_class\": \"DONATIAN_ACCIDENT_VALUE\",\n \"label\": \"DATIVUS\",\n \"value_classes\": [\n \"CASUS\"\n ],\n \"used_by_accidents\": [\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.NOMEN.CASUS\",\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.PRONOMEN.CASUS\",\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.PARTICIPIUM.CASUS\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.VALUE.CASUS.GENETIVUS\",\n \"object_class\": \"DONATIAN_ACCIDENT_VALUE\",\n \"label\": \"GENETIVUS\",\n \"value_classes\": [\n \"CASUS\"\n ],\n \"used_by_accidents\": [\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.NOMEN.CASUS\",\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.PRONOMEN.CASUS\",\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.PARTICIPIUM.CASUS\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.VALUE.CASUS.NOMINATIVUS\",\n \"object_class\": \"DONATIAN_ACCIDENT_VALUE\",\n \"label\": \"NOMINATIVUS\",\n \"value_classes\": [\n \"CASUS\"\n ],\n \"used_by_accidents\": [\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.NOMEN.CASUS\",\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.PRONOMEN.CASUS\",\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.PARTICIPIUM.CASUS\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.VALUE.CASUS.VOCATIVUS\",\n \"object_class\": \"DONATIAN_ACCIDENT_VALUE\",\n \"label\": \"VOCATIVUS\",\n \"value_classes\": [\n \"CASUS\"\n ],\n \"used_by_accidents\": [\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.NOMEN.CASUS\",\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.PRONOMEN.CASUS\",\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.PARTICIPIUM.CASUS\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.VALUE.CONIUGATIO.PRIMA\",\n \"object_class\": \"DONATIAN_ACCIDENT_VALUE\",\n \"label\": \"PRIMA\",\n \"value_classes\": [\n \"CONIUGATIONES\"\n ],\n \"used_by_accidents\": [\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.VERBUM.CONIUGATIO\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.VALUE.CONIUGATIO.SECUNDA\",\n \"object_class\": \"DONATIAN_ACCIDENT_VALUE\",\n \"label\": \"SECUNDA\",\n \"value_classes\": [\n \"CONIUGATIONES\"\n ],\n \"used_by_accidents\": [\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.VERBUM.CONIUGATIO\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.VALUE.CONIUGATIO.TERTIA\",\n \"object_class\": \"DONATIAN_ACCIDENT_VALUE\",\n \"label\": \"TERTIA\",\n \"value_classes\": [\n \"CONIUGATIONES\"\n ],\n \"used_by_accidents\": [\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.VERBUM.CONIUGATIO\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.VALUE.CONIUNCTIO.ORDO.COMMUNIS\",\n \"object_class\": \"DONATIAN_ACCIDENT_VALUE\",\n \"label\": \"COMMUNIS\",\n \"value_classes\": [\n \"ORDINES\"\n ],\n \"used_by_accidents\": [\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.CONIUNCTIO.ORDO\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.VALUE.CONIUNCTIO.ORDO.PRAEPOSITIVUS\",\n \"object_class\": \"DONATIAN_ACCIDENT_VALUE\",\n \"label\": \"PRAEPOSITIVUS\",\n \"value_classes\": [\n \"ORDINES\"\n ],\n \"used_by_accidents\": [\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.CONIUNCTIO.ORDO\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.VALUE.CONIUNCTIO.ORDO.SUBIUNCTIVUS\",\n \"object_class\": \"DONATIAN_ACCIDENT_VALUE\",\n \"label\": \"SUBIUNCTIVUS\",\n \"value_classes\": [\n \"ORDINES\"\n ],\n \"used_by_accidents\": [\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.CONIUNCTIO.ORDO\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.VALUE.CONIUNCTIO.POTESTAS.CAUSALIS\",\n \"object_class\": \"DONATIAN_ACCIDENT_VALUE\",\n \"label\": \"CAUSALIS\",\n \"value_classes\": [\n \"POTESTATES\"\n ],\n \"used_by_accidents\": [\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.CONIUNCTIO.POTESTAS\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.VALUE.CONIUNCTIO.POTESTAS.COPULATIVA\",\n \"object_class\": \"DONATIAN_ACCIDENT_VALUE\",\n \"label\": \"COPULATIVA\",\n \"value_classes\": [\n \"POTESTATES\"\n ],\n \"used_by_accidents\": [\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.CONIUNCTIO.POTESTAS\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.VALUE.CONIUNCTIO.POTESTAS.DISIUNCTIVA\",\n \"object_class\": \"DONATIAN_ACCIDENT_VALUE\",\n \"label\": \"DISIUNCTIVA\",\n \"value_classes\": [\n \"POTESTATES\"\n ],\n \"used_by_accidents\": [\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.CONIUNCTIO.POTESTAS\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.VALUE.CONIUNCTIO.POTESTAS.EXPLETIVA\",\n \"object_class\": \"DONATIAN_ACCIDENT_VALUE\",\n \"label\": \"EXPLETIVA\",\n \"value_classes\": [\n \"POTESTATES\"\n ],\n \"used_by_accidents\": [\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.CONIUNCTIO.POTESTAS\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.VALUE.CONIUNCTIO.POTESTAS.RATIONALIS\",\n \"object_class\": \"DONATIAN_ACCIDENT_VALUE\",\n \"label\": \"RATIONALIS\",\n \"value_classes\": [\n \"POTESTATES\"\n ],\n \"used_by_accidents\": [\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.CONIUNCTIO.POTESTAS\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.VALUE.FIGURA.COMPOSITA\",\n \"object_class\": \"DONATIAN_ACCIDENT_VALUE\",\n \"label\": \"COMPOSITA\",\n \"value_classes\": [\n \"FIGURAE\"\n ],\n \"used_by_accidents\": [\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.NOMEN.FIGURA\",\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.PRONOMEN.FIGURA\",\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.VERBUM.FIGURA\",\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.ADVERBIUM.FIGURA\",\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.PARTICIPIUM.FIGURA\",\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.CONIUNCTIO.FIGURA\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.VALUE.FIGURA.SIMPLEX\",\n \"object_class\": \"DONATIAN_ACCIDENT_VALUE\",\n \"label\": \"SIMPLEX\",\n \"value_classes\": [\n \"FIGURAE\"\n ],\n \"used_by_accidents\": [\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.NOMEN.FIGURA\",\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.PRONOMEN.FIGURA\",\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.VERBUM.FIGURA\",\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.ADVERBIUM.FIGURA\",\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.PARTICIPIUM.FIGURA\",\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.CONIUNCTIO.FIGURA\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.VALUE.FORMA.FREQUENTATIVA\",\n \"object_class\": \"DONATIAN_ACCIDENT_VALUE\",\n \"label\": \"FREQUENTATIVA\",\n \"value_classes\": [\n \"MODI_ET_FORMAE\"\n ],\n \"used_by_accidents\": [\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.VERBUM.QUALITAS\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.VALUE.FORMA.INCHOATIVA\",\n \"object_class\": \"DONATIAN_ACCIDENT_VALUE\",\n \"label\": \"INCHOATIVA\",\n \"value_classes\": [\n \"MODI_ET_FORMAE\"\n ],\n \"used_by_accidents\": [\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.VERBUM.QUALITAS\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.VALUE.FORMA.MEDITATIVA\",\n \"object_class\": \"DONATIAN_ACCIDENT_VALUE\",\n \"label\": \"MEDITATIVA\",\n \"value_classes\": [\n \"MODI_ET_FORMAE\"\n ],\n \"used_by_accidents\": [\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.VERBUM.QUALITAS\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.VALUE.FORMA.PERFECTA\",\n \"object_class\": \"DONATIAN_ACCIDENT_VALUE\",\n \"label\": \"PERFECTA\",\n \"value_classes\": [\n \"MODI_ET_FORMAE\"\n ],\n \"used_by_accidents\": [\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.VERBUM.QUALITAS\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.VALUE.GENUS_VERBI.ACTIVUM\",\n \"object_class\": \"DONATIAN_ACCIDENT_VALUE\",\n \"label\": \"ACTIVUM\",\n \"value_classes\": [\n \"GENERA_VERBI\"\n ],\n \"used_by_accidents\": [\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.VERBUM.GENUS\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.VALUE.GENUS_VERBI.COMMUNE\",\n \"object_class\": \"DONATIAN_ACCIDENT_VALUE\",\n \"label\": \"COMMUNE\",\n \"value_classes\": [\n \"GENERA_VERBI\"\n ],\n \"used_by_accidents\": [\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.VERBUM.GENUS\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.VALUE.GENUS_VERBI.DEPONENS\",\n \"object_class\": \"DONATIAN_ACCIDENT_VALUE\",\n \"label\": \"DEPONENS\",\n \"value_classes\": [\n \"GENERA_VERBI\"\n ],\n \"used_by_accidents\": [\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.VERBUM.GENUS\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.VALUE.GENUS_VERBI.NEUTRUM\",\n \"object_class\": \"DONATIAN_ACCIDENT_VALUE\",\n \"label\": \"NEUTRUM\",\n \"value_classes\": [\n \"GENERA_VERBI\"\n ],\n \"used_by_accidents\": [\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.VERBUM.GENUS\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.VALUE.GENUS_VERBI.PASSIVUM\",\n \"object_class\": \"DONATIAN_ACCIDENT_VALUE\",\n \"label\": \"PASSIVUM\",\n \"value_classes\": [\n \"GENERA_VERBI\"\n ],\n \"used_by_accidents\": [\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.VERBUM.GENUS\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.VALUE.INTERIECTIO.SIGNIFICATIO.ADMIRATIO\",\n \"object_class\": \"DONATIAN_ACCIDENT_VALUE\",\n \"label\": \"ADMIRATIO\",\n \"value_classes\": [\n \"SIGNIFICATIONES\"\n ],\n \"used_by_accidents\": [\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.INTERIECTIO.SIGNIFICATIO\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.VALUE.INTERIECTIO.SIGNIFICATIO.DOLOR\",\n \"object_class\": \"DONATIAN_ACCIDENT_VALUE\",\n \"label\": \"DOLOR\",\n \"value_classes\": [\n \"SIGNIFICATIONES\"\n ],\n \"used_by_accidents\": [\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.INTERIECTIO.SIGNIFICATIO\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.VALUE.INTERIECTIO.SIGNIFICATIO.LAETITIA\",\n \"object_class\": \"DONATIAN_ACCIDENT_VALUE\",\n \"label\": \"LAETITIA\",\n \"value_classes\": [\n \"SIGNIFICATIONES\"\n ],\n \"used_by_accidents\": [\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.INTERIECTIO.SIGNIFICATIO\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.VALUE.INTERIECTIO.SIGNIFICATIO.TIMOR\",\n \"object_class\": \"DONATIAN_ACCIDENT_VALUE\",\n \"label\": \"TIMOR\",\n \"value_classes\": [\n \"SIGNIFICATIONES\"\n ],\n \"used_by_accidents\": [\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.INTERIECTIO.SIGNIFICATIO\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.VALUE.MODUS.CONIUNCTIVUS\",\n \"object_class\": \"DONATIAN_ACCIDENT_VALUE\",\n \"label\": \"CONIUNCTIVUS\",\n \"value_classes\": [\n \"MODI_ET_FORMAE\"\n ],\n \"used_by_accidents\": [\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.VERBUM.QUALITAS\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.VALUE.MODUS.IMPERATIVUS\",\n \"object_class\": \"DONATIAN_ACCIDENT_VALUE\",\n \"label\": \"IMPERATIVUS\",\n \"value_classes\": [\n \"MODI_ET_FORMAE\"\n ],\n \"used_by_accidents\": [\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.VERBUM.QUALITAS\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.VALUE.MODUS.IMPERSONALIS\",\n \"object_class\": \"DONATIAN_ACCIDENT_VALUE\",\n \"label\": \"IMPERSONALIS\",\n \"value_classes\": [\n \"MODI_ET_FORMAE\"\n ],\n \"used_by_accidents\": [\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.VERBUM.QUALITAS\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.VALUE.MODUS.INDICATIVUS\",\n \"object_class\": \"DONATIAN_ACCIDENT_VALUE\",\n \"label\": \"INDICATIVUS\",\n \"value_classes\": [\n \"MODI_ET_FORMAE\"\n ],\n \"used_by_accidents\": [\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.VERBUM.QUALITAS\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.VALUE.MODUS.INFINITIVUS\",\n \"object_class\": \"DONATIAN_ACCIDENT_VALUE\",\n \"label\": \"INFINITIVUS\",\n \"value_classes\": [\n \"MODI_ET_FORMAE\"\n ],\n \"used_by_accidents\": [\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.VERBUM.QUALITAS\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.VALUE.MODUS.OPTATIVUS\",\n \"object_class\": \"DONATIAN_ACCIDENT_VALUE\",\n \"label\": \"OPTATIVUS\",\n \"value_classes\": [\n \"MODI_ET_FORMAE\"\n ],\n \"used_by_accidents\": [\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.VERBUM.QUALITAS\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.VALUE.NUMERUS.PLURALIS\",\n \"object_class\": \"DONATIAN_ACCIDENT_VALUE\",\n \"label\": \"PLURALIS\",\n \"value_classes\": [\n \"NUMERI\"\n ],\n \"used_by_accidents\": [\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.NOMEN.NUMERUS\",\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.PRONOMEN.NUMERUS\",\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.VERBUM.NUMERUS\",\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.PARTICIPIUM.NUMERUS\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.VALUE.NUMERUS.SINGULARIS\",\n \"object_class\": \"DONATIAN_ACCIDENT_VALUE\",\n \"label\": \"SINGULARIS\",\n \"value_classes\": [\n \"NUMERI\"\n ],\n \"used_by_accidents\": [\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.NOMEN.NUMERUS\",\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.PRONOMEN.NUMERUS\",\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.VERBUM.NUMERUS\",\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.PARTICIPIUM.NUMERUS\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.VALUE.PARTICIPIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.ACTIVA\",\n \"object_class\": \"DONATIAN_ACCIDENT_VALUE\",\n \"label\": \"ACTIVA\",\n \"value_classes\": [\n \"SIGNIFICATIONES\"\n ],\n \"used_by_accidents\": [\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.PARTICIPIUM.SIGNIFICATIO\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.VALUE.PARTICIPIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.COMMUNIS\",\n \"object_class\": \"DONATIAN_ACCIDENT_VALUE\",\n \"label\": \"COMMUNIS\",\n \"value_classes\": [\n \"SIGNIFICATIONES\"\n ],\n \"used_by_accidents\": [\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.PARTICIPIUM.SIGNIFICATIO\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.VALUE.PARTICIPIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.DEPONENS\",\n \"object_class\": \"DONATIAN_ACCIDENT_VALUE\",\n \"label\": \"DEPONENS\",\n \"value_classes\": [\n \"SIGNIFICATIONES\"\n ],\n \"used_by_accidents\": [\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.PARTICIPIUM.SIGNIFICATIO\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.VALUE.PARTICIPIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.NEUTRA\",\n \"object_class\": \"DONATIAN_ACCIDENT_VALUE\",\n \"label\": \"NEUTRA\",\n \"value_classes\": [\n \"SIGNIFICATIONES\"\n ],\n \"used_by_accidents\": [\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.PARTICIPIUM.SIGNIFICATIO\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.VALUE.PARTICIPIUM.SIGNIFICATIO.PASSIVA\",\n \"object_class\": \"DONATIAN_ACCIDENT_VALUE\",\n \"label\": \"PASSIVA\",\n \"value_classes\": [\n \"SIGNIFICATIONES\"\n ],\n \"used_by_accidents\": [\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.PARTICIPIUM.SIGNIFICATIO\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.VALUE.PERSONA.PRIMA\",\n \"object_class\": \"DONATIAN_ACCIDENT_VALUE\",\n \"label\": \"PRIMA\",\n \"value_classes\": [\n \"PERSONAE\"\n ],\n \"used_by_accidents\": [\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.PRONOMEN.PERSONA\",\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.VERBUM.PERSONA\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.VALUE.PERSONA.SECUNDA\",\n \"object_class\": \"DONATIAN_ACCIDENT_VALUE\",\n \"label\": \"SECUNDA\",\n \"value_classes\": [\n \"PERSONAE\"\n ],\n \"used_by_accidents\": [\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.PRONOMEN.PERSONA\",\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.VERBUM.PERSONA\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.VALUE.PERSONA.TERTIA\",\n \"object_class\": \"DONATIAN_ACCIDENT_VALUE\",\n \"label\": \"TERTIA\",\n \"value_classes\": [\n \"PERSONAE\"\n ],\n \"used_by_accidents\": [\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.PRONOMEN.PERSONA\",\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.VERBUM.PERSONA\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.VALUE.PRAEPOSITIO.CASUS.ABLATIVUS\",\n \"object_class\": \"DONATIAN_ACCIDENT_VALUE\",\n \"label\": \"ABLATIVUS\",\n \"value_classes\": [\n \"CASUS\"\n ],\n \"used_by_accidents\": [\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.PRAEPOSITIO.CASUS\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.VALUE.PRAEPOSITIO.CASUS.ACCUSATIVUS\",\n \"object_class\": \"DONATIAN_ACCIDENT_VALUE\",\n \"label\": \"ACCUSATIVUS\",\n \"value_classes\": [\n \"CASUS\"\n ],\n \"used_by_accidents\": [\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.PRAEPOSITIO.CASUS\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.VALUE.PRAEPOSITIO.CASUS.UTERQUE\",\n \"object_class\": \"DONATIAN_ACCIDENT_VALUE\",\n \"label\": \"UTERQUE\",\n \"value_classes\": [\n \"CASUS\"\n ],\n \"used_by_accidents\": [\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.PRAEPOSITIO.CASUS\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.VALUE.QUALITAS_NOMINIS.APPELLATIVUM\",\n \"object_class\": \"DONATIAN_ACCIDENT_VALUE\",\n \"label\": \"APPELLATIVUM\",\n \"value_classes\": [\n \"QUALITATES\"\n ],\n \"used_by_accidents\": [\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.NOMEN.QUALITAS\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.VALUE.QUALITAS_NOMINIS.PROPRIUM\",\n \"object_class\": \"DONATIAN_ACCIDENT_VALUE\",\n \"label\": \"PROPRIUM\",\n \"value_classes\": [\n \"QUALITATES\"\n ],\n \"used_by_accidents\": [\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.NOMEN.QUALITAS\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.VALUE.QUALITAS_PRONOMINIS.FINITA\",\n \"object_class\": \"DONATIAN_ACCIDENT_VALUE\",\n \"label\": \"FINITA\",\n \"value_classes\": [\n \"QUALITATES\"\n ],\n \"used_by_accidents\": [\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.PRONOMEN.QUALITAS\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.VALUE.QUALITAS_PRONOMINIS.INFINITA\",\n \"object_class\": \"DONATIAN_ACCIDENT_VALUE\",\n \"label\": \"INFINITA\",\n \"value_classes\": [\n \"QUALITATES\"\n ],\n \"used_by_accidents\": [\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.PRONOMEN.QUALITAS\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.VALUE.TEMPUS.FUTURUM\",\n \"object_class\": \"DONATIAN_ACCIDENT_VALUE\",\n \"label\": \"FUTURUM\",\n \"value_classes\": [\n \"TEMPORA\"\n ],\n \"used_by_accidents\": [\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.VERBUM.TEMPUS\",\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.PARTICIPIUM.TEMPUS\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.VALUE.TEMPUS.PRAESENS\",\n \"object_class\": \"DONATIAN_ACCIDENT_VALUE\",\n \"label\": \"PRAESENS\",\n \"value_classes\": [\n \"TEMPORA\"\n ],\n \"used_by_accidents\": [\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.VERBUM.TEMPUS\",\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.PARTICIPIUM.TEMPUS\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.VALUE.TEMPUS.PRAETERITUM\",\n \"object_class\": \"DONATIAN_ACCIDENT_VALUE\",\n \"label\": \"PRAETERITUM\",\n \"value_classes\": [\n \"TEMPORA\"\n ],\n \"used_by_accidents\": [\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.VERBUM.TEMPUS\",\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.PARTICIPIUM.TEMPUS\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n }\n ],\n \"llullian_grammar_modes\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"LLULL.GRAM.MODUS.CONIUGATIO\",\n \"object_class\": \"LLULLIAN_GRAMMAR_MODE\",\n \"label\": \"Coniugatio\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_LLULL_AGU_ARTICLE_88\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"LLULL.GRAM.MODUS.DECLINATIO\",\n \"object_class\": \"LLULLIAN_GRAMMAR_MODE\",\n \"label\": \"Declinatio\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_LLULL_AGU_ARTICLE_88\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"LLULL.GRAM.MODUS.GENUS\",\n \"object_class\": \"LLULLIAN_GRAMMAR_MODE\",\n \"label\": \"Genus\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_LLULL_AGU_ARTICLE_88\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"LLULL.GRAM.MODUS.REGIMEN\",\n \"object_class\": \"LLULLIAN_GRAMMAR_MODE\",\n \"label\": \"Regimen\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_LLULL_AGU_ARTICLE_88\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"LLULL.GRAM.MODUS.CONSTRUCTIO\",\n \"object_class\": \"LLULLIAN_GRAMMAR_MODE\",\n \"label\": \"Constructio\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_LLULL_AGU_ARTICLE_88\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"LLULL.GRAM.MODUS.ORTHOGRAPHIA\",\n \"object_class\": \"LLULLIAN_GRAMMAR_MODE\",\n \"label\": \"Orthographia\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_LLULL_AGU_ARTICLE_88\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"LLULL.GRAM.MODUS.FIGURAE\",\n \"object_class\": \"LLULLIAN_GRAMMAR_MODE\",\n \"label\": \"Figurae\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_LLULL_AGU_ARTICLE_88\"\n }\n ],\n \"auxiliary_objects\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.ACCIDENS\",\n \"object_class\": \"DONATIAN_META_CLASS\",\n \"label\": \"Accidens grammaticale\",\n \"source_status\": \"STRUCTURAL_REGISTRY\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"ARIST.ACCIDENS\",\n \"object_class\": \"ARISTOTELIAN_META_CLASS\",\n \"label\": \"Accidens ontologicum/categoriale\",\n \"source_status\": \"STRUCTURAL_REGISTRY\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"LLULL.PRINCIPIA\",\n \"object_class\": \"LLULLIAN_DOMAIN_REFERENCE\",\n \"label\": \"Principia Artis\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_LLULLIAN_REFERENCE\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"LLULL.A.VOLUNTAS\",\n \"object_class\": \"LLULLIAN_ABSOLUTE_PRINCIPLE_REFERENCE\",\n \"label\": \"Voluntas\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_LLULLIAN_REFERENCE\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"LLULL.T.HIK\",\n \"object_class\": \"LLULLIAN_T_FAMILY_REFERENCE\",\n \"label\": \"Maioritas / Aequalitas / Minoritas family\",\n \"source_status\": \"STRUCTURAL_REGISTRY\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"TRIV.GRAM.TYPE\",\n \"object_class\": \"TRIVIUM_META_OBJECT\",\n \"label\": \"Grammatical type/class\",\n \"source_status\": \"STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"TRIV.GRAM.TOKEN\",\n \"object_class\": \"TRIVIUM_META_OBJECT\",\n \"label\": \"Concrete grammatical token\",\n \"source_status\": \"STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"TRIV.LOG.GATE.ACCIDENTALITAS_INHAERENTIA\",\n \"object_class\": \"TRIVIUM_EXPERIMENTAL_GATE\",\n \"label\": \"Accidentalitas / inhaerentia admission gate\",\n \"source_status\": \"USER_AUTHORITY_EXPERIMENTAL\"\n }\n ],\n \"donatian_dependencies\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.DEP.COMPARATIO_ADMISSIBILITY\",\n \"if\": [\n \"DON.ACCIDENS.NOMEN.QUALITAS=APPELLATIVUM\",\n \"SIGNIFICATIO∈{QUALITAS,QUANTITAS}\"\n ],\n \"then\": \"DON.ACCIDENS.NOMEN.COMPARATIO=ADMISSIBLE\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.DEP.COMPARATIVUS_ABLATIVE\",\n \"if\": [\n \"DON.GRADUS.COMPARATIVUS\"\n ],\n \"then\": \"COMPLEMENT_CASE=ABLATIVUS_SINE_PRAEPOSITIONE\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.DEP.SUPERLATIVUS_GENITIVE\",\n \"if\": [\n \"DON.GRADUS.SUPERLATIVUS\"\n ],\n \"then\": \"COMPARISON_DOMAIN=GENETIVUS_PLURALIS\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.DEP.AGREEMENT\",\n \"if\": [\n \"TWO_OR_MORE_AGREEING_NOMINAL_FORMS\"\n ],\n \"then\": \"MATCH(GENUS,NUMERUS,CASUS)\",\n \"source_status\": \"STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.DEP.PREPOSITION_GOVERNMENT\",\n \"if\": [\n \"DON.PARS.PRAEPOSITIO\"\n ],\n \"then\": \"GOVERNS(CASUS)\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"DON.DEP.PARTICIPLE_INHERITANCE\",\n \"if\": [\n \"DON.PARS.PARTICIPIUM\"\n ],\n \"then\": [\n \"FROM_NOMEN: GENUS,CASUS\",\n \"FROM_VERBUM: TEMPUS,SIGNIFICATIO\",\n \"FROM_BOTH: NUMERUS,FIGURA\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_DONATUS\"\n }\n ],\n \"llullian_grammar_applications\": [\n {\n \"object_id\": \"DON.PARS.NOMEN\",\n \"targets\": [\n \"LLULL.PRINCIPIA\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_LLULL_AGU_ARTICLE_88\",\n \"rationale\": \"Goodness, greatness and other principles are nouns.\"\n },\n {\n \"object_id\": \"DON.PARS.PRONOMEN\",\n \"targets\": [\n \"LLULL.PRINCIPIA\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_LLULL_AGU_ARTICLE_88\",\n \"rationale\": \"Pronouns stand for nouns; the principles are nouns.\"\n },\n {\n \"object_id\": \"DON.PARS.VERBUM\",\n \"targets\": [\n \"LLULL.Q.C.COESSENTIALIA_IN_SE\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_LLULL_AGU_ARTICLE_88\",\n \"rationale\": \"Verbs signify act, illustrated by bonificare and magnificare.\"\n },\n {\n \"object_id\": \"DON.PARS.PARTICIPIUM\",\n \"targets\": [\n \"LLULL.Q.C.COESSENTIALIA_IN_SE\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_LLULL_AGU_ARTICLE_88\",\n \"rationale\": \"Participles expose active and passive correlatives: bonificans/bonificatum.\"\n },\n {\n \"object_id\": \"DON.PARS.CONIUNCTIO\",\n \"targets\": [\n \"LLULL.Q.C.COESSENTIALIA_IN_SE\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_LLULL_AGU_ARTICLE_88\",\n \"rationale\": \"The act joins agent and patient as conjunction joins diverse words or phrases.\"\n },\n {\n \"object_id\": \"DON.PARS.ADVERBIUM\",\n \"targets\": [\n \"LLULL.Q.C.COESSENTIALIA_IN_SE\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_LLULL_AGU_ARTICLE_88\",\n \"rationale\": \"The adverb qualifies the act: bonificans bene bonificat bonificatum.\"\n },\n {\n \"object_id\": \"DON.PARS.PRAEPOSITIO\",\n \"targets\": [\n \"LLULL.Q.C.QUID_HABEAT_IN_ALIO\",\n \"LLULL.Q.K2.AD_ALIA\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_LLULL_AGU_ARTICLE_88\",\n \"rationale\": \"The preposition is an instrument bringing a case into act.\"\n },\n {\n \"object_id\": \"DON.PARS.INTERIECTIO\",\n \"targets\": [\n \"LLULL.A.VOLUNTAS\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_LLULL_AGU_ARTICLE_88\",\n \"rationale\": \"Joy and sadness are primarily expressed by will.\"\n },\n {\n \"object_id\": \"DON.VALUE.CASUS.NOMINATIVUS\",\n \"targets\": [\n \"LLULL.Q.C.COESSENTIALIA_IN_SE\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_LLULL_AGU_ARTICLE_88\",\n \"rationale\": \"Mapped to the active correlative/originating bonifier.\"\n },\n {\n \"object_id\": \"DON.VALUE.CASUS.GENETIVUS\",\n \"targets\": [\n \"LLULL.Q.C.COESSENTIALIA_IN_SE\",\n \"LLULL.Q.D.PERTINENTIA\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_LLULL_AGU_ARTICLE_88\",\n \"rationale\": \"Dependency on nominative and possession.\"\n },\n {\n \"object_id\": \"DON.VALUE.CASUS.DATIVUS\",\n \"targets\": [\n \"LLULL.Q.C.COESSENTIALIA_IN_SE\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_LLULL_AGU_ARTICLE_88\",\n \"rationale\": \"Mapped to the generated passive correlative / recipient.\"\n },\n {\n \"object_id\": \"DON.VALUE.CASUS.ACCUSATIVUS\",\n \"targets\": [\n \"LLULL.Q.C.QUID_SIT_IN_ALIO\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_LLULL_AGU_ARTICLE_88\",\n \"rationale\": \"The agent’s act terminates in its passive object.\"\n },\n {\n \"object_id\": \"DON.VALUE.CASUS.VOCATIVUS\",\n \"targets\": [\n \"LLULL.Q.C.QUID_HABEAT_IN_ALIO\",\n \"LLULL.Q.B.AFFIRMATIO\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_LLULL_AGU_ARTICLE_88\",\n \"rationale\": \"Calling takes an object; rule B is also applicable.\"\n },\n {\n \"object_id\": \"DON.VALUE.CASUS.ABLATIVUS\",\n \"targets\": [\n \"LLULL.Q.C.COESSENTIALIA_IN_SE\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_LLULL_AGU_ARTICLE_88\",\n \"rationale\": \"Mapped to the original causal essence of correlatives.\"\n },\n {\n \"object_id\": \"LLULL.GRAM.MODUS.CONIUGATIO\",\n \"targets\": [\n \"LLULL.Q.C.COESSENTIALIA_IN_SE\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_LLULL_AGU_ARTICLE_88\",\n \"rationale\": \"Conjugated forms descend from a principle across person, tense and mood.\"\n },\n {\n \"object_id\": \"LLULL.GRAM.MODUS.DECLINATIO\",\n \"targets\": [\n \"LLULL.Q.C.COESSENTIALIA_IN_SE\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_LLULL_AGU_ARTICLE_88\",\n \"rationale\": \"Cases descend from an originating form as correlatives descend from their source.\"\n },\n {\n \"object_id\": \"LLULL.GRAM.MODUS.GENUS\",\n \"targets\": [\n \"LLULL.Q.C.COESSENTIALIA_IN_SE\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_LLULL_AGU_ARTICLE_88\",\n \"rationale\": \"Masculine, feminine and neuter are analogized to agent, patient and act.\"\n },\n {\n \"object_id\": \"LLULL.GRAM.MODUS.REGIMEN\",\n \"targets\": [\n \"LLULL.T.TH.SUB_SUB\",\n \"LLULL.T.TH.SUB_ACC\",\n \"LLULL.T.TK.SUB_SUB\",\n \"LLULL.T.TK.SUB_ACC\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_LLULL_AGU_ARTICLE_88\",\n \"rationale\": \"Governance is expressed through greater power/virtue in governor and lesser in governed.\"\n },\n {\n \"object_id\": \"LLULL.GRAM.MODUS.CONSTRUCTIO\",\n \"targets\": [\n \"LLULL.T.TE.CAUSA\",\n \"LLULL.T.TF.CONIUNCTIO\",\n \"LLULL.T.TG.PERFECTIO\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_LLULL_AGU_ARTICLE_88\",\n \"rationale\": \"Construction follows due order of beginning, middle and end.\"\n },\n {\n \"object_id\": \"LLULL.GRAM.MODUS.ORTHOGRAPHIA\",\n \"targets\": [\n \"LLULL.Q.K1.IN_SE\",\n \"LLULL.Q.K1.IN_ALIO_RECIPROCUM\",\n \"LLULL.Q.K1.TOTUM_PARTES\",\n \"LLULL.Q.K1.SIMILITUDO_AD_EXTRA\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_LLULL_AGU_ARTICLE_88\",\n \"rationale\": \"Spelling is mapped to all four species of modality.\"\n },\n {\n \"object_id\": \"LLULL.GRAM.MODUS.FIGURAE\",\n \"targets\": [\n \"LLULL.T.TC.INTEL_INTEL\",\n \"LLULL.T.TD.INTEL_INTEL\"\n ],\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_LLULL_AGU_ARTICLE_88\",\n \"rationale\": \"Figures of speech are judged by concordance or contrariety with grammar.\"\n }\n ],\n \"q_affinity_records\": [\n {\n \"object_id\": \"DON.PARS.NOMEN_SUBSTANTIVUM\",\n \"target_id\": \"LLULL.Q.C.QUID_SIT\",\n \"affinity_class\": \"PRIMARY_STRUCTURAL\",\n \"source_status\": \"STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION\",\n \"rationale\": \"Defines the nominally posited subject or form.\",\n \"object_level\": \"OBJECT_CLASS\"\n },\n {\n \"object_id\": \"DON.PARS.NOMEN_SUBSTANTIVUM\",\n \"target_id\": \"LLULL.Q.C.COESSENTIALIA_IN_SE\",\n \"affinity_class\": \"PRIMARY_STRUCTURAL\",\n \"source_status\": \"STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION\",\n \"rationale\": \"Interrogates the constitution of what the substantive names.\",\n \"object_level\": \"OBJECT_CLASS\"\n },\n {\n \"object_id\": \"DON.PARS.NOMEN_SUBSTANTIVUM\",\n \"target_id\": \"LLULL.Q.B.AFFIRMATIO\",\n \"affinity_class\": \"MNEMONIC_DIAGONAL\",\n \"source_status\": \"USER_AUTHORITY\",\n \"rationale\": \"A substantive can serve as the first nominal posit whose being/admissibility is tested; not its exhaustive definition.\",\n \"object_level\": \"OBJECT_CLASS\"\n },\n {\n \"object_id\": \"DON.PARS.NOMEN_ADIECTIVUM\",\n \"target_id\": \"LLULL.Q.C.QUID_SIT\",\n \"affinity_class\": \"PRIMARY_STRUCTURAL\",\n \"source_status\": \"USER_AUTHORITY_PLUS_DERIVATION\",\n \"rationale\": \"Interrogates the universal or intelligible form signified by the adjective.\",\n \"object_level\": \"OBJECT_CLASS\"\n },\n {\n \"object_id\": \"DON.PARS.NOMEN_ADIECTIVUM\",\n \"target_id\": \"LLULL.Q.C.QUID_SIT_IN_ALIO\",\n \"affinity_class\": \"PRIMARY_STRUCTURAL\",\n \"source_status\": \"STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION\",\n \"rationale\": \"Interrogates the form as contracted/predicated in a subject.\",\n \"object_level\": \"OBJECT_CLASS\"\n },\n {\n \"object_id\": \"DON.PARS.NOMEN_ADIECTIVUM\",\n \"target_id\": \"LLULL.Q.C.QUID_HABEAT_IN_ALIO\",\n \"affinity_class\": \"PRIMARY_STRUCTURAL\",\n \"source_status\": \"STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION\",\n \"rationale\": \"Interrogates operations or properties of the form in the subject.\",\n \"object_level\": \"OBJECT_CLASS\"\n },\n {\n \"object_id\": \"DON.PARS.NOMEN_ADIECTIVUM\",\n \"target_id\": \"LLULL.Q.G.PROPRIA\",\n \"affinity_class\": \"DIAGNOSTIC\",\n \"source_status\": \"STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION\",\n \"rationale\": \"Discriminates whether attribution is proper.\",\n \"object_level\": \"OBJECT_CLASS\"\n },\n {\n \"object_id\": \"DON.PARS.NOMEN_ADIECTIVUM\",\n \"target_id\": \"LLULL.Q.G.APPROPRIATA\",\n \"affinity_class\": \"DIAGNOSTIC\",\n \"source_status\": \"STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION\",\n \"rationale\": \"Discriminates whether attribution is appropriated/acquired.\",\n \"object_level\": \"OBJECT_CLASS\"\n },\n {\n \"object_id\": \"DON.PARS.PRONOMEN\",\n \"target_id\": \"LLULL.Q.D.PERTINENTIA\",\n \"affinity_class\": \"PRIMARY_STRUCTURAL\",\n \"source_status\": \"STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION\",\n \"rationale\": \"Anchors reference, antecedent, person and belonging.\",\n \"object_level\": \"OBJECT_CLASS\"\n },\n {\n \"object_id\": \"DON.PARS.PRONOMEN\",\n \"target_id\": \"LLULL.Q.C.QUID_SIT_IN_ALIO\",\n \"affinity_class\": \"SECONDARY_FUNCTIONAL\",\n \"source_status\": \"STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION\",\n \"rationale\": \"Tracks the same nominal content under another expression/context.\",\n \"object_level\": \"OBJECT_CLASS\"\n },\n {\n \"object_id\": \"DON.PARS.VERBUM\",\n \"target_id\": \"LLULL.Q.C.COESSENTIALIA_IN_SE\",\n \"affinity_class\": \"DIRECT_TEXT\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_LLULL_AGU_ARTICLE_88\",\n \"rationale\": \"Verb signifies the correlative act.\",\n \"object_level\": \"OBJECT_CLASS\"\n },\n {\n \"object_id\": \"DON.PARS.VERBUM\",\n \"target_id\": \"LLULL.Q.C.QUID_HABEAT_IN_ALIO\",\n \"affinity_class\": \"SECONDARY_FUNCTIONAL\",\n \"source_status\": \"STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION\",\n \"rationale\": \"Interrogates the act as operating in another.\",\n \"object_level\": \"OBJECT_CLASS\"\n },\n {\n \"object_id\": \"DON.PARS.VERBUM\",\n \"target_id\": \"LLULL.Q.H.C.COESSENTIALIA_IN_SE\",\n \"affinity_class\": \"CONDITIONAL\",\n \"source_status\": \"STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION\",\n \"rationale\": \"Temporalizes the verbal act.\",\n \"object_level\": \"OBJECT_CLASS\"\n },\n {\n \"object_id\": \"DON.PARS.VERBUM\",\n \"target_id\": \"LLULL.Q.E.CAUSA_FINALIS\",\n \"affinity_class\": \"CONDITIONAL\",\n \"source_status\": \"STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION\",\n \"rationale\": \"Interrogates the end of the act; verb is not identical with Quare.\",\n \"object_level\": \"OBJECT_CLASS\"\n },\n {\n \"object_id\": \"DON.PARS.ADVERBIUM\",\n \"target_id\": \"LLULL.Q.C.COESSENTIALIA_IN_SE\",\n \"affinity_class\": \"DIRECT_TEXT\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_LLULL_AGU_ARTICLE_88\",\n \"rationale\": \"Adverb qualifies how the correlative act is carried out.\",\n \"object_level\": \"OBJECT_CLASS\"\n },\n {\n \"object_id\": \"DON.PARS.ADVERBIUM\",\n \"target_id\": \"LLULL.Q.F.CONTINUA\",\n \"affinity_class\": \"CONDITIONAL\",\n \"source_status\": \"STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION\",\n \"rationale\": \"Activated for degree, extension or intensity adverbs.\",\n \"object_level\": \"OBJECT_CLASS\"\n },\n {\n \"object_id\": \"DON.PARS.ADVERBIUM\",\n \"target_id\": \"LLULL.Q.F.DISCRETA\",\n \"affinity_class\": \"CONDITIONAL\",\n \"source_status\": \"STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION\",\n \"rationale\": \"Activated for number/count adverbs.\",\n \"object_level\": \"OBJECT_CLASS\"\n },\n {\n \"object_id\": \"DON.PARS.ADVERBIUM\",\n \"target_id\": \"LLULL.Q.G.PROPRIA\",\n \"affinity_class\": \"CONDITIONAL\",\n \"source_status\": \"STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION\",\n \"rationale\": \"Activated for qualitative adverbs.\",\n \"object_level\": \"OBJECT_CLASS\"\n },\n {\n \"object_id\": \"DON.PARS.ADVERBIUM\",\n \"target_id\": \"LLULL.Q.H.C.QUID_SIT_IN_ALIO\",\n \"affinity_class\": \"CONDITIONAL\",\n \"source_status\": \"STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION\",\n \"rationale\": \"Activated for temporal adverbs.\",\n \"object_level\": \"OBJECT_CLASS\"\n },\n {\n \"object_id\": \"DON.PARS.ADVERBIUM\",\n \"target_id\": \"LLULL.Q.I.C.QUID_SIT_IN_ALIO\",\n \"affinity_class\": \"CONDITIONAL\",\n \"source_status\": \"STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION\",\n \"rationale\": \"Activated for locative adverbs.\",\n \"object_level\": \"OBJECT_CLASS\"\n },\n {\n \"object_id\": \"DON.PARS.ADVERBIUM\",\n \"target_id\": \"LLULL.Q.K1.IN_SE\",\n \"affinity_class\": \"CONDITIONAL\",\n \"source_status\": \"STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION\",\n \"rationale\": \"Activated for modal adverbs.\",\n \"object_level\": \"OBJECT_CLASS\"\n },\n {\n \"object_id\": \"DON.PARS.PARTICIPIUM\",\n \"target_id\": \"LLULL.Q.C.COESSENTIALIA_IN_SE\",\n \"affinity_class\": \"DIRECT_TEXT\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_LLULL_AGU_ARTICLE_88\",\n \"rationale\": \"Participles signify active/passive correlatives.\",\n \"object_level\": \"OBJECT_CLASS\"\n },\n {\n \"object_id\": \"DON.PARS.PARTICIPIUM\",\n \"target_id\": \"LLULL.Q.G.PROPRIA\",\n \"affinity_class\": \"SECONDARY_FUNCTIONAL\",\n \"source_status\": \"STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION\",\n \"rationale\": \"Tests act/state as proper quality.\",\n \"object_level\": \"OBJECT_CLASS\"\n },\n {\n \"object_id\": \"DON.PARS.PARTICIPIUM\",\n \"target_id\": \"LLULL.Q.G.APPROPRIATA\",\n \"affinity_class\": \"SECONDARY_FUNCTIONAL\",\n \"source_status\": \"STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION\",\n \"rationale\": \"Tests received/acquired state.\",\n \"object_level\": \"OBJECT_CLASS\"\n },\n {\n \"object_id\": \"DON.PARS.PARTICIPIUM\",\n \"target_id\": \"LLULL.Q.H.C.COESSENTIALIA_IN_SE\",\n \"affinity_class\": \"SECONDARY_FUNCTIONAL\",\n \"source_status\": \"STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION\",\n \"rationale\": \"Temporal/aspectual qualification.\",\n \"object_level\": \"OBJECT_CLASS\"\n },\n {\n \"object_id\": \"DON.PARS.CONIUNCTIO\",\n \"target_id\": \"LLULL.Q.C.COESSENTIALIA_IN_SE\",\n \"affinity_class\": \"DIRECT_TEXT\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_LLULL_AGU_ARTICLE_88\",\n \"rationale\": \"Conjunction analogized to the act joining agent and patient.\",\n \"object_level\": \"OBJECT_CLASS\"\n },\n {\n \"object_id\": \"DON.PARS.PRAEPOSITIO\",\n \"target_id\": \"LLULL.Q.C.QUID_HABEAT_IN_ALIO\",\n \"affinity_class\": \"DIRECT_TEXT\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_LLULL_AGU_ARTICLE_88\",\n \"rationale\": \"Preposition brings a case into act in another construction.\",\n \"object_level\": \"OBJECT_CLASS\"\n },\n {\n \"object_id\": \"DON.PARS.PRAEPOSITIO\",\n \"target_id\": \"LLULL.Q.K2.AD_ALIA\",\n \"affinity_class\": \"DIRECT_TEXT\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_LLULL_AGU_ARTICLE_88\",\n \"rationale\": \"Preposition is treated as an instrument.\",\n \"object_level\": \"OBJECT_CLASS\"\n },\n {\n \"object_id\": \"DON.PARS.PRAEPOSITIO\",\n \"target_id\": \"LLULL.Q.I.C.QUID_SIT_IN_ALIO\",\n \"affinity_class\": \"CONDITIONAL\",\n \"source_status\": \"STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION\",\n \"rationale\": \"Activated for locative/directional prepositions.\",\n \"object_level\": \"OBJECT_CLASS\"\n },\n {\n \"object_id\": \"DON.PARS.INTERIECTIO\",\n \"target_id\": \"LLULL.Q.K1.SIMILITUDO_AD_EXTRA\",\n \"affinity_class\": \"SECONDARY_FUNCTIONAL\",\n \"source_status\": \"STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION\",\n \"rationale\": \"Externalizes an internal affection.\",\n \"object_level\": \"OBJECT_CLASS\"\n },\n {\n \"object_id\": \"DON.PARS.INTERIECTIO\",\n \"target_id\": \"LLULL.Q.G.PROPRIA\",\n \"affinity_class\": \"CONDITIONAL\",\n \"source_status\": \"STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION\",\n \"rationale\": \"Tests whether expressed affect is proper.\",\n \"object_level\": \"OBJECT_CLASS\"\n },\n {\n \"object_id\": \"DON.PARS.INTERIECTIO\",\n \"target_id\": \"LLULL.Q.G.APPROPRIATA\",\n \"affinity_class\": \"CONDITIONAL\",\n \"source_status\": \"STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION\",\n \"rationale\": \"Tests whether expressed affect is appropriated/acquired.\",\n \"object_level\": \"OBJECT_CLASS\"\n },\n {\n \"object_id\": \"DON.ACCIDENS.NOMEN.QUALITAS\",\n \"target_id\": \"LLULL.Q.C.QUID_SIT\",\n \"affinity_class\": \"PRIMARY_STRUCTURAL\",\n \"source_status\": \"STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION\",\n \"rationale\": \"Defines proprium/appellativum as grammatical extension classes.\",\n \"object_level\": \"OBJECT_CLASS\"\n },\n {\n \"object_id\": \"DON.ACCIDENS.NOMEN.QUALITAS\",\n \"target_id\": \"LLULL.Q.C.QUID_SIT_IN_ALIO\",\n \"affinity_class\": \"PRIMARY_STRUCTURAL\",\n \"source_status\": \"STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION\",\n \"rationale\": \"Appellative applies one form to many subjects.\",\n \"object_level\": \"OBJECT_CLASS\"\n },\n {\n \"object_id\": \"DON.ACCIDENS.NOMEN.QUALITAS\",\n \"target_id\": \"LLULL.Q.D.PERTINENTIA\",\n \"affinity_class\": \"PRIMARY_STRUCTURAL\",\n \"source_status\": \"STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION\",\n \"rationale\": \"Proper names anchor belonging/reference.\",\n \"object_level\": \"OBJECT_CLASS\"\n },\n {\n \"object_id\": \"DON.ACCIDENS.NOMEN.COMPARATIO\",\n \"target_id\": \"LLULL.Q.F.CONTINUA\",\n \"affinity_class\": \"PRIMARY_STRUCTURAL\",\n \"source_status\": \"STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION\",\n \"rationale\": \"Comparison presupposes measurable degree/continuum.\",\n \"object_level\": \"OBJECT_CLASS\"\n },\n {\n \"object_id\": \"DON.ACCIDENS.NOMEN.COMPARATIO\",\n \"target_id\": \"LLULL.Q.G.PROPRIA\",\n \"affinity_class\": \"DIAGNOSTIC\",\n \"source_status\": \"STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION\",\n \"rationale\": \"Determines the quality under comparison and its proper attribution.\",\n \"object_level\": \"OBJECT_CLASS\"\n },\n {\n \"object_id\": \"DON.ACCIDENS.NOMEN.COMPARATIO\",\n \"target_id\": \"LLULL.Q.G.APPROPRIATA\",\n \"affinity_class\": \"DIAGNOSTIC\",\n \"source_status\": \"STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION\",\n \"rationale\": \"Determines appropriated quality under comparison.\",\n \"object_level\": \"OBJECT_CLASS\"\n },\n {\n \"object_id\": \"DON.ACCIDENS.NOMEN.GENUS\",\n \"target_id\": \"LLULL.Q.C.QUID_SIT\",\n \"affinity_class\": \"PRIMARY_STRUCTURAL\",\n \"source_status\": \"STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION\",\n \"rationale\": \"Defines grammatical gender class without treating it as Porphyrian genus.\",\n \"object_level\": \"OBJECT_CLASS\"\n },\n {\n \"object_id\": \"DON.ACCIDENS.NOMEN.NUMERUS\",\n \"target_id\": \"LLULL.Q.F.DISCRETA\",\n \"affinity_class\": \"PRIMARY_STRUCTURAL\",\n \"source_status\": \"STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION\",\n \"rationale\": \"Singular/plural is discrete grammatical quantity.\",\n \"object_level\": \"OBJECT_CLASS\"\n },\n {\n \"object_id\": \"DON.ACCIDENS.NOMEN.FIGURA\",\n \"target_id\": \"LLULL.Q.D.COMPOSITIO\",\n \"affinity_class\": \"PRIMARY_STRUCTURAL\",\n \"source_status\": \"STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION\",\n \"rationale\": \"Simple/compound form is a composition question.\",\n \"object_level\": \"OBJECT_CLASS\"\n },\n {\n \"object_id\": \"DON.ACCIDENS.NOMEN.FIGURA\",\n \"target_id\": \"LLULL.Q.K1.TOTUM_PARTES\",\n \"affinity_class\": \"SECONDARY_FUNCTIONAL\",\n \"source_status\": \"STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION\",\n \"rationale\": \"Interrogates parts and whole of compound morphology.\",\n \"object_level\": \"OBJECT_CLASS\"\n },\n {\n \"object_id\": \"DON.ACCIDENS.NOMEN.CASUS\",\n \"target_id\": \"LLULL.Q.D.PERTINENTIA\",\n \"affinity_class\": \"PRIMARY_STRUCTURAL\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_LLULL_AGU_ARTICLE_88\",\n \"rationale\": \"Case expresses dependency, possession, government and syntactic role.\",\n \"object_level\": \"OBJECT_CLASS\"\n },\n {\n \"object_id\": \"DON.ACCIDENS.NOMEN.CASUS\",\n \"target_id\": \"LLULL.Q.K2.AD_ALIA\",\n \"affinity_class\": \"SECONDARY_FUNCTIONAL\",\n \"source_status\": \"STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION\",\n \"rationale\": \"Case may be actuated by prepositional or governing instruments.\",\n \"object_level\": \"OBJECT_CLASS\"\n },\n {\n \"object_id\": \"DON.ACCIDENS.VERBUM.TEMPUS\",\n \"target_id\": \"LLULL.Q.H.C.COESSENTIALIA_IN_SE\",\n \"affinity_class\": \"PRIMARY_STRUCTURAL\",\n \"source_status\": \"STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION\",\n \"rationale\": \"Temporalizes the act and its correlatives.\",\n \"object_level\": \"OBJECT_CLASS\"\n },\n {\n \"object_id\": \"DON.ACCIDENS.PRONOMEN.PERSONA\",\n \"target_id\": \"LLULL.Q.D.PERTINENTIA\",\n \"affinity_class\": \"PRIMARY_STRUCTURAL\",\n \"source_status\": \"STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION\",\n \"rationale\": \"Anchors who speaks, is addressed or is referred to.\",\n \"object_level\": \"OBJECT_CLASS\"\n },\n {\n \"object_id\": \"DON.ACCIDENS.CONIUNCTIO.ORDO\",\n \"target_id\": \"LLULL.Q.K1.TOTUM_PARTES\",\n \"affinity_class\": \"PRIMARY_STRUCTURAL\",\n \"source_status\": \"STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION\",\n \"rationale\": \"Orders the conjunction relative to the whole construction.\",\n \"object_level\": \"OBJECT_CLASS\"\n },\n {\n \"object_id\": \"DON.ACCIDENS.INTERIECTIO.SIGNIFICATIO\",\n \"target_id\": \"LLULL.Q.K1.SIMILITUDO_AD_EXTRA\",\n \"affinity_class\": \"PRIMARY_STRUCTURAL\",\n \"source_status\": \"STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION\",\n \"rationale\": \"Affection becomes outward signification.\",\n \"object_level\": \"OBJECT_CLASS\"\n }\n ],\n \"t_affinity_records\": [\n {\n \"object_id\": \"DON.PARS.NOMEN_SUBSTANTIVUM\",\n \"target_id\": \"LLULL.T.TB.INTEL_INTEL\",\n \"affinity_class\": \"PRIMARY_STRUCTURAL\",\n \"source_status\": \"STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION\",\n \"rationale\": \"Distinguishes nominal classes/forms at the intelligible level.\",\n \"object_level\": \"OBJECT_CLASS\"\n },\n {\n \"object_id\": \"DON.PARS.NOMEN_SUBSTANTIVUM\",\n \"target_id\": \"LLULL.T.TC.INTEL_INTEL\",\n \"affinity_class\": \"SECONDARY_FUNCTIONAL\",\n \"source_status\": \"STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION\",\n \"rationale\": \"Concordance among nominal concepts under a shared ratio.\",\n \"object_level\": \"OBJECT_CLASS\"\n },\n {\n \"object_id\": \"DON.PARS.NOMEN_ADIECTIVUM\",\n \"target_id\": \"LLULL.T.TB.SENS_INTEL\",\n \"affinity_class\": \"PRIMARY_STRUCTURAL\",\n \"source_status\": \"STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION\",\n \"rationale\": \"Distinguishes adjective-as-form from its sensible token or subject instantiation.\",\n \"object_level\": \"OBJECT_CLASS\"\n },\n {\n \"object_id\": \"DON.PARS.NOMEN_ADIECTIVUM\",\n \"target_id\": \"LLULL.T.TC.SENS_INTEL\",\n \"affinity_class\": \"PRIMARY_STRUCTURAL\",\n \"source_status\": \"STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION\",\n \"rationale\": \"Concordance between intelligible quality/form and concrete bearer.\",\n \"object_level\": \"OBJECT_CLASS\"\n },\n {\n \"object_id\": \"DON.PARS.NOMEN_ADIECTIVUM\",\n \"target_id\": \"LLULL.T.TH.SUB_ACC\",\n \"affinity_class\": \"CONDITIONAL\",\n \"source_status\": \"STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION\",\n \"rationale\": \"Compares substance and attributed accident under a declared respectus.\",\n \"object_level\": \"OBJECT_CLASS\"\n },\n {\n \"object_id\": \"DON.PARS.PRONOMEN\",\n \"target_id\": \"LLULL.T.TB.SENS_INTEL\",\n \"affinity_class\": \"SECONDARY_FUNCTIONAL\",\n \"source_status\": \"STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION\",\n \"rationale\": \"Type/reference versus token occurrence.\",\n \"object_level\": \"OBJECT_CLASS\"\n },\n {\n \"object_id\": \"DON.PARS.VERBUM\",\n \"target_id\": \"LLULL.T.TE.CAUSA\",\n \"affinity_class\": \"PRIMARY_STRUCTURAL\",\n \"source_status\": \"STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION\",\n \"rationale\": \"Action begins from causal principle.\",\n \"object_level\": \"OBJECT_CLASS\"\n },\n {\n \"object_id\": \"DON.PARS.VERBUM\",\n \"target_id\": \"LLULL.T.TF.MENSURATIO\",\n \"affinity_class\": \"PRIMARY_STRUCTURAL\",\n \"source_status\": \"STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION\",\n \"rationale\": \"Act mediates and measures agent/object or patient.\",\n \"object_level\": \"OBJECT_CLASS\"\n },\n {\n \"object_id\": \"DON.PARS.VERBUM\",\n \"target_id\": \"LLULL.T.TG.PERFECTIO\",\n \"affinity_class\": \"CONDITIONAL\",\n \"source_status\": \"STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION\",\n \"rationale\": \"Act reaches its intended completion.\",\n \"object_level\": \"OBJECT_CLASS\"\n },\n {\n \"object_id\": \"DON.PARS.VERBUM\",\n \"target_id\": \"LLULL.T.TG.TERMINATIO\",\n \"affinity_class\": \"CONDITIONAL\",\n \"source_status\": \"STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION\",\n \"rationale\": \"Act terminates without implying perfection.\",\n \"object_level\": \"OBJECT_CLASS\"\n },\n {\n \"object_id\": \"DON.PARS.VERBUM\",\n \"target_id\": \"LLULL.T.TG.PRIVATIO\",\n \"affinity_class\": \"CONDITIONAL\",\n \"source_status\": \"STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION\",\n \"rationale\": \"Act ceases or fails by privation.\",\n \"object_level\": \"OBJECT_CLASS\"\n },\n {\n \"object_id\": \"DON.PARS.ADVERBIUM\",\n \"target_id\": \"LLULL.T.TF.MENSURATIO\",\n \"affinity_class\": \"PRIMARY_STRUCTURAL\",\n \"source_status\": \"STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION\",\n \"rationale\": \"Adverb commonly measures degree or manner of act.\",\n \"object_level\": \"OBJECT_CLASS\"\n },\n {\n \"object_id\": \"DON.PARS.ADVERBIUM\",\n \"target_id\": \"LLULL.T.TE.QUANTITAS\",\n \"affinity_class\": \"CONDITIONAL\",\n \"source_status\": \"STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION\",\n \"rationale\": \"Quantity/degree adverbs.\",\n \"object_level\": \"OBJECT_CLASS\"\n },\n {\n \"object_id\": \"DON.PARS.ADVERBIUM\",\n \"target_id\": \"LLULL.T.TE.TEMPUS\",\n \"affinity_class\": \"CONDITIONAL\",\n \"source_status\": \"STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION\",\n \"rationale\": \"Temporal adverbs.\",\n \"object_level\": \"OBJECT_CLASS\"\n },\n {\n \"object_id\": \"DON.PARS.PARTICIPIUM\",\n \"target_id\": \"LLULL.T.TF.CONIUNCTIO\",\n \"affinity_class\": \"PRIMARY_STRUCTURAL\",\n \"source_status\": \"STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION\",\n \"rationale\": \"Participates in noun and verb, binding agent/patient to act.\",\n \"object_level\": \"OBJECT_CLASS\"\n },\n {\n \"object_id\": \"DON.PARS.PARTICIPIUM\",\n \"target_id\": \"LLULL.T.TF.MENSURATIO\",\n \"affinity_class\": \"SECONDARY_FUNCTIONAL\",\n \"source_status\": \"STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION\",\n \"rationale\": \"Positions agent/patient under the measured act.\",\n \"object_level\": \"OBJECT_CLASS\"\n },\n {\n \"object_id\": \"DON.PARS.PARTICIPIUM\",\n \"target_id\": \"LLULL.T.TG.TERMINATIO\",\n \"affinity_class\": \"CONDITIONAL\",\n \"source_status\": \"STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION\",\n \"rationale\": \"Resultative/terminative participial state.\",\n \"object_level\": \"OBJECT_CLASS\"\n },\n {\n \"object_id\": \"DON.PARS.CONIUNCTIO\",\n \"target_id\": \"LLULL.T.TF.CONIUNCTIO\",\n \"affinity_class\": \"PRIMARY_STRUCTURAL\",\n \"source_status\": \"DIRECT_LLULLIAN_FUNCTIONAL_CONVERGENCE\",\n \"rationale\": \"Direct function-level convergence: joining diverse terms into one construction.\",\n \"object_level\": \"OBJECT_CLASS\"\n },\n {\n \"object_id\": \"DON.PARS.CONIUNCTIO\",\n \"target_id\": \"LLULL.T.TC.SENS_SENS\",\n \"affinity_class\": \"SECONDARY_FUNCTIONAL\",\n \"source_status\": \"STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION\",\n \"rationale\": \"Concrete words/clauses concord in an utterance.\",\n \"object_level\": \"OBJECT_CLASS\"\n },\n {\n \"object_id\": \"DON.PARS.PRAEPOSITIO\",\n \"target_id\": \"LLULL.T.TF.CONIUNCTIO\",\n \"affinity_class\": \"PRIMARY_STRUCTURAL\",\n \"source_status\": \"STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION\",\n \"rationale\": \"Links governed terms.\",\n \"object_level\": \"OBJECT_CLASS\"\n },\n {\n \"object_id\": \"DON.PARS.PRAEPOSITIO\",\n \"target_id\": \"LLULL.T.TF.INTER_EXTREMA\",\n \"affinity_class\": \"PRIMARY_STRUCTURAL\",\n \"source_status\": \"STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION\",\n \"rationale\": \"Expresses position, direction or interval between terms.\",\n \"object_level\": \"OBJECT_CLASS\"\n },\n {\n \"object_id\": \"DON.PARS.INTERIECTIO\",\n \"target_id\": \"LLULL.T.TE.TEMPUS\",\n \"affinity_class\": \"CONDITIONAL\",\n \"source_status\": \"STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION\",\n \"rationale\": \"Occasion of affective emission.\",\n \"object_level\": \"OBJECT_CLASS\"\n },\n {\n \"object_id\": \"DON.PARS.INTERIECTIO\",\n \"target_id\": \"LLULL.T.TH.ACC_ACC\",\n \"affinity_class\": \"CONDITIONAL\",\n \"source_status\": \"STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION\",\n \"rationale\": \"Compares intensity of affective accidents.\",\n \"object_level\": \"OBJECT_CLASS\"\n },\n {\n \"object_id\": \"DON.ACCIDENS.NOMEN.COMPARATIO\",\n \"target_id\": \"LLULL.T.TF.MENSURATIO\",\n \"affinity_class\": \"PRIMARY_STRUCTURAL\",\n \"source_status\": \"STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION\",\n \"rationale\": \"Comparison requires a common measure.\",\n \"object_level\": \"OBJECT_CLASS\"\n },\n {\n \"object_id\": \"DON.ACCIDENS.NOMEN.COMPARATIO\",\n \"target_id\": \"LLULL.T.TH.SUB_SUB\",\n \"affinity_class\": \"CONDITIONAL\",\n \"source_status\": \"STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION\",\n \"rationale\": \"Two substance relata compared in an accidental respectus.\",\n \"object_level\": \"OBJECT_CLASS\"\n },\n {\n \"object_id\": \"DON.ACCIDENS.NOMEN.COMPARATIO\",\n \"target_id\": \"LLULL.T.TH.SUB_ACC\",\n \"affinity_class\": \"CONDITIONAL\",\n \"source_status\": \"STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION\",\n \"rationale\": \"Substance–accident comparison.\",\n \"object_level\": \"OBJECT_CLASS\"\n },\n {\n \"object_id\": \"DON.ACCIDENS.NOMEN.COMPARATIO\",\n \"target_id\": \"LLULL.T.TH.ACC_ACC\",\n \"affinity_class\": \"CONDITIONAL\",\n \"source_status\": \"STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION\",\n \"rationale\": \"Accident–accident comparison.\",\n \"object_level\": \"OBJECT_CLASS\"\n },\n {\n \"object_id\": \"DON.ACCIDENS.NOMEN.NUMERUS\",\n \"target_id\": \"LLULL.T.TE.QUANTITAS\",\n \"affinity_class\": \"PRIMARY_STRUCTURAL\",\n \"source_status\": \"STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION\",\n \"rationale\": \"Grammatical singular/plural is a discrete quantitative organization.\",\n \"object_level\": \"OBJECT_CLASS\"\n },\n {\n \"object_id\": \"DON.ACCIDENS.NOMEN.FIGURA\",\n \"target_id\": \"LLULL.T.TF.CONIUNCTIO\",\n \"affinity_class\": \"PRIMARY_STRUCTURAL\",\n \"source_status\": \"STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION\",\n \"rationale\": \"Compound morphology joins components.\",\n \"object_level\": \"OBJECT_CLASS\"\n },\n {\n \"object_id\": \"DON.ACCIDENS.NOMEN.CASUS\",\n \"target_id\": \"LLULL.T.TF.CONIUNCTIO\",\n \"affinity_class\": \"PRIMARY_STRUCTURAL\",\n \"source_status\": \"STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION\",\n \"rationale\": \"Case relates terms in construction.\",\n \"object_level\": \"OBJECT_CLASS\"\n },\n {\n \"object_id\": \"DON.ACCIDENS.NOMEN.CASUS\",\n \"target_id\": \"LLULL.T.TF.INTER_EXTREMA\",\n \"affinity_class\": \"SECONDARY_FUNCTIONAL\",\n \"source_status\": \"STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION\",\n \"rationale\": \"Case can mark syntactic endpoint/direction between terms.\",\n \"object_level\": \"OBJECT_CLASS\"\n },\n {\n \"object_id\": \"DON.ACCIDENS.VERBUM.TEMPUS\",\n \"target_id\": \"LLULL.T.TE.TEMPUS\",\n \"affinity_class\": \"PRIMARY_STRUCTURAL\",\n \"source_status\": \"STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION\",\n \"rationale\": \"Tense is the temporal principle of verbal inflection.\",\n \"object_level\": \"OBJECT_CLASS\"\n },\n {\n \"object_id\": \"DON.ACCIDENS.CONIUNCTIO.POTESTAS\",\n \"target_id\": \"LLULL.T.TB.INTEL_INTEL\",\n \"affinity_class\": \"PRIMARY_STRUCTURAL\",\n \"source_status\": \"STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION\",\n \"rationale\": \"Differentiates copulative, disjunctive, causal, rational etc. functions.\",\n \"object_level\": \"OBJECT_CLASS\"\n },\n {\n \"object_id\": \"DON.ACCIDENS.CONIUNCTIO.POTESTAS\",\n \"target_id\": \"LLULL.T.TC.SENS_SENS\",\n \"affinity_class\": \"CONDITIONAL\",\n \"source_status\": \"STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION\",\n \"rationale\": \"Copulative conjunction produces concrete concordance.\",\n \"object_level\": \"OBJECT_CLASS\"\n },\n {\n \"object_id\": \"DON.ACCIDENS.CONIUNCTIO.POTESTAS\",\n \"target_id\": \"LLULL.T.TD.SENS_SENS\",\n \"affinity_class\": \"CONDITIONAL\",\n \"source_status\": \"STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION\",\n \"rationale\": \"Adversative/disjunctive use can expose resistance or separation, but difference is not automatically contrariety.\",\n \"object_level\": \"OBJECT_CLASS\"\n }\n ],\n \"aristotelian_categories\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"ARIST.PRAEDICAMENTUM.SUBSTANTIA\",\n \"canonical_order\": 1,\n \"label\": \"Substantia\",\n \"definition\": \"What is primarily said to be this thing; bearer not present in a subject in the same way as accidents.\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"ARIST.PRAEDICAMENTUM.QUANTITAS\",\n \"canonical_order\": 2,\n \"label\": \"Quantitas\",\n \"definition\": \"How much; continuous or discrete magnitude/number.\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"ARIST.PRAEDICAMENTUM.QUALITAS\",\n \"canonical_order\": 3,\n \"label\": \"Qualitas\",\n \"definition\": \"What kind; a category of qualification.\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"ARIST.PRAEDICAMENTUM.RELATIO\",\n \"canonical_order\": 4,\n \"label\": \"Relatio\",\n \"definition\": \"What is said with reference to another.\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"ARIST.PRAEDICAMENTUM.UBI\",\n \"canonical_order\": 5,\n \"label\": \"Ubi / Locus\",\n \"definition\": \"Where.\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"ARIST.PRAEDICAMENTUM.QUANDO\",\n \"canonical_order\": 6,\n \"label\": \"Quando / Tempus\",\n \"definition\": \"When.\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"ARIST.PRAEDICAMENTUM.SITUS\",\n \"canonical_order\": 7,\n \"label\": \"Situs / Positio\",\n \"definition\": \"Position or posture.\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"ARIST.PRAEDICAMENTUM.HABERE\",\n \"canonical_order\": 8,\n \"label\": \"Habere / Habitus\",\n \"definition\": \"State of having or being equipped/disposed.\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"ARIST.PRAEDICAMENTUM.ACTIO\",\n \"canonical_order\": 9,\n \"label\": \"Actio\",\n \"definition\": \"Doing or acting.\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"ARIST.PRAEDICAMENTUM.PASSIO\",\n \"canonical_order\": 10,\n \"label\": \"Passio\",\n \"definition\": \"Being affected or acted upon.\"\n }\n ],\n \"aristotelian_candidate_wheel\": [\n {\n \"placement\": \"PRE\",\n \"object_id\": \"ARIST.PRAEDICAMENTUM.SUBSTANTIA\",\n \"placement_status\": \"USER_AUTHORITY_STRUCTURAL_CANDIDATE\",\n \"note\": \"Substance is the bearer/reference field.\"\n },\n {\n \"placement\": \"B\",\n \"object_id\": \"TRIV.LOG.GATE.ACCIDENTALITAS_INHAERENTIA\",\n \"placement_status\": \"EXPERIMENTAL_NON_PRAEDICAMENT\",\n \"note\": \"Admission gate asking whether/how an accident inheres; not one of Aristotle’s ten categories.\"\n },\n {\n \"placement\": \"C\",\n \"object_id\": \"ARIST.PRAEDICAMENTUM.HABERE\",\n \"placement_status\": \"EXPERIMENTAL_REORDERING\",\n \"note\": \"Habitus/Habere.\"\n },\n {\n \"placement\": \"D\",\n \"object_id\": \"ARIST.PRAEDICAMENTUM.SITUS\",\n \"placement_status\": \"EXPERIMENTAL_REORDERING\",\n \"note\": \"Position.\"\n },\n {\n \"placement\": \"E\",\n \"object_id\": \"ARIST.PRAEDICAMENTUM.ACTIO\",\n \"placement_status\": \"EXPERIMENTAL_REORDERING\",\n \"note\": \"Action.\"\n },\n {\n \"placement\": \"F\",\n \"object_id\": \"ARIST.PRAEDICAMENTUM.QUANTITAS\",\n \"placement_status\": \"STRONG_DIAGONAL\",\n \"note\": \"Quantity.\"\n },\n {\n \"placement\": \"G\",\n \"object_id\": \"ARIST.PRAEDICAMENTUM.QUALITAS\",\n \"placement_status\": \"STRONG_DIAGONAL_NON_IDENTITY\",\n \"note\": \"Category Qualitas is not universal regula QG.\"\n },\n {\n \"placement\": \"H\",\n \"object_id\": \"ARIST.PRAEDICAMENTUM.QUANDO\",\n \"placement_status\": \"STRONG_DIAGONAL\",\n \"note\": \"Time.\"\n },\n {\n \"placement\": \"I\",\n \"object_id\": \"ARIST.PRAEDICAMENTUM.UBI\",\n \"placement_status\": \"STRONG_DIAGONAL\",\n \"note\": \"Place.\"\n },\n {\n \"placement\": \"K\",\n \"object_id\": \"ARIST.PRAEDICAMENTUM.PASSIO\",\n \"placement_status\": \"STRUCTURAL_POLARITY\",\n \"note\": \"Patient/passive pole; not identical with QK or TK.\"\n },\n {\n \"placement\": \"T_CENTER\",\n \"object_id\": \"ARIST.PRAEDICAMENTUM.RELATIO\",\n \"placement_status\": \"DELEGATED_TO_META_RELATIONAL_REGIME\",\n \"note\": \"Aristotelian relation is analyzed through T but is not identical with Regimen T.\"\n }\n ],\n \"aristotelian_qt_profiles\": {\n \"ARIST.PRAEDICAMENTUM.SUBSTANTIA\": {\n \"q\": [\n \"LLULL.Q.C.QUID_SIT\",\n \"LLULL.Q.C.COESSENTIALIA_IN_SE\",\n \"LLULL.Q.D.COMPOSITIO\",\n \"LLULL.Q.E.CAUSA_FORMALIS\",\n \"LLULL.Q.K1.IN_SE\",\n \"LLULL.Q.K1.TOTUM_PARTES\"\n ],\n \"t\": [\n \"LLULL.T.TH.SUB_SUB\",\n \"LLULL.T.TI.SUB_SUB\",\n \"LLULL.T.TK.SUB_SUB\"\n ]\n },\n \"ARIST.PRAEDICAMENTUM.QUANTITAS\": {\n \"q\": [\n \"LLULL.Q.F.CONTINUA\",\n \"LLULL.Q.F.DISCRETA\"\n ],\n \"t\": [\n \"LLULL.T.TE.QUANTITAS\",\n \"LLULL.T.TF.MENSURATIO\",\n \"LLULL.T.TF.INTER_EXTREMA\"\n ]\n },\n \"ARIST.PRAEDICAMENTUM.QUALITAS\": {\n \"q\": [\n \"LLULL.Q.G.PROPRIA\",\n \"LLULL.Q.G.APPROPRIATA\",\n \"LLULL.Q.C.QUID_SIT_IN_ALIO\",\n \"LLULL.Q.C.QUID_HABEAT_IN_ALIO\"\n ],\n \"t\": [\n \"LLULL.T.TH.ACC_ACC\",\n \"LLULL.T.TI.ACC_ACC\",\n \"LLULL.T.TK.ACC_ACC\"\n ]\n },\n \"ARIST.PRAEDICAMENTUM.RELATIO\": {\n \"q\": [\n \"LLULL.Q.C.QUID_SIT_IN_ALIO\",\n \"LLULL.Q.C.QUID_HABEAT_IN_ALIO\",\n \"LLULL.Q.K1.IN_ALIO_RECIPROCUM\"\n ],\n \"t\": [\n \"LLULL.T.TB.INTEL_INTEL\",\n \"LLULL.T.TC.INTEL_INTEL\",\n \"LLULL.T.TD.INTEL_INTEL\"\n ]\n },\n \"ARIST.PRAEDICAMENTUM.UBI\": {\n \"q\": [\n \"LLULL.Q.I.C.QUID_SIT\",\n \"LLULL.Q.I.C.QUID_SIT_IN_ALIO\",\n \"LLULL.Q.I.K1.IN_ALIO_RECIPROCUM\"\n ],\n \"t\": [\n \"LLULL.T.TF.INTER_EXTREMA\"\n ]\n },\n \"ARIST.PRAEDICAMENTUM.QUANDO\": {\n \"q\": [\n \"LLULL.Q.H.C.QUID_SIT\",\n \"LLULL.Q.H.C.QUID_SIT_IN_ALIO\",\n \"LLULL.Q.H.K1.IN_ALIO_RECIPROCUM\"\n ],\n \"t\": [\n \"LLULL.T.TE.TEMPUS\",\n \"LLULL.T.TG.TERMINATIO\"\n ]\n },\n \"ARIST.PRAEDICAMENTUM.SITUS\": {\n \"q\": [\n \"LLULL.Q.D.COMPOSITIO\",\n \"LLULL.Q.K1.TOTUM_PARTES\",\n \"LLULL.Q.I.K1.TOTUM_PARTES\"\n ],\n \"t\": [\n \"LLULL.T.TF.INTER_EXTREMA\"\n ]\n },\n \"ARIST.PRAEDICAMENTUM.HABERE\": {\n \"q\": [\n \"LLULL.Q.C.QUID_HABEAT_IN_ALIO\",\n \"LLULL.Q.D.PERTINENTIA\",\n \"LLULL.Q.G.APPROPRIATA\",\n \"LLULL.Q.K2.CONSTITUTIVUM\"\n ],\n \"t\": [\n \"LLULL.T.TH.SUB_ACC\",\n \"LLULL.T.TI.SUB_ACC\",\n \"LLULL.T.TK.SUB_ACC\"\n ]\n },\n \"ARIST.PRAEDICAMENTUM.ACTIO\": {\n \"q\": [\n \"LLULL.Q.C.COESSENTIALIA_IN_SE\",\n \"LLULL.Q.C.QUID_HABEAT_IN_ALIO\",\n \"LLULL.Q.E.CAUSA_FINALIS\",\n \"LLULL.Q.K1.SIMILITUDO_AD_EXTRA\"\n ],\n \"t\": [\n \"LLULL.T.TE.CAUSA\",\n \"LLULL.T.TF.MENSURATIO\",\n \"LLULL.T.TG.PERFECTIO\"\n ]\n },\n \"ARIST.PRAEDICAMENTUM.PASSIO\": {\n \"q\": [\n \"LLULL.Q.C.COESSENTIALIA_IN_SE\",\n \"LLULL.Q.G.PROPRIA\",\n \"LLULL.Q.G.APPROPRIATA\"\n ],\n \"t\": [\n \"LLULL.T.TF.MENSURATIO\",\n \"LLULL.T.TG.PRIVATIO\",\n \"LLULL.T.TG.TERMINATIO\"\n ]\n }\n },\n \"porphyrian_predicables\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"PORPH.PRAEDICABILE.GENUS\",\n \"label\": \"Genus\",\n \"definition\": \"Predicated of many differing in species in answer to what a thing is.\",\n \"q_profile\": [\n \"LLULL.Q.C.QUID_SIT\",\n \"LLULL.Q.C.QUID_SIT_IN_ALIO\",\n \"LLULL.Q.F.DISCRETA\"\n ],\n \"t_profile\": [\n \"LLULL.T.TB.INTEL_INTEL\",\n \"LLULL.T.TC.INTEL_INTEL\"\n ]\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"PORPH.PRAEDICABILE.SPECIES\",\n \"label\": \"Species\",\n \"definition\": \"Predicated of many differing in number in answer to what a thing is.\",\n \"q_profile\": [\n \"LLULL.Q.C.QUID_SIT\",\n \"LLULL.Q.C.QUID_SIT_IN_ALIO\",\n \"LLULL.Q.F.DISCRETA\"\n ],\n \"t_profile\": [\n \"LLULL.T.TB.INTEL_INTEL\",\n \"LLULL.T.TC.INTEL_INTEL\"\n ]\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"PORPH.PRAEDICABILE.DIFFERENTIA\",\n \"label\": \"Differentia\",\n \"definition\": \"Predicated of many differing in species in answer to what kind; specific difference contributes to essence.\",\n \"q_profile\": [\n \"LLULL.Q.C.QUID_SIT\",\n \"LLULL.Q.G.PROPRIA\"\n ],\n \"t_profile\": [\n \"LLULL.T.TB.INTEL_INTEL\"\n ]\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"PORPH.PRAEDICABILE.PROPRIUM\",\n \"label\": \"Proprium\",\n \"definition\": \"In the strict sense, predicated of one species alone, of every individual and always, reciprocally.\",\n \"q_profile\": [\n \"LLULL.Q.G.PROPRIA\",\n \"LLULL.Q.C.QUID_SIT_IN_ALIO\",\n \"LLULL.Q.C.QUID_HABEAT_IN_ALIO\"\n ],\n \"t_profile\": [\n \"LLULL.T.TC.INTEL_INTEL\",\n \"LLULL.T.TI.ACC_ACC\"\n ]\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"PORPH.PRAEDICABILE.ACCIDENS\",\n \"label\": \"Accidens\",\n \"definition\": \"Can be present or absent without destruction of the subject; separable or inseparable.\",\n \"q_profile\": [\n \"LLULL.Q.G.APPROPRIATA\",\n \"LLULL.Q.C.QUID_SIT_IN_ALIO\",\n \"LLULL.Q.C.QUID_HABEAT_IN_ALIO\",\n \"LLULL.Q.D.PERTINENTIA\"\n ],\n \"t_profile\": [\n \"LLULL.T.TH.SUB_ACC\",\n \"LLULL.T.TI.SUB_ACC\",\n \"LLULL.T.TK.SUB_ACC\"\n ]\n }\n ],\n \"cross_domain_t_bcd_records\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"TRIV.CROSS.QUALITAS.DON_ARIST\",\n \"left\": \"DON.ACCIDENS.NOMEN.QUALITAS\",\n \"right\": \"ARIST.PRAEDICAMENTUM.QUALITAS\",\n \"relation\": \"TB\",\n \"level\": \"INTEL_INTEL\",\n \"respectus\": \"technical meaning\",\n \"differentia\": \"Donatian qualitas distinguishes proprium/appellativum; Aristotelian qualitas is a category of qualification.\",\n \"concordantia\": \"Both classify a way in which a term or bearer is qualified only under explicit mediation.\",\n \"contrarietas_condition\": \"Collapsing the two produces false lexical-to-ontological inference.\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"TRIV.CROSS.GENUS.DON_PORPH\",\n \"left\": \"DON.ACCIDENS.NOMEN.GENUS\",\n \"right\": \"PORPH.PRAEDICABILE.GENUS\",\n \"relation\": \"TB\",\n \"level\": \"INTEL_INTEL\",\n \"respectus\": \"classification\",\n \"differentia\": \"Grammatical gender versus predicable genus.\",\n \"concordantia\": \"Both partition forms under rules, but on different objects and for different ends.\",\n \"contrarietas_condition\": \"Treating masculine/feminine/neuter as Porphyrian genera.\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"TRIV.CROSS.ACCIDENS.DON_ARIST\",\n \"left\": \"DON.ACCIDENS\",\n \"right\": \"ARIST.ACCIDENS\",\n \"relation\": \"TB\",\n \"level\": \"INTEL_INTEL\",\n \"respectus\": \"dependency\",\n \"differentia\": \"A grammatical accident is an analysis axis of a part of speech; an ontological accident inheres in a subject.\",\n \"concordantia\": \"Both express determinations of a carrier without replacing its class/subject.\",\n \"contrarietas_condition\": \"Inferring ontological accidentality from mere inflection.\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"TRIV.CROSS.ACCIDENS.DON_PORPH\",\n \"left\": \"DON.ACCIDENS\",\n \"right\": \"PORPH.PRAEDICABILE.ACCIDENS\",\n \"relation\": \"TB\",\n \"level\": \"INTEL_INTEL\",\n \"respectus\": \"predication\",\n \"differentia\": \"Part-specific grammatical feature versus contingent predicable.\",\n \"concordantia\": \"Both can vary without changing the higher class under declared conditions.\",\n \"contrarietas_condition\": \"Using grammatical optionality as proof of Porphyrian accident.\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"TRIV.CROSS.ADIECTIVUM_QUALITAS\",\n \"left\": \"DON.PARS.NOMEN_ADIECTIVUM\",\n \"right\": \"ARIST.PRAEDICAMENTUM.QUALITAS\",\n \"relation\": \"TB_TC\",\n \"level\": \"INTEL_INTEL\",\n \"respectus\": \"signification\",\n \"differentia\": \"A grammatical class is not an ontological category.\",\n \"concordantia\": \"An adjective can signify a quality in a particular predication.\",\n \"contrarietas_condition\": \"Claiming every adjective is categorial quality or every quality is adjectival.\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"TRIV.CROSS.ADIECTIVUM_PROPRIUM\",\n \"left\": \"DON.PARS.NOMEN_ADIECTIVUM\",\n \"right\": \"PORPH.PRAEDICABILE.PROPRIUM\",\n \"relation\": \"TB_TC\",\n \"level\": \"INTEL_INTEL\",\n \"respectus\": \"mode of predication\",\n \"differentia\": \"Adjective is a form class; proprium is a logical relation of predicate to species.\",\n \"concordantia\": \"An adjective may express a proprium in a proposition.\",\n \"contrarietas_condition\": \"Reading adjective form as sufficient evidence of proprium.\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"TRIV.CROSS.ADIECTIVUM_ACCIDENT\",\n \"left\": \"DON.PARS.NOMEN_ADIECTIVUM\",\n \"right\": \"PORPH.PRAEDICABILE.ACCIDENS\",\n \"relation\": \"TB_TC\",\n \"level\": \"INTEL_INTEL\",\n \"respectus\": \"mode of predication\",\n \"differentia\": \"Adjective is grammatical; accident is predicable status.\",\n \"concordantia\": \"An adjective may express an accidental predicate.\",\n \"contrarietas_condition\": \"Assuming all adjectives are accidents.\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"TRIV.CROSS.COMPARATIO_T\",\n \"left\": \"DON.ACCIDENS.NOMEN.COMPARATIO\",\n \"right\": \"LLULL.T.HIK\",\n \"relation\": \"TC\",\n \"level\": \"INTEL_INTEL\",\n \"respectus\": \"measured ordering\",\n \"differentia\": \"Donatian degree is morphology/grammar; HIK are universal relative operators resolved by relata.\",\n \"concordantia\": \"Comparative constructions commonly instantiate maioritas/minoritas through TF.MENSURATIO.\",\n \"contrarietas_condition\": \"Equating positive with equality, comparative with majority, or superlative with perfection.\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"TRIV.CROSS.CASUS_RELATIO\",\n \"left\": \"DON.ACCIDENS.NOMEN.CASUS\",\n \"right\": \"ARIST.PRAEDICAMENTUM.RELATIO\",\n \"relation\": \"TB_TC\",\n \"level\": \"INTEL_INTEL\",\n \"respectus\": \"syntactic versus categorial relation\",\n \"differentia\": \"Case marks grammatical role; relation is an ontological category.\",\n \"concordantia\": \"Case can linguistically express a relation.\",\n \"contrarietas_condition\": \"Treating case morphology as the relation itself.\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"TRIV.CROSS.VERBUM_ACTIO\",\n \"left\": \"DON.PARS.VERBUM\",\n \"right\": \"ARIST.PRAEDICAMENTUM.ACTIO\",\n \"relation\": \"TB_TC\",\n \"level\": \"INTEL_INTEL\",\n \"respectus\": \"act signification\",\n \"differentia\": \"Verb is a part of speech; actio is a category.\",\n \"concordantia\": \"A verb may signify action.\",\n \"contrarietas_condition\": \"Ignoring verbs of state/passion or actions expressed nominally.\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"TRIV.CROSS.PARTICIPIUM_PASSIO\",\n \"left\": \"DON.PARS.PARTICIPIUM\",\n \"right\": \"ARIST.PRAEDICAMENTUM.PASSIO\",\n \"relation\": \"TB_TC\",\n \"level\": \"INTEL_INTEL\",\n \"respectus\": \"passive/resultative signification\",\n \"differentia\": \"Participle is a hybrid grammatical class; passio is a category.\",\n \"concordantia\": \"A passive participle may signify being affected.\",\n \"contrarietas_condition\": \"Equating all participles with passion.\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"TRIV.CROSS.SUBSTANCE_GENUS\",\n \"left\": \"ARIST.PRAEDICAMENTUM.SUBSTANTIA\",\n \"right\": \"PORPH.PRAEDICABILE.GENUS\",\n \"relation\": \"TC\",\n \"level\": \"INTEL_INTEL\",\n \"respectus\": \"supreme genus in logical classification\",\n \"differentia\": \"Substance is a category; genus is a predicable relation.\",\n \"concordantia\": \"Substance can function as the highest genus in the logical ladder described by Llull.\",\n \"contrarietas_condition\": \"Treating the predicable genus as itself a substance.\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"TRIV.CROSS.TOKEN_TYPE\",\n \"left\": \"TRIV.GRAM.TYPE\",\n \"right\": \"TRIV.GRAM.TOKEN\",\n \"relation\": \"TB_TC\",\n \"level\": \"INTEL_SENS\",\n \"respectus\": \"instantiation\",\n \"differentia\": \"Class/value is intelligible; token is a sensible occurrence.\",\n \"concordantia\": \"The token instantiates or realizes the class under a binding.\",\n \"contrarietas_condition\": \"Treating token irregularity as automatic destruction of class definition.\"\n }\n ],\n \"rhetoric_port\": {\n \"id\": \"TRIV.RHET.PORT\",\n \"status\": \"RESERVED\",\n \"prohibition\": \"No complete rhetorical carrier wheel may be inferred in G1–G5.\",\n \"source_bound_functions\": [\n \"speech colored/adorned according to purpose, audience, vocation and subject matter\",\n \"positive/comparative/superlative gradation\",\n \"noun–adjective coloring\",\n \"matter–form articulation\",\n \"beginning–middle–end disposition\",\n \"substantial/necessary versus accidental/contingent emphasis\",\n \"possibility/impossibility and other rule-mediated contrasts\",\n \"proverb/example application\"\n ],\n \"future_required\": [\n \"source-bound rhetorical carrier registry\",\n \"rhetorical accident/operation profiles\",\n \"Q_RHET specialization\",\n \"T_RHET resolver\",\n \"T(BCD) cross-art relations at sentence/discourse level\"\n ],\n \"status_detail\": \"STRUCTURAL_PORT_RESERVED_SOURCE_ANCHORED_CARRIERS_UNRESOLVED\",\n \"source_anchor_status\": \"SOURCE_ANCHORED_FUNCTIONS_AVAILABLE\",\n \"carrier_status\": \"CARRIERS_UNRESOLVED\",\n \"execution_status\": \"CARRIER_DEPENDENT_EXECUTION_DEFERRED\"\n },\n \"unresolved\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"TRIV-UNR-001\",\n \"issue\": \"No source-bound complete rhetorical carrier wheel is established.\",\n \"status\": \"NONBLOCKING\",\n \"handling\": \"Preserve TRIV.RHET port and source-bound functions; do not synthesize carriers.\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"TRIV-UNR-002\",\n \"issue\": \"Donatus has eight parts and does not split nomen into separate substantive/adjective parts.\",\n \"status\": \"NONBLOCKING\",\n \"handling\": \"Preserve DON.PARS.NOMEN parent; mark B/C as user-authorized adaptation.\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"TRIV-UNR-003\",\n \"issue\": \"The nine-slot Aristotelian candidate wheel uses a non-predicament accidentalitas/inherentia gate and delegates relatio to T.\",\n \"status\": \"NONBLOCKING\",\n \"handling\": \"Preserve canonical ten-category registry separately; mark candidate wheel experimental and reversible.\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"TRIV-UNR-004\",\n \"issue\": \"Source order and current AGLA analytic g-order diverge for T BCD and TG.\",\n \"status\": \"NONBLOCKING\",\n \"handling\": \"Store semantic IDs plus independent source_order and analytic_order.\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"TRIV-UNR-005\",\n \"issue\": \"K2 semantic labels are verified through an external English translation witness rather than a directly parsed critical Latin edition.\",\n \"status\": \"NONBLOCKING\",\n \"handling\": \"Mark verified translation witness; preserve exact semantic IDs but not critical-edition status.\"\n }\n ]\n}\n" }, { "role": "ADD_ON_MODALITY_PROFILE", "class": "PROFILE", "path": "13_STACK_ADD_ONS/Trivium_Stack/ADD_ON_DUAL_MODALITY_PROFILE.md", "bytes": 2094, "sha256": "85705851c0243bb19c09158590f267aba3ce49d58c8f175fe341703ebc65b14a", "hash_scope": "UTF8_LF_NORMALIZED_CONTENT", "content": "# ADD-ON Dual-Modality Profile — Trivium\n\nVersion: 1.0.0\n\nStatus: STABLE ADD-ON PROFILE / GRAMMATICA + LOGICA AVAILABLE / RHETORICA DEFERRED\n\nAdd-On ID: `ADD_ON_TRIVIUM_STACK`\n\nPromotion source: `_01_INTEGRATION_CANDIDATES/Trivium_Stack`\n\n## Principal-stack composition\n\n- Lifecycle: AVAILABLE / OPTIONAL / SOURCE-BOUNDED.\n- Entry: the active bundle selects Trivium; current principal-stack TENET and\n ROTAS evidence bind the local family, and AREPO TRIVIUM admits the object,\n telos, sources, namespace, art, Q/T profile, and analysis depth.\n- Capabilities: Grammar and Logic analysis, Q/T specialization, Donatian\n adaptation, the disclosed Aristotelian display, and nested Porphyrian medium.\n- Dependencies: the local five-class Trivium family, matrix substrate/records,\n vanilla root-class laws, and the exact A/T interfaces required by the request.\n- Validation: `VALIDATE_TRIVIUM_ADD_ON.ps1` and applicable root-stack\n regressions must pass.\n- Failure posture: missing or stale evidence, failed admission, unresolved\n provider, or a request requiring unavailable Rhetoric fails closed or returns\n an explicit deferred state.\n\n## Standalone packaging/deployment\n\n- Lifecycle: AVAILABLE / OPTIONAL STANDALONE DEPLOYMENT.\n- Package: `../JSON_STANDALONE/ADD_ON_TRIVIUM_STACK_STANDALONE.json`.\n- Entry: load embedded vanilla root laws, the Trivium five-class family, and\n both LIBER substrates; then execute LOAD → RESOLVE → BIND → ADMIT → EXECUTE →\n RETURN.\n- Capabilities: the same Grammar and Logic scope as composition mode.\n RHETORICA is reserved and unavailable until its independent source-closure\n gate passes.\n- Validation: embedded path, byte-count, SHA-256, class-completeness, matrix\n cardinality, and deferred-rhetoric assertions must pass.\n- Failure posture: any package-integrity or admission failure blocks execution;\n standalone mode does not counterfeit principal-stack authority.\n\n## Non-collapse\n\nPackage stability and add-on integration do not erase source provenance,\nactivate deferred Rhetoric, or make the add-on mandatory in every deployment.\n" }, { "role": "ADD_ON_LOCAL_SYSTEM_INDEX", "class": "SYSTEM_INDEX", "path": "13_STACK_ADD_ONS/Trivium_Stack/TRIVIUM_LOCAL_SYSTEM_INDEX.md", "bytes": 2117, "sha256": "4bb63061e02af7ab7bc4d5b5bcffc11b81e247b0d7b488b5f1824ca5b2cac352", "hash_scope": "UTF8_LF_NORMALIZED_CONTENT", "content": "# Trivium Add-On Local System Index\n\nVersion: 1.0.0\n\nStatus: ACTIVE / STABLE ADD-ON / DUAL-MODE\n\nAdd-On ID: `ADD_ON_TRIVIUM_STACK`\n\nAvailability: OPTIONAL / GRAMMATICA + LOGICA AVAILABLE / RHETORICA DEFERRED\n\n## Modality registry\n\n| Mode | Status | Entry | Failure posture |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| Principal-stack composition | AVAILABLE / OPT-IN | current principal-stack laws → TENET/ROTAS TRIVIUM → AREPO admission | fail closed; no principal-stack mutation |\n| Standalone deployment | AVAILABLE / OPTIONAL PACKAGE | embedded root-law closure → local family → AREPO admission | package or admission failure blocks execution |\n\nNormative profile:\n`13_STACK_ADD_ONS/Trivium_Stack/ADD_ON_DUAL_MODALITY_PROFILE.md`\n\nStandalone package:\n`13_STACK_ADD_ONS/JSON_STANDALONE/ADD_ON_TRIVIUM_STACK_STANDALONE.json`\n\nPromotion record:\n`13_STACK_ADD_ONS/Trivium_Stack/TRIVIUM_PROMOTION_RECORD_2026-08-29.md`\n\n## Local artifacts\n\n| Local ID | Class | Path | Posture |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| `LOCAL-TRIVIUM-TENET` | TENET | `TENET_TRIVIUM_DoctrinalInvariants.md` | STABLE ADD-ON SOURCE |\n| `LOCAL-TRIVIUM-ROTAS` | ROTAS | `ROTAS_TRIVIUM_StructuralInstantiation.md` | GRAMMATICA + LOGICA AVAILABLE |\n| `LOCAL-TRIVIUM-AREPO` | AREPO | `AREPO_TRIVIUM_InputAdmissibility.md` | FAIL-CLOSED |\n| `LOCAL-TRIVIUM-OPERA` | OPERA | `OPERA_TRIVIUM_ExecutionMechanism.md` | RHETORICA NOT EXECUTABLE |\n| `LOCAL-TRIVIUM-SATOR` | SATOR | `SATOR_TRIVIUM_OutputRequirements.md` | DEFERRED-PORT DISCLOSURE REQUIRED |\n| `LOCAL-TRIVIUM-LIBER-MD` | LIBER X | `LIBER_X_TRIVIUM_MATRIX_SUBSTRATE.md` | SOURCE-BOUNDED SUPPORT |\n| `LOCAL-TRIVIUM-LIBER-JSON` | LIBER X | `LIBER_X_TRIVIUM_MATRIX_RECORDS.json` | NORMALIZED SUPPORT |\n\n## Provenance\n\nThe seven v1.0.0 successors derive from the corresponding byte-preserved\nv0.1.0 family in `_01_INTEGRATION_CANDIDATES/Trivium_Stack`. The candidate lane\nremains historical qualification evidence and is not a runtime dependency.\n\n## Non-collapse\n\nLocal registration does not make the add-on mandatory, close the Rhetoric\nsource gap, or grant authority outside the selected composition or standalone\npackage.\n" }, { "role": "ADD_ON_PROMOTION_RECORD", "class": "PROMOTION_RECORD", "path": "13_STACK_ADD_ONS/Trivium_Stack/TRIVIUM_PROMOTION_RECORD_2026-08-29.md", "bytes": 2673, "sha256": "5c1c681f5ab30c430d9613b74e67b207ee14d54ed12c46cad6a78281e4fe13d2", "hash_scope": "UTF8_LF_NORMALIZED_CONTENT", "content": "# Trivium Add-On Promotion Record\n\nVersion: 1.0.0\n\nStatus: PROMOTED / STABLE ADD-ON / DUAL-MODE\n\nDecision date: 2026-08-29\n\nSource intake commit: `cdc01bbae8bbc494e297ddbf776189c490a6b2da`\n\nPromotion base: `f78f045f93c129adbef4374e137ec257cd009b07`\n\n## Decision binding\n\nThe current human instruction promotes Trivium from\n`_01_INTEGRATION_CANDIDATES/Trivium_Stack` into\n`13_STACK_ADD_ONS/Trivium_Stack` for composition with the principal stack and\nstandalone deployment. This explicit later decision supersedes HP-018 Option A\u0027s\nearlier no-promotion disposition for this promotion scope.\n\nThe stable package exposes Grammar and Logic. Rhetoric remains a mandatory\ndeferred/fail-closed port; promotion does not invent its missing source closure.\n\n## Source-to-successor hashes\n\nSHA-256 values cover filesystem bytes before Git filtering.\n\n| Artifact | Candidate v0.1.0 SHA-256 | Add-on v1.0.0 SHA-256 |\n|---|---|---|\n| AREPO | `4b36184e8573a50766945ca71b1cfd4d18e75ac7a16ce527135f17ffc9436a43` | `2a764f930a0417fefe77186e0167da1fbe1734074cb4005889d906bb1fdc30b0` |\n| LIBER matrix JSON | `b6cfd598c42eddc2d60544851c17d9e26af0371ffbc170ef49644ee908cb37d0` | `9b075cffdb35239421baf588521e9df2d8763c7ae20e7cff66421d44d2840272` |\n| LIBER substrate Markdown | `48795066013f63a8e1693faa7c1bd3ef3f6d776f216a5dfa5e8b69675ec33832` | `8156d754c33362ff47de8d087dbc22d082ce58d3904e37d7985f1650dba595a2` |\n| OPERA | `0a54a8813497585aa9248f46a2c32911701668eb6d9b0051f1598b33cff0a41b` | `f92bf903eb52fdf8b0d5768f73b747b1631df0b38515133f5cbdf7c84cdc3795` |\n| ROTAS | `e08159f23b184ee80bb21becf41dddc2e8b3029375c9a00e20e2d7fcc4ce0b90` | `f2cda2a90f8f04c3918c0191faba40028f103cb23fad0a199c82fa4ca724751a` |\n| SATOR | `77775c0dd885779c5af96fedb5df7f9327cd3ead95f64a99d161f27f77460893` | `4ef5bedb199542ac3680f2a6157730c0a8ba3b623184144fabe9d7b25e893c7e` |\n| TENET | `da68c311f420aa0eb5528803dd187fe349068e6a988815a6d35b9ab89fe7d2a8` | `424b20eab38a9c3487bfadb40ddd481d89012fc4150267b572f30fe07ad57a1a` |\n\n## Permitted successor delta\n\nThe v1.0.0 successors preserve the received semantic substrate while changing\nthe lifecycle wrapper, internal file references, dual-modality declarations,\navailable/deferred capability posture, and promotion provenance. Candidate\nbytes remain untouched in the candidate lane.\n\n## Validation posture\n\n- 54 Q species, 27 T species, 9 Donatian parts, 10 Aristotelian categories,\n and 5 Porphyrian predicables remain structurally present.\n- `VALIDATE_TRIVIUM_ADD_ON.ps1` checks the local package and embedded hashes.\n- `VALIDATE_ADD_ON_DUAL_MODALITY.ps1` checks the repository-wide add-on law.\n- Principal-stack and standalone use both require AREPO admission.\n" } ] }