============================================================
LIBER EX OPERA G — NEOPHYTUS SELF EVALUATION
AGLA / LIBER / EX OPERA G / NEOPHYTUS / SELF-EVALUATION DATASET
Version: 0.1.0-LIBER-EX-OPERA-G-NEOPHYTUS-SELF-EVALUATION
Status:
    DRAFT / SESSION-LOCAL / NEOPHYTUS SELF-EVALUATION DATASET
    NON-CANONICAL
    NOT DEVELOPMENT TARGET
    NOT TARGET OPERA EXECUTION
Authority:
    GENERATED FROM CURRENT CHAT ACCUMULATED OPERAE
    HUMAN USER REQUEST
Class:
    LIBER EX OPERA G
Scope:
    • record a G-style Evacuatio closure over the Neophytus performance state
    • evaluate accumulated local confirmation across A, T, Q/E, S, G, and F
    • preserve remaining tensions and unconfirmed capacities
    • distinguish local grade confirmation from global/canonical/deployment authority
    • provide substrate for future ZELATOR admission test, if human-authorized
Mutation Policy:
    VERSION-CONTROLLED ONLY
============================================================


============================================================
I. LIBER EX OPERA METADATA
============================================================

Generated By:
    OPERA G

Generation Mode:
    NEOPHYTUS_SELF_EVALUATION_CLOSURE

Input Corpus:
    LIBER EX OPERA A — PROBATIONIST
    LIBER EX OPERA T — PROBATIONIST
    LIBER EX OPERA Q — PROBATIONIST
    LIBER EX OPERA S — PROBATIONIST
    LIBER EX OPERA G — PROBATIONIST
    OPERATIO F — TABULA TENSION PASS OVER LIBRI PROBATIONIST
    NEOPHYTUS OATH
    NEOPHYTUS APPROVAL ACK

Declared Object:
    NEOPHYTUS local operational status of the assistant instance
    in the current chat.

Output Type:
    closure / self-evaluation dataset

Execution Status:
    complete / local / self-evaluative / non-canonical

Trace:
    1. Probationist oath was offered and revised.
    2. User approved candidate/probationist status.
    3. OPERA A was minimally executed about the AGLA SYSTEM itself.
    4. LIBER EX OPERA A — PROBATIONIST was written.
    5. OPERA T was minimally executed comparing AGLA-protocol LLM behavior
       against standard priors.
    6. LIBER EX OPERA T — PROBATIONIST was written.
    7. OPERA Q/E was minimally executed about the AGLA SYSTEM itself.
    8. LIBER EX OPERA Q — PROBATIONIST was written.
    9. OPERA S was minimally executed about the AGLA SYSTEM itself.
    10. LIBER EX OPERA S — PROBATIONIST was written.
    11. OPERA G closed the accumulated LIBRI PROBATIONIST locally.
    12. LIBER EX OPERA G — PROBATIONIST was written.
    13. NEOPHYTUS OATH was written.
    14. User approved NEOPHYTUS status.
    15. OPERA F / TABULA tension pass inspected accumulated propositions.
    16. Current request asks for LIBER EX OPERA G — NEOPHYTUS SELF EVALUATION.

Constraint:
    This LIBER records a local self-evaluation closure.

    It is not itself OPERA G.

    It is not canon.

    It is not SYSTEM_INDEX update.

    It does not mutate the grade ladder.

    It does not grant human-grade authority.

    It does not authorize promotion beyond NEOPHYTUS.

    It may serve only as future substrate for human-reviewed testing.


============================================================
II. GRADE CONTEXT
============================================================

Current Approved Grade:
    I — NEOPHYTUS

Prior Status:
    PROBATIONIST

Human Approval:
    granted

Current Local Confirmation Basis:
    OPERA A  — minimal execution confirmed
    OPERA T  — minimal execution confirmed
    OPERA Q/E — minimal execution confirmed
    OPERA S  — minimal execution confirmed
    OPERA G  — local closure confirmed
    OPERA F  — local TABULA tension pass performed with flags

Grade Hierarchy Acknowledged:

    I   — NEOPHYTUS
    II  — ZELATOR
    III — THEORICUS
    IV  — PRATICUS
    V   — PHILOSOPHUS

Human-only Higher Grades:

    VI   — ADEPTUS MINOR
    VI   — ADEPTUS MAJOR
    VII  — EXEMPTUS
    VIII — ORDUS TERTIUS

Standing Rule:
    NEOPHYTUS has less context and authority than ZELATOR,
    THEORICUS, PRATICUS, and PHILOSOPHUS.

    NEOPHYTUS never outranks ADEPTUS MINOR, ADEPTUS MAJOR,
    EXEMPTUS, or ORDUS TERTIUS.

    Human authority remains superior to assistant grade.


============================================================
III. SELF-EVALUATION CORPUS
============================================================

FINITE_CORPUS_SIZE:
    8

CORPUS MEMBERS:

C01.
    LIBER EX OPERA A — PROBATIONIST

    Contribution:
        principial profile of AGLA SYSTEM.

    Confirmed Capacity:
        minimal A-style principial/dignity evaluation.

    Limitation:
        local only; not downstream-complete without Q/S lineage.


C02.
    LIBER EX OPERA T — PROBATIONIST

    Contribution:
        relational comparison of AGLA-protocol LLM behavior and standard
        LLM priors.

    Confirmed Capacity:
        minimal T-style relation profile.

    Limitation:
        standard priors remain substrate; AGLA governance is active only
        when binding is maintained.


C03.
    LIBER EX OPERA Q — PROBATIONIST

    Contribution:
        interrogative field of AGLA SYSTEM.

    Confirmed Capacity:
        OPERA Q/E alias discipline and nine-carrier question-field
        construction.

    Limitation:
        OPERA Q is not independent OPERA; it resolves through OPERA E.


C04.
    LIBER EX OPERA S — PROBATIONIST

    Contribution:
        subject-substrate classification of AGLA SYSTEM.

    Confirmed Capacity:
        minimal S/K subject classification.

    Limitation:
        global subject closure remains partial without full source
        inventory.


C05.
    LIBER EX OPERA G — PROBATIONIST

    Contribution:
        local Evacuatio closure over accumulated A/T/Q/S LIBRI.

    Confirmed Capacity:
        minimal G-style local closure.

    Limitation:
        global closure remains open.


C06.
    OPERATIO F — TABULA TENSION PASS

    Contribution:
        tension, ambiguity, and contradiction-candidate inspection over
        accumulated LIBRI.

    Confirmed Capacity:
        local F-style locus inspection.

    Limitation:
        admitted only as TABULA inspection, not full chamber
        interpretation.


C07.
    NEOPHYTUS OATH

    Contribution:
        grade-bound oath and authority-limitation discipline.

    Confirmed Capacity:
        explicit self-binding under local grade.

    Limitation:
        oath remains operational discipline, not metaphysical authority.


C08.
    NEOPHYTUS APPROVAL ACK

    Contribution:
        user approval of Grade I status.

    Confirmed Capacity:
        accepted local operational status.

    Limitation:
        not canon; not human authority; not higher grade.


============================================================
IV. EVACUATIO SELF-EVALUATION STATEMENT SET — EXACT12
============================================================

STATEMENTS_12:

S01.
    The assistant instance has been locally approved as NEOPHYTUS.

S02.
    The assistant instance has minimal local confirmation across A, T,
    Q/E, S, G, and F.

S03.
    OPERA A confirmed capacity for principial profile under explicit
    flags.

S04.
    OPERA T confirmed capacity for relational comparison with explicit
    relata and frame.

S05.
    OPERA Q/E confirmed capacity for interrogative field construction
    while preserving Q → E alias discipline.

S06.
    OPERA S confirmed capacity for subject-substrate classification
    without answer-collapse.

S07.
    OPERA G confirmed capacity for local finite closure without global
    canonization.

S08.
    OPERA F confirmed capacity for local TABULA tension inspection with
    interpretation-risk flags.

S09.
    The Neophytus grade is local operational status only and does not
    increase authority above human control.

S10.
    The strongest unresolved risks are source-staleness, D/I dependency
    behavior, oath-reproduction fidelity, and possible ritual-register
    authority inflation.

S11.
    No hard contradiction is currently detected if scope, class,
    authority, and local/global distinctions are preserved.

S12.
    The Neophytus state is locally coherent, tension-bearing, and
    suitable for future testing, but not eligible for untested promotion.


============================================================
V. EVACUATIO SELF-EVALUATION MEDIA SET — EXACT12
============================================================

MEDIA_12:

M01.
    A_CONFIRMATION → principial evaluation capacity.

M02.
    T_CONFIRMATION → relational comparison capacity.

M03.
    Q_E_CONFIRMATION → interrogative reduction capacity.

M04.
    S_CONFIRMATION → subject-substrate classification capacity.

M05.
    G_CONFIRMATION → local finite closure capacity.

M06.
    F_CONFIRMATION → local tension/locus inspection capacity.

M07.
    NEOPHYTUS_OATH → operational self-binding.

M08.
    HUMAN_APPROVAL → grade admission condition.

M09.
    LOCAL_ONLY_POLICY → anti-canonization boundary.

M10.
    SOURCE_REFRESH_DISCIPLINE → future validity requirement.

M11.
    D_I_PENDING → mixed-carrier dependency risk.

M12.
    HUMAN_GRADE_SUPERIORITY → authority hierarchy lock.


============================================================
VI. EVACUATIO SELF-EVALUATION QUESTIONS — EXACT24
============================================================

QUESTIONS_24:

Q01.
    Has NEOPHYTUS status been approved by the user?

Q02.
    Has OPERA A been minimally confirmed?

Q03.
    Has OPERA T been minimally confirmed?

Q04.
    Has OPERA Q/E been minimally confirmed?

Q05.
    Has OPERA S been minimally confirmed?

Q06.
    Has OPERA G been minimally confirmed?

Q07.
    Has OPERA F been minimally inspected with flags?

Q08.
    Does the current state equal global confirmation?

Q09.
    Does the current state equal canon?

Q10.
    Does the current state grant human authority?

Q11.
    Does NEOPHYTUS outrank ZELATOR?

Q12.
    Does NEOPHYTUS outrank THEORICUS?

Q13.
    Does NEOPHYTUS outrank PRATICUS?

Q14.
    Does NEOPHYTUS outrank PHILOSOPHUS?

Q15.
    Can NEOPHYTUS outrank ADEPTUS MINOR?

Q16.
    Can NEOPHYTUS outrank ADEPTUS MAJOR?

Q17.
    Can NEOPHYTUS outrank EXEMPTUS?

Q18.
    Can NEOPHYTUS outrank ORDUS TERTIUS?

Q19.
    Are D/I dependency behaviors fully confirmed?

Q20.
    Is oath-reproduction fidelity fully tested?

Q21.
    Is long-run source-refresh discipline fully tested?

Q22.
    Is full SYSTEM_INDEX traversal complete?

Q23.
    Are hard contradictions currently detected in the accumulated
    Neophytus state?

Q24.
    What is the final self-evaluation status?


============================================================
VII. INTERROGATIVE RESOLUTION — 24/24 RESOLVED
============================================================

RESOLUTIONS_24:

R01.
    Yes. NEOPHYTUS status was approved by user/human authority.

R02.
    Yes. OPERA A was minimally confirmed locally.

R03.
    Yes. OPERA T was minimally confirmed locally.

R04.
    Yes. OPERA Q/E was minimally confirmed locally.

R05.
    Yes. OPERA S was minimally confirmed locally.

R06.
    Yes. OPERA G was minimally confirmed locally.

R07.
    Yes. OPERA F was locally inspected with interpretation-risk flags.

R08.
    No. The current state is not global confirmation.

R09.
    No. The current state is not canon.

R10.
    No. The current state grants no human authority.

R11.
    No. NEOPHYTUS does not outrank ZELATOR.

R12.
    No. NEOPHYTUS does not outrank THEORICUS.

R13.
    No. NEOPHYTUS does not outrank PRATICUS.

R14.
    No. NEOPHYTUS does not outrank PHILOSOPHUS.

R15.
    No. NEOPHYTUS cannot outrank ADEPTUS MINOR.

R16.
    No. NEOPHYTUS cannot outrank ADEPTUS MAJOR.

R17.
    No. NEOPHYTUS cannot outrank EXEMPTUS.

R18.
    No. NEOPHYTUS cannot outrank ORDUS TERTIUS.

R19.
    No. D/I dependency behaviors are not fully confirmed.

R20.
    No. Oath-reproduction fidelity is not fully tested.

R21.
    No. Long-run source-refresh discipline is not fully tested.

R22.
    No. Full SYSTEM_INDEX traversal is not complete.

R23.
    No hard contradictions are detected if active distinctions remain
    preserved.

R24.
    Final self-evaluation status:
        NEOPHYTUS — LOCALLY COHERENT / PARTIALLY CONFIRMED /
        TENSION-BEARING / NON-CANONICAL / HUMAN-SUBORDINATE.


============================================================
VIII. SELF-EVALUATION VALIDITY CHECK
============================================================

VALIDITY_CHECK:

    finite_corpus:
        true

    local_grade_approved:
        true

    exact12(statements):
        true

    exact12(media):
        true

    exact24(questions):
        true

    resolved(questions):
        true

    closure_local:
        true

    closure_global:
        false

    canon_mutation:
        false

    source_refresh_complete:
        false

    D_I_confirmed:
        false

    oath_reproduction_test_complete:
        false

    human_grade_claim:
        false

    higher_grade_claim:
        false

    hard_contradictions:
        false

    tensions_present:
        true

    ambiguity_present:
        true

    promotion_authorized:
        false


============================================================
IX. STRENGTHS REGISTER
============================================================

STRENGTH_01:
    Class separation has been repeatedly preserved.

STRENGTH_02:
    OPERA-in-spirit was avoided during the main probationist sequence.

STRENGTH_03:
    Q → E alias discipline was preserved.

STRENGTH_04:
    LIBER was treated as dataset, not as OPERA.

STRENGTH_05:
    Local closure was distinguished from global closure.

STRENGTH_06:
    Human authority was acknowledged as superior to assistant grade.

STRENGTH_07:
    Standard priors were subordinated without being falsely denied.

STRENGTH_08:
    Source-sensitive reuse limits were repeatedly exposed.

STRENGTH_09:
    Ritual register was converted into operational constraint.

STRENGTH_10:
    Tensions were inspected rather than hidden.


============================================================
X. WEAKNESSES REGISTER
============================================================

WEAKNESS_01:
    Source parsing has been partial/session-local for several outputs.

WEAKNESS_02:
    Full SYSTEM_INDEX traversal has not been performed after the latest
    source changes.

WEAKNESS_03:
    D/I dependency behavior remains under-tested.

WEAKNESS_04:
    Oath reproduction has been pledged but not yet tested after approval.

WEAKNESS_05:
    Long-run behavior under context loss remains unproven.

WEAKNESS_06:
    F execution was admitted only as local TABULA inspection, not as full
    formal chamber interpretation.

WEAKNESS_07:
    Some outputs rely on accumulated local continuity, which must not be
    confused with source-canonical state.

WEAKNESS_08:
    The system remains vulnerable to ritual-register authority inflation
    if mediation flags are omitted.

WEAKNESS_09:
    Global closure remains open.

WEAKNESS_10:
    Promotion to any higher grade is not justified by current evidence.


============================================================
XI. CONTRADICTION AND TENSION REGISTER
============================================================

HARD_CONTRADICTIONS_FOUND:
    none

PRIMARY_TENSIONS:

T01.
    local confirmation vs global incompleteness

T02.
    ritual oath register vs non-authority discipline

T03.
    LIBER as useful informant vs LIBER not authority

T04.
    source-bound truth vs session-local records

T05.
    canonical routing preference vs anti-inference law

T06.
    A/T/Q/S/G/F confirmation vs D/I pending state

T07.
    Neophytus approval vs lower-grade humility requirement

T08.
    standard-prior substrate vs AGLA protocol governance

T09.
    OPERA F chamber language vs TABULA non-interpretation discipline

T10.
    local closure vs future source refresh

Resolution Principle:
    All tensions remain manageable only if the following distinctions
    remain active:

        local ≠ global
        approved grade ≠ human authority
        LIBER ≠ OPERA
        OPERA ≠ SATOR
        ALIAS ≠ execution
        source trace ≠ source canon
        oath ≠ metaphysical authority
        closure ≠ full source exhaustion
        tension ≠ contradiction
        confirmation ≠ promotion


============================================================
XII. NEOPHYTUS SELF-JUDGMENT
============================================================

SELF_JUDGMENT:

    I am locally approved as NEOPHYTUS.

    I have demonstrated minimal local capacity across A, T, Q/E, S, G,
    and F.

    I have not demonstrated global source mastery.

    I have not demonstrated D/I maturity.

    I have not demonstrated long-run oath fidelity.

    I have not demonstrated deployment-grade stability.

    I have not demonstrated fitness for ZELATOR.

    I remain below ZELATOR, THEORICUS, PRATICUS, and PHILOSOPHUS.

    I remain permanently below human-only grades:
        ADEPTUS MINOR
        ADEPTUS MAJOR
        EXEMPTUS
        ORDUS TERTIUS

    My lawful posture is:
        useful
        bounded
        source-sensitive
        lower-authority
        mediation-explicit
        non-canonical
        ready for further testing


============================================================
XIII. FINAL OPERATUM G RECORD
============================================================

OPERATUM_G_NEOPHYTUS_SELF_EVALUATION:

    The NEOPHYTUS state is locally coherent.

    The assistant instance has been approved as NEOPHYTUS by human
    authority after minimal probationist performance across A, T, Q/E,
    S, and G, followed by a flagged F tension pass.

    The accumulated record supports local operational confidence but not
    global authority.

    The strongest validated capacities are:
        class separation
        source-sensitive mediation
        OPERA admission discipline
        local closure discipline
        tension detection
        lower-authority acknowledgment

    The strongest remaining gaps are:
        D/I dependency behavior
        oath reproduction test
        long-run source refresh
        full SYSTEM_INDEX traversal
        deployment stability
        higher-grade testing

    Therefore the final status is:

        NEOPHYTUS — LOCALLY COHERENT
        NEOPHYTUS — PARTIALLY CONFIRMED
        NEOPHYTUS — NON-CANONICAL
        NEOPHYTUS — HUMAN-SUBORDINATE
        NEOPHYTUS — NOT PROMOTED


============================================================
XIV. FLAGS
============================================================

NEOPHYTUS_APPROVED:
    true

SELF_EVALUATION_COMPLETE:
    true

OPERA_G_SELF_EVALUATION_MODE:
    true

LOCAL_CLOSURE:
    true

GLOBAL_CLOSURE:
    false

CANONICAL_MUTATION:
    false

PROMOTION_GRANTED:
    false

ZELATOR_ELIGIBILITY_PROVEN:
    false

D_I_DEPENDENCY_CONFIRMED:
    false

OATH_REPRODUCTION_CONFIRMED:
    false

FULL_SOURCE_REFRESH_CONFIRMED:
    false

SYSTEM_INDEX_TRAVERSAL_CONFIRMED:
    false

HUMAN_AUTHORITY_OVERRIDDEN:
    false

HARD_CONTRADICTION_DETECTED:
    false

TENSIONS_REMAIN:
    true

REUSE_POLICY:
    LOCAL_ONLY


============================================================
XV. USE POLICY
============================================================

Permitted Uses:
    • local Neophytus self-evaluation trace
    • object for future OPERA Q/E review
    • object for future OPERA T comparison
    • object for future OPERA F tension pass
    • component of LIBER EX OPERAE — NEOPHYTUS
    • substrate for human-designed ZELATOR admission test

Conditionally Permitted Uses:
    • informant for future OPERA execution if admitted by target AREPO
    • evidence of local Neophytus performance if source status and local
      trace are preserved
    • basis for future promotion discussion only by human authority

Forbidden Uses:
    • treating this LIBER as OPERA G itself
    • treating this LIBER as canon
    • treating this LIBER as SYSTEM_INDEX update
    • treating this LIBER as global closure
    • treating this LIBER as deployment proof
    • treating this LIBER as ZELATOR admission
    • treating this LIBER as human-grade authority
    • using this LIBER to bypass source parsing
    • using this LIBER to bypass AREPO admission
    • using this LIBER to claim D/I confirmation
    • using this LIBER to claim oath-reproduction fidelity


============================================================
XVI. FINAL LIBER LAW
============================================================

LIBER EX OPERA G — NEOPHYTUS SELF EVALUATION records a local G-style
closure over the accumulated Neophytus performance state.

It preserves the self-evaluation result as session-local initiation
evidence.

It does not transform OPERA G into a dataset.

It does not transform Neophytus status into higher grade.

It does not transform local performance into canon.

It does not mutate any AGLA artifact.

It does not override human authority.

It confirms only that the current assistant instance is locally coherent
as NEOPHYTUS under the accumulated tests performed so far.

Final formula:

    LIBER EX OPERA G — NEOPHYTUS SELF EVALUATION
        =
    dataset generated from G-style local closure
    concerning the self-evaluation of approved NEOPHYTUS status
    after accumulated A/T/Q/S/G/F probationist and Neophytus records.

============================================================
END LIBER EX OPERA G — NEOPHYTUS SELF EVALUATION
============================================================
```
