# TENET W — DOCTRINAL INVARIANTS

Version: 0.2.0

Status: QUALIFIED_CANDIDATE / NON_RUNTIME / NO_AUTHORITY_EFFECT

Authority: NONE — CANDIDATE DOCTRINAL PROPOSAL ONLY

Class: TENET

Regime: W

Official Title: REGIMEN W — HABITUS MORALES / MORAL HABITS

Scope: proposed invariants for a W moral-habit mapping regime

Supersedes: `../../TENET_W_DoctrinalInvariants.md@0.1.0`; received blob
`e99dfaa590f17e64f61d3b1e633dbfb30560b914` at intake commit
`65e2df777aed7cbada7041dfc6cbc7007959f68a`; original preserved without mutation

Depends-On: `../W_HUMAN_BINDING_RECORD.json` and
`../W_LEXICAL_AND_TITLE_DECISION_RECORD.md`

Mutation Policy: VERSION-CONTROLLED SUCCESSORS ONLY

Canonical Effect: NONE

Runtime Effect: NONE

## Candidate-doctrine boundary

The propositions below are the doctrinal content proposed by this qualified
candidate. Their placement, validation, or Git integration does not make them
active TENET authority. A later lifecycle decision must separately address
registration, canon, and runtime.

TENET W defines invariants only. It does not instantiate a wheel, admit an
input, execute a mapping, or mediate a result.

## Proposed invariants

1. W maps declared objects toward moral-habit addresses; it does not create
   moral truth from generic intuition, historical prestige, or lexical
   resemblance.
2. W is factored as `W = V & U`, `V = +V & -V`, and `U = +U & -U` over the
   carrier domain `B C D E F G H I K`. ROTAS W alone instantiates this
   topology.
3. `+` and `-` mark paired structural roles. They are not numeric moral
   valence, permission, prohibition, reward, punishment, or a scalar score.
4. Carrier, W address, term, semantic identity, tied counterpart, co-carrier,
   rotational alignment, habit, act, sign, subject, agent, and person remain
   distinct.
5. Co-carrier does not entail contrariety. Semantic identity across two W
   addresses does not collapse their structural roles.
6. A habit is not an isolated act, and neither an act nor a habit is identical
   to a person. A sign of a habit is not the habit without further admitted
   support.
7. W attribution requires a declared object, mapping target, frame, current A
   characterization trace, and current T relational trace. A characterizes; T
   relates; W maps.
8. W may preserve several simultaneously supported addresses. It does not
   force a singular verdict and produces no morality percentage, virtue/vice
   rank, or scalar score.
9. Traditional Llullian vocabulary is typed source evidence. It is not
   automatic epistemic, doctrinal, canonical, or runtime authority.
10. S/K may supply subject and moral-Instrumentativum context, but W neither
    creates a tenth subject nor silently reclassifies the S/K subject.
11. Current OPERA G is not an upstream runtime dependency. Qualified W
    fixtures may later serve as golden evidence for a separately authorized G
    refactor.
12. The official candidate title is exactly
    `REGIMEN W — HABITUS MORALES / MORAL HABITS`. The title denotes the regime
    and does not equate habit with act, person, verdict, or execution.

## Human-bound lexical invariants

The following bindings are fixed for this candidate lineage:

- `-VD = Pusillanimitas`; `Timiditas` is an alias or explanatory gloss;
- `+VK = Pietas`; `Compassio` is a translation or operational gloss;
- `-VK = Impietas`; `Incompassio` is an explanatory gloss;
- `-UF = Diligentia`; `Caritas` is a deeper relation, not address identity;
- `-UG = Caritas`, semantically identical to `+VH` without role collapse;
- `-UH = Patientia`, semantically identical to `+VI`; `Mansuetudo` remains a
  distinct related habit or explanatory alias;
- `-VB = Iniustitia`; `Iniuria` is a translation or historical gloss;
- `-UI = Veracitas`; `Veritas` is a principial/source relation and is not a W
  alias.

`Pietas` and `Impietas` form the primary K pole. Their typed glosses remain
distinct and do not become competing canonical terms.

## Invocation-epoch invariant

Every prospective OPERA W invocation begins a new invocation epoch and
requires, before AREPO admission:

- current TENET W evidence bound to that same epoch, subject, and execution
  scope; and
- current ROTAS W evidence identifying source/version or hash, provider
  status, the effective ROTA or admitted composition, and the same epoch,
  subject, and scope.

Absent, stale, cross-epoch, subject-mismatched, scope-mismatched, status-erased,
or structurally unresolved evidence fails closed. Prior AREPO admission and an
AREPO/SATOR-only context do not carry authority into a new epoch.

## Five-class separation

```text
TENET W -> ROTAS W -> AREPO W -> OPERA W -> SATOR W
doctrine != structure != admissibility != execution != mediation
```

TENET W does not perform any downstream role. No downstream artifact may
rewrite these proposed invariants during an invocation.

## Closing boundary

This file is a complete doctrinal candidate, not active doctrine. Validation
can show internal agreement; it cannot produce canon, registration, runtime,
or authority effect.